Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Bug Reports
  3. Possible Bug using Authentic Nordic nRF24L01+ Module

Possible Bug using Authentic Nordic nRF24L01+ Module

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Bug Reports
44 Posts 7 Posters 12.9k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tbowmoT tbowmo

    @tcontrada

    Have you updated the firmware on the sensebender? (they still ship with mysensors 1.4, because someone has been very "lazy" :))

    T Offline
    T Offline
    tcontrada
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @tbowmo Hi Thomas, I am still having an issue with the authentic Nordic module and the mysensors software.

    I was wondering if you has access to one of these modules and could test the software?

    Or, if there is someone else that could help out?

    If needed, I could ship a Nordic module out for testing as I have several that I got from a Nordic rep in the U.S.

    Thanks,
    Tony

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tbowmoT Offline
      tbowmoT Offline
      tbowmo
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      @tcontrada

      I only have China modules :). Right now I don't have the bandwidth for debugging nrf problems, and I have almost decided to go with rfm69 for my sensors instead of the nrf module (mostly due to theoretical better rf coverage)

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • tbowmoT tbowmo

        @tcontrada

        I only have China modules :). Right now I don't have the bandwidth for debugging nrf problems, and I have almost decided to go with rfm69 for my sensors instead of the nrf module (mostly due to theoretical better rf coverage)

        T Offline
        T Offline
        tcontrada
        wrote on last edited by
        #34

        @tbowmo Understand, any suggestions on another person to help. I think that in all honesty we should make this work and resolve the issue.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tbowmoT Offline
          tbowmoT Offline
          tbowmo
          Admin
          wrote on last edited by
          #35

          @tcontrada

          This is not only related to the sensebender, it's the core library. So any one could look into it.. :)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T tcontrada

            @hek

            @hek said:

            The sketch works. We can rule out that. I suspect the power requirement might differ from the clone. You could play around width extra capacitors on the module.

            Well, not sure how you can say the sketch works when I have it here and it does not work with the Nordic module.

            Have you tested the SensBender sketch with the genuine Nordic module?

            Since these are battery powered adding a capacitor will not make a difference and it will further drain the battery over time.

            Again, there is something else going on...

            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1
            wrote on last edited by alexsh1
            #36

            @tcontrada said:

            @hek

            @hek said:

            The sketch works. We can rule out that. I suspect the power requirement might differ from the clone. You could play around width extra capacitors on the module.

            Well, not sure how you can say the sketch works when I have it here and it does not work with the Nordic module.

            I would definitely back up @hek on this. It works for 99% people on this forum. We all are sourcing Nordic modules from Aliexpress / eBay (read China). Personally, I have not seen a single genuine module (not chip) built by Nordic so every test is based on chinese modules.
            I believe that the issue you have is related to a radio stack and not related to the sensebender sketch.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alexsh1A alexsh1

              @tcontrada said:

              @hek

              @hek said:

              The sketch works. We can rule out that. I suspect the power requirement might differ from the clone. You could play around width extra capacitors on the module.

              Well, not sure how you can say the sketch works when I have it here and it does not work with the Nordic module.

              I would definitely back up @hek on this. It works for 99% people on this forum. We all are sourcing Nordic modules from Aliexpress / eBay (read China). Personally, I have not seen a single genuine module (not chip) built by Nordic so every test is based on chinese modules.
              I believe that the issue you have is related to a radio stack and not related to the sensebender sketch.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              tcontrada
              wrote on last edited by
              #37

              @alexsh1 I believe the sketch works for the Chinese chips, as you say, but not for the genuine Nordic chips.

              That said, I contacted ITead yesterday and asked if the Nordic Module they sell uses the genuine Nordic chip or another chip from a 3rd party. The response I got back was that the supplier they get the Nordic chips says they are authentic. Although, they did not indicate which supplier. So I replied back to ask which supplier they use and I am still waiting for a response from ITead on this question.

              Let's say that ITead is using an authentic chip. I run the sketch with their module and it works. I replace the module with the Nordic sample I have and the sketch does not work. So now what?
              Is ITead actually using the authentic chip or not?

              alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T tcontrada

                @alexsh1 I believe the sketch works for the Chinese chips, as you say, but not for the genuine Nordic chips.

                That said, I contacted ITead yesterday and asked if the Nordic Module they sell uses the genuine Nordic chip or another chip from a 3rd party. The response I got back was that the supplier they get the Nordic chips says they are authentic. Although, they did not indicate which supplier. So I replied back to ask which supplier they use and I am still waiting for a response from ITead on this question.

                Let's say that ITead is using an authentic chip. I run the sketch with their module and it works. I replace the module with the Nordic sample I have and the sketch does not work. So now what?
                Is ITead actually using the authentic chip or not?

                alexsh1A Offline
                alexsh1A Offline
                alexsh1
                wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                #38

                @tcontrada The problem is to identify whether the a chip is genuine. Personally, I am not going to spend days on this. If modules are working - fine. If not I get my money back and move on to the next reseller. Unfortunately, that's the way it is with these modules.
                BTW, I do not think ITead will provide you its supplier. I wouldn't not. As you can appreciate they are resellers so putting their customer directly to suppliers is not in their best interest

                T JokgiJ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • alexsh1A alexsh1

                  @tcontrada The problem is to identify whether the a chip is genuine. Personally, I am not going to spend days on this. If modules are working - fine. If not I get my money back and move on to the next reseller. Unfortunately, that's the way it is with these modules.
                  BTW, I do not think ITead will provide you its supplier. I wouldn't not. As you can appreciate they are resellers so putting their customer directly to suppliers is not in their best interest

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  tcontrada
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  @alexsh1 I think that the folks that are getting unknown Nordic fakes are actually shortchanging themselves. First there is no way the Chinese can make an exact duplicate of the Nordic chip, all they can do is make a cheap facsimile (which is what they do best anyway). If you're like me an seriously want to utilize the work that the guys did on the SensBender module and get the longest battery life and best RF performance then you'd want to use the genuine Nordic chip.
                  Second, Nordic does not manufacture those chips in China anyway (according to Nordic). So if a reseller says they get them from a Chinese manufacturer then they are fake, no doubt.

                  I also received an email from Seeed Studio indicating they get their chips from a Chinese manufacturer...So probably fake as well.

                  JokgiJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • alexsh1A alexsh1

                    @tcontrada The problem is to identify whether the a chip is genuine. Personally, I am not going to spend days on this. If modules are working - fine. If not I get my money back and move on to the next reseller. Unfortunately, that's the way it is with these modules.
                    BTW, I do not think ITead will provide you its supplier. I wouldn't not. As you can appreciate they are resellers so putting their customer directly to suppliers is not in their best interest

                    JokgiJ Offline
                    JokgiJ Offline
                    Jokgi
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #40

                    @alexsh1 Of course there is no requirement that they say who they are using. However If the parts are Genuine Nordic nRF24L01P then releasing the source of the Nordic devices should not be a issue as the authorized worldwide Nordic Semiconductor distributors are listed on the Nordic Semiconductor Web Site. So if the Manufacture of the modules were not forthcoming with the distributor used this would raise questions in my mind as to the history of the parts.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T tcontrada

                      @alexsh1 I think that the folks that are getting unknown Nordic fakes are actually shortchanging themselves. First there is no way the Chinese can make an exact duplicate of the Nordic chip, all they can do is make a cheap facsimile (which is what they do best anyway). If you're like me an seriously want to utilize the work that the guys did on the SensBender module and get the longest battery life and best RF performance then you'd want to use the genuine Nordic chip.
                      Second, Nordic does not manufacture those chips in China anyway (according to Nordic). So if a reseller says they get them from a Chinese manufacturer then they are fake, no doubt.

                      I also received an email from Seeed Studio indicating they get their chips from a Chinese manufacturer...So probably fake as well.

                      JokgiJ Offline
                      JokgiJ Offline
                      Jokgi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      @tcontrada The flow of Nordic materials are as following : Wafer fabrication, packaging (QFN or WLCSP) test, then packaging (Tape & Reel or Tray). None of this is done in China. The finished goods are then sent to the authorized distributors worldwide for sale to manufactures. There are authorized distribution channels in China.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • JokgiJ Jokgi

                        @tcontrada The flow of Nordic materials are as following : Wafer fabrication, packaging (QFN or WLCSP) test, then packaging (Tape & Reel or Tray). None of this is done in China. The finished goods are then sent to the authorized distributors worldwide for sale to manufactures. There are authorized distribution channels in China.

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        tcontrada
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #42

                        @Jokgi So then why would these companies not use the authentic Nordic chips if there are distributors in China? Seems like a lot of trouble to go and produce fake chips when the real chips are readily available there already?

                        JokgiJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T tcontrada

                          @Jokgi So then why would these companies not use the authentic Nordic chips if there are distributors in China? Seems like a lot of trouble to go and produce fake chips when the real chips are readily available there already?

                          JokgiJ Offline
                          JokgiJ Offline
                          Jokgi
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #43

                          @tcontrada I cannot say what their motivation is. I would imagine that the parts being made in China are still cheaper to manufacture. I am not hip to all the ways the Chinese government (State Capitalism) assists their companies but that may enter into the equations. (incentives, etc).

                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • JokgiJ Jokgi

                            @tcontrada I cannot say what their motivation is. I would imagine that the parts being made in China are still cheaper to manufacture. I am not hip to all the ways the Chinese government (State Capitalism) assists their companies but that may enter into the equations. (incentives, etc).

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            tcontrada
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #44

                            @Jokgi Hi Jokgi, do you think you can have a rep from Nordic send out some sample authentic modules to the MySensors community to those that can help solve the deficiency between the fake and authentic modules? I think that might help.

                            If there are community members that might want to work with the authentic module maybe reply here if interested.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            9

                            Online

                            11.7k

                            Users

                            11.2k

                            Topics

                            113.1k

                            Posts


                            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • MySensors
                            • OpenHardware.io
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular