💬 Connecting the Radio
-
Hello!
I would like to use NRF24+PA radio, but when I try to use it instead normal NRF24 radio in MQTT-gateway it just dont work. I cant make connection between sensors and gateway.Normal radio works just fine, but the range is a bit short for me.
I tried the low power setting also, but no help.
What should I do to make it work?
I use Domoticz as my controller.
-
Hello!
I would like to use NRF24+PA radio, but when I try to use it instead normal NRF24 radio in MQTT-gateway it just dont work. I cant make connection between sensors and gateway.Normal radio works just fine, but the range is a bit short for me.
I tried the low power setting also, but no help.
What should I do to make it work?
I use Domoticz as my controller.
Welcome to the MySensors community @mattiman !
Could you post the debug logs of the node and the gateway? That's usually the quickest way to get a hint on what is wrong.If you haven't already, you can also look at https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/666/debug-faq-and-how-ask-for-help/ which has recommendations on the most common problems and how to troubleshoot them.
People have also been helped by this: http://blog.blackoise.de/2016/02/fixing-your-cheap-nrf24l01-palna-module/
-
Hi
I use Arduino Pro Mini 5V and i want user radio RFM69HW. I must use logic level converter from 5V to 3.3V to connect radio or i can only reduce power from 5V to 3.3V to VCC ?
On this page is nothing describe that i must use logic level converter,...but some users on this page write that i must use:
https://www.openhardware.io/view/268/RFM69HW-interstitial-board-for-Arduino-Pro-Mini#tabs-commentsNow i have connected only with reduce power to 3.3V but my Arduino not working still time. Only some minutes to test...
-
I connect to 5V Arduino but i use AMS1117 to step down power 5v to 3.3V and radio still working.
I have two of my nodes using rfm69hw and mini pro 5v 17mhz. I only step down the power line to 3.3v, the comms lines work just fine with 5v. I also remember reading somewhere that this is actually the case, even though the datasheet says the opposite.
-
They've been working for more than 6 months now as part of a test run and are not yet fried.
There is other people around reporting the same with at least the rfm69HW. I remember someone stating that the new models are more robust in this regard than older models, in spite of the manufacturer not yet stating 5v tolerance in the data pins.
In fact the datasheet never mentions 5v intolerance, and it does never actually mention a max voltage for the data pins, only for Vdd.
It seems like the board does something with the voltages in the data pins anyways, since if it was using the definitions of the logic levels (as a percent of Vdd) as they appear in the datasheet, it should not be able to communicate at all with a 5v arduino when powered at 3.3v and no logic level shifter on the data pins - but it does.
This doesn't mean this is good practice, directions in the datasheet are there for some reason and my nodes will eventually get a logic level shifter when they finally go into their final case. But reality is it seems at least RFM69HW can tolerate 5v for months without being fried.
-
still I would not advise someone to go ahead and use them without a level shifter as I would not take responsibility to damage someone else hardware 3.3V is still able to talk to 5V, depends on how large is the tolerance zone around the 2.5V grey zone of the arduino
-
I would not expect anyone to put or take responsability on anyone for a piece of advice. I think we are here to help each other by sharing information and our own experiences.
The full picture should be more than clear at this point for anyone reading this and other threads, but I will clarify once more. Best practice is using the rfm69 family with a logic level converter when connected with a 5v arduino, given that as of today the manufacturer's datasheet is not 100% clear on this area. From a problem solving perspective, keep in mind, however, that should a converter not be in place for any reason, the setup might or might not work, so if it doesn't don't discard it as a cause but don't take it for granted at 100%. And even if it works, do plan for adding a converter.
-
@hek @mfalkvidd RFM95 radio part connection details are missing.
-
Is it possible to change any of the radio pins 9, 10, 11 to something else? The reason is that I'd like to use 4 PWM pins and currently I only have pins 3,5,6 available on my Pro Mini.
-
Thanks - I use NRF24 radios.
I found MY_RF24_CE_PIN which I redefined to pin 8 which worked absolutely fine.
The problem I have now is that now cannot use the Newbie PCB anymore :cold_sweat: :wink:
-
Thanks - I use NRF24 radios.
I found MY_RF24_CE_PIN which I redefined to pin 8 which worked absolutely fine.
The problem I have now is that now cannot use the Newbie PCB anymore :cold_sweat: :wink:
@maghac cut the trace with a small knife and re-attach it with a wire.
-
@maghac doh!
How about using a software pwm library instead? I have not tried any, but I have seen this before: https://github.com/Palatis/arduino-softpwm -
@mfalkvidd Maybe I'll give that a try.
I think FOTA will fail as the bootloader will try to initialise the radio with the default pin, right? Then I'll need software pwm or recompile my own bootloader.
-
@gohan But then I would need additional hardware to use DualOptiBoot?
Anyone have any quick instructions on how to build a new custom version of MySensorsBootLoader using MY_RF24_CE_PIN = 8 :wink:
I have access to ArduinoIDE on Windows or a Ubuntu 16.04 box.
-
@gohan But then I would need additional hardware to use DualOptiBoot?
Anyone have any quick instructions on how to build a new custom version of MySensorsBootLoader using MY_RF24_CE_PIN = 8 :wink:
I have access to ArduinoIDE on Windows or a Ubuntu 16.04 box.
