Nice analysis - powering up devices in an appropriate order can definitely cause problems such as via the (parasitic) static protection diodes seen on various pins. Presumably this invokes Yveaux's interest in current limiting resistors.

It's a bit unclear how the layout under discussion is actually powered. A cct diagram would be useful here but generally speaking, everything should be powered up pretty much simultaneously, if possible. Regardless the various arduino ccts in existence seem to provide a variety of power paths, many of which are perhaps undesirable. eg supplying power directly to power lines that have on board regulators and hoping that "back driving" those regulators will not cause problems. Likewise various arduinos use the serial chip to provide some power and it's quickly overloaded.

A detailed cct is required to provide any definitive PSU analysis.

@DAN S "...do I really need the IRQ line?"

As far as I can see the IRQ is not used by the NRF24 radio library. I don't ever wire it to the radio.

@hek - just suggesting that you ensure the CT you purchase has some protective measure, such as Zener clamps to limit the Voltage when the secondary is not connected to anything. The ones you linked to look fine.

On the current transformers (CT). Need a little caution with these. If they are energized with no burden resistor and do not have any protective measures in place like zeners, then the output Voltage can be very high. For example if the transformer is one turn to 2000 turns, like Hek's example transformer and we assume the open circuit resistance is 10 MOhms (it's probably higher) and the primary current flow is just one 1 Amp, then the output Voltage can reach 5000 Volts. (1/2000)*10,000,000=5000. The Voltage produced is ultimately moderated by core saturation. I've seen these things produce nice sparks. However Hek's transformer uses a protective measure to avoid this: two zeners in series across the secondary. The linked article under "6. Operation without an external burden."

http://openenergymonitor.org/emon/buildingblocks/report-yhdc-sct-013-000-current-transformer

indicates the Voltage is clamped to +/-22V by the zeners. This is still enough to fry your Arduino ADC, if the required burden resistor is accidentally incorrectly connected. Likewise probably best not to unplug & plug in the CT, while its got power going through the primary. It may be more prudent to hardwire the CT to the Arduino.

V_ANGLE sounds good. With a bit of (floating point) maths, all can be calculated.

@HEK I'll bite:

Use under scores consistently ? eg V_RAINRATE and V_LIGHT_LEVEL

The units to be used here can be clearer:
V_VOLTAGE ---> V_VOLTS
V_CURRENT ---> V_AMPS

Where the base unit is not used - should the name reflect that? eg V_DISTANCE --> V_DISTANCE_CM

Electrical impedance and resistance are not the same thing- suspect resistance is intended here?
V_IMPEDANCE --> V_RESISTANCE

HUM is a bit vague - suggest: V_HUM --> V_HUMIDITY

V_DIRECTION may be confused with an angle or up/down. Could use V_COMPASS_POINT, but that may be confused with magnetic or true north!
V_LIGHT could be confused with V_LIGHT_LEVEL. Could use V_LIGHT_STATUS
V_TEMP while often used, can be confused with a temporary variable? Could use V_TEMPERATURE
V_VOLUME could be confused with audio volume? Could use V_CUBIC_MEASURE
V_HEATER_MODE for V_HEATER?

Could add V_DEW_POINT

STATUS always be used for binary values eg on/off, locked/unlocked?
V_LOCK_STATUS
V_LIGHT_STATUS
V_HEATER_STATUS

The DHT22 spec sheet (a similar device), indicates that you need a single dedicated i/o pin per sensor.

Any one presenting measurements should indicate if they are using Ver 1.3 or 1.4 of the code. There are significant differences in how the timing and ACKing is organized between the two. The OP is using 1.3 and I suspect @yVEAUX is using 1.4 - please correct me if I am wrong on that.

There is no point in trying compare results between 1.3 and 1.4 Any one using 1.3V will be far better off with 1.4.

Yes the improvement to the noise figure is the prime consideration. A signal buried in the noise, amplified by 10 dB, is still a signal buried in the noise. As you point out the NF is defined primarily by the front end amplifier. As long as the front end has reasonable gain subsequent stages will not contribute substantially to the NF. I've incorrectly used the 10 dB figure as the NF improvement.

So using your figure of 2.6 dB, which looks like an appropriate figure but could be higher; then this suggests, It's really a waste of time using the LNA+PA PCBs unless they are used at both ends. In which case you get the benefit of the power amplifiers and a slight receiver improvement.

Any improvement people may witness with just one end having a LNA+PA PCB is probably just because the LNA+PA PCB uses a far better antenna - the rubber duck versus the PCB antennas. In which case you are probably just as better off using these:

https://www.sparkfun.com/products/705

Noting it has 3V3 regulator built in, that may help with power supply sag, that people are experiencing with the PCB modules - requiring capacitors to be added latter. However they are a bit expensive\e.

There are all sorts of magical antenna shapes - a few examples here:

http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra351a/swra351a.pdf

The PCBs with the zigzag shape

http://www.barefootelectronics.com/nordicc.png

are probably a "meandering inverted F antenna" similar to this one:

http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra117d/swra117d.pdf

The PCBs with the seven shaped antenna is probably just a 1/4 wave monopole bent to make it less sensitive to polarization?

http://www.barefootelectronics.com/NordicA.jpg

Hard to say what the rubber ducks use unless pulled apart. It's easy to just assume they are all interchangeable. They aren't - they are designed specifically for the frequency to be used. This one is a dipole with the associated doughnut radiation pattern:

http://martybugs.net/wireless/rubberducky.cgi