Anyone here tried either LoRa Meshtastic or LoRaWan for grid-down emergency communications?
-
Reporting back: for an emergency receiver, the radio I settled on was the Crane Skywave SSB Shortwave:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07HXKR479/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1because the youtube reviews were extremely positive, because it runs for 30 hours on a pair of AA batteries, because of its compact size and light weight (good for travel), and because it comes with a 20 foot long external antenna on a compact spool for pulling in long-distance HF and Shortwave. As it would be most beneficial in a mega-disaster, I'll be glad if I never have a reason to actually use it. ;-)
For those in US, an additional radio worth getting is the Reecom R-1630C emergency alert radio.
http://www.reecominc.com/r1630.htm
It has S.A.M.E. and will listen for a broad range of emergency alerts specific to the counties you program it for. It can run for 200 hours on one set of AA batteries, and, crucially, unlike the Midland radio I already have, it cuts off the announcement automatically when it reaches the End of Message (EOM). In contrast, my Midland continues playing the NOAA weather broadcast for 5 minutes before it times out, which is irritating whenever it sounds off due to a thunderstorm warning, flash flood warning, tornado watch, etc. There are enough of them for sale on ebay that you can get one for cheap there. I just today picked one up there for $20. Curiously enough, I've lately noticed that my Alexa now warns me about severe weather even before my NOAA radio does. Incredible! I had thought that by design NOAA was supposed to be fastest of all, but these days the evidence proves otherwise. In addition to weather, it covers the gamut of other warnings as well--everything from earthquakes to civil emergency to radiological threats to fire warnings to evacuation alerts: https://www.weather.gov/nwr/eventcodes Depending on where you live, some of those might be more relevant than others. For instance, I don't live anywhere near a nuclear power plant, but there are some in my state, and I suppose if the wind blew in the wrong direction after a meltdown, I'd probably get an alert--hopefully long before the fallout lands in my backyard! -
Although it may sound wild to those not closely following current events, here's the Reuter's headline: "Russia strikes Ukrainian infrastructure, says it may destroy Western satellites"
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-hits-ukraine-homes-evacuates-kherson-warns-escalation-2022-10-24/Considering Starlink's current use and with the sabotage of Nordstream 2 as context.... It would certainly be provocative, but civilian infrastructure apparently isn't deemed escalatory, so for that reason it's maybe not far-fetched. i.e. AFAIK, there is no "Article 5" equivalent in NATO that would be triggered, so Starlink is a sitting duck if it continues with its status-quo. It would probably take only one satellite getting fried for Starlink to shift its policy, and so I'm guessing that would happen first as a demonstration of resolve, with the threat of taking down the entire thing, or maybe one at a time, as leverage. Elon Musk can save face, because it will be his board of directors that overrule him. Ironically, giving it away for free makes it a no-brainer decision for any board of directors in a for-profit company to simply end it entirely.
Anyway, here's the TLDR: if satellite internet is anybody's "Plan B", then FWIW you may need a "Plan C"--such as discussed above in earlier posts--as a fallback. Even more so if you happen to live in Ukraine.
-
Although it may sound wild to those not closely following current events, here's the Reuter's headline: "Russia strikes Ukrainian infrastructure, says it may destroy Western satellites"
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-hits-ukraine-homes-evacuates-kherson-warns-escalation-2022-10-24/Considering Starlink's current use and with the sabotage of Nordstream 2 as context.... It would certainly be provocative, but civilian infrastructure apparently isn't deemed escalatory, so for that reason it's maybe not far-fetched. i.e. AFAIK, there is no "Article 5" equivalent in NATO that would be triggered, so Starlink is a sitting duck if it continues with its status-quo. It would probably take only one satellite getting fried for Starlink to shift its policy, and so I'm guessing that would happen first as a demonstration of resolve, with the threat of taking down the entire thing, or maybe one at a time, as leverage. Elon Musk can save face, because it will be his board of directors that overrule him. Ironically, giving it away for free makes it a no-brainer decision for any board of directors in a for-profit company to simply end it entirely.
Anyway, here's the TLDR: if satellite internet is anybody's "Plan B", then FWIW you may need a "Plan C"--such as discussed above in earlier posts--as a fallback. Even more so if you happen to live in Ukraine.
@NeverDie they already attacked Viasat https://techcrunch.com/2022/05/10/russia-viasat-cyberattack/
But that was not a physical attack.
I wonder how many of the 2,500 satellites need to be affected before the network would be degraded. Physical attacks on a single geostationary satellite is definitely within the capabilities of nation states. But bringing down a constellation is a different game. -
-
"Unfortunately the Commotion Project appears to be somewhat dormant. Their GitHub repository has not had any changes made since 2018, and the blog on their site has not been updated since 2015." https://jessehirsh.com/future-fibre-the-commotion-wireless-project/
Yes commotion is dormant, no more activity on gitHut but maybe another open source system has taken over ??? https://jessehirsh.com/future-fibre-telecomunicaciones-indigenas-comunitarias/
https://commotionwireless.net/docs/cck/networking/learn-wireless-basics/
-
"Unfortunately the Commotion Project appears to be somewhat dormant. Their GitHub repository has not had any changes made since 2018, and the blog on their site has not been updated since 2015." https://jessehirsh.com/future-fibre-the-commotion-wireless-project/
Yes commotion is dormant, no more activity on gitHut but maybe another open source system has taken over ??? https://jessehirsh.com/future-fibre-telecomunicaciones-indigenas-comunitarias/
https://commotionwireless.net/docs/cck/networking/learn-wireless-basics/
@JeeLet The Things Network claims 89,623 gateways connected via LoRaWAN: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/map
-
@JeeLet The Things Network claims 89,623 gateways connected via LoRaWAN: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/map
-
This youtube is perhaps a little tangential, but I found it both informative and entertaining to watch. It makes an argument for why you'd want to have a stand-alone GPS (no, not the usual "connected" one in your phone) for use in emergency scenarios:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUEZK_qmd_gThis youtuber also has a great sense of humor and demos some interesting products.
FWIW, the Red Cross recommends everyone should have paper maps as a backup, but these days who keeps up-to-date paper maps anymore? What this youtuber describes might make more sense as an alternative to paper maps, and he gives a compare/contrast as to why.
Although he didn't cover it, I'm fairly sure there's a way to download google maps to your phone so that you can be stand-alone that way, and this method wouldn't require any added expense (provided you have enough spare storage in your phone).
The same guy also did an interesting overview of emergency radio communications, which is very much on-topic for this thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzDj0u1HhvE -
This youtube is perhaps a little tangential, but I found it both informative and entertaining to watch. It makes an argument for why you'd want to have a stand-alone GPS (no, not the usual "connected" one in your phone) for use in emergency scenarios:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUEZK_qmd_gThis youtuber also has a great sense of humor and demos some interesting products.
FWIW, the Red Cross recommends everyone should have paper maps as a backup, but these days who keeps up-to-date paper maps anymore? What this youtuber describes might make more sense as an alternative to paper maps, and he gives a compare/contrast as to why.
Although he didn't cover it, I'm fairly sure there's a way to download google maps to your phone so that you can be stand-alone that way, and this method wouldn't require any added expense (provided you have enough spare storage in your phone).
The same guy also did an interesting overview of emergency radio communications, which is very much on-topic for this thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzDj0u1HhvE@NeverDie yes google maps can be cached offline. I do that. Saves data traffic when I am online as well.
Not sure if the youtuber already mentioned it (I did not watch the videos) but the app called maps.me is great. I use it for offline maps on my phone and tablet. The maps are very detailed and it supports offline routing.
-
@NeverDie yes google maps can be cached offline. I do that. Saves data traffic when I am online as well.
Not sure if the youtuber already mentioned it (I did not watch the videos) but the app called maps.me is great. I use it for offline maps on my phone and tablet. The maps are very detailed and it supports offline routing.
@mfalkvidd If things go sideways in the "you know where" region of eastern Europe, such that they affect Sweden, feel free to open a thread and ask for help. I'm sure everyone on this forum will do their best to get you any information or other resources you might need to adapt to events as they develop.
