Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Dynamic change of variable name

Dynamic change of variable name

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
14 Posts 7 Posters 1.5k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Greg_2502

    Hi, I can't find a solution to my problem.
    I'd like to change the name in a function in a for loop. If it is possible?

    for (i=1; i<5; i++){
    int value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
    }
    
    Y Offline
    Y Offline
    Yveaux
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @greg_2502 do you mean to fill an array?
    Something like

    int value[5];
    for (i=1; i<5; i++){
      value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
    }
    

    http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

    skywatchS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Y Yveaux

      @greg_2502 do you mean to fill an array?
      Something like

      int value[5];
      for (i=1; i<5; i++){
        value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
      }
      
      skywatchS Offline
      skywatchS Offline
      skywatch
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @yveaux Shouldn't that be int value[4]; ? ;)

      mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • skywatchS skywatch

        @yveaux Shouldn't that be int value[4]; ? ;)

        mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkvidd
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @skywatch not if the 0th position is skipped

        skywatchS 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

          @skywatch not if the 0th position is skipped

          skywatchS Offline
          skywatchS Offline
          skywatch
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @mfalkvidd Hehehe...... ;)

          But i starts at 1 yes? and then increments in interger units whilst it is less than 5. So that should give 1,2,3,4. Or have I been under a misunderstanding?

          mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • skywatchS skywatch

            @mfalkvidd Hehehe...... ;)

            But i starts at 1 yes? and then increments in interger units whilst it is less than 5. So that should give 1,2,3,4. Or have I been under a misunderstanding?

            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkvidd
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @skywatch arrays indexes in c/c++ always start at 0.
            int myarray[5] would have positions 0 thorugh 4. Position 5 would be outside the array. In the code above, position 0 is never used.

            So either make the array 1 element larger than actually needed (with position 0 unused), or let i start at 0:

            int value[4];
            for (i=0; i<4; i++){
              value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
            }
            
            Sergio RiusS skywatchS 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

              @skywatch arrays indexes in c/c++ always start at 0.
              int myarray[5] would have positions 0 thorugh 4. Position 5 would be outside the array. In the code above, position 0 is never used.

              So either make the array 1 element larger than actually needed (with position 0 unused), or let i start at 0:

              int value[4];
              for (i=0; i<4; i++){
                value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
              }
              
              Sergio RiusS Offline
              Sergio RiusS Offline
              Sergio Rius
              wrote on last edited by Sergio Rius
              #8

              @mfalkvidd said in Dynamic change of variable name:

              int myarray[5] would have positions 0 thorugh 4. Position 5 would be outside the array. In the code above, position 0 is never used.

              So either make the array 1 element larger than actually needed (with position 0 unused), or let i start at 0:

              In fact, I interpreted it more like @skywatch
              Notice the <=

               int value[5];
               for (i=1; i<=5; i++){
                 value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
               }
              

              I just made something like this for indexing sensors in a node, where idx 0 was the node itself, and thus already filled before the loop.

              Y 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

                @mfalkvidd said in Dynamic change of variable name:

                int myarray[5] would have positions 0 thorugh 4. Position 5 would be outside the array. In the code above, position 0 is never used.

                So either make the array 1 element larger than actually needed (with position 0 unused), or let i start at 0:

                In fact, I interpreted it more like @skywatch
                Notice the <=

                 int value[5];
                 for (i=1; i<=5; i++){
                   value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
                 }
                

                I just made something like this for indexing sensors in a node, where idx 0 was the node itself, and thus already filled before the loop.

                Y Offline
                Y Offline
                Yveaux
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @sergio-rius said in Dynamic change of variable name:

                Notice the <=

                That will cause a buffer overrun at the end again...

                http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                skywatchS Sergio RiusS 2 Replies Last reply
                2
                • Y Yveaux

                  @sergio-rius said in Dynamic change of variable name:

                  Notice the <=

                  That will cause a buffer overrun at the end again...

                  skywatchS Offline
                  skywatchS Offline
                  skywatch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  @yveaux Can you please explain why as I want to learn why it won't run the code the way I expected it to! -

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                    @skywatch arrays indexes in c/c++ always start at 0.
                    int myarray[5] would have positions 0 thorugh 4. Position 5 would be outside the array. In the code above, position 0 is never used.

                    So either make the array 1 element larger than actually needed (with position 0 unused), or let i start at 0:

                    int value[4];
                    for (i=0; i<4; i++){
                      value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
                    }
                    
                    skywatchS Offline
                    skywatchS Offline
                    skywatch
                    wrote on last edited by skywatch
                    #11

                    @mfalkvidd That won't get '0 through 4' as it will never produce i=4 in this case. I would expect it to need to be

                    int value[4];
                    for (i=0; i<=4; i++){
                      value[i] = debouncer[i].read();
                    }
                    

                    in order to get 0 through 4 (note the extra '=' in line 2 above to make this work. Or am I still misunderstanding something? ???

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Y Yveaux

                      @sergio-rius said in Dynamic change of variable name:

                      Notice the <=

                      That will cause a buffer overrun at the end again...

                      Sergio RiusS Offline
                      Sergio RiusS Offline
                      Sergio Rius
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      It's as easy as trying it.

                      @yveaux said in Dynamic change of variable name:

                      That will cause a buffer overrun at the end again...

                      Really? I can't see why a loop trough 1, 2, 3, 4 could overflow a 5 elements array.

                      In my code, I manually add 0 (the device itself, for vcc) before entering the loop. So in this case, still 5 elements.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Sergio RiusS Sergio Rius

                        It's as easy as trying it.

                        @yveaux said in Dynamic change of variable name:

                        That will cause a buffer overrun at the end again...

                        Really? I can't see why a loop trough 1, 2, 3, 4 could overflow a 5 elements array.

                        In my code, I manually add 0 (the device itself, for vcc) before entering the loop. So in this case, still 5 elements.

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        badmannen
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @sergio-rius
                        the loop will run even at "5".
                        that is the problem. if you write "i<5" , then it would be ok

                        rPi 3 - UNO R3 - Mini - Nano - custom

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Sergio RiusS Offline
                          Sergio RiusS Offline
                          Sergio Rius
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @badmannen @Yveaux You're absolutely right. I was lazy, only changed a symbol and gave a bad advice. My response should be changed to <=4.

                          Still I don't understand what the original question was.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          17

                          Online

                          12.0k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.4k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular