Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. CNC PCB milling

CNC PCB milling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
933 Posts 28 Posters 135.1k Views 27 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDie
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
    #229

    This is a good video for how to auto level in ChiliPeppr:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WNE3E1ZZYY

    So, with that as inspiration, I plan to connect the probe to A5 on the woodpecker, and the PCB surface to GND. He soldered his ground wire to the PCB, so I guess I'll do the same, at least for now.

    I'll use tape to secure the PCB to the sacrificial board underneath.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
      #230

      I've confirmed that A5 and GND work correctly for the auto-leveling.

      However, Chillipeppr strangely defaults to probe a much larger area than is needed for auto-leveling, so I need to figure out how to reduce the upper and right-hand boundaries of the probing area:
      0_1513977914047_too_large.png

      Otherwise, it runs the risk of not even hitting the PCB if it gets too far out.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDie
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by NeverDie
        #231

        Nailed it!
        0_1513979933006_just_right.png

        Well, further progress will have to wait until I can move the CNC to the garage or outdoors, so that I don't fill the house with toxic fiberglass particles (Thank you @executivul for pointing that out, and sorry I butchered your name earlier. I didn't mean to.)

        E 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • NeverDieN NeverDie

          Nailed it!
          0_1513979933006_just_right.png

          Well, further progress will have to wait until I can move the CNC to the garage or outdoors, so that I don't fill the house with toxic fiberglass particles (Thank you @executivul for pointing that out, and sorry I butchered your name earlier. I didn't mean to.)

          E Offline
          E Offline
          executivul
          wrote on last edited by
          #232

          @neverdie no problem, I got used to it since I'm using such a weird nickname, the good part is it's always free to register on any forum so all I have to remember is the pass.

          I'm really excited about wet milling, it's freezing down here and not having to have windows open for the modded vacuum cleaner it's a treat. The trick is to use a solution with higher surface tension then water, but not too thick or it will gather around the mill as a small tornado and start splashing everywhere. You can use soap, shampoo, dishwash, carwash, etc. Start at 1:1 water mix and add more water if it tends to gather around the spinning bit. It's better to pour it slowly on the board and spread with your finger (use a syringe) than to spray it as not to make foam. Also try using a clear shampoo to better see what's milling below the liquid. A piece of flat plastic, acrylic, lexan, plexiglas, whatever, doublesided taped to the wood spoilboard is a must unless you leave a large margin between the actual milling and pcb edge liquid will spill and will swell the wood. Have a roll of paper sheets nearby and a garbage bag open. Always use glasses when operating the machine. I made a "fence" out of some polycarbonate sheet to contain any eventual splashes which occur mostly when drilling through the board, normal engraving behaves and doesn't splash at all.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDieN Offline
            NeverDie
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by NeverDie
            #233

            Given that the goal is to get 6mil isolatioin routing, what cutting depth should I set in flatcam? 0.05mm?

            dbemowskD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NeverDieN NeverDie

              Given that the goal is to get 6mil isolatioin routing, what cutting depth should I set in flatcam? 0.05mm?

              dbemowskD Offline
              dbemowskD Offline
              dbemowsk
              wrote on last edited by
              #234

              @neverdie I have been kind of following this topic, but don't have a CNC mill, but wouldn't the thickness of the copper clad on the board be your depth?

              Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
              Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

              NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dbemowskD dbemowsk

                @neverdie I have been kind of following this topic, but don't have a CNC mill, but wouldn't the thickness of the copper clad on the board be your depth?

                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                #235

                @dbemowsk said in CNC PCB milling:

                @neverdie I have been kind of following this topic, but don't have a CNC mill, but wouldn't the thickness of the copper clad on the board be your depth?

                Makes sense to me. Well, doing that it would be 0.01mm. But since this isn't a perfect process, it likely needs some added depth to guarantee it's removed. The effective tool width gets wider the deeper you cut, so in some sense I suppose there's that as an added constraint on how deep you can cut before it becomes more than 6 mil isolation. We could try to arrive at an answer analytically from first principles only, but I thought it might be easier to just ask what depth others who are doing this successfully are using.

                dbemowskD andrewA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • NeverDieN NeverDie

                  @dbemowsk said in CNC PCB milling:

                  @neverdie I have been kind of following this topic, but don't have a CNC mill, but wouldn't the thickness of the copper clad on the board be your depth?

                  Makes sense to me. Well, doing that it would be 0.01mm. But since this isn't a perfect process, it likely needs some added depth to guarantee it's removed. The effective tool width gets wider the deeper you cut, so in some sense I suppose there's that as an added constraint on how deep you can cut before it becomes more than 6 mil isolation. We could try to arrive at an answer analytically from first principles only, but I thought it might be easier to just ask what depth others who are doing this successfully are using.

                  dbemowskD Offline
                  dbemowskD Offline
                  dbemowsk
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #236

                  @neverdie See what depth you need to go with that bit to get 6 mil routing, and that will be your max. I would think that would be more than 0.01mm, but I haven't seen your bit, so I don't know.

                  Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
                  Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NeverDieN NeverDie

                    @dbemowsk said in CNC PCB milling:

                    @neverdie I have been kind of following this topic, but don't have a CNC mill, but wouldn't the thickness of the copper clad on the board be your depth?

                    Makes sense to me. Well, doing that it would be 0.01mm. But since this isn't a perfect process, it likely needs some added depth to guarantee it's removed. The effective tool width gets wider the deeper you cut, so in some sense I suppose there's that as an added constraint on how deep you can cut before it becomes more than 6 mil isolation. We could try to arrive at an answer analytically from first principles only, but I thought it might be easier to just ask what depth others who are doing this successfully are using.

                    andrewA Offline
                    andrewA Offline
                    andrew
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #237

                    @neverdie you should use one depth, regardless of the trace width. for me 0.05mm worked, see my shared settings above. you should decide the isolation width, this is the main property for the given config, but you should stick for one milling depth only. if the requires isolation width is bigger than the tool width at a given depth, then it will use multiple rounds to reach the given width, but still, with one milling depth.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDie
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                      #238

                      I'm stuck. I converted my gerber to gcode using flatcam, and imported it into Chilipeppr:
                      0_1514058048699_stuck.png
                      On the one hand, it seems to have gotten the dimensioning right, as indicated by the Y1.48in and X1.43in. However, the grid that it's showing is out of sync with that. Each square on the grid is 5mm. It's as though Chilipeppr thinks the entire design fits easily inside a 5mm square, and so when I attempt to do the autoleveling, it comes out completely wrong.

                      andrewA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NeverDieN NeverDie

                        I'm stuck. I converted my gerber to gcode using flatcam, and imported it into Chilipeppr:
                        0_1514058048699_stuck.png
                        On the one hand, it seems to have gotten the dimensioning right, as indicated by the Y1.48in and X1.43in. However, the grid that it's showing is out of sync with that. Each square on the grid is 5mm. It's as though Chilipeppr thinks the entire design fits easily inside a 5mm square, and so when I attempt to do the autoleveling, it comes out completely wrong.

                        andrewA Offline
                        andrewA Offline
                        andrew
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #239

                        @neverdie said in CNC PCB milling:

                        I'm stuck. I converted my gerber to gcode using flatcam, and imported it into Chilipeppr:
                        0_1514058048699_stuck.png
                        On the one hand, it seems to have gotten the dimensioning right, as indicated by the Y1.48in and X1.43in. However, the grid that it's showing is out of sync with that. Each square on the grid is 5mm. It's as though Chilipeppr thinks the entire design fits easily inside a 5mm square, and so when I attempt to do the autoleveling, it comes out completely wrong.

                        you can mark the zero point in the pcb designer tool before you export the gergbel, or in flatcam, during the post processing. if you do not define it, then maybe the given zero point could have some "offset" to the effective design. it is not problem, but it could make your life easier if your zero is e.g. at the pcb's corner.
                        if you don't want to update the files, then in chilipeppr you can update the probe area to not start from 0,0 but from a given offset.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • NeverDieN Offline
                          NeverDieN Offline
                          NeverDie
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #240

                          Thanks! I don't know why, but somehow that fixed the problem:
                          0_1514071420069_gcode2_autolevel.png
                          :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDie
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #241

                            I found these copper clad boards that seem to be made out of bakelite (?) rather than fiberglass. So, hopefully not the same level of toxic dust concern as with FR4's.

                            I double sided taped the non-copper side:
                            0_1514073784631_bakelite1.jpg
                            and soldered a ground wire on the copper clad side:
                            0_1514073810947_bakelite2.jpg

                            Now I'm ready for autoleveling and then my first PCB etch.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDie
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #242

                              Here are the results of the autoleveling:
                              0_1514079156036_autoleveling.png
                              For some reason it's hard to read some of the numbers.

                              dbemowskD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                Here are the results of the autoleveling:
                                0_1514079156036_autoleveling.png
                                For some reason it's hard to read some of the numbers.

                                dbemowskD Offline
                                dbemowskD Offline
                                dbemowsk
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #243

                                @neverdie It looks like everything in the top right corner is above the level bed surface. which puts it above the grid that is shown. Looks like the bed is tilted.

                                Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
                                Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

                                NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dbemowskD dbemowsk

                                  @neverdie It looks like everything in the top right corner is above the level bed surface. which puts it above the grid that is shown. Looks like the bed is tilted.

                                  NeverDieN Offline
                                  NeverDieN Offline
                                  NeverDie
                                  Hero Member
                                  wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                  #244

                                  @dbemowsk Fortunately the auto-leveling should render it a moot issue.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDie
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                    #245

                                    LOL, except that unfortunately it did not:
                                    0_1514080543041_etching1.jpg

                                    OK, my bad. I hadn't sent the auto-leveled g-code to the workspace (I had thought this would be done automatically, but no), so this picture shows what would happen without auto-leveling.

                                    I've made the change and am now re-running the job with the auto-leveled g-code.

                                    dbemowskD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • NeverDieN NeverDie

                                      LOL, except that unfortunately it did not:
                                      0_1514080543041_etching1.jpg

                                      OK, my bad. I hadn't sent the auto-leveled g-code to the workspace (I had thought this would be done automatically, but no), so this picture shows what would happen without auto-leveling.

                                      I've made the change and am now re-running the job with the auto-leveled g-code.

                                      dbemowskD Offline
                                      dbemowskD Offline
                                      dbemowsk
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #246

                                      @neverdie Looks about on par with your final matrix, only it is following the grid and not the auto leveling values.

                                      Vera Plus running UI7 with MySensors, Sonoffs and 1-Wire devices
                                      Visit my website for more Bits, Bytes and Ramblings from me: http://dan.bemowski.info/

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDieN Offline
                                        NeverDie
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #247

                                        So, I re-ran the job over the same area with the g-code modified by auto-leveling, and this time I got a better result:
                                        0_1514083159570_etching2.jpg

                                        So, now I'll try it on a fresh area of the PCB, after doing a new auto-leveling.

                                        rmtuckerR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDie
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                                          #248

                                          Judging from the looks of the photo directly above though, it looks like quite a bit of copper wasn't removed where it needed to be. I'm guessing I will need to:

                                          1. etch to a deeper depth; and/or,
                                          2. use a finer mesh for auto-leveling; and/or
                                          3. ???
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          13

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular