Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Antenna 101

Antenna 101

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
27 Posts 9 Posters 20.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z Zeph

    @petewill
    I'm glad you resurfaced that lost discussion.

    Did you take a look at the references posted by @a-lurker about magical antenna shapes? A device similar to the zig-zag nRF was well measured in different planes and polarization and it'a all over the board - peaks and nulls in all sorts of directions.

    But the zigzag isn't a random thing, it's carefully computed for a given wavelength and impedance. When you are bending and splitting and changing trace widths, the linear length for best matching is no longer as simple to compute as with a simple wire antenna. It's not that they forgot to add the last 3.28 inches, it's that their computations told them they had already reached a good compromise for coverage and making it longer would make it worse.

    It's still surprising that soldering a loose wire to some location along the zig-zag so substantially improved your antenna performance. I still suspect some luck was involved, and I would not suggest it unless other solutions didn't work or were not available (eg: changing the antenna orientation). But if it works sometimes (not rarely), then it's useful on the practical level (and a fun puzzle on the theoretic level).

    And I'd love to hear the take that better antenna experts than I have on your experience.

    I am reminded of my youth, when people would hang aluminum foil fragments on the coat hanger substituting for the broken half of rabbit ears for the TV, and then try all sorts of positions for both ears, seeking better reception. :-) To the degree that this worked (vs just giving a perception of doing something) it was based on doing all that random adjustment while watching the picture and stopping in the best configuration.

    epierreE Offline
    epierreE Offline
    epierre
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @Zeph a zigzag with 10dB and mesured 2 km range: Long range RF link using NRF24L01+ RF Transceiver

    z-wave - Vera -> Domoticz
    rfx - Domoticz <- MyDomoAtHome <- Imperihome
    mysensors -> mysensors-gw -> Domoticz

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • DammeD Damme

      Hello guys!

      I am no expert at antennas but I realize some of you have really bad reception.

      I got ~450 meters between my nrf24l01+ap and a regular nrf24l01, and this through the house (concrete + wood) and through a forest.

      There are some things to take in count;

      Antenna orientation, if your gateway (with external antenna) is pointing straight up you have a vertical polarization of your transmission, this basically means that your nodes will work best if they also are vertical.

      The radiation-pattern from the external antenna looks like this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Short_dipole_radiation_pattern.gif

      This means in a ideal location with no walls and you were floating in space you basically don't have any reception at all straight above or below the gateway. but since radio waves also reflect from objects you just have very poor reception in the real world.

      And looking at the radiation-pattern you'll see that you have the best reception in the blue circles. (and the antennas on your internet router should be pointing straight up if you dont have a multi floor building.)

      And because the radio waves reflect, the distance to cables, metal and ground-plane on a pcb matters a lot, if you have wrong distance, you can cancel out the signal almost completely, and you could actually amplify the signal in one direction by having the correct distance. (1/2 wave length = ~61mm if I'm not totally lost today) This is how parabolics works.

      Well this is just a very short beginners knowledge and please, correct me and fill in missing facts. I just wanted to get the topic started.. :)

      //Damme

      DammeD Offline
      DammeD Offline
      Damme
      Code Contributor
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Lol
      I just realized why my wlan-antenna didn't work..:+1: IMG_20140805_153548.jpg

      YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • DammeD Damme

        Lol
        I just realized why my wlan-antenna didn't work..:+1: IMG_20140805_153548.jpg

        YveauxY Offline
        YveauxY Offline
        Yveaux
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @Damme ;-)

        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • DammeD Damme

          Hello guys!

          I am no expert at antennas but I realize some of you have really bad reception.

          I got ~450 meters between my nrf24l01+ap and a regular nrf24l01, and this through the house (concrete + wood) and through a forest.

          There are some things to take in count;

          Antenna orientation, if your gateway (with external antenna) is pointing straight up you have a vertical polarization of your transmission, this basically means that your nodes will work best if they also are vertical.

          The radiation-pattern from the external antenna looks like this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Short_dipole_radiation_pattern.gif

          This means in a ideal location with no walls and you were floating in space you basically don't have any reception at all straight above or below the gateway. but since radio waves also reflect from objects you just have very poor reception in the real world.

          And looking at the radiation-pattern you'll see that you have the best reception in the blue circles. (and the antennas on your internet router should be pointing straight up if you dont have a multi floor building.)

          And because the radio waves reflect, the distance to cables, metal and ground-plane on a pcb matters a lot, if you have wrong distance, you can cancel out the signal almost completely, and you could actually amplify the signal in one direction by having the correct distance. (1/2 wave length = ~61mm if I'm not totally lost today) This is how parabolics works.

          Well this is just a very short beginners knowledge and please, correct me and fill in missing facts. I just wanted to get the topic started.. :)

          //Damme

          DammeD Offline
          DammeD Offline
          Damme
          Code Contributor
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          I did some testing and analyzing of my microwave RF band.. (hehe)

          Channel 76 which is 2476Mhz. and is between wlan channel 13 and 14.
          My microwave oven destroys channel 7 - 13 almost completely (2462 - 2472) and affects 6 and 14 too. so a total of 2437 - 2484 mhz is mangled up (Surprises me a bit. And this is no cheap brand, its a quality micro wave, and the cheap one I have in the trash is even worse..)

          Me myself uses wlan 802.11n (40mhz channels) on ch1. so freq 2400 - 2442 is full also., so the best choice is actually using nrf24 channel above ch 85 in my case (and probobly others too). Could be good to know in future choice of default channel.

          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • DammeD Damme

            I did some testing and analyzing of my microwave RF band.. (hehe)

            Channel 76 which is 2476Mhz. and is between wlan channel 13 and 14.
            My microwave oven destroys channel 7 - 13 almost completely (2462 - 2472) and affects 6 and 14 too. so a total of 2437 - 2484 mhz is mangled up (Surprises me a bit. And this is no cheap brand, its a quality micro wave, and the cheap one I have in the trash is even worse..)

            Me myself uses wlan 802.11n (40mhz channels) on ch1. so freq 2400 - 2442 is full also., so the best choice is actually using nrf24 channel above ch 85 in my case (and probobly others too). Could be good to know in future choice of default channel.

            YveauxY Offline
            YveauxY Offline
            Yveaux
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by Yveaux
            #25

            @Damme Or stay away from the microwave; better for you health too :feelsgood:

            Post #200 -- Yeah baby !

            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • daulagariD Offline
              daulagariD Offline
              daulagari
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by daulagari
              #26

              @Damme Just wondering, how did you analyze your 2.4 GHz band?

              Here I read the typical levels of radiation leakage from microwave ovens is about 0.2 mW/cm², which is roughly equivalent to a point source of 6 dBm.

              Is your microwave oven maybe leaking? According to this site you can test it placing your laptop in the microwave oven, close the door ... (do not turn the microwave on) and see if you can still ping it ;-)

              DammeD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • daulagariD daulagari

                @Damme Just wondering, how did you analyze your 2.4 GHz band?

                Here I read the typical levels of radiation leakage from microwave ovens is about 0.2 mW/cm², which is roughly equivalent to a point source of 6 dBm.

                Is your microwave oven maybe leaking? According to this site you can test it placing your laptop in the microwave oven, close the door ... (do not turn the microwave on) and see if you can still ping it ;-)

                DammeD Offline
                DammeD Offline
                Damme
                Code Contributor
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                @daulagari I had the chance of borrowing a hand held RF spectrum analyzer for a very short while (2h) I would love to do some more scientific measurements on all my transmitting apparatus.. :)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                20

                Online

                11.7k

                Users

                11.2k

                Topics

                113.1k

                Posts


                Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • MySensors
                • OpenHardware.io
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular