Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. Do I need to implement the IRQ on future PCBs for nodes?

Do I need to implement the IRQ on future PCBs for nodes?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
5 Posts 4 Posters 1.4k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    sineverba
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,
    the title say all...
    I have fun designing PCB for nodes. But, as title, do I need to implement the IRQ for them?

    And, if yes, for the ATMEGA328 and NRF24 radio, what PIN are available for it? 'Cause, for example, I have a node very populated (interrupt, reset, tx leds, 2 sensors, 1 relay, etc etc) so many Atmega PINs are not available.

    Thank you very much!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • hekH Offline
      hekH Offline
      hek
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Probably good to have it routed. It's already possible to use the IRQ for RF24 by enabling MY_RX_MESSAGE_BUFFER_FEATURE (dev-branch)

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • hekH hek

        Probably good to have it routed. It's already possible to use the IRQ for RF24 by enabling MY_RX_MESSAGE_BUFFER_FEATURE (dev-branch)

        S Offline
        S Offline
        sineverba
        Hardware Contributor
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @hek thank you. For atmega 328 only D2 and D3 are available, all' right?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • scalzS Offline
          scalzS Offline
          scalz
          Hardware Contributor
          wrote on last edited by scalz
          #4

          for this specific usecase (radio irq), yes it is better to use D2/D3.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Make a route for irq with a couple of pads that you can bridge them to enable the irq to either d2 or d3 so that you can disable the irq feature in case you need those pins for something else.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            15

            Online

            11.7k

            Users

            11.2k

            Topics

            113.1k

            Posts


            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • MySensors
            • OpenHardware.io
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular