Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Unable to get started

Unable to get started

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
7 Posts 5 Posters 1.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Marcus Schmidke
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello all.

    I cannot wait to get started and since I already own some arduinos and some radio modules, I tried to get the "door sensor" example running. But unfortunately it doesn't work at all.

    I've searched the forum, but even more unfortunately, all matching threads I found end before there was a solution ...

    This is what I did:

    • I connected two Arduinos and two radios and triple checked the wires
    • I uploaded the "serial gateway" example to one of them, the "door sensor" example to the other
    • I started both and looked at the serial monitors

    On the sensor node I have the following output:
    Sensor Node:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    sensor started, id 255
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=ok:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
    req node id
    send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:

    Note there is one "st=ok" and lots of "st=fail".

    I've read about "assigning id not working without controller" and so on so I do not wonder why assigning an ID does not work. I will do further investigations in that direction (assigning a static id and so on).

    But my question is: why are there such a lot of failed transmissions and only a few are working?

    I will order some capacitors and try again, but since I've powered the Arduinos by a battery driven notebook I did not expect that much noise on the power line, or am I wrong?

    Marcus.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      dzairo
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      ehm.. on first set node ID manually ..
      sensor_node.begin(NULL,25);
      with this set node ID manually to 25 ..

      try it ..

      regards.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hekH Offline
        hekH Offline
        hek
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Adding capacitors will do wonders to your failed ack:s.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Offline
          D Offline
          dzairo
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          ... ehm .. I also have this idea .. but can't find example photo from this forum..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Offline
            K Offline
            kalle
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            http://www.mysensors.org/build/connect_radio#connecting-a-decoupling-capacitor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • raditvR Offline
              raditvR Offline
              raditv
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I think node ID is given by controller on serial gateway.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Marcus Schmidke
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Oha, you are right.

                The capacitor was the solution. I never thought that a battery-powered notebook could be a bad power source. Sorry for asking before having tried it ...

                Thank you!!

                Marcus.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                19

                Online

                11.7k

                Users

                11.2k

                Topics

                113.1k

                Posts


                Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • MySensors
                • OpenHardware.io
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular