Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Bug Reports
  3. Possible Bug version 2.2.0

Possible Bug version 2.2.0

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Bug Reports
38 Posts 4 Posters 3.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alexsh1A alexsh1

    @anticimex Just out of curiosity - what happens if re-personalisation is not done after moving to 2.2.0? Signing fails?

    AnticimexA Offline
    AnticimexA Offline
    Anticimex
    Contest Winner
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @alexsh1 checksum verification for the signing backend will fail and signing will not operate

    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • AnticimexA Anticimex

      @alexsh1 checksum verification for the signing backend will fail and signing will not operate

      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      @anticimex OK, but if the GW is still on 2.1.1 and nodes are 2.2.0 it should be fine, right?

      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alexsh1A alexsh1

        @anticimex OK, but if the GW is still on 2.1.1 and nodes are 2.2.0 it should be fine, right?

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @alexsh1 if the 2.2 node has correct checksum yes. And this is shown in the debug log.

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • AnticimexA Anticimex

          @sindrome73 you use signing? Have you followed the signing migration guide for 2.1 to 2.2?
          https://forum.mysensors.org/topic/7843/security-migrating-from-library-version-2-1-to-2-2

          S Offline
          S Offline
          sindrome73
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @anticimex

          532/5000
          I made the customization from the beginning, with MySensors 2.2.0

          I followed these steps:

          • The EEPROM has been deleted
          • Open SecurityPersonalize.ino inserted the new Key
          • loaded the scketch and it does not go

          I redid the same procedure above, then EEprom deleted, SecurityPersonalize file, and loaded the scketch, but this time using Mysensors 2.1.1
          And here it worked ..... The same thing I did on Several Pro Mini at 5V 16Mhz and the result is the same ..... That's why I assume there may be something wrong with 2.2.0

          AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S sindrome73

            @anticimex

            532/5000
            I made the customization from the beginning, with MySensors 2.2.0

            I followed these steps:

            • The EEPROM has been deleted
            • Open SecurityPersonalize.ino inserted the new Key
            • loaded the scketch and it does not go

            I redid the same procedure above, then EEprom deleted, SecurityPersonalize file, and loaded the scketch, but this time using Mysensors 2.1.1
            And here it worked ..... The same thing I did on Several Pro Mini at 5V 16Mhz and the result is the same ..... That's why I assume there may be something wrong with 2.2.0

            AnticimexA Offline
            AnticimexA Offline
            Anticimex
            Contest Winner
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @sindrome73 2.2 works. At least signing. Log please.

            Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              sindrome73
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              I apologize, but I did not understand what you tell me ....

              I would like to add that the script without the signature with the 2.2 version works, while the signature works only with MySensors 2.1

              AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S sindrome73

                I apologize, but I did not understand what you tell me ....

                I would like to add that the script without the signature with the 2.2 version works, while the signature works only with MySensors 2.1

                AnticimexA Offline
                AnticimexA Offline
                Anticimex
                Contest Winner
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                @sindrome73 log please.

                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  sindrome73
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  In the evening ..... Now I'm at work and I can not

                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S sindrome73

                    In the evening ..... Now I'm at work and I can not

                    AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @sindrome73 no problem

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      sindrome73
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Here I am at home .... I proceeded to redo the procedure and this sot is the log ....

                      I had to put an image because the last signs that mida I can not copy them as text ....

                      0_1522266474450_Log_arduino.jpg

                      AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S sindrome73

                        Here I am at home .... I proceeded to redo the procedure and this sot is the log ....

                        I had to put an image because the last signs that mida I can not copy them as text ....

                        0_1522266474450_Log_arduino.jpg

                        AnticimexA Offline
                        AnticimexA Offline
                        Anticimex
                        Contest Winner
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        @sindrome73 log looks pretty corrupt, but I can't find any signing related messages so it would seem signing is not enabled on the node. Do you have a log from the GW? Is it also running 2.2.0?

                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S sindrome73

                          Here I am at home .... I proceeded to redo the procedure and this sot is the log ....

                          I had to put an image because the last signs that mida I can not copy them as text ....

                          0_1522266474450_Log_arduino.jpg

                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          @sindrome73 sorry, the capabilities string indicate software signing. But I don't see the backend initialization message. Could you please enable verbose signing debug?

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            sindrome73
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            tell me how to abbilitate the detailed signature debug .....

                            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S sindrome73

                              tell me how to abbilitate the detailed signature debug .....

                              AnticimexA Offline
                              AnticimexA Offline
                              Anticimex
                              Contest Winner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              @sindrome73 https://www.mysensors.org/apidocs-beta/group__MySigningTroubleshootinggrp.html

                              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                sindrome73
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Here is the log with the Debug signed abbreviation.
                                I specify that I had to disable // # define MY_DEBUG because the scketch is too big

                                0_1522270397919_Log_arduino2.jpg

                                AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • S sindrome73

                                  Here is the log with the Debug signed abbreviation.
                                  I specify that I had to disable // # define MY_DEBUG because the scketch is too big

                                  0_1522270397919_Log_arduino2.jpg

                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  Anticimex
                                  Contest Winner
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @sindrome73 signing messages look sane. But the logs look very corrupt. It also looks like the sketch crashed and restarted so I suspect you are running out of stack space. The arduino IDE reports and warns about memory usage and I suspect you get a warning on that.

                                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    sindrome73
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Yes indeed I have already said this !! So true that to have the DEBUG of the signature I had to disable the DEBUG.

                                    But with this same script, and going to Mysensors 2.1 it works !!

                                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S sindrome73

                                      Here is the log with the Debug signed abbreviation.
                                      I specify that I had to disable // # define MY_DEBUG because the scketch is too big

                                      0_1522270397919_Log_arduino2.jpg

                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      Anticimex
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @sindrome73 you could try to completely disable debug on your node and observe the behavior of your gw or controller.

                                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        sindrome73
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        Ok .... Tomorrow I'll do it ..... But it will be difficult to have the Gateway Log because with the signature enabled, the sketch is very large, and does not allow me to activate the Debug ....

                                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S sindrome73

                                          Yes indeed I have already said this !! So true that to have the DEBUG of the signature I had to disable the DEBUG.

                                          But with this same script, and going to Mysensors 2.1 it works !!

                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          Anticimex
                                          Contest Winner
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @sindrome73 well, 2.2.0 could be requiring more memory than 2.1. You can compare since the IDE reports exactly how much memory is used.

                                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          12

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular