Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. [SOLVED] MySigning cannot write hmac key to eeprom of standalone ATmega328p (sign verify fail)

[SOLVED] MySigning cannot write hmac key to eeprom of standalone ATmega328p (sign verify fail)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
18 Posts 2 Posters 2.7k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    alexanderkind
    wrote on last edited by alexanderkind
    #1

    Hey everybody,

    today I tried to use MySigning with a SerialGateway and a BinarySwitchSleepSensor but it didn't work.

    The SerialGateway is an Arduino Nano and the sensor node is an ATmega328p@1Mhz on a Breadboard. The Nano is powered by USB and the ATmega is powered by battery (2 AA cells).

    Arduino Nano SerialGateway:

    #define MY_DEBUG
    
    #define MY_RADIO_NRF24
    #define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_MAX
    #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 71
    
    #define MY_GATEWAY_SERIAL
    
    #if F_CPU == 8000000L
    #define MY_BAUD_RATE 115200
    #endif
    
    #define MY_DEFAULT_LED_BLINK_PERIOD 300
    
    #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
    #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
    #define MY_SIGNING_GW_REQUEST_SIGNATURES_FROM_ALL 
    #include <MySensors.h>
    
    void setup()
    {
    }
    
    void presentation()
    {
    }
    
    void loop()
    {
    }
    

    ATmega node:

    #define MY_NODE_ID 1
    
    #define MY_DEBUG
    
    #define MY_RADIO_NRF24
    #define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_MAX
    #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 71
    
    #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
    #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
    #include <MySensors.h>
    #include <Vcc.h>
    
    #define PRIMARY_CHILD_ID 0
    
    #define PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN 3
    
    int oldBatteryPcnt = 0;
    
    const float VccMin   = 1.9;
    const float VccMax   = 3.3;
    // Measured Vcc by multimeter divided by reported Vcc
    const float VccCorrection = 1.0 / 1.0;
    
    Vcc vcc(VccCorrection);
    
    MyMessage msg(PRIMARY_CHILD_ID, V_TRIPPED);
    
    void setup()
    {
      pinMode(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN, INPUT);
    
      digitalWrite(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN, HIGH);
    
      analogReference(INTERNAL);
    }
    
    void presentation()
    {
      present(PRIMARY_CHILD_ID, S_DOOR);
    }
    
    void loop()
    {
      uint8_t value;
      static uint8_t sentValue = 2;
    
      sleep(5);
    
      value = digitalRead(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN);
    
      if (value != sentValue) {
        send(msg.set(value == HIGH));
        sentValue = value;
      }
    
      int batteryPcnt = vcc.Read_Perc(VccMin, VccMax);
      if (oldBatteryPcnt != batteryPcnt) {
        sendBatteryLevel(batteryPcnt);
        oldBatteryPcnt = batteryPcnt;
      }
    
      sleep(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN - 2, CHANGE, 0);
    }
    

    I exactly followed these instructions and everything seemed to be fine. But there is no communication between the gateway and the node after the initial find parent request is answered by the gateway:

    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGAS-,VER=2.1.1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:WUR:MS=0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:TSP OK
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:GW MODE
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
    0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
    0;255;0;0;18;2.1.1
    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:STP
    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:BC
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:CKU:OK
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:GWL OK
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
    

    If I remove the sleep instruction at the end of the node script I don't have this problem anymore but then I get a "sign verify fail" message.

    I already checked the keys in the EEPROM with the SecurityPersonalizer.ino and they are still there. So nothing has overwritten the EEPROM.

    If I completly remove the MySigning code everything just works fine:

    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGA--,VER=2.1.1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:WUR:MS=0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:TSP OK
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:GW MODE
    0;255;3;0;9;TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
    0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
    0;255;0;0;18;2.1.1
    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:STP
    0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:BC
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:CKU:OK
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:GWL OK
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:PINGED,ID=1,HP=1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0100
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0:2.1.1
    1;255;0;0;17;2.1.1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
    1;255;3;0;6;0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
    1;0;0;0;0;
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
    1;0;1;0;16;0
    0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:69
    1;255;3;0;0;69
    

    I hope somebody can help me :+1:

    Edit: Now the communication problem is solved but I still get the "sign verify fail" message. Debug output of the node:

    0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
    32 TSM:INIT
    49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
    81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
    98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
    131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
    147 TSM:FPAR
    196 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    1064 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
    1114 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
    2293 TSM:FPAR:OK
    2310 TSM:ID
    2326 TSM:ID:OK
    2342 TSM:UPL
    2359 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
    2441 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
    2506 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
    2539 TSM:UPL:OK
    2555 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
    2588 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
    2686 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
    2752 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    2834 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:EB2599F19FCF3F8046FFF401B88BA0A57A489EAB20B62AC91C
    4227 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
    4308 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
    4390 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:12E9344AAEB6BF1A064AFD2E13081D1924A3D6B6758AD68595
    5783 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
    7880 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
    7962 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:708B63BB7A30C43B18B20E73F8CEA18B2343238077ED5F341F
    9355 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
    9420 MCO:REG:REQ
    9453 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2
    9535 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
    9830 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:EC89D0D3CE5C8BA3F0C559BEB77D7B1181D7D1BD753BD3AC6B
    9961 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
    11288 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
    11337 MCO:BGN:STP
    11354 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
    11386 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
    11452 MCO:SLP:TPD
    11468 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
    11501 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
    11583 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:5B22EFBFFA514553827667BB7C406E63AB5216E72F520EF981
    12976 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
    13058 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
    13139 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:C2269B73674B275848348F737A6CA5F932E886E678EE086AC9
    14532 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:100
    14614 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
    14680 MCO:SLP:TPD
    
    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A alexanderkind

      Hey everybody,

      today I tried to use MySigning with a SerialGateway and a BinarySwitchSleepSensor but it didn't work.

      The SerialGateway is an Arduino Nano and the sensor node is an ATmega328p@1Mhz on a Breadboard. The Nano is powered by USB and the ATmega is powered by battery (2 AA cells).

      Arduino Nano SerialGateway:

      #define MY_DEBUG
      
      #define MY_RADIO_NRF24
      #define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_MAX
      #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 71
      
      #define MY_GATEWAY_SERIAL
      
      #if F_CPU == 8000000L
      #define MY_BAUD_RATE 115200
      #endif
      
      #define MY_DEFAULT_LED_BLINK_PERIOD 300
      
      #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
      #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
      #define MY_SIGNING_GW_REQUEST_SIGNATURES_FROM_ALL 
      #include <MySensors.h>
      
      void setup()
      {
      }
      
      void presentation()
      {
      }
      
      void loop()
      {
      }
      

      ATmega node:

      #define MY_NODE_ID 1
      
      #define MY_DEBUG
      
      #define MY_RADIO_NRF24
      #define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_MAX
      #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 71
      
      #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT
      #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
      #include <MySensors.h>
      #include <Vcc.h>
      
      #define PRIMARY_CHILD_ID 0
      
      #define PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN 3
      
      int oldBatteryPcnt = 0;
      
      const float VccMin   = 1.9;
      const float VccMax   = 3.3;
      // Measured Vcc by multimeter divided by reported Vcc
      const float VccCorrection = 1.0 / 1.0;
      
      Vcc vcc(VccCorrection);
      
      MyMessage msg(PRIMARY_CHILD_ID, V_TRIPPED);
      
      void setup()
      {
        pinMode(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN, INPUT);
      
        digitalWrite(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN, HIGH);
      
        analogReference(INTERNAL);
      }
      
      void presentation()
      {
        present(PRIMARY_CHILD_ID, S_DOOR);
      }
      
      void loop()
      {
        uint8_t value;
        static uint8_t sentValue = 2;
      
        sleep(5);
      
        value = digitalRead(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN);
      
        if (value != sentValue) {
          send(msg.set(value == HIGH));
          sentValue = value;
        }
      
        int batteryPcnt = vcc.Read_Perc(VccMin, VccMax);
        if (oldBatteryPcnt != batteryPcnt) {
          sendBatteryLevel(batteryPcnt);
          oldBatteryPcnt = batteryPcnt;
        }
      
        sleep(PRIMARY_BUTTON_PIN - 2, CHANGE, 0);
      }
      

      I exactly followed these instructions and everything seemed to be fine. But there is no communication between the gateway and the node after the initial find parent request is answered by the gateway:

      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGAS-,VER=2.1.1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:WUR:MS=0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:TSP OK
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:GW MODE
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
      0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
      0;255;0;0;18;2.1.1
      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:STP
      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:BC
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:CKU:OK
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:GWL OK
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
      

      If I remove the sleep instruction at the end of the node script I don't have this problem anymore but then I get a "sign verify fail" message.

      I already checked the keys in the EEPROM with the SecurityPersonalizer.ino and they are still there. So nothing has overwritten the EEPROM.

      If I completly remove the MySigning code everything just works fine:

      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGA--,VER=2.1.1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:WUR:MS=0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:TSP OK
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:INIT:GW MODE
      0;255;3;0;9;TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
      0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
      0;255;0;0;18;2.1.1
      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:STP
      0;255;3;0;9;MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:BC
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:CKU:OK
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:GWL OK
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:PINGED,ID=1,HP=1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0100
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0:2.1.1
      1;255;0;0;17;2.1.1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
      1;255;3;0;6;0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
      1;0;0;0;0;
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
      1;0;1;0;16;0
      0;255;3;0;9;TSF:MSG:READ,1-1-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:69
      1;255;3;0;0;69
      

      I hope somebody can help me :+1:

      Edit: Now the communication problem is solved but I still get the "sign verify fail" message. Debug output of the node:

      0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
      32 TSM:INIT
      49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
      81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
      98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
      131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
      147 TSM:FPAR
      196 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      1064 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
      1114 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
      2293 TSM:FPAR:OK
      2310 TSM:ID
      2326 TSM:ID:OK
      2342 TSM:UPL
      2359 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
      2441 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
      2506 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
      2539 TSM:UPL:OK
      2555 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
      2588 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
      2686 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
      2752 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
      2834 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:EB2599F19FCF3F8046FFF401B88BA0A57A489EAB20B62AC91C
      4227 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
      4308 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
      4390 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:12E9344AAEB6BF1A064AFD2E13081D1924A3D6B6758AD68595
      5783 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
      7880 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
      7962 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:708B63BB7A30C43B18B20E73F8CEA18B2343238077ED5F341F
      9355 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
      9420 MCO:REG:REQ
      9453 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2
      9535 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
      9830 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:EC89D0D3CE5C8BA3F0C559BEB77D7B1181D7D1BD753BD3AC6B
      9961 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
      11288 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
      11337 MCO:BGN:STP
      11354 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
      11386 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
      11452 MCO:SLP:TPD
      11468 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
      11501 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
      11583 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:5B22EFBFFA514553827667BB7C406E63AB5216E72F520EF981
      12976 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
      13058 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
      13139 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:C2269B73674B275848348F737A6CA5F932E886E678EE086AC9
      14532 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:100
      14614 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
      14680 MCO:SLP:TPD
      
      AnticimexA Offline
      AnticimexA Offline
      Anticimex
      Contest Winner
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @alexanderkind
      Hi,
      Can you please post the memory consumption report when you build the gateway sketch?
      I suspect it crashes due to stack being too small.

      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • AnticimexA Anticimex

        @alexanderkind
        Hi,
        Can you please post the memory consumption report when you build the gateway sketch?
        I suspect it crashes due to stack being too small.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        alexanderkind
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Anticimex Do you mean this one?

        Sketch uses 18868 bytes (61%) of program storage space. Maximum is 30720 bytes.
        Global variables use 1182 bytes (57%) of dynamic memory, leaving 866 bytes for local variables. Maximum is 2048 bytes.
        
        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A alexanderkind

          @Anticimex Do you mean this one?

          Sketch uses 18868 bytes (61%) of program storage space. Maximum is 30720 bytes.
          Global variables use 1182 bytes (57%) of dynamic memory, leaving 866 bytes for local variables. Maximum is 2048 bytes.
          
          AnticimexA Offline
          AnticimexA Offline
          Anticimex
          Contest Winner
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @alexanderkind yes. Does not look that bad. You could try with debugging disabled and see if it makes a difference. Apart from that, I don't really know what could be the issue, but the GW does not seem happy. The signing code has been verified though and should not be the cause of a crash in itself.

          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • AnticimexA Anticimex

            @alexanderkind yes. Does not look that bad. You could try with debugging disabled and see if it makes a difference. Apart from that, I don't really know what could be the issue, but the GW does not seem happy. The signing code has been verified though and should not be the cause of a crash in itself.

            A Offline
            A Offline
            alexanderkind
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Anticimex Unfortunately it doesn't made a difference. Maybe someone else already had this problem...

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A alexanderkind

              @Anticimex Unfortunately it doesn't made a difference. Maybe someone else already had this problem...

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @alexanderkind could you post the debug from the node? Perhaps the GW is still alive but the node isn't. Do you have other nodes running? I notice that you enabled the request from all flag on the gateway.

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AnticimexA Anticimex

                @alexanderkind could you post the debug from the node? Perhaps the GW is still alive but the node isn't. Do you have other nodes running? I notice that you enabled the request from all flag on the gateway.

                A Offline
                A Offline
                alexanderkind
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @Anticimex Here it is:

                0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
                32 TSM:INIT
                49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
                131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                147 TSM:FPAR
                196 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                1064 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
                1114 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
                2293 TSM:FPAR:OK
                2310 TSM:ID
                2326 TSM:ID:OK
                2342 TSM:UPL
                2359 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                2441 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                2506 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                2539 TSM:UPL:OK
                2555 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
                2588 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
                2686 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
                2752 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                2834 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:EB2599F19FCF3F8046FFF401B88BA0A57A489EAB20B62AC91C
                4227 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
                4308 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                4390 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:12E9344AAEB6BF1A064AFD2E13081D1924A3D6B6758AD68595
                5783 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                7880 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                7962 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:708B63BB7A30C43B18B20E73F8CEA18B2343238077ED5F341F
                9355 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                9420 MCO:REG:REQ
                9453 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2
                9535 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                9830 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:EC89D0D3CE5C8BA3F0C559BEB77D7B1181D7D1BD753BD3AC6B
                9961 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                11288 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                11337 MCO:BGN:STP
                11354 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                11386 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                11452 MCO:SLP:TPD
                11468 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                11501 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                11583 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:5B22EFBFFA514553827667BB7C406E63AB5216E72F520EF981
                12976 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                13058 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                13139 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:C2269B73674B275848348F737A6CA5F932E886E678EE086AC9
                14532 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:100
                14614 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                14680 MCO:SLP:TPD
                

                The problem with the connection is gone. Now gateway and node are startig up correctly and are talking but I get the "sign verify fail" every time.

                AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A alexanderkind

                  @Anticimex Here it is:

                  0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
                  32 TSM:INIT
                  49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                  81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                  98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
                  131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                  147 TSM:FPAR
                  196 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  1064 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
                  1114 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
                  2293 TSM:FPAR:OK
                  2310 TSM:ID
                  2326 TSM:ID:OK
                  2342 TSM:UPL
                  2359 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                  2441 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                  2506 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                  2539 TSM:UPL:OK
                  2555 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
                  2588 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
                  2686 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
                  2752 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                  2834 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:EB2599F19FCF3F8046FFF401B88BA0A57A489EAB20B62AC91C
                  4227 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
                  4308 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                  4390 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:12E9344AAEB6BF1A064AFD2E13081D1924A3D6B6758AD68595
                  5783 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                  7880 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                  7962 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:708B63BB7A30C43B18B20E73F8CEA18B2343238077ED5F341F
                  9355 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                  9420 MCO:REG:REQ
                  9453 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2
                  9535 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                  9830 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:EC89D0D3CE5C8BA3F0C559BEB77D7B1181D7D1BD753BD3AC6B
                  9961 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                  11288 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                  11337 MCO:BGN:STP
                  11354 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                  11386 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                  11452 MCO:SLP:TPD
                  11468 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                  11501 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                  11583 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:5B22EFBFFA514553827667BB7C406E63AB5216E72F520EF981
                  12976 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                  13058 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                  13139 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:C2269B73674B275848348F737A6CA5F932E886E678EE086AC9
                  14532 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:100
                  14614 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                  14680 MCO:SLP:TPD
                  

                  The problem with the connection is gone. Now gateway and node are startig up correctly and are talking but I get the "sign verify fail" every time.

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @alexanderkind could you enable the verbose signing debug flag on the node please?

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  A 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • AnticimexA Anticimex

                    @alexanderkind could you enable the verbose signing debug flag on the node please?

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    alexanderkind
                    wrote on last edited by alexanderkind
                    #9

                    @Anticimex Yeah of course:

                    0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
                    32 TSM:INIT
                    49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                    81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                    98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
                    131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                    147 TSM:FPAR
                    163 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                    278 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                    2375 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                    2392 TSM:FPAR
                    2408 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                    2523 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                    4636 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                    4653 TSM:FPAR
                    4669 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                    4800 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                    6897 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                    6914 TSM:FPAR
                    6930 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                    7045 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                    9158 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
                    9175 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
                    9191 TSM:FAIL:PDT
                    

                    That's strange, isn't it? I will try it without the request from all flag on the gateway but I thought it would be right to set it if I want signing for all nodes. (At the moment I'm just experimenting with one node.)

                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • AnticimexA Anticimex

                      @alexanderkind could you enable the verbose signing debug flag on the node please?

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      alexanderkind
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @Anticimex Sorry. It was my fault. Now it should be correct. Here is the new debug output:

                      0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
                      32 TSM:INIT
                      49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                      81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                      98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
                      131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                      147 TSM:FPAR
                      163 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                      278 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                      737 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
                      802 Skipping security for command 3 type 8
                      851 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
                      2375 TSM:FPAR:OK
                      2392 TSM:ID
                      2408 TSM:ID:OK
                      2424 TSM:UPL
                      2441 Skipping security for command 3 type 24
                      2490 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                      2572 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                      2637 Skipping security for command 3 type 25
                      2686 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                      2719 TSM:UPL:OK
                      2736 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
                      2768 Signing required
                      2801 Skipping security for command 3 type 15
                      2850 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
                      2932 Waiting for GW to send signing preferences...
                      2998 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
                      3063 Skipping security for command 3 type 15
                      3112 Mark node 0 as one that require signed messages
                      3162 Mark node 0 as one that do not require whitelisting
                      3227 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      3293 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                      3358 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                      3407 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:03AC0D8B3CB5CB15A89C1CA0D34A23A3CD126BB074F8B86363
                      3538 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                      3588 Nonce received from 0.
                      3620 Proceeding with signing...
                      Message to process: 01002E0011FF322E312E31
                      Current nonce: 03AC0D8B3CB5CB15A89C1CA0D34A23A3CD126BB074F8B86363AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                      HMAC: 42A3503DBB004E69A9D9F7D28B95840D053FC9392FA07DEEB0F7DF77FDE96F28
                      Signature in message: 01A3503DBB004E69A9D9F7D28B95840D053FC939
                      5062 Message signed
                      5160 Message to send has been signed
                      5193 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
                      5292 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      5341 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                      5423 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                      5472 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:4C7070935D33A92B30B5C969B2D73AD1528B7715B3DDBCE1A3
                      5586 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                      5636 Nonce received from 0.
                      5668 Proceeding with signing...
                      Message to process: 01000E2306FF00
                      Current nonce: 4C7070935D33A92B30B5C969B2D73AD1528B7715B3DDBCE1A3AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                      HMAC: CB7D06543C6086C9CCB25CF7DB42F0A81613215486A512EDA03238F8E33D3C4D
                      Signature in message: 017D06543C6086C9CCB25CF7DB42F0A81613215486A512ED
                      7127 Message signed
                      7208 Message to send has been signed
                      7258 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                      9338 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      9388 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                      9469 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                      9502 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:39A8009337CE6B2429675B3EE9D1FD11A12CB201C27B7AB731
                      9633 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                      9682 Nonce received from 0.
                      9715 Proceeding with signing...
                      Message to process: 010006000000
                      Current nonce: 39A8009337CE6B2429675B3EE9D1FD11A12CB201C27B7AB731AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                      HMAC: 925B0FAED6941FFC943824E7ADBC694D1521C515B5C28BB0445873043CE2A167
                      Signature in message: 015B0FAED6941FFC943824E7ADBC694D1521C515B5C28BB044
                      11157 Message signed
                      11255 Message to send has been signed
                      11304 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                      11370 MCO:REG:REQ
                      11403 Skipping security for command 3 type 26
                      11452 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2
                      11534 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                      11599 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      SHA256: 21F723FE2BC6B783D6180A5D5FD4FA6FEEBC9619DB03AC42F700000000000000
                      11894 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                      12009 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:21F723FE2BC6B783D6180A5D5FD4FA6FEEBC9619DB03AC42F7
                      12156 Transmitted nonce
                      12173 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                      Signature in message: 01F9F3C6AB0598E633E422941AED25C8326217E59EB80E2D
                      Message to process: 00010E231BFF01
                      Current nonce: 21F723FE2BC6B783D6180A5D5FD4FA6FEEBC9619DB03AC42F7AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                      HMAC: 4DB8C02FBF9752C441D02C31E770CC7D7E9559C3F0323EB5E85949DB55479125
                      Signature bad: 01B8C02FBF9752C441D02C31E770CC7D7E9559C3F0323EB5
                      13729 Signature verification failed!
                      13828 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                      13860 MCO:BGN:STP
                      13893 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                      13926 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                      13975 MCO:SLP:TPD
                      14008 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                      14024 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      14090 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                      14155 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                      14204 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:9C129D83097B589C208D1C9C33B1950DC9EE1C258CF7A93E05
                      14336 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                      14385 Nonce received from 0.
                      14417 Proceeding with signing...
                      Message to process: 01000E21100000
                      Current nonce: 9C129D83097B589C208D1C9C33B1950DC9EE1C258CF7A93E05AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                      HMAC: EB1086A4ED61967A799188580A94ED63AF3FA19D416CDFEBD44533337287719C
                      Signature in message: 011086A4ED61967A799188580A94ED63AF3FA19D416CDFEB
                      15876 Message signed
                      15958 Message to send has been signed
                      16007 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                      16089 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                      16138 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                      16220 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                      16269 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:387EA66DC5039E8E6868373832492E019E1A5A055A01A69988
                      16400 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                      16449 Nonce received from 0.
                      16482 Proceeding with signing...
                      Message to process: 01000E2300FF64
                      Current nonce: 387EA66DC5039E8E6868373832492E019E1A5A055A01A69988AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                      HMAC: 33644999A7B56076EBC8E6C12C787406C9348F721D1B7AEC56F5430DC1A659CD
                      Signature in message: 01644999A7B56076EBC8E6C12C787406C9348F721D1B7AEC
                      17924 Message signed
                      18022 Message to send has been signed
                      18071 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:100
                      18153 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                      18202 MCO:SLP:TPD
                      
                      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A alexanderkind

                        @Anticimex Yeah of course:

                        0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
                        32 TSM:INIT
                        49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                        81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                        98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
                        131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                        147 TSM:FPAR
                        163 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                        278 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                        2375 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                        2392 TSM:FPAR
                        2408 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                        2523 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                        4636 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                        4653 TSM:FPAR
                        4669 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                        4800 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                        6897 !TSM:FPAR:NO REPLY
                        6914 TSM:FPAR
                        6930 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                        7045 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                        9158 !TSM:FPAR:FAIL
                        9175 TSM:FAIL:CNT=1
                        9191 TSM:FAIL:PDT
                        

                        That's strange, isn't it? I will try it without the request from all flag on the gateway but I thought it would be right to set it if I want signing for all nodes. (At the moment I'm just experimenting with one node.)

                        AnticimexA Offline
                        AnticimexA Offline
                        Anticimex
                        Contest Winner
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @alexanderkind from your last log, I don't see the signing presentation data being exchanged so the node have not yet learned of the gw:s signing preferences.

                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A alexanderkind

                          @Anticimex Sorry. It was my fault. Now it should be correct. Here is the new debug output:

                          0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS-,VER=2.1.1
                          32 TSM:INIT
                          49 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                          81 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                          98 TSM:INIT:STATID=1
                          131 TSF:SID:OK,ID=1
                          147 TSM:FPAR
                          163 Will not sign message for destination 255 as it does not require it
                          278 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                          737 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:0
                          802 Skipping security for command 3 type 8
                          851 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
                          2375 TSM:FPAR:OK
                          2392 TSM:ID
                          2408 TSM:ID:OK
                          2424 TSM:UPL
                          2441 Skipping security for command 3 type 24
                          2490 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                          2572 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                          2637 Skipping security for command 3 type 25
                          2686 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                          2719 TSM:UPL:OK
                          2736 TSM:READY:ID=1,PAR=0,DIS=1
                          2768 Signing required
                          2801 Skipping security for command 3 type 15
                          2850 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
                          2932 Waiting for GW to send signing preferences...
                          2998 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0101
                          3063 Skipping security for command 3 type 15
                          3112 Mark node 0 as one that require signed messages
                          3162 Mark node 0 as one that do not require whitelisting
                          3227 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          3293 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                          3358 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          3407 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:03AC0D8B3CB5CB15A89C1CA0D34A23A3CD126BB074F8B86363
                          3538 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          3588 Nonce received from 0.
                          3620 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 01002E0011FF322E312E31
                          Current nonce: 03AC0D8B3CB5CB15A89C1CA0D34A23A3CD126BB074F8B86363AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: 42A3503DBB004E69A9D9F7D28B95840D053FC9392FA07DEEB0F7DF77FDE96F28
                          Signature in message: 01A3503DBB004E69A9D9F7D28B95840D053FC939
                          5062 Message signed
                          5160 Message to send has been signed
                          5193 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
                          5292 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          5341 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          5423 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          5472 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:4C7070935D33A92B30B5C969B2D73AD1528B7715B3DDBCE1A3
                          5586 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          5636 Nonce received from 0.
                          5668 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 01000E2306FF00
                          Current nonce: 4C7070935D33A92B30B5C969B2D73AD1528B7715B3DDBCE1A3AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: CB7D06543C6086C9CCB25CF7DB42F0A81613215486A512EDA03238F8E33D3C4D
                          Signature in message: 017D06543C6086C9CCB25CF7DB42F0A81613215486A512ED
                          7127 Message signed
                          7208 Message to send has been signed
                          7258 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                          9338 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          9388 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          9469 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          9502 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:39A8009337CE6B2429675B3EE9D1FD11A12CB201C27B7AB731
                          9633 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          9682 Nonce received from 0.
                          9715 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 010006000000
                          Current nonce: 39A8009337CE6B2429675B3EE9D1FD11A12CB201C27B7AB731AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: 925B0FAED6941FFC943824E7ADBC694D1521C515B5C28BB0445873043CE2A167
                          Signature in message: 015B0FAED6941FFC943824E7ADBC694D1521C515B5C28BB044
                          11157 Message signed
                          11255 Message to send has been signed
                          11304 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=0,t=0,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          11370 MCO:REG:REQ
                          11403 Skipping security for command 3 type 26
                          11452 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:2
                          11534 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1:
                          11599 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          SHA256: 21F723FE2BC6B783D6180A5D5FD4FA6FEEBC9619DB03AC42F700000000000000
                          11894 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          12009 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:21F723FE2BC6B783D6180A5D5FD4FA6FEEBC9619DB03AC42F7
                          12156 Transmitted nonce
                          12173 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=1:1
                          Signature in message: 01F9F3C6AB0598E633E422941AED25C8326217E59EB80E2D
                          Message to process: 00010E231BFF01
                          Current nonce: 21F723FE2BC6B783D6180A5D5FD4FA6FEEBC9619DB03AC42F7AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: 4DB8C02FBF9752C441D02C31E770CC7D7E9559C3F0323EB5E85949DB55479125
                          Signature bad: 01B8C02FBF9752C441D02C31E770CC7D7E9559C3F0323EB5
                          13729 Signature verification failed!
                          13828 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                          13860 MCO:BGN:STP
                          13893 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                          13926 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                          13975 MCO:SLP:TPD
                          14008 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                          14024 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          14090 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          14155 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          14204 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:9C129D83097B589C208D1C9C33B1950DC9EE1C258CF7A93E05
                          14336 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          14385 Nonce received from 0.
                          14417 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 01000E21100000
                          Current nonce: 9C129D83097B589C208D1C9C33B1950DC9EE1C258CF7A93E05AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: EB1086A4ED61967A799188580A94ED63AF3FA19D416CDFEBD44533337287719C
                          Signature in message: 011086A4ED61967A799188580A94ED63AF3FA19D416CDFEB
                          15876 Message signed
                          15958 Message to send has been signed
                          16007 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=0,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:0
                          16089 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                          16138 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
                          16220 Nonce requested from 0. Waiting...
                          16269 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-1,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:387EA66DC5039E8E6868373832492E019E1A5A055A01A69988
                          16400 Skipping security for command 3 type 17
                          16449 Nonce received from 0.
                          16482 Proceeding with signing...
                          Message to process: 01000E2300FF64
                          Current nonce: 387EA66DC5039E8E6868373832492E019E1A5A055A01A69988AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
                          HMAC: 33644999A7B56076EBC8E6C12C787406C9348F721D1B7AEC56F5430DC1A659CD
                          Signature in message: 01644999A7B56076EBC8E6C12C787406C9348F721D1B7AEC
                          17924 Message signed
                          18022 Message to send has been signed
                          18071 TSF:MSG:SEND,1-1-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:100
                          18153 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                          18202 MCO:SLP:TPD
                          
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @alexanderkind ok, everything points to that the GW and the node have different hmac keys. Are you absolutely positive that they are identical?
                          You don't need to post them as proof, just make sure that every single bit is the same :)
                          The security personalizer can be configured to dump them. Or you can dump eeprom by other means.

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          A 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • AnticimexA Anticimex

                            @alexanderkind ok, everything points to that the GW and the node have different hmac keys. Are you absolutely positive that they are identical?
                            You don't need to post them as proof, just make sure that every single bit is the same :)
                            The security personalizer can be configured to dump them. Or you can dump eeprom by other means.

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            alexanderkind
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Anticimex I will try to dump them with the security personalizer. I already did that earlier. Should be no problem. But I thought they were the same :confused:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • AnticimexA Anticimex

                              @alexanderkind ok, everything points to that the GW and the node have different hmac keys. Are you absolutely positive that they are identical?
                              You don't need to post them as proof, just make sure that every single bit is the same :)
                              The security personalizer can be configured to dump them. Or you can dump eeprom by other means.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              alexanderkind
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @Anticimex You're definitely right. For some reason I can't write the key to the eeprom of the ATmega328p. If I upload the sketch and then try to dump the keys, there are only many F's. With the Arduino Nano Gateway everything works fine.

                              You're great! I would have never thought that it could be such a problem :) But now I have to solve that :joy:

                              AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A alexanderkind

                                @Anticimex You're definitely right. For some reason I can't write the key to the eeprom of the ATmega328p. If I upload the sketch and then try to dump the keys, there are only many F's. With the Arduino Nano Gateway everything works fine.

                                You're great! I would have never thought that it could be such a problem :) But now I have to solve that :joy:

                                AnticimexA Offline
                                AnticimexA Offline
                                Anticimex
                                Contest Winner
                                wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                                #15

                                @alexanderkind well, sorry to hear that you have a problem with the eeprom. Glad to be able to help out in troubleshooting it.
                                Perhaps you have some code on your node that writes to eeprom and happens to write to the wrong place? (only speculating). But now at least you have a reason for the the failed verifications. 👍

                                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                A 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                  @alexanderkind well, sorry to hear that you have a problem with the eeprom. Glad to be able to help out in troubleshooting it.
                                  Perhaps you have some code on your node that writes to eeprom and happens to write to the wrong place? (only speculating). But now at least you have a reason for the the failed verifications. 👍

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  alexanderkind
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @Anticimex I think I will try that tomorrow. And I will set up the node with another Arduino Nano instead of the ATmega standalone to see if that works :+1:

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                    @alexanderkind well, sorry to hear that you have a problem with the eeprom. Glad to be able to help out in troubleshooting it.
                                    Perhaps you have some code on your node that writes to eeprom and happens to write to the wrong place? (only speculating). But now at least you have a reason for the the failed verifications. 👍

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    alexanderkind
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @Anticimex I couldn't stop trying to fix the problem :) Now it's working. I had to set different fuses with avrdude because EESAVE wasn't enabled. So every upload with the Arduino IDE cleaned the eeprom :)

                                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • A alexanderkind

                                      @Anticimex I couldn't stop trying to fix the problem :) Now it's working. I had to set different fuses with avrdude because EESAVE wasn't enabled. So every upload with the Arduino IDE cleaned the eeprom :)

                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      Anticimex
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                                      #18

                                      @alexanderkind great that the root cause was found! And now we have a forum thread for others to read in case they have the same problem! Thanks for reporting!

                                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      11

                                      Online

                                      11.7k

                                      Users

                                      11.2k

                                      Topics

                                      113.1k

                                      Posts


                                      Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • MySensors
                                      • OpenHardware.io
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular