Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. SerialGateway Standalone not working

SerialGateway Standalone not working

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
serialgatewaypro minidebug mode
14 Posts 5 Posters 5.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • warawaraW Offline
    warawaraW Offline
    warawara
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Yes. I have installed the libraries and examples according to the tutorial on the site.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hekH Offline
      hekH Offline
      hek
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      You seem to have done some extensive testing. Especially if you get the RF24 ping examples working.

      Enabling debug mode on gateway will show more information when an actual radio message is picked up.. So it could be working (but does nor receive anything).

      Could you perhaps try the 1.4 development branch?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • warawaraW Offline
        warawaraW Offline
        warawara
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @Hek I was already starting with some tests with the 1.4 development branch.

        Just finishing my initial tests. Don't know why, but the development branch is working perfect!

        hekH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • warawaraW warawara

          @Hek I was already starting with some tests with the 1.4 development branch.

          Just finishing my initial tests. Don't know why, but the development branch is working perfect!

          hekH Offline
          hekH Offline
          hek
          Admin
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @warawara

          Both the development branch and the ping-examples uses shockburst mode of the NRF24l01.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • warawaraW Offline
            warawaraW Offline
            warawara
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Then it looks like that did the trick for me.

            Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • warawaraW Offline
              warawaraW Offline
              warawara
              wrote on last edited by warawara
              #8

              @hek is it possible to use shockburst mode in the master branche with some kind of config setting?

              hekH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • warawaraW warawara

                @hek is it possible to use shockburst mode in the master branche with some kind of config setting?

                hekH Offline
                hekH Offline
                hek
                Admin
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @warawara

                It might be, but why?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • warawaraW Offline
                  warawaraW Offline
                  warawara
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  So i can use the master branche instead of the development.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bandra
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @warawara , the development branch is very stable. At this point there is no reason not to use it. It is superior in every way to 1.3.

                    YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Bandra

                      @warawara , the development branch is very stable. At this point there is no reason not to use it. It is superior in every way to 1.3.

                      YveauxY Offline
                      YveauxY Offline
                      Yveaux
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @Bandra well, the protocol still changes every now and then, so be prepared to update your sensors and gateway when updating the library!

                      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • YveauxY Yveaux

                        @Bandra well, the protocol still changes every now and then, so be prepared to update your sensors and gateway when updating the library!

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bandra
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @Yveaux
                        True. The library is changing constantly (for the better!).

                        I've not encountered any major bugs in the 1.4 beta libraries that I've tried. So if the OP was just starting out then there's value in pulling down the latest 1.4 (which should be quite stable) and starting their sketches from there. Once 1.4 goes to production, then upgrading sketches will be much easier from 1.4b -> 1.4 than from 1.3 -> 1.4.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • warawaraW Offline
                          warawaraW Offline
                          warawara
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          I'm aware of the superiority of 1.4. Because I just started with building my custom controller I will go with the development branch for now. I really like the new protocol so far.

                          I'm using very basic arduino sketches at the moment. The only thing I'm worried about is my custom controller that I'm building in Node-Red. Hopefully the feature changes will not have to much impact on that part.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          21

                          Online

                          11.7k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.1k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular