Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. 1.4b Radio Transmission(?) Problem Not Present in 1.3b

1.4b Radio Transmission(?) Problem Not Present in 1.3b

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
16 Posts 5 Posters 4.1k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JohnJ Offline
    JohnJ Offline
    John
    Plugin Developer
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Because it is send in bursts it can require more current then when not send in bursts. Can not check because have only a cheap multimeter which does not show maximum currents and is not fast enough to show even the current used.

    Also i have a device with multiple sensors and display where the radio which is getting 3.4something volts from a L78L33AC regulator which is having an regulated input of 5 volts from a power source regulator and it works almost perfectly in the beginning but now perfectly.

    I forgot to put a capacitor between the L78 Vout and RF Vin / ground. But now it is sending happily even when there is current pulled by the display (120>ma when back light is on) at the same time.

    If you have the equipment check if the supplied current is the same in all the configurations. Maybe the regulator is requesting to much current to step up in combination with the radio when sending and the batteries can not supply it.

    My Domotica project: http://www.pidome.org

    RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • JohnJ John

      Because it is send in bursts it can require more current then when not send in bursts. Can not check because have only a cheap multimeter which does not show maximum currents and is not fast enough to show even the current used.

      Also i have a device with multiple sensors and display where the radio which is getting 3.4something volts from a L78L33AC regulator which is having an regulated input of 5 volts from a power source regulator and it works almost perfectly in the beginning but now perfectly.

      I forgot to put a capacitor between the L78 Vout and RF Vin / ground. But now it is sending happily even when there is current pulled by the display (120>ma when back light is on) at the same time.

      If you have the equipment check if the supplied current is the same in all the configurations. Maybe the regulator is requesting to much current to step up in combination with the radio when sending and the batteries can not supply it.

      RJ_MakeR Offline
      RJ_MakeR Offline
      RJ_Make
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @John
      Yeah I only have a Fluke 16, so I can't measure the current while the radio is transmitting either. Are there any alternative step up regulators to the one in the store? http://www.ebay.com/itm/231083181020

      RJ_Make

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • RJ_MakeR Offline
        RJ_MakeR Offline
        RJ_Make
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Looking at the specs on the regulator I listed, I doubt the radio is exceeding 400-600MA?

        RJ_Make

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • RJ_MakeR Offline
          RJ_MakeR Offline
          RJ_Make
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Looks like the NRF24L01 power consumption is WAY below the regulators limit.

          11.3mA Radio TX at 0dBm
          12.3mA Radio RX at 2Mbps on-air data-rate

          RJ_Make

          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bjornhallbergB Offline
            bjornhallbergB Offline
            bjornhallberg
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by bjornhallberg
            #11

            Yeah those regulators in the Ebay store are probably not great. Decoupling is probably a good idea, but 4.7nF wasn't enough if I recall an earlier discussion correctly. Try 22nF or something like that. Or ceramic? But you can probably run the sensors on just 2x1.5V batteries for the time being, until another regulator is available. That is what I plan to do anyway.

            The boost modules that @axillent was prototyping can't arrive fast enough :-)

            YveauxY RJ_MakeR 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • bjornhallbergB bjornhallberg

              Yeah those regulators in the Ebay store are probably not great. Decoupling is probably a good idea, but 4.7nF wasn't enough if I recall an earlier discussion correctly. Try 22nF or something like that. Or ceramic? But you can probably run the sensors on just 2x1.5V batteries for the time being, until another regulator is available. That is what I plan to do anyway.

              The boost modules that @axillent was prototyping can't arrive fast enough :-)

              YveauxY Offline
              YveauxY Offline
              Yveaux
              Mod
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              @bjornhallberg said:

              4.7nF wasn't enough if I recall an earlier discussion correctly. Try 22nF or something like that.

              I guess you mean 4.7uF and 22uF (micro Farad instead of nano Farad)?!

              http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

              bjornhallbergB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

                Looks like the NRF24L01 power consumption is WAY below the regulators limit.

                11.3mA Radio TX at 0dBm
                12.3mA Radio RX at 2Mbps on-air data-rate

                YveauxY Offline
                YveauxY Offline
                Yveaux
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @ServiceXp Looks like actual power consumtion is much less. See http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/250/how-do-i-use-the-interrupt/13

                http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JohnJ Offline
                  JohnJ Offline
                  John
                  Plugin Developer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  It was just a wild guess, because i personally didn't have any noticeable problems haven't dived deep into to hardware (yet), only software part.

                  My Domotica project: http://www.pidome.org

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • YveauxY Yveaux

                    @bjornhallberg said:

                    4.7nF wasn't enough if I recall an earlier discussion correctly. Try 22nF or something like that.

                    I guess you mean 4.7uF and 22uF (micro Farad instead of nano Farad)?!

                    bjornhallbergB Offline
                    bjornhallbergB Offline
                    bjornhallberg
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @Yveaux Haha, yeah, uF. But I think I remember some thread where we tried larger capacitors with greater success. Basically, the 4.7uF was pretty much useless?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bjornhallbergB bjornhallberg

                      Yeah those regulators in the Ebay store are probably not great. Decoupling is probably a good idea, but 4.7nF wasn't enough if I recall an earlier discussion correctly. Try 22nF or something like that. Or ceramic? But you can probably run the sensors on just 2x1.5V batteries for the time being, until another regulator is available. That is what I plan to do anyway.

                      The boost modules that @axillent was prototyping can't arrive fast enough :-)

                      RJ_MakeR Offline
                      RJ_MakeR Offline
                      RJ_Make
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @bjornhallberg

                      That was it!!!!! I tried 22uF, was still doggie, so I thought why not move up to 47uF ;-) and what do you know, that seems to be the winning value. I have some more testing, but looking pretty good so far.

                      Thanks everybody for all the suggestions.

                      RJ_Make

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      16

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.0k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • MySensors
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular