Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. smart sleep inconsistent?

smart sleep inconsistent?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
21 Posts 3 Posters 150 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

    Another quick update. I hooked my gateway up to my computer to get some debug logs off it. I am not seeing ANYTHING coming from that node using smartsleep at all. So it does appear the issue is specifically with that node.

    Since it's battery powered i am going to see if i can get serial connected up without a reset and see what's it saying but i have a feeling it's going to be what ive seen before and it's having a hard time finding a parent for some reason. Not sure how to fix that.

    skywatchS Offline
    skywatchS Offline
    skywatch
    wrote on last edited by skywatch
    #9

    @CrankyCoder I have similar issue with a couple of nodes. Sometimes it looses signal for hours at a time...

    It might be external interference from other devices like wifi, bluetooth or microwave oven.

    It can also be connection issues especially with the push-on dupont connectors as when the temperature/humidity/air pressure change then the connectors can move slightly. Also they might be badly crimped in the first place.

    So check all connections are good and can't move (soldering is best here), and then look for sources that might be an issue.

    It could also be another node closer to the GW is sending at the exact same time as the problem node and masking the signal.

    Batteries are susceptable to variations due to temperature too, they are a chemical reaction. So try a better source of power for testing too.

    Looking at the code, send_status_message only ever sends 1 - is this what you want? It seems to never send anything else (like 0)....

    Also you are using sleep but have a receive function - what happens to messages when the node is asleep?

    You are sending battery level every second? That is too often. How long will the batteries last? This wastes battery power a lot. I check betteries once a day on my security sensors, they don't change for weeks at a time....

    Have you modified the pro mini as per the battery page on this site? Have you added capacitors to the radio module?

    directionControl seems like it will always turn off both digital pins regardless of the message as //disable are the last statements to be actioned?

    You can try changing

    #define MY_RADIO_RF24

    to.....

    #define MY_RADIO_RF24
    #define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_HIGH

    options for power are MIN, LOW, HIGH, MAX. - it might help.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CrankyCoderC Offline
      CrankyCoderC Offline
      CrankyCoder
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

      Looking at the code, send_status_message only ever sends 1 - is this what you want? It seems to never send anything else (like 0)....

      battery is only sent when there is a change in the voltage.

      @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

      Looking at the code, send_status_message only ever sends 1 - is this what you want? It seems to never send anything else (like 0)....

      Where do you see that? i get 1 and 0 reported as needed based on the state.

      @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

      Also you are using sleep but have a receive function - what happens to messages when the node is asleep?

      That is what smartsleep does. It tells my controller (homeassistant) to queue up the messages. Which works fine, as long as the node wakes up.

      @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

      Have you modified the pro mini as per the battery page on this site? Have you added capacitors to the radio module?

      Correct, modified for battery use, and capacitors to the radio module.

      @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

      directionControl seems like it will always turn off both digital pins regardless of the message as //disable are the last statements to be actioned?

      This is correct, this is a directional H-bridge controller to pulse a latching solenoid valve, so I do not need them on but very briefly.

      Home Automation Tinkerer
      www.CrankyCoder.net

      Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
      Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
      MySensors: 2.3

      skywatchS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • CrankyCoderC Offline
        CrankyCoderC Offline
        CrankyCoder
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

        #define MY_RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_HIGH

        I have the node and gateway on my desk now for testing, so I am going to reflash with this now! Fingers crossed it helps. :)

        Home Automation Tinkerer
        www.CrankyCoder.net

        Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
        Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
        MySensors: 2.3

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrankyCoderC Offline
          CrankyCoderC Offline
          CrankyCoder
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Got some more info. Here is some debug log off the gateway. The node in question is node 18

          22:02:47.582 -> 28832653 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-18-18,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
          22:03:51.377 -> 28896448 TSF:MSG:READ,18-18-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
          22:03:51.422 -> 28896512 TSF:MSG:BC
          22:03:51.422 -> 28896533 TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=18
          22:03:51.468 -> 28896566 TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
          22:03:51.513 -> 28896594 TSF:CKU:OK
          22:03:51.513 -> 28896615 TSF:MSG:GWL OK
          22:03:51.967 -> 28897026 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-18-18,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
          22:05:01.405 -> 28966464 GWT:IMQ:TOPIC=mygateway1-in/10/1/1/0/40, MSG RECEIVED
          22:05:01.497 -> 28966569 !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-53-10,s=1,c=1,t=40,pt=0,l=6,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:FFFFFF
          22:07:04.200 -> 29089296 TSF:MSG:READ,18-18-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
          22:07:04.246 -> 29089359 TSF:MSG:BC
          22:07:04.292 -> 29089380 TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=18
          22:07:04.337 -> 29089414 TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
          22:07:04.337 -> 29089442 TSF:CKU:OK
          22:07:04.382 -> 29089463 TSF:MSG:GWL OK
          22:07:05.152 -> 29090214 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-18-18,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
          22:10:01.430 -> 29266499 GWT:IMQ:TOPIC=mygateway1-in/10/1/1/0/40, MSG RECEIVED
          22:10:01.521 -> 29266604 !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-53-10,s=1,c=1,t=40,pt=0,l=6,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:FFFFFF
          22:10:59.660 -> 29324730 TSF:MSG:READ,38-38-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
          22:10:59.706 -> 29324794 TSF:MSG:BC
          22:10:59.706 -> 29324815 TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=38
          22:10:59.751 -> 29324848 TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
          22:10:59.797 -> 29324877 TSF:CKU:OK
          22:10:59.797 -> 29324897 TSF:MSG:GWL OK
          22:11:00.523 -> 29325594 !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-38-38,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:0
          

          Running it through the log parser it would appear the gateway is responding to the find parent request.

          BUT. The node it self seems to be failing to find parent periodically. Like it's not getting the message back from the gateway.

          22:12:10.465 -> Going to sleep
          22:12:10.465 -> 44562 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=1,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
          22:12:10.465 -> 44572 !MCO:SLP:TNR
          22:12:20.399 -> 54491 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
          22:12:20.399 -> 54493 TSM:INIT
          22:12:20.399 -> 54499 !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
          22:12:20.444 -> 54501 TSM:FAIL:CNT=5
          22:12:20.444 -> 54503 TSM:FAIL:DIS
          22:12:20.444 -> 54505 TSF:TDI:TSL
          22:12:20.489 -> 54575 MCO:SLP:MS=19999
          22:12:20.489 -> 54577 !TSF:SND:TNR
          22:12:21.035 -> 55080 TSF:TDI:TSL
          22:12:42.255 -> 55083 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
          22:12:42.301 -> 55085 TSF:TRI:TSB
          22:12:42.301 -> 55091 !TSF:SND:TNR
          22:12:42.301 -> Awake Now
          22:12:42.301 -> 1010
          22:12:42.301 -> 3.29
          22:12:42.301 -> Battery Voltage: 7.98 V
          22:12:42.301 -> Battery percent: 94 %
          22:12:42.301 -> sensorValue:1010
          22:12:42.301 -> Going to sleep
          22:12:42.301 -> 55099 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=1,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
          22:12:42.301 -> 55109 !MCO:SLP:TNR
          22:12:51.744 -> 64509 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
          22:12:51.744 -> 64512 TSM:INIT
          22:12:51.744 -> 64518 !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
          22:12:51.744 -> 64520 TSM:FAIL:CNT=6
          22:12:51.744 -> 64522 TSM:FAIL:DIS
          22:12:51.744 -> 64524 TSF:TDI:TSL
          22:12:52.330 -> 65112 MCO:SLP:MS=19999
          22:12:52.330 -> 65114 !TSF:SND:TNR
          22:12:52.829 -> 65617 TSF:TDI:TSL
          

          Home Automation Tinkerer
          www.CrankyCoder.net

          Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
          Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
          MySensors: 2.3

          mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

            Got some more info. Here is some debug log off the gateway. The node in question is node 18

            22:02:47.582 -> 28832653 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-18-18,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
            22:03:51.377 -> 28896448 TSF:MSG:READ,18-18-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
            22:03:51.422 -> 28896512 TSF:MSG:BC
            22:03:51.422 -> 28896533 TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=18
            22:03:51.468 -> 28896566 TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
            22:03:51.513 -> 28896594 TSF:CKU:OK
            22:03:51.513 -> 28896615 TSF:MSG:GWL OK
            22:03:51.967 -> 28897026 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-18-18,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
            22:05:01.405 -> 28966464 GWT:IMQ:TOPIC=mygateway1-in/10/1/1/0/40, MSG RECEIVED
            22:05:01.497 -> 28966569 !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-53-10,s=1,c=1,t=40,pt=0,l=6,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:FFFFFF
            22:07:04.200 -> 29089296 TSF:MSG:READ,18-18-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
            22:07:04.246 -> 29089359 TSF:MSG:BC
            22:07:04.292 -> 29089380 TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=18
            22:07:04.337 -> 29089414 TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
            22:07:04.337 -> 29089442 TSF:CKU:OK
            22:07:04.382 -> 29089463 TSF:MSG:GWL OK
            22:07:05.152 -> 29090214 TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-18-18,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
            22:10:01.430 -> 29266499 GWT:IMQ:TOPIC=mygateway1-in/10/1/1/0/40, MSG RECEIVED
            22:10:01.521 -> 29266604 !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-53-10,s=1,c=1,t=40,pt=0,l=6,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:FFFFFF
            22:10:59.660 -> 29324730 TSF:MSG:READ,38-38-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
            22:10:59.706 -> 29324794 TSF:MSG:BC
            22:10:59.706 -> 29324815 TSF:MSG:FPAR REQ,ID=38
            22:10:59.751 -> 29324848 TSF:PNG:SEND,TO=0
            22:10:59.797 -> 29324877 TSF:CKU:OK
            22:10:59.797 -> 29324897 TSF:MSG:GWL OK
            22:11:00.523 -> 29325594 !TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-38-38,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:0
            

            Running it through the log parser it would appear the gateway is responding to the find parent request.

            BUT. The node it self seems to be failing to find parent periodically. Like it's not getting the message back from the gateway.

            22:12:10.465 -> Going to sleep
            22:12:10.465 -> 44562 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=1,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
            22:12:10.465 -> 44572 !MCO:SLP:TNR
            22:12:20.399 -> 54491 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
            22:12:20.399 -> 54493 TSM:INIT
            22:12:20.399 -> 54499 !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
            22:12:20.444 -> 54501 TSM:FAIL:CNT=5
            22:12:20.444 -> 54503 TSM:FAIL:DIS
            22:12:20.444 -> 54505 TSF:TDI:TSL
            22:12:20.489 -> 54575 MCO:SLP:MS=19999
            22:12:20.489 -> 54577 !TSF:SND:TNR
            22:12:21.035 -> 55080 TSF:TDI:TSL
            22:12:42.255 -> 55083 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
            22:12:42.301 -> 55085 TSF:TRI:TSB
            22:12:42.301 -> 55091 !TSF:SND:TNR
            22:12:42.301 -> Awake Now
            22:12:42.301 -> 1010
            22:12:42.301 -> 3.29
            22:12:42.301 -> Battery Voltage: 7.98 V
            22:12:42.301 -> Battery percent: 94 %
            22:12:42.301 -> sensorValue:1010
            22:12:42.301 -> Going to sleep
            22:12:42.301 -> 55099 MCO:SLP:MS=30000,SMS=1,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
            22:12:42.301 -> 55109 !MCO:SLP:TNR
            22:12:51.744 -> 64509 TSM:FAIL:RE-INIT
            22:12:51.744 -> 64512 TSM:INIT
            22:12:51.744 -> 64518 !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
            22:12:51.744 -> 64520 TSM:FAIL:CNT=6
            22:12:51.744 -> 64522 TSM:FAIL:DIS
            22:12:51.744 -> 64524 TSF:TDI:TSL
            22:12:52.330 -> 65112 MCO:SLP:MS=19999
            22:12:52.330 -> 65114 !TSF:SND:TNR
            22:12:52.829 -> 65617 TSF:TDI:TSL
            
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkvidd
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
            #13

            !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL indicates that the radio chip is not responding to the arduino's commands.

            The most common cause is unreliable wiring. But it could be something else. Define MY_DEBUG_VERBOSE_RF24 to get more details.

            CrankyCoderC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mfalkviddM Offline
              mfalkviddM Offline
              mfalkvidd
              Mod
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Btw, are you using MySensors 2.3 on the node and the gateway?

              CrankyCoderC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

                @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

                Looking at the code, send_status_message only ever sends 1 - is this what you want? It seems to never send anything else (like 0)....

                battery is only sent when there is a change in the voltage.

                @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

                Looking at the code, send_status_message only ever sends 1 - is this what you want? It seems to never send anything else (like 0)....

                Where do you see that? i get 1 and 0 reported as needed based on the state.

                @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

                Also you are using sleep but have a receive function - what happens to messages when the node is asleep?

                That is what smartsleep does. It tells my controller (homeassistant) to queue up the messages. Which works fine, as long as the node wakes up.

                @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

                Have you modified the pro mini as per the battery page on this site? Have you added capacitors to the radio module?

                Correct, modified for battery use, and capacitors to the radio module.

                @skywatch said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

                directionControl seems like it will always turn off both digital pins regardless of the message as //disable are the last statements to be actioned?

                This is correct, this is a directional H-bridge controller to pulse a latching solenoid valve, so I do not need them on but very briefly.

                skywatchS Offline
                skywatchS Offline
                skywatch
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                @CrankyCoder Do the data drop outs have any correlation to the solenoid valve operating and does the valave use the same power supply as the node MCU?

                CrankyCoderC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                  !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL indicates that the radio chip is not responding to the arduino's commands.

                  The most common cause is unreliable wiring. But it could be something else. Define MY_DEBUG_VERBOSE_RF24 to get more details.

                  CrankyCoderC Offline
                  CrankyCoderC Offline
                  CrankyCoder
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @mfalkvidd Will add this now.

                  Home Automation Tinkerer
                  www.CrankyCoder.net

                  Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                  Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                  MySensors: 2.3

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                    Btw, are you using MySensors 2.3 on the node and the gateway?

                    CrankyCoderC Offline
                    CrankyCoderC Offline
                    CrankyCoder
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    @mfalkvidd said in smart sleep inconsistent?:

                    Btw, are you using MySensors 2.3 on the node and the gateway?

                    Correct 2.3 on node and gateway.

                    Home Automation Tinkerer
                    www.CrankyCoder.net

                    Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                    Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                    MySensors: 2.3

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • skywatchS skywatch

                      @CrankyCoder Do the data drop outs have any correlation to the solenoid valve operating and does the valave use the same power supply as the node MCU?

                      CrankyCoderC Offline
                      CrankyCoderC Offline
                      CrankyCoder
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      @skywatch unfortunately no. This is for a sprinkler valve that I haven't set up any automations for yet since the questionable reliability at the moment would flood my yard lol

                      Home Automation Tinkerer
                      www.CrankyCoder.net

                      Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                      Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                      MySensors: 2.3

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CrankyCoderC Offline
                        CrankyCoderC Offline
                        CrankyCoder
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        Not sure if this helps or if anything jumps out, but here is the node and gateway side by side. Node does find parent request, gateway sees it, responds with 0. But node never gets it.

                        5b95b0ce-3b3b-44c8-ad45-f1bb1ed7af22-image.png

                        Home Automation Tinkerer
                        www.CrankyCoder.net

                        Controller: HomeAssistant in Kubernetes
                        Gateway: MQTTClientGateway
                        MySensors: 2.3

                        mfalkviddM skywatchS 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

                          Not sure if this helps or if anything jumps out, but here is the node and gateway side by side. Node does find parent request, gateway sees it, responds with 0. But node never gets it.

                          5b95b0ce-3b3b-44c8-ad45-f1bb1ed7af22-image.png

                          mfalkviddM Offline
                          mfalkviddM Offline
                          mfalkvidd
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          @CrankyCoder I am not sure but to me it looks like it takes a bit more than 1 second for the gateway to send the response? And by then, the node has already gone to sleep so it can't receive the message.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • CrankyCoderC CrankyCoder

                            Not sure if this helps or if anything jumps out, but here is the node and gateway side by side. Node does find parent request, gateway sees it, responds with 0. But node never gets it.

                            5b95b0ce-3b3b-44c8-ad45-f1bb1ed7af22-image.png

                            skywatchS Offline
                            skywatchS Offline
                            skywatch
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            @CrankyCoder How far apart are the node and gateway? What is between them? Can you post any photos of of each with the wiring?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            18

                            Online

                            11.7k

                            Users

                            11.2k

                            Topics

                            113.1k

                            Posts


                            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • MySensors
                            • OpenHardware.io
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular