Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. My Project
  3. nRF5 action!

nRF5 action!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved My Project
1.9k Posts 49 Posters 631.3k Views 44 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDie
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
    #959

    Interestingly, it looks as though Arduino is suggesting/recommending users to use the regular Arduino Primo to program the Arduino Primo Core (i.e. the wearable).
    alt text

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN NeverDie

      Interestingly, it looks as though Arduino is suggesting/recommending users to use the regular Arduino Primo to program the Arduino Primo Core (i.e. the wearable).
      alt text

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Toyman
      wrote on last edited by
      #960

      @NeverDie is this SWD?

      NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Toyman

        @NeverDie is this SWD?

        NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDie
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
        #961

        @Toyman said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

        @NeverDie is this SWD?

        I don't have either the Primo or the Primo Core, so I can't say for sure. However, I presume so.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mike_Lemo

          Did anyone managed to get two NRF52832 to connect to each other with the arduino IDE and communicate?

          Also why does I2C initializes only after an SWD programmed gets connected?

          Wierd phenomenon when I use an I2C oled display with that chip and program it with an st link V2 after it displays alright when it's booted if the SWD programmer is connected but as soon as you disconnect it everything else works but the I2C display...

          U Offline
          U Offline
          Uhrheber
          wrote on last edited by
          #962

          @Mike_Lemo
          This sounds more like an EMC issue.
          The connected ST Link filters some disturbance at the i2c lines, and when it's not connected, the disturbance corrupts the signals.
          Try connecting capacitors from the i2c lines to ground. I'd start with 100pF each.
          May also be a power supply issue. Did you connect the st-link's 3.3V line to the board?

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDie
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #963

            Here's the small budget nRF51 soldered to the breakout board that I had linked earlier above:
            0_1506460203841_nrf51bob.jpg

            NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NeverDieN NeverDie

              Here's the small budget nRF51 soldered to the breakout board that I had linked earlier above:
              0_1506460203841_nrf51bob.jpg

              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDie
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by NeverDie
              #964

              I have the RTC running off the low frequency internal RC, because I don't see a crystal oscillator on the module. I have it blinking an LED now and sending text to the serial port, which I'm able to read on the serial console.

              At least so far, all is good. :)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NeverDieN NeverDie

                Here's a very simple OPEN/CLOSE remote control I was able to quickly throw together using my small prototyping board:
                0_1506355423385_open_close.jpg
                It required only two buttons, a diode, a resistor, and (obviously) some wire. When not in use, everything is powered 100% OFF to save the most energy possible. So, pushing either button powers it ON, at which point it rapidly determines which button was pushed and then sends the corresponding packet to the receiver. From the standpoint of human perception, it all appears to happen instantly.

                Nca78N Offline
                Nca78N Offline
                Nca78
                Hardware Contributor
                wrote on last edited by
                #965

                @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                Here's a very simple OPEN/CLOSE remote control I was able to quickly throw together using my small prototyping board:
                0_1506355423385_open_close.jpg
                It required only two buttons, a diode, a resistor, and (obviously) some wire. When not in use, everything is powered 100% OFF to save the most energy possible. So, pushing either button powers it ON, at which point it rapidly determines which button was pushed and then sends the corresponding packet to the receiver. From the standpoint of human perception, it all appears to happen instantly.

                Hello @NeverDie, could you please share the code for this ?
                I'd like to adapt and test it on a reprogrammed nrf51822 beacon that I just received.

                NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Nca78N Nca78

                  @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                  Here's a very simple OPEN/CLOSE remote control I was able to quickly throw together using my small prototyping board:
                  0_1506355423385_open_close.jpg
                  It required only two buttons, a diode, a resistor, and (obviously) some wire. When not in use, everything is powered 100% OFF to save the most energy possible. So, pushing either button powers it ON, at which point it rapidly determines which button was pushed and then sends the corresponding packet to the receiver. From the standpoint of human perception, it all appears to happen instantly.

                  Hello @NeverDie, could you please share the code for this ?
                  I'd like to adapt and test it on a reprogrammed nrf51822 beacon that I just received.

                  NeverDieN Offline
                  NeverDieN Offline
                  NeverDie
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                  #966

                  @Nca78
                  I can, but it wouldn't be proper "mysensors" code, because mysensors code has a 5-10 second power-up delay. So, for that reason, it's using radiohead instead. Do you still want it anyway?

                  Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NeverDieN NeverDie

                    @Nca78
                    I can, but it wouldn't be proper "mysensors" code, because mysensors code has a 5-10 second power-up delay. So, for that reason, it's using radiohead instead. Do you still want it anyway?

                    Nca78N Offline
                    Nca78N Offline
                    Nca78
                    Hardware Contributor
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #967

                    @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                    @Nca78
                    I can, but it wouldn't be proper "mysensors" code, because mysensors code has a 5-10 second power-up delay. So, for that reason, it's using radiohead instead. Do you still want it anyway?

                    Ah I see, probably still interesting to see, please share anyway :)

                    NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Toyman
                      wrote on last edited by Toyman
                      #968

                      I am trying to reprogram a commercial nrf51 module. Under "commerical" I mean "not from aliexpress", but installed in "smart" bluetooth socket.
                      I can connect to it with Black Magic Probe just fine, but after mass_erase, BMP reports 0xfffffffe instead of usual 0xffffffff, meaning something is lef behind. That prohibits reflashing of softdevice BUT I can load "plain" skethes that do not require softdevice
                      I ASSUME the module has some kind of write protection and/or UICR registers set that are not erased with BMP mass+erase command.
                      I've tried to load d0016 uuicr clearing sketch, It loads fine, but I've still got 0xfffffffe after masserase.
                      So what's the proper way to really completely erase the module?
                      I have nrf52 dk that I tried to use as a programmer but it didn't worked.

                      JokgiJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Nca78N Nca78

                        @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                        @Nca78
                        I can, but it wouldn't be proper "mysensors" code, because mysensors code has a 5-10 second power-up delay. So, for that reason, it's using radiohead instead. Do you still want it anyway?

                        Ah I see, probably still interesting to see, please share anyway :)

                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDie
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                        #969

                        @Nca78 said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                        @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                        @Nca78
                        I can, but it wouldn't be proper "mysensors" code, because mysensors code has a 5-10 second power-up delay. So, for that reason, it's using radiohead instead. Do you still want it anyway?

                        Ah I see, probably still interesting to see, please share anyway :)

                        Here it is, warts and all:
                        0_1506603795796_remote_control_v031.zip
                        It works, but it's just hastily improvised throw-away code, so I made no attempt to polish it. i.e. For anyone reading this: It is very definitely not demo code.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • NeverDieN NeverDie

                          I was thinking that maybe the Ebyte module is stuck in some kind of reset mode, but I just now checked pin P0.21 (the reset pin), and it measures high at 3.3v. This is the same as for the Sparkfun board, which I have no trouble programming. Reset is active low.

                          JokgiJ Offline
                          JokgiJ Offline
                          Jokgi
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #970

                          @NeverDie This may be old news but I will throw it out anyway. The Reset pin on the nRF52 series is both a GPIO and RESET line (one or the other) . This is not a dedicated Reset however and the application must define that pin as RESET. This is the only pin that can be defined as reset. The Datasheet describes this as well.

                          NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • T Toyman

                            I am trying to reprogram a commercial nrf51 module. Under "commerical" I mean "not from aliexpress", but installed in "smart" bluetooth socket.
                            I can connect to it with Black Magic Probe just fine, but after mass_erase, BMP reports 0xfffffffe instead of usual 0xffffffff, meaning something is lef behind. That prohibits reflashing of softdevice BUT I can load "plain" skethes that do not require softdevice
                            I ASSUME the module has some kind of write protection and/or UICR registers set that are not erased with BMP mass+erase command.
                            I've tried to load d0016 uuicr clearing sketch, It loads fine, but I've still got 0xfffffffe after masserase.
                            So what's the proper way to really completely erase the module?
                            I have nrf52 dk that I tried to use as a programmer but it didn't worked.

                            JokgiJ Offline
                            JokgiJ Offline
                            Jokgi
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #971

                            @Toyman What is the make and model of the module. You can use the nRF52-DK to erase the device. P20 is a ease access to the programming pins on that board. You need to power up the module, run the VDD from the module back to the dev kit , P20, Pin2. Hook up the SWDIO lines to Pin3 and the SWDCLK to Pin4. and Ground, Pin8. As reset is not hardwired you don't have to hook that up unless you want to (Pin7. . ![alt text](image url) You can use nRFJPROG to exersise the J-Link (Segger). This is found in the downloadable tools on the Nordic site. BTW - I have no problem using J-Link Commander version 6.20c with the nRF52-DK with the nRF52832 mounted. I hope this helped. 0_1506616486979_Programming using P20 on the dev kit.JPG

                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • JokgiJ Jokgi

                              @NeverDie This may be old news but I will throw it out anyway. The Reset pin on the nRF52 series is both a GPIO and RESET line (one or the other) . This is not a dedicated Reset however and the application must define that pin as RESET. This is the only pin that can be defined as reset. The Datasheet describes this as well.

                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDie
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #972

                              @Jokgi said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                              @NeverDie This may be old news but I will throw it out anyway. The Reset pin on the nRF52 series is both a GPIO and RESET line (one or the other) . This is not a dedicated Reset however and the application must define that pin as RESET. This is the only pin that can be defined as reset. The Datasheet describes this as well.

                              Yes, and thanks to @d00616's work, RESET can also be enabled/disabled from the Tools menu of the arduino IDE if using myNRF5Board as the board definition.

                              d00616D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NeverDieN Offline
                                NeverDieN Offline
                                NeverDie
                                Hero Member
                                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                #973

                                I just now compared the transmission range and packet loss of the cheap nRF51822 to the Ebyte nRF52832. I expected that the Ebyte, with its bigger and fancier antenna, to mop the floor with the nRF51822, but I was surprised to find that they actually seem fairly comparable (at least in my informal, off-the-cuff testing). So, if you have a sensor that's mostly transmission oriented, like, say, a TH sensor, the smaller and cheaper nRF51822 is maybe worth considering.

                                TerrenceT 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                  I just now compared the transmission range and packet loss of the cheap nRF51822 to the Ebyte nRF52832. I expected that the Ebyte, with its bigger and fancier antenna, to mop the floor with the nRF51822, but I was surprised to find that they actually seem fairly comparable (at least in my informal, off-the-cuff testing). So, if you have a sensor that's mostly transmission oriented, like, say, a TH sensor, the smaller and cheaper nRF51822 is maybe worth considering.

                                  TerrenceT Offline
                                  TerrenceT Offline
                                  Terrence
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #974

                                  @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                                  the smaller and cheaper nRF51822 is maybe worth considering.

                                  That is interesting. What sort of range where you getting?

                                  Do you have the 840 dev kit? If so, can you measure range on that guy? Should be 10x I would think.

                                  NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • TerrenceT Terrence

                                    @NeverDie said in nRF5 Bluetooth action!:

                                    the smaller and cheaper nRF51822 is maybe worth considering.

                                    That is interesting. What sort of range where you getting?

                                    Do you have the 840 dev kit? If so, can you measure range on that guy? Should be 10x I would think.

                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDie
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                    #975

                                    @Terrence

                                    Around 30 feet, through some walls, but at 2mbps. I realize that's not very far, but even so the measured packet loss (informal testing) is pretty high at that speed. I can see why most people default to 250kbps instead.

                                    I don't have the 840 dev kit yet, mostly because I don't see anyother 840 modules on the market right now.

                                    ahmedadelhosniA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • NeverDieN Offline
                                      NeverDieN Offline
                                      NeverDie
                                      Hero Member
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #976

                                      What's a good initial value to use for DATAWHITEIV, if doing data whitening?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • JokgiJ Jokgi

                                        @Toyman What is the make and model of the module. You can use the nRF52-DK to erase the device. P20 is a ease access to the programming pins on that board. You need to power up the module, run the VDD from the module back to the dev kit , P20, Pin2. Hook up the SWDIO lines to Pin3 and the SWDCLK to Pin4. and Ground, Pin8. As reset is not hardwired you don't have to hook that up unless you want to (Pin7. . ![alt text](image url) You can use nRFJPROG to exersise the J-Link (Segger). This is found in the downloadable tools on the Nordic site. BTW - I have no problem using J-Link Commander version 6.20c with the nRF52-DK with the nRF52832 mounted. I hope this helped. 0_1506616486979_Programming using P20 on the dev kit.JPG

                                        T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Toyman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #977

                                        @Jokgi Thanks. That's exactly what I did. Flashed successfully but ideally I'd like to find a way to power the module from the DK (I had to use the external power)
                                        Unfortunately, this was the first time when BMP let me down. It just failed to load either softdevice or the sketch hex while Jlink@DK handled it without any problem.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDie
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                          #978

                                          @d00616
                                          Which settings are key for ensuring that packets sent by the nRF24 are correctly received by the nRF5? It would be nice to leverage the versions of the nRF24 that have amplified Tx. For sending wake-up packets, I shoudln't need shockburst, and so maybe this will work fairly easily.

                                          d00616D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          10

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular