Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. OpenHAB
  4. openHAB 2.2 binding

openHAB 2.2 binding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHAB
132 Posts 32 Posters 58.2k Views 34 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nofoxN nofox

    Ok, I've found that sanity check starting when you configure your thing through .thing file not from PaperUI. The sanity checker runs but when I disconnect and connect gateway sanity check send message to gateway and return that gateway isn't connected and start counting retries to disconnecting. That repeats until I restart OpenHab..

    T Offline
    T Offline
    TimO
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @nofox It's definatly not working the way it should work. It also should not make any difference if the configuration comes from PaperUI or from a .thing file. It is not possible to differentiate between those configuration modes within the binding.

    My gateways are using static IPs, so I need to find a way to reproduce this behaviour. :-)

    P nofoxN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • T TimO

      @nofox It's definatly not working the way it should work. It also should not make any difference if the configuration comes from PaperUI or from a .thing file. It is not possible to differentiate between those configuration modes within the binding.

      My gateways are using static IPs, so I need to find a way to reproduce this behaviour. :-)

      P Offline
      P Offline
      philro
      wrote on last edited by
      #37

      @TimO, i could reproduce this problem if i power down the gateway for some Minutes

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T TimO

        @nofox It's definatly not working the way it should work. It also should not make any difference if the configuration comes from PaperUI or from a .thing file. It is not possible to differentiate between those configuration modes within the binding.

        My gateways are using static IPs, so I need to find a way to reproduce this behaviour. :-)

        nofoxN Offline
        nofoxN Offline
        nofox
        wrote on last edited by
        #38

        @TimO I confirm, I could reproduce that simply by resetting gateway or disconnect it from the network for a second. My gateway and controller are also on static IPs.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nofoxN Offline
          nofoxN Offline
          nofox
          wrote on last edited by
          #39

          I don't know if it would help but openhab reconnects with the gateway when I change something in .things file and save it. Binding reloads and all starts to comunicate again.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • andreacioniA Offline
            andreacioniA Offline
            andreacioni
            wrote on last edited by
            #40

            @philro @nofox
            We are discussing this issue on GitHub. Probably we have found the problem and a possible, temporary, solution. If you can try it it would be useful, thanks! :blush:

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              LastSamurai
              Hardware Contributor
              wrote on last edited by
              #41

              I have added 2 more issues in github. Most importantly there seems to be an issue with ACK right now. So if you have enabled acknowledgment on one of your things and sometimes see no reactions from your leds (or whatever you are using) try disabling ACK. I helped in my case.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                krejcarek
                wrote on last edited by
                #42

                Hello,
                Not sure if it is related to the above mentioned ACK issue... I have some distanced actuators, and was heavily relying on the repeated message send if no ACK. I habe the impression with this upgrade, it does not work as before. Can it be the case?

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K krejcarek

                  Hello,
                  Not sure if it is related to the above mentioned ACK issue... I have some distanced actuators, and was heavily relying on the repeated message send if no ACK. I habe the impression with this upgrade, it does not work as before. Can it be the case?

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  LastSamurai
                  Hardware Contributor
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #43

                  @krejcarek I haven't heard anything from @TimO recently but have you tried it without ACK enabled? In my case the rate of success increased visibly. There are still some cases where the message doesn't get send successfully though, so I am still waiting for the working ACK feature ;)

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L LastSamurai

                    @krejcarek I haven't heard anything from @TimO recently but have you tried it without ACK enabled? In my case the rate of success increased visibly. There are still some cases where the message doesn't get send successfully though, so I am still waiting for the working ACK feature ;)

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TimO
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #44

                    @LastSamurai I haven't found the time to look at the issues lately, I'm sorry. :-/
                    I'm on vacation for the next 10 days and will continue my work after after that. :)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Fabien
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #45

                      @TimO enjoy your holidays ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gahlawathomeG Offline
                        gahlawathomeG Offline
                        gahlawathome
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #46

                        Hi TimO, I am interested in Mqtt version of binding as I like the flexibility of my system with Mqtt. I see that Sean has already a PR open for this quite some time and I do not see any reason why his changes would break things. Any idea when can we expect this to be merged. Also I have just started getting involved in things and although don't have much time but will try to contribute around this area.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gahlawathomeG gahlawathome

                          Hi TimO, I am interested in Mqtt version of binding as I like the flexibility of my system with Mqtt. I see that Sean has already a PR open for this quite some time and I do not see any reason why his changes would break things. Any idea when can we expect this to be merged. Also I have just started getting involved in things and although don't have much time but will try to contribute around this area.

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          TimO
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #47

                          Hi @gahlawathome !

                          The code for the MQTT support is only working within the development environment. If I try to compile a jar, there is a dependency problem which I was not yet able to solve. There is MQTT support in ESH and in OpenHAB. The MQTT binding needs the one from Openhab because it is still based on Openhab 1. The MQTT support in the binding needs to be based on ESH, but you can't fulfill both dependencies because only one library at a time is allowed.

                          I need to check if there has been some development on a MQTT 2.x binding, that would solve the problem.

                          gahlawathomeG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T TimO

                            Hi @gahlawathome !

                            The code for the MQTT support is only working within the development environment. If I try to compile a jar, there is a dependency problem which I was not yet able to solve. There is MQTT support in ESH and in OpenHAB. The MQTT binding needs the one from Openhab because it is still based on Openhab 1. The MQTT support in the binding needs to be based on ESH, but you can't fulfill both dependencies because only one library at a time is allowed.

                            I need to check if there has been some development on a MQTT 2.x binding, that would solve the problem.

                            gahlawathomeG Offline
                            gahlawathomeG Offline
                            gahlawathome
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #48

                            @TimO Thank you very much for a very clear explanation. I will also search around MQTT 2.x on OpenHAB and post here if I find something relevant.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              LastSamurai
                              Hardware Contributor
                              wrote on last edited by LastSamurai
                              #49

                              @TimO Hope you had a nice vacation!
                              Is there already some new version of the binding to test?

                              I was on vacation too lately and when I powered my openhab system back on I got lots of problems with my gateway and sensor connections. First I got a never ending circle of failing startup checks (although I could already switch lights). After I disabled the check it seemed to work. But when restarting a sensor node (that did not send any values after the controller restart) I got this error:

                              16:55:54.552 [DEBUG] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;159004 Skipping security for command 3 type 16
                              16:55:54.604 [DEBUG] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Message from gateway received: 0;255;3;0;9;159011 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-1-1,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                              16:55:54.747 [WARN ] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Exception on reading from connection
                              java.io.IOException: Underlying input stream returned zero bytes
                                      at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:288)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:184)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:324)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:389)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.MySensorsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader.run(MySensorsAbstractConnection.java:335)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_144]
                              

                              Any idea why or how to fix this? Everything was working fine before

                              PS I also just got another error while switching a light (the light still worked though):

                              
                              17:08:31.549 [WARN ] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Exception on reading from connection
                              java.text.ParseException: class java.text.ParseException : Message length is not > 4
                                      at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.message.MySensorsMessage.parse(MySensorsMessage.java:337)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                                      at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.MySensorsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader.run(MySensorsAbstractConnection.java:345)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_144]
                              17:08:31.678 [WARN ] [rsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader] - Exception on reading from connection
                              java.io.IOException: Underlying input stream returned zero bytes
                                      at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:288)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:184)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:324)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:389)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at org.openhab.binding.mysensors.internal.protocol.MySensorsAbstractConnection$MySensorsReader.run(MySensorsAbstractConnection.java:335)[205:org.openhab.binding.mysensors:2.2.0.201707241115]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_144]
                                      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_144]
                              
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Offline
                                L Offline
                                LastSamurai
                                Hardware Contributor
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #50

                                Ok I reflashed the gateway and it's gotten a little better. Still have some errors though.

                                T 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L LastSamurai

                                  Ok I reflashed the gateway and it's gotten a little better. Still have some errors though.

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  TimO
                                  Hero Member
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #51

                                  Hi @LastSamurai !

                                  You've debug enabled on the gateway, have you? Looks like the binding does not like the (debug) output from the gateway.
                                  But the binding should recover just fine from the exception, only the (debug) message that has lead to this exception won't be parsed.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T TimO

                                    Hi @LastSamurai !

                                    You've debug enabled on the gateway, have you? Looks like the binding does not like the (debug) output from the gateway.
                                    But the binding should recover just fine from the exception, only the (debug) message that has lead to this exception won't be parsed.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    LastSamurai
                                    Hardware Contributor
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #52

                                    Wow, you are right of course. Debugging is indeed enabled... but than I can just ignore the errors, thank you.
                                    @TimO said in openHAB 2.2 binding:

                                    Hi @LastSamurai !

                                    You've debug enabled on the gateway, have you? Looks like the binding does not like the (debug) output from the gateway.
                                    But the binding should recover just fine from the exception, only the (debug) message that has lead to this exception won't be parsed.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      LastSamurai
                                      Hardware Contributor
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #53

                                      So I disabled debug output on the gateway to avoid the error messages but I still have problems with my setup. I used to have a motion sensor that worked with openhab. Now when the sensor sends a motion event to the gateway nothing happens in openhab.

                                      Part of the log of the motion sensor:

                                      6236 TSF:MSG:SEND,11-11-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                                      6307 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                                      6367 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                      6385 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                                      6406 TSF:TRI:TSB
                                      6424 MCO:SLP:MS=86400000,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                                      6481 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                      6500 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                                      6520 TSF:TRI:TSB
                                      6541 TSF:MSG:SEND,11-11-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                                      6612 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                                      6670 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                      

                                      So it seems like the message gets send succesfully but on the openhab log I see no mentioning of that (although I enable debug output for mysensors and I can switch on/off some led nodes). Any ideas why? I really want to get this working again.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        LastSamurai
                                        Hardware Contributor
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #54

                                        Sorry for bothering you guys, I figured out the problem: I have installed domoticz on the same raspberry and after a restart I forgot to turn it off. So all the missing data was "hidden" away by domoticz instead of openhab.

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L LastSamurai

                                          Sorry for bothering you guys, I figured out the problem: I have installed domoticz on the same raspberry and after a restart I forgot to turn it off. So all the missing data was "hidden" away by domoticz instead of openhab.

                                          T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TimO
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #55

                                          @LastSamurai :smile:
                                          I'm glad you've found the problem, I was out of ideas. ;-)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          10

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular