Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. RS485/RS232/Serial transport class for mysensors.org

RS485/RS232/Serial transport class for mysensors.org

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
rs485 serialrs485
143 Posts 27 Posters 103.3k Views 27 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    TimO
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    So, I've tried to further invest the problem and there is something wrong with _dev.write() in transportSend(). It is too much C-Kungfu for me but there is something wrong with the conversion of data.

    • _dev.write("bla") looks good in terminal
    • _dev.write(to) throws trash in the terminal
    • Serial.println(to) looks good in terminal

    Here is the output of the soft-serial:

    #���X��z
                   �Humidity Sensor��X
    ��
         �1.0�X��b�X��b�X
                                         ��*�������X
                                                         ��*�gfB�X
                                                                        ��*�������X
        ��*�gfB�X
                       
    

    Another thing:

    The management of the DE-Pin is missing right?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hekH Offline
      hekH Offline
      hek
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      to is a uint_t...so I guess it could generate trash in the terminal when showing the low ASCII values. Guess you'd have to use some other program to view the bytes sent.

      Yes, de-pin was stripped away. Would it be useful in your setup?

      (thankful for your help out testing it... I need some more time before I can setup a test rig)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        TimO
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        Holy crap ...
        It was too obvious. :-(

        Gateway can't work with this code:
        https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/blob/development/libraries/MySensors/examples/GatewaySerialRS485/GatewaySerialRS485.ino

        #define MY_DEFAULT_ERR_LED_PIN 7  // Error led pin
        #define MY_DEFAULT_RX_LED_PIN  8  // Receive led pin
        #define MY_DEFAULT_TX_LED_PIN  9  // the PCB, on board LED
        

        @hek: Your code works!

        The de-pin is set to high if a node wants to send something, otherwise it is set to ground.
        I'll try to add that code.

        hekH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T TimO

          Holy crap ...
          It was too obvious. :-(

          Gateway can't work with this code:
          https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/blob/development/libraries/MySensors/examples/GatewaySerialRS485/GatewaySerialRS485.ino

          #define MY_DEFAULT_ERR_LED_PIN 7  // Error led pin
          #define MY_DEFAULT_RX_LED_PIN  8  // Receive led pin
          #define MY_DEFAULT_TX_LED_PIN  9  // the PCB, on board LED
          

          @hek: Your code works!

          The de-pin is set to high if a node wants to send something, otherwise it is set to ground.
          I'll try to add that code.

          hekH Offline
          hekH Offline
          hek
          Admin
          wrote on last edited by hek
          #27

          @TimO

          :blush: I Sorry.. should have changed those pin assignments of course... I'll push an update ASAP.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hekH hek

            @TimO

            :blush: I Sorry.. should have changed those pin assignments of course... I'll push an update ASAP.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            LeoDesigner
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            @hek
            I am wondering why did you remove the code responsible for dePin management ?
            It's not possible to use MAX485 boards without tx/rx management.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              TimO
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              @LeoDesigner : yeah, you're right, that is needed.

              But there seems to be another problem, I can't get the current development code to work. I've simply interconnected two Nanos at D8/D9. The gateway and the motion example come up fine according to serial output and the motion sensor definiatly sends something via AltSerial but the gateway doesn't seem to recognize it.

              A simple test, where I pipe the input on hardware serial of one nano to AltSerial on the second nano and from there to hardware serial works just fine, so hardware and AltSerial is working.

              Sender:

              #include <AltSoftSerial.h>
              
              AltSoftSerial altSerial;
              
              void setup() {
                Serial.begin(115200);
                Serial.println("Demo begins");
              
                altSerial.begin(115200);
              
              }
              
              void loop() {
                char c;
              
                if (Serial.available()) {
                  c = Serial.read();
                  altSerial.print(c);
                }
              
              }
              

              Receiver:

              #include <AltSoftSerial.h>
              
              AltSoftSerial altSerial;
              
              void setup() {
                Serial.begin(115200);
                Serial.println("Demo begins");
              
                altSerial.begin(115200);
              
              }
              
              void loop() {
                char c;
              
                if (altSerial.available()) {
                  c = altSerial.read();
                  Serial.print(c);
                }
              
              }
              
              antiA 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • hekH Offline
                hekH Offline
                hek
                Admin
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                Added DE-pin management

                https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/pull/266

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  shabba
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  I am very interested in doing this as I have many sensors local to my gateway. I use domoticz and see from http://www.domoticz.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=8018 that people are doing this. I was just wondering would this do as a USB adaptor? Seems very cheap :

                  http://www.aliexpress.com/item/1-pcs-USB-to-RS485-USB-485-Converter-Adapter-Support-Win7-XP-Vista-Linux-for-Mac/1684582905.html?spm=2114.031010208.3.1.hHoz94&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_10_79_78_77_80_61,searchweb201644_0,searchweb201560_9

                  Also was looking at :
                  http://www.aliexpress.com/item/FREE-SHIPPING-5PCS-LOT-MAX485-module-RS485-module-TTL-turn-RS-485-module-MCU-development-accessories/1718665649.html

                  Appreciate any feedback.

                  Thanks.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L LeoDesigner

                    Hi everyone !

                    I needed a wired solution for my several nodes.
                    Here is the serial rs485/rs232 wired network transport for mysensors.
                    https://github.com/leodesigner/mysensors-serial-transport
                    It is based on the Majenko ICSC serial library.
                    Can you please test it? It is a beta version - but it is working for me.
                    (However, I am still waiting for my rs485 boards to arrive)
                    You can find more technical information at
                    http://sourceforge.net/p/arduino-icsc/wiki/RS-485/

                    To use it, you have to:

                    1. Put SerialTransport.cpp and SerialTransport.h to folder/directory/path SerialTransport in your library.
                    2. Add #include <SerialTransport.h> to your .ino sketch
                    3. Replace transport class with:
                      MyTransportSerial transport(Serial,0,-1); // serial port, node, dePin (-1 disabled)

                    Please let me know about bugs and how it is working for you.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    MarkV
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    @LeoDesigner

                    I'm searching for a usb transport class, could i use this??

                    I'd like to connect my arduino (with sensors/actuators connected to it) to my rasberrypi through usb, without the wireless part, but still see them as mysensors sensors.

                    Is this possible or could someone make a transport class for it???

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M MarkV

                      @LeoDesigner

                      I'm searching for a usb transport class, could i use this??

                      I'd like to connect my arduino (with sensors/actuators connected to it) to my rasberrypi through usb, without the wireless part, but still see them as mysensors sensors.

                      Is this possible or could someone make a transport class for it???

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      LeoDesigner
                      wrote on last edited by LeoDesigner
                      #33

                      @MarkV
                      Regarding the USB to RS485 adapters:
                      I think they are using a some kind of serial to USB chip like CH340/341. So your RPi will be able to see RS485 bus as the regular serial port. It may work. It worth trying, you can always build an Ethernet GW later in other case.

                      @shabba
                      I am using exactly the same MAX485 modules. It is much more reliable media comparing to radio communication.

                      @hek
                      Thanks for adding DE pin management code.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • scalzS Offline
                        scalzS Offline
                        scalz
                        Hardware Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #34

                        hi.

                        I am not sure if it can be useful.. I have read this note recently, about rs485 powering chip (3.3v or 5v). And I found this interesting, for knowledge..
                        https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface/industrial_interface/f/142/t/93260
                        So what I understand here, and it makes sense, is that : even if some rs485 chips are able to be powered with 3.3v or 5v, if you want to power it with 3.3v, it can work of course with a 5v chip, but it is better to use a true 3.3v chip only. Because they are more sensitive to be rs485 compliant (better internal transistor).

                        Always good to know :smiley:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T TimO

                          @LeoDesigner : yeah, you're right, that is needed.

                          But there seems to be another problem, I can't get the current development code to work. I've simply interconnected two Nanos at D8/D9. The gateway and the motion example come up fine according to serial output and the motion sensor definiatly sends something via AltSerial but the gateway doesn't seem to recognize it.

                          A simple test, where I pipe the input on hardware serial of one nano to AltSerial on the second nano and from there to hardware serial works just fine, so hardware and AltSerial is working.

                          Sender:

                          #include <AltSoftSerial.h>
                          
                          AltSoftSerial altSerial;
                          
                          void setup() {
                            Serial.begin(115200);
                            Serial.println("Demo begins");
                          
                            altSerial.begin(115200);
                          
                          }
                          
                          void loop() {
                            char c;
                          
                            if (Serial.available()) {
                              c = Serial.read();
                              altSerial.print(c);
                            }
                          
                          }
                          

                          Receiver:

                          #include <AltSoftSerial.h>
                          
                          AltSoftSerial altSerial;
                          
                          void setup() {
                            Serial.begin(115200);
                            Serial.println("Demo begins");
                          
                            altSerial.begin(115200);
                          
                          }
                          
                          void loop() {
                            char c;
                          
                            if (altSerial.available()) {
                              c = altSerial.read();
                              Serial.print(c);
                            }
                          
                          }
                          
                          antiA Offline
                          antiA Offline
                          anti
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #35

                          @TimO I cloned the current development branch, and tried to use a modified motion sketch, and a gateway sketch, simply interconnecting two mini-pros with TTL serial : the same problem appears.

                          I can only see garbage sent on the AltSerial pins, so the gateway don't see the message.

                          Before I dig more and start debugging, did anybody made progress on that problem ?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            TimO
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #36

                            @anti: I'm glad, I'm not the only one! :-)
                            I've tried to find the problem, but had no luck.

                            What is bugging me: it was working with a early version, before it was merged into development, but I don't see any changes.

                            I've not tested the latest / current version though.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              andriej
                              wrote on last edited by andriej
                              #37

                              Hi!

                              Glad to see 'wired' version of MySensor protocol coming.
                              One question - how long wires and how many sensors on one pair/multiple pairs will be supported?

                              I'm thinking about cabling for new home, which means many meters of cable to every sensor/door/actuator/ligth/meter etc.

                              In best scenario - one cat5e - one termination (sensor/node/etc.)
                              Currently I'm looking for a cabled version of protocol to support it and be 101% stable (no hiccups and freezes over the protocol), so I can rely on my home.

                              MySensors seems to be great to implement, but I'm worried about the signal... I was thinking about letting something around 12-24-30V thru one pair of Cat5 to power all nodes from one power-source (with backup batteries).

                              Or - are there any better alternatives for RS485, that doesn't need resistors, have no limitations of 32 devices etc?

                              :-)

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A andriej

                                Hi!

                                Glad to see 'wired' version of MySensor protocol coming.
                                One question - how long wires and how many sensors on one pair/multiple pairs will be supported?

                                I'm thinking about cabling for new home, which means many meters of cable to every sensor/door/actuator/ligth/meter etc.

                                In best scenario - one cat5e - one termination (sensor/node/etc.)
                                Currently I'm looking for a cabled version of protocol to support it and be 101% stable (no hiccups and freezes over the protocol), so I can rely on my home.

                                MySensors seems to be great to implement, but I'm worried about the signal... I was thinking about letting something around 12-24-30V thru one pair of Cat5 to power all nodes from one power-source (with backup batteries).

                                Or - are there any better alternatives for RS485, that doesn't need resistors, have no limitations of 32 devices etc?

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                LeoDesigner
                                wrote on last edited by LeoDesigner
                                #38

                                @andriej
                                According to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-485
                                "It offers data transmission speeds of 35 Mbit/s up to 10 m and 100 kbit/s at 1200 m. "
                                also check this: https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/367
                                You may design a bus with up to 256 nodes.
                                CAT5 is the best choice anyway for any type of communication (I mean you can run regular Ethernet on them too).
                                Check the video at the beginning of the post. It's a working example of two remote nodes connected only with one CAT5 cable over 50m. They are working at 115200 - however speed might be up to 1 Mbit/s.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L LeoDesigner

                                  @andriej
                                  According to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-485
                                  "It offers data transmission speeds of 35 Mbit/s up to 10 m and 100 kbit/s at 1200 m. "
                                  also check this: https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/367
                                  You may design a bus with up to 256 nodes.
                                  CAT5 is the best choice anyway for any type of communication (I mean you can run regular Ethernet on them too).
                                  Check the video at the beginning of the post. It's a working example of two remote nodes connected only with one CAT5 cable over 50m. They are working at 115200 - however speed might be up to 1 Mbit/s.

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  andriej
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #39

                                  @LeoDesigner but how would I connect all sensors in house and relays too?
                                  SOme resistors needed? Star topology? Few gateways?

                                  :-)

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A andriej

                                    @LeoDesigner but how would I connect all sensors in house and relays too?
                                    SOme resistors needed? Star topology? Few gateways?

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    LeoDesigner
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #40

                                    @andriej
                                    The star topology could be a problem. However for low speed nodes this may work anyway.
                                    You may need something like RS485 hub :) or a GW with many RS485 bus ports.
                                    Or just a separate MAX485 board for each node. You need to test it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • antiA Offline
                                      antiA Offline
                                      anti
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #41

                                      @TimO Well... it turns out that the garbage seen on the wire was not garbage, just the binary serial protocol. And the node was desperately attempting to find a parent, with no success.

                                      FYI this is how I workaround it. But I did not feel like I could fix it for 100% sure.

                                      The gateway ignored the broadcasts from the node. The following code in MyTransportRS485 triggered for probably wrong reasons (sender=0; nodeid=0;station=broadcast) :

                                                     if ((_recSender == _nodeId) ||
                                                        (_recStation != _nodeId &&
                                                         _recStation != BROADCAST_ADDRESS)) {
                                                                _dev.print(" wrongid: ");
                                      

                                      Since the gateway was not responding correctly to the node broadcasts, I solved the serial communication problem between node and gateway by defining a fixed node Id :

                                      #define MY_NODE_ID 10
                                      

                                      (ps: the MySensors version used was cloned from git today)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • antiA Offline
                                        antiA Offline
                                        anti
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #42

                                        Replying to myself... Of course the "Controller" MUST be properly connected
                                        for dynamic nodes IDs to function properly, since it's the controller's job to affect the node ids.

                                        This explains a part of my original problem.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K Offline
                                          K Offline
                                          kimot
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #43

                                          I think, that CAN transceiver chip is better then RS485 transceiver chip.
                                          Then we dont need direction setting pin and bus state is better determined, becose CAn bus is prepered for bus collisions, RS485 not.
                                          I mean only CAN bus transceiver, not CAN controller ! For example MCP2551 or MCP2562.
                                          And we can use normal serial library.

                                          A L 3 Replies Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          17

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular