Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. My Project
  3. Round water tank level sensor

Round water tank level sensor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved My Project
55 Posts 14 Posters 22.5k Views 19 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Denverado

    @zboblamont I have the 2.0 as well.

    zboblamontZ Offline
    zboblamontZ Offline
    zboblamont
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @Denverado The puzzle continues then... I could not get it to work at all even having read through your linked post and meticulously following every step. All very strange...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Denverado

      @zboblamont I got mine to work by following the instructions from this guy. I also found the following drawing. here. So my therory is if you change the variable inductor. You should be able to narrow the beam..... just a therory. If someone wants to try it... im happy to hear the results.

      zboblamontZ Offline
      zboblamontZ Offline
      zboblamont
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      @Denverado I would intrigued if the electrical configuration of a transducer could influence it's formation of an ultrasonic cone as I understood this to be down to the emitting diaphragm thereby physical), but my only experience of ultrasonics was in the water industry where we would confine the transducer in a pipe to negate offside reflections to measure distance to a surface. The objective was to hit still fluid which was the shortest echo path back to the receiver. The shortest route was the trigger....

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Huw ThomasH Offline
        Huw ThomasH Offline
        Huw Thomas
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        I've been searching online for a project like this and it looks great. I'm doing something similar with an oil tank and have everything up and running, but the sketch I'm using is really basic, it just returns distance to oil level. Is it possible to change your sketch to allow for a rectangular tank, rather than cylindrical?! I'm an absolute beginner when it comes to coding unfortunately so any advice would be great. Thanks.

        zboblamontZ gohanG 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Huw ThomasH Huw Thomas

          I've been searching online for a project like this and it looks great. I'm doing something similar with an oil tank and have everything up and running, but the sketch I'm using is really basic, it just returns distance to oil level. Is it possible to change your sketch to allow for a rectangular tank, rather than cylindrical?! I'm an absolute beginner when it comes to coding unfortunately so any advice would be great. Thanks.

          zboblamontZ Offline
          zboblamontZ Offline
          zboblamont
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          @Huw-Thomas Not so much a coding issue Huw, it's basic mathematics once you have the depth to surface and the cross section is a constant over the range.
          You will know or be able to measure the height from the sensor head to the outlet and the full mark. Everything between is a proportion of height multiplied by floor area whether it is capacity or spare capacity...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Huw ThomasH Huw Thomas

            I've been searching online for a project like this and it looks great. I'm doing something similar with an oil tank and have everything up and running, but the sketch I'm using is really basic, it just returns distance to oil level. Is it possible to change your sketch to allow for a rectangular tank, rather than cylindrical?! I'm an absolute beginner when it comes to coding unfortunately so any advice would be great. Thanks.

            gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            @Huw-Thomas it's basic geometry 😀

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Huw ThomasH Offline
              Huw ThomasH Offline
              Huw Thomas
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              Yes I realise that , I just wasn't sure at first where I needed to change things in the sketch. I think I've worked it out. I have zero experience in reading programming code so couldn't at first find the PiR^2h equation to change it, but now I've found it.

              Boots33B 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Huw ThomasH Huw Thomas

                Yes I realise that , I just wasn't sure at first where I needed to change things in the sketch. I think I've worked it out. I have zero experience in reading programming code so couldn't at first find the PiR^2h equation to change it, but now I've found it.

                Boots33B Offline
                Boots33B Offline
                Boots33
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                @Huw-Thomas Sounds like you are heading in the right direction.
                The water percent available calculation should work unaltered for a rectangular tank and you have already found

                waterAvail = PI* pow(tankRad,2)*(((fullHeight-outletHeight)+sensHeight)-pingHeight)/1000;    // calculate water available in litres
                
                

                That is the line that will need the change with the suggestions from above.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Lawrence HelmL Offline
                  Lawrence HelmL Offline
                  Lawrence Helm
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  @Boots33 Have you thought about sending the days available. i.e. calculate daily usage and divide that by the water that is still available? would have to roll the numbers i.e. say take the last two weeks of how much the water dropped in a day averaged out... if that makes sense. :)

                  Boots33B 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • Lawrence HelmL Lawrence Helm

                    @Boots33 Have you thought about sending the days available. i.e. calculate daily usage and divide that by the water that is still available? would have to roll the numbers i.e. say take the last two weeks of how much the water dropped in a day averaged out... if that makes sense. :)

                    Boots33B Offline
                    Boots33B Offline
                    Boots33
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    @lawrence-helm The tank that I am monitoring is used primarily for garden watering and topping up the pool, so it does not really have a regular sort of use. We also live in an area of frequent rainfall so the tank can stay at 100% for weeks on end.

                    I can see that your idea would be a good addition to the sketch if the tank was to be used for general house duties where more frequent use would likely give a more meaningful result.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Ritesh T
                      Banned
                      wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
                      #47

                      Sorry for bumping up an old question but I’m in the same boat of requirement.

                      And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

                      This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

                      Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                      Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

                      Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                      The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one.

                      Boots33B zboblamontZ 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • R Ritesh T

                        Sorry for bumping up an old question but I’m in the same boat of requirement.

                        And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

                        This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

                        Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                        Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

                        Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                        The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one.

                        Boots33B Offline
                        Boots33B Offline
                        Boots33
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        @ritesh-t If you have not already found it you may also benefit from the thread by @zboblamont which can be found here. It addresses some issues of unstable readings that were occurring when the water in the tank was at a lower level.

                        zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Boots33B Boots33

                          @ritesh-t If you have not already found it you may also benefit from the thread by @zboblamont which can be found here. It addresses some issues of unstable readings that were occurring when the water in the tank was at a lower level.

                          zboblamontZ Offline
                          zboblamontZ Offline
                          zboblamont
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          @boots33 To be fair that was specific to the SR04-2.0, the technology has moved on a bit since non-waterproof twin head devices were the standard, but I confess having discovered the error it verifies with the Class-D quality water meter on the house-side. I may have to recalibrate the Litres/mm but the tank shape is not uniform cross section.
                          @Ritesh-T All you can do is try the version you bought, but the original suffered badly inside a sealed tank where moisture was very high indeed, and housing it to protect the board may prove tricky. That was my reasoning for going with the parking sensor button type with remote board, plus the sensor is a snug fit in the end of 3/4" pipe/socket. The only recurring problem is condensation below -10c, perhaps your environment is different or have better luck with yours.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • CrankyCoderC Offline
                            CrankyCoderC Offline
                            CrankyCoder
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            I made a sensor like this myself. i took a non-water proof one and drilled holes to match the sensor in some plexiglass. and sealed around it with silicone. This worked until florida tried to drowned me out and flooded my entire sensor housing lol

                            Home Automation Tinkerer
                            www.CrankyCoder.net

                            Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                            Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                            MySensors: 2.3

                            zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

                              I made a sensor like this myself. i took a non-water proof one and drilled holes to match the sensor in some plexiglass. and sealed around it with silicone. This worked until florida tried to drowned me out and flooded my entire sensor housing lol

                              zboblamontZ Offline
                              zboblamontZ Offline
                              zboblamont
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              @crankycoder
                              Bad luck on the storm, presumably a weatherproof box lid/side drilled out per your plexiglass original was the next version?

                              CrankyCoderC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Ritesh T

                                Sorry for bumping up an old question but I’m in the same boat of requirement.

                                And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

                                This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

                                Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                                Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

                                Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                                The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one.

                                zboblamontZ Offline
                                zboblamontZ Offline
                                zboblamont
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                @ritesh-t I presume you are aware the device you bought is 5v?
                                Not so sure of their claim that the reduced blind-spot of 2cm is down to dual diaphragms, the original dual from memory had the same 20cm blind-spot as the remote and also was 5v only.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • zboblamontZ zboblamont

                                  @crankycoder
                                  Bad luck on the storm, presumably a weatherproof box lid/side drilled out per your plexiglass original was the next version?

                                  CrankyCoderC Offline
                                  CrankyCoderC Offline
                                  CrankyCoder
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  @zboblamont actually it was more of a "not completed" type of thing. i didn't finish the connection between the bottom part that houses the sensor and the top cap. so it got knocked over and water soaked in. so i will be redoing it and will just complete it this time :)

                                  Home Automation Tinkerer
                                  www.CrankyCoder.net

                                  Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                                  Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                                  MySensors: 2.3

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • Christian WC Offline
                                    Christian WC Offline
                                    Christian W
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    I have problems with the same sensor, the minimum or shortest measurement is 40 cm, and yet in its technical characteristics it says that the minimum is 20 cm.

                                    Will we have to calibrate something?

                                    Thank you

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • greyy greyyG Offline
                                      greyy greyyG Offline
                                      greyy greyy
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      interesting, i will buy same sensor too

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      9

                                      Online

                                      11.7k

                                      Users

                                      11.2k

                                      Topics

                                      113.0k

                                      Posts


                                      Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • MySensors
                                      • OpenHardware.io
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular