Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. MySensors 1.4 Released

MySensors 1.4 Released

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
72 Posts 19 Posters 28.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • epierreE Offline
    epierreE Offline
    epierre
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #35
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      mikeones
      wrote on last edited by
      #36

      @hek I am having an issue assigning a node ID since the last update. I have cleared the eprom in one of my nodes and I am trying to assign a node id of 1 via the serial monitor on the GW. I am sending "255;255;3;0;4;1" in response to the node ID request of "255;255;3;0;3;".

      This is the console log from the node with debug enabled.

      send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
      read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1:0
      new parent=0, d=1
      req node id
      send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=ok:
      read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
      id=49
      sensor started, id 49
      send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
      send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
      

      Here is the console log from the GW.

      0;0;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
      255;255;3;0;3;
      49;255;0;0;17;1.4
      49;255;3;0;6;0
      

      What I don't understand is why the node would get assigned ID "49" when I sent "1" as the new node ID. Should the node get an ID of "1" or "49" for the command below?

      255;255;3;0;4;1
      
      hekH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M mikeones

        @hek I am having an issue assigning a node ID since the last update. I have cleared the eprom in one of my nodes and I am trying to assign a node id of 1 via the serial monitor on the GW. I am sending "255;255;3;0;4;1" in response to the node ID request of "255;255;3;0;3;".

        This is the console log from the node with debug enabled.

        send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
        read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1:0
        new parent=0, d=1
        req node id
        send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=ok:
        read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
        id=49
        sensor started, id 49
        send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
        send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
        

        Here is the console log from the GW.

        0;0;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
        255;255;3;0;3;
        49;255;0;0;17;1.4
        49;255;3;0;6;0
        

        What I don't understand is why the node would get assigned ID "49" when I sent "1" as the new node ID. Should the node get an ID of "1" or "49" for the command below?

        255;255;3;0;4;1
        
        hekH Offline
        hekH Offline
        hek
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by
        #37

        @mikeones

        Darn, yes, you are so right. The getByte fix affected the node-id functionality. Please update again (MySensor.cpp) and report back.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          mikeones
          wrote on last edited by mikeones
          #38

          @hek After updating, I have tested this via the serial monitor and it seems ok.

          send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
          read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
          id=1
          

          When I send this string via a (ago) controller, the node sets an id of 0 again. Do you see any issue with this string format?

          255;255;3;0;4;1
          

          Serial monitor output. Does "l=0:" indicate there was an issue with the payload?

          send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
          read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=0:
          id=0
          
          hekH 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mikeones

            @hek After updating, I have tested this via the serial monitor and it seems ok.

            send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
            read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
            id=1
            

            When I send this string via a (ago) controller, the node sets an id of 0 again. Do you see any issue with this string format?

            255;255;3;0;4;1
            

            Serial monitor output. Does "l=0:" indicate there was an issue with the payload?

            send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
            read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=0:
            id=0
            
            hekH Offline
            hekH Offline
            hek
            Admin
            wrote on last edited by
            #39

            @mikeones

            Hmm. I wonder which control characters Argcontrol sends ( \n and/or \r ). It could be that Vera sends both. I'll have to check when I get home.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mikeones
              wrote on last edited by
              #40

              @hek

              It appears sending "255;255;3;0;4;1\r\n" fixes my issue.

              send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
              read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
              id=1
              sensor started, id 1
              
              hekH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M mikeones

                @hek

                It appears sending "255;255;3;0;4;1\r\n" fixes my issue.

                send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
                id=1
                sensor started, id 1
                
                hekH Offline
                hekH Offline
                hek
                Admin
                wrote on last edited by
                #41

                @mikeones

                Ok thanks. I will make this more robust. It should be ok to skip the carriage return character.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mikeones
                  wrote on last edited by mikeones
                  #42

                  What does st=fail represent? Is that stating the ack failed or sending failed? Would this error show up for all messages if debug is enabled on the sensor node and not the gateway.? Maybe this is a non issue? I am trying to confirm if gw.getConfig and gw.requestTime requests are reaching the GW since they don't seem to be set consistently in my environment.

                  sensor started, id 3
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=fail:1.4
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=fail:0
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=8,st=ok:Humidity
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.0
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=0,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=3,st=fail:1.4
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=1,c=0,t=6,pt=0,l=3,st=fail:1.4
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:25.8
                  T: 25.80
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:50.4
                  H: 50.40
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:25.8
                  T: 25.80
                  send: 3-3-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:50.4
                  H: 50.40
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • hekH hek

                    ###1.4 update 1 released

                    NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

                    • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
                    • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
                    • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
                    • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
                    • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
                    • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
                    • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.
                    RJ_MakeR Offline
                    RJ_MakeR Offline
                    RJ_Make
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #43

                    @hek said:> ###1.4 update 1 released

                    NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

                    • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
                    • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
                    • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
                    • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
                    • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
                    • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
                    • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.

                    Was this release supposed to fix the C to F conversion problem I've been having? I just updated and problem persists for me.

                    2014-09-08_12-28-44.png

                    2014-09-08_12-29-11.png

                    RJ_Make

                    hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

                      @hek said:> ###1.4 update 1 released

                      NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

                      • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
                      • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
                      • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
                      • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
                      • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
                      • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
                      • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.

                      Was this release supposed to fix the C to F conversion problem I've been having? I just updated and problem persists for me.

                      2014-09-08_12-28-44.png

                      2014-09-08_12-29-11.png

                      hekH Offline
                      hekH Offline
                      hek
                      Admin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #44

                      @ServiceXp
                      Think I found the config problem. No wonder it didn't work. Please download and try again.

                      @mikeones
                      You should now be able to omit carriage return now.
                      The fail you're seeing is for the inter-node-ack.
                      Just verified requesting time from controller and it seems to work fine here (using the example sketch).

                      RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • YveauxY Offline
                        YveauxY Offline
                        Yveaux
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #45

                        @hek When MySensors has no parent, or fails to contact parent for a number of times, the findParentNode() method is entered.
                        This sends a broadcast (ignoring the result) and then waits at most 2 seconds for a response.
                        When this response doesn't come, the sensor just carries on as if the parent has been found, sending messages until again a number of times it failed to contact the parent.

                        Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                        hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • YveauxY Yveaux

                          @hek When MySensors has no parent, or fails to contact parent for a number of times, the findParentNode() method is entered.
                          This sends a broadcast (ignoring the result) and then waits at most 2 seconds for a response.
                          When this response doesn't come, the sensor just carries on as if the parent has been found, sending messages until again a number of times it failed to contact the parent.

                          Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                          hekH Offline
                          hekH Offline
                          hek
                          Admin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #46

                          @Yveaux said:

                          Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                          Blocking is as you say a bad idea for battery sensors (1.3 had this problem resulting in drained batteries).

                          How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hekH Offline
                            hekH Offline
                            hek
                            Admin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #47

                            @Yveaux

                            BTW. Do you have any idea why this happens?

                            http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/347/1-4-error-compiling-with-pinchangeint-h-library-file/5

                            I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                            YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hekH hek

                              @Yveaux said:

                              Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                              Blocking is as you say a bad idea for battery sensors (1.3 had this problem resulting in drained batteries).

                              How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                              YveauxY Offline
                              YveauxY Offline
                              Yveaux
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #48

                              @hek said:

                              How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                              Just thinking out aloud:

                              • Don't reset failedTransmissions in findParentNode()
                              • Reset failedTransmissions only when a new parent has been found
                              • In sendRoute() first perform findParentNode() when failedTransmissions > SEARCH_FAILURES
                              • When succesful (failedTransmissions == 0) perform sendWrite()

                              This will always first try to find a parent when none has been found yet, before trying to send the message.
                              If it fails, the send of the message will fail and the (battery powered) sensor will just carry on as if the message has been send, and sleep the sensor as usual.
                              Just sending to a known-bad parent node should be avoided at all times.

                              http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                              hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • YveauxY Yveaux

                                @hek said:

                                How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                                Just thinking out aloud:

                                • Don't reset failedTransmissions in findParentNode()
                                • Reset failedTransmissions only when a new parent has been found
                                • In sendRoute() first perform findParentNode() when failedTransmissions > SEARCH_FAILURES
                                • When succesful (failedTransmissions == 0) perform sendWrite()

                                This will always first try to find a parent when none has been found yet, before trying to send the message.
                                If it fails, the send of the message will fail and the (battery powered) sensor will just carry on as if the message has been send, and sleep the sensor as usual.
                                Just sending to a known-bad parent node should be avoided at all times.

                                hekH Offline
                                hekH Offline
                                hek
                                Admin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #49

                                @Yveaux

                                Sounds good. Go for it!

                                YveauxY 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • hekH hek

                                  @Yveaux

                                  Sounds good. Go for it!

                                  YveauxY Offline
                                  YveauxY Offline
                                  Yveaux
                                  Mod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #50

                                  @hek ;-)

                                  http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • hekH hek

                                    @Yveaux

                                    BTW. Do you have any idea why this happens?

                                    http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/347/1-4-error-compiling-with-pinchangeint-h-library-file/5

                                    I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                                    YveauxY Offline
                                    YveauxY Offline
                                    Yveaux
                                    Mod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #51

                                    @hek said:

                                    I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                                    Compiler & linker seem to be configured correctly in 1.5.7 (see hardware\arduino\avr\patform.txt)
                                    Did you have a look at the map-file? What exactly is included from the MyGateway.cpp file?

                                    http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                    hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • hekH hek

                                      @Yveaux

                                      Sounds good. Go for it!

                                      YveauxY Offline
                                      YveauxY Offline
                                      Yveaux
                                      Mod
                                      wrote on last edited by Yveaux
                                      #52

                                      @hek I'm also a bit puzzled by the RF24::enableAckPayload() and RF24::writeAckPayload() calls in the library, just like @Zeph .
                                      If I disable them the findParentNode() call only seems to emit a single message (which I can understand, as auto-ack is disabled for broadcasts), while 16 will be emit when the calls are enabled.
                                      Looks like auto-ack doesn't get disabled for broadcasts in this case.

                                      A sending nRF24 will immediately & automatically **switch to listen to the destination node's ID **after it has sent its message. Reason for this is that the nRF24 packet format only contains a destination node address and no source. The receiving node has no idea where the message came from and does not know who to send the ack to. Therefore it just sends the ack to its own node address, which the transmitting node happens to listen to.

                                      I tested only with a single sensor sending to a non-existent parent, but I can imagine that when auto-acks are enabled for broadcasts the s**t will definately hit the fan when there are many nodes within close proximity!

                                      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                      hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • YveauxY Yveaux

                                        @hek said:

                                        I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                                        Compiler & linker seem to be configured correctly in 1.5.7 (see hardware\arduino\avr\patform.txt)
                                        Did you have a look at the map-file? What exactly is included from the MyGateway.cpp file?

                                        hekH Offline
                                        hekH Offline
                                        hek
                                        Admin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #53

                                        @Yveaux

                                        Ok, I'll download 1.5.7 and test again. Can't find any map-file anywhere in the build directory.

                                        YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hekH hek

                                          @Yveaux

                                          Ok, I'll download 1.5.7 and test again. Can't find any map-file anywhere in the build directory.

                                          YveauxY Offline
                                          YveauxY Offline
                                          Yveaux
                                          Mod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #54

                                          @hek said:

                                          Can't find any map-file anywhere in the build directory.

                                          I think Arduino does not enable it by default. You either have to add generation to the build-parameters in platform.txt, or generate it afterwards .

                                          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular