Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. My Project
  3. Round water tank level sensor

Round water tank level sensor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved My Project
55 Posts 14 Posters 22.5k Views 19 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Lawrence HelmL Lawrence Helm

    @Boots33 Have you thought about sending the days available. i.e. calculate daily usage and divide that by the water that is still available? would have to roll the numbers i.e. say take the last two weeks of how much the water dropped in a day averaged out... if that makes sense. :)

    Boots33B Offline
    Boots33B Offline
    Boots33
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @lawrence-helm The tank that I am monitoring is used primarily for garden watering and topping up the pool, so it does not really have a regular sort of use. We also live in an area of frequent rainfall so the tank can stay at 100% for weeks on end.

    I can see that your idea would be a good addition to the sketch if the tank was to be used for general house duties where more frequent use would likely give a more meaningful result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Ritesh T
      Banned
      wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
      #47

      Sorry for bumping up an old question but I’m in the same boat of requirement.

      And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

      This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

      Ebay spam link removed by moderator

      Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

      Ebay spam link removed by moderator

      The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one.

      Boots33B zboblamontZ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Ritesh T

        Sorry for bumping up an old question but I’m in the same boat of requirement.

        And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

        This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

        Ebay spam link removed by moderator

        Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

        Ebay spam link removed by moderator

        The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one.

        Boots33B Offline
        Boots33B Offline
        Boots33
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #48

        @ritesh-t If you have not already found it you may also benefit from the thread by @zboblamont which can be found here. It addresses some issues of unstable readings that were occurring when the water in the tank was at a lower level.

        zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Boots33B Boots33

          @ritesh-t If you have not already found it you may also benefit from the thread by @zboblamont which can be found here. It addresses some issues of unstable readings that were occurring when the water in the tank was at a lower level.

          zboblamontZ Offline
          zboblamontZ Offline
          zboblamont
          wrote on last edited by
          #49

          @boots33 To be fair that was specific to the SR04-2.0, the technology has moved on a bit since non-waterproof twin head devices were the standard, but I confess having discovered the error it verifies with the Class-D quality water meter on the house-side. I may have to recalibrate the Litres/mm but the tank shape is not uniform cross section.
          @Ritesh-T All you can do is try the version you bought, but the original suffered badly inside a sealed tank where moisture was very high indeed, and housing it to protect the board may prove tricky. That was my reasoning for going with the parking sensor button type with remote board, plus the sensor is a snug fit in the end of 3/4" pipe/socket. The only recurring problem is condensation below -10c, perhaps your environment is different or have better luck with yours.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • CrankyCoderC Offline
            CrankyCoderC Offline
            CrankyCoder
            wrote on last edited by
            #50

            I made a sensor like this myself. i took a non-water proof one and drilled holes to match the sensor in some plexiglass. and sealed around it with silicone. This worked until florida tried to drowned me out and flooded my entire sensor housing lol

            Home Automation Tinkerer
            www.CrankyCoder.net

            Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
            Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
            MySensors: 2.3

            zboblamontZ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

              I made a sensor like this myself. i took a non-water proof one and drilled holes to match the sensor in some plexiglass. and sealed around it with silicone. This worked until florida tried to drowned me out and flooded my entire sensor housing lol

              zboblamontZ Offline
              zboblamontZ Offline
              zboblamont
              wrote on last edited by
              #51

              @crankycoder
              Bad luck on the storm, presumably a weatherproof box lid/side drilled out per your plexiglass original was the next version?

              CrankyCoderC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Ritesh T

                Sorry for bumping up an old question but I’m in the same boat of requirement.

                And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

                This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

                Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

                Ebay spam link removed by moderator

                The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one.

                zboblamontZ Offline
                zboblamontZ Offline
                zboblamont
                wrote on last edited by
                #52

                @ritesh-t I presume you are aware the device you bought is 5v?
                Not so sure of their claim that the reduced blind-spot of 2cm is down to dual diaphragms, the original dual from memory had the same 20cm blind-spot as the remote and also was 5v only.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • zboblamontZ zboblamont

                  @crankycoder
                  Bad luck on the storm, presumably a weatherproof box lid/side drilled out per your plexiglass original was the next version?

                  CrankyCoderC Offline
                  CrankyCoderC Offline
                  CrankyCoder
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #53

                  @zboblamont actually it was more of a "not completed" type of thing. i didn't finish the connection between the bottom part that houses the sensor and the top cap. so it got knocked over and water soaked in. so i will be redoing it and will just complete it this time :)

                  Home Automation Tinkerer
                  www.CrankyCoder.net

                  Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                  Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                  MySensors: 2.3

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • Christian WC Offline
                    Christian WC Offline
                    Christian W
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #54

                    I have problems with the same sensor, the minimum or shortest measurement is 40 cm, and yet in its technical characteristics it says that the minimum is 20 cm.

                    Will we have to calibrate something?

                    Thank you

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • greyy greyyG Offline
                      greyy greyyG Offline
                      greyy greyy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #55

                      interesting, i will buy same sensor too

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      12

                      Online

                      11.7k

                      Users

                      11.2k

                      Topics

                      113.0k

                      Posts


                      Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • MySensors
                      • OpenHardware.io
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular