Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. MySensors 1.4 Released

MySensors 1.4 Released

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
72 Posts 19 Posters 28.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • epierreE epierre

    @hek In what case should I use the ack ?

    hekH Offline
    hekH Offline
    hek
    Admin
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @epierre

    If you really want to make sure your sensor data has reached the gateway (or the other way around).

    In the vera plugin the state isn't changed until ack comes back from actuator. So user get instant feedback if there is some problem in communication (=nothing updates in GUI).

    BulldogLowellB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hekH hek

      @epierre

      If you really want to make sure your sensor data has reached the gateway (or the other way around).

      In the vera plugin the state isn't changed until ack comes back from actuator. So user get instant feedback if there is some problem in communication (=nothing updates in GUI).

      BulldogLowellB Offline
      BulldogLowellB Offline
      BulldogLowell
      Contest Winner
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      @hek

      Congratulations

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hekH Offline
        hekH Offline
        hek
        Admin
        wrote on last edited by hek
        #34

        ###1.4 update 1 released

        NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

        • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
        • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
        • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
        • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
        • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
        • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
        • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.
        RJ_MakeR T 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • epierreE Offline
          epierreE Offline
          epierre
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #35
          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mikeones
            wrote on last edited by
            #36

            @hek I am having an issue assigning a node ID since the last update. I have cleared the eprom in one of my nodes and I am trying to assign a node id of 1 via the serial monitor on the GW. I am sending "255;255;3;0;4;1" in response to the node ID request of "255;255;3;0;3;".

            This is the console log from the node with debug enabled.

            send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
            read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1:0
            new parent=0, d=1
            req node id
            send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=ok:
            read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
            id=49
            sensor started, id 49
            send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
            send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
            

            Here is the console log from the GW.

            0;0;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
            255;255;3;0;3;
            49;255;0;0;17;1.4
            49;255;3;0;6;0
            

            What I don't understand is why the node would get assigned ID "49" when I sent "1" as the new node ID. Should the node get an ID of "1" or "49" for the command below?

            255;255;3;0;4;1
            
            hekH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M mikeones

              @hek I am having an issue assigning a node ID since the last update. I have cleared the eprom in one of my nodes and I am trying to assign a node id of 1 via the serial monitor on the GW. I am sending "255;255;3;0;4;1" in response to the node ID request of "255;255;3;0;3;".

              This is the console log from the node with debug enabled.

              send: 255-255-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
              read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1:0
              new parent=0, d=1
              req node id
              send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=ok:
              read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
              id=49
              sensor started, id 49
              send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
              send: 49-49-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
              

              Here is the console log from the GW.

              0;0;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
              255;255;3;0;3;
              49;255;0;0;17;1.4
              49;255;3;0;6;0
              

              What I don't understand is why the node would get assigned ID "49" when I sent "1" as the new node ID. Should the node get an ID of "1" or "49" for the command below?

              255;255;3;0;4;1
              
              hekH Offline
              hekH Offline
              hek
              Admin
              wrote on last edited by
              #37

              @mikeones

              Darn, yes, you are so right. The getByte fix affected the node-id functionality. Please update again (MySensor.cpp) and report back.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                mikeones
                wrote on last edited by mikeones
                #38

                @hek After updating, I have tested this via the serial monitor and it seems ok.

                send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
                id=1
                

                When I send this string via a (ago) controller, the node sets an id of 0 again. Do you see any issue with this string format?

                255;255;3;0;4;1
                

                Serial monitor output. Does "l=0:" indicate there was an issue with the payload?

                send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=0:
                id=0
                
                hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M mikeones

                  @hek After updating, I have tested this via the serial monitor and it seems ok.

                  send: 255-255-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                  read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
                  id=1
                  

                  When I send this string via a (ago) controller, the node sets an id of 0 again. Do you see any issue with this string format?

                  255;255;3;0;4;1
                  

                  Serial monitor output. Does "l=0:" indicate there was an issue with the payload?

                  send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                  read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=0:
                  id=0
                  
                  hekH Offline
                  hekH Offline
                  hek
                  Admin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  @mikeones

                  Hmm. I wonder which control characters Argcontrol sends ( \n and/or \r ). It could be that Vera sends both. I'll have to check when I get home.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mikeones
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #40

                    @hek

                    It appears sending "255;255;3;0;4;1\r\n" fixes my issue.

                    send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                    read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
                    id=1
                    sensor started, id 1
                    
                    hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M mikeones

                      @hek

                      It appears sending "255;255;3;0;4;1\r\n" fixes my issue.

                      send: 255-255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,st=fail:
                      read: 0-0-255 s=255,c=3,t=4,pt=0,l=1:1
                      id=1
                      sensor started, id 1
                      
                      hekH Offline
                      hekH Offline
                      hek
                      Admin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      @mikeones

                      Ok thanks. I will make this more robust. It should be ok to skip the carriage return character.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mikeones
                        wrote on last edited by mikeones
                        #42

                        What does st=fail represent? Is that stating the ack failed or sending failed? Would this error show up for all messages if debug is enabled on the sensor node and not the gateway.? Maybe this is a non issue? I am trying to confirm if gw.getConfig and gw.requestTime requests are reaching the GW since they don't seem to be set consistently in my environment.

                        sensor started, id 3
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=fail:1.4
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=fail:0
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=8,st=ok:Humidity
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.0
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=0,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=3,st=fail:1.4
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=1,c=0,t=6,pt=0,l=3,st=fail:1.4
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:25.8
                        T: 25.80
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:50.4
                        H: 50.40
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=1,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:25.8
                        T: 25.80
                        send: 3-3-0-0 s=0,c=1,t=1,pt=7,l=5,st=fail:50.4
                        H: 50.40
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • hekH hek

                          ###1.4 update 1 released

                          NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

                          • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
                          • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
                          • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
                          • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
                          • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
                          • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
                          • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.
                          RJ_MakeR Offline
                          RJ_MakeR Offline
                          RJ_Make
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #43

                          @hek said:> ###1.4 update 1 released

                          NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

                          • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
                          • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
                          • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
                          • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
                          • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
                          • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
                          • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.

                          Was this release supposed to fix the C to F conversion problem I've been having? I just updated and problem persists for me.

                          2014-09-08_12-28-44.png

                          2014-09-08_12-29-11.png

                          RJ_Make

                          hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

                            @hek said:> ###1.4 update 1 released

                            NOTE: This release does not require you to update all nodes . Nothing has changed in protocols.

                            • All outgoing messages from gateway included a newline character. This has now been fixed.
                            • The msg.getByte() wrongfully used atoi() conversion if payload was of string type.
                            • The getByte-bug caused problems when receiving Metric/Imperial settings from controller.
                            • A new sleep-method added to allow wake-up on both external interrupts.
                            • A new example BinarySwitchSleepSensor showing the new sleep function (thanks @Anticimex).
                            • Library code (RF24) reduced by 624 bytes (thanks @Damme)
                            • Many people has reported powering problems when using amplified version of the NRF-chip on their gateway. The Arduino Nanos 3v3 output does not seem to be sufficient for PA_MAX. The radio needs to be feeded separately with a stable 3v3 to work. Defaulting gateway PA-level to LOW now and if you are using a vanilla radio on gateway you can switch back to MAX in your MyConfig.h.

                            Was this release supposed to fix the C to F conversion problem I've been having? I just updated and problem persists for me.

                            2014-09-08_12-28-44.png

                            2014-09-08_12-29-11.png

                            hekH Offline
                            hekH Offline
                            hek
                            Admin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #44

                            @ServiceXp
                            Think I found the config problem. No wonder it didn't work. Please download and try again.

                            @mikeones
                            You should now be able to omit carriage return now.
                            The fail you're seeing is for the inter-node-ack.
                            Just verified requesting time from controller and it seems to work fine here (using the example sketch).

                            RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • YveauxY Offline
                              YveauxY Offline
                              Yveaux
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #45

                              @hek When MySensors has no parent, or fails to contact parent for a number of times, the findParentNode() method is entered.
                              This sends a broadcast (ignoring the result) and then waits at most 2 seconds for a response.
                              When this response doesn't come, the sensor just carries on as if the parent has been found, sending messages until again a number of times it failed to contact the parent.

                              Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                              http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                              hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • YveauxY Yveaux

                                @hek When MySensors has no parent, or fails to contact parent for a number of times, the findParentNode() method is entered.
                                This sends a broadcast (ignoring the result) and then waits at most 2 seconds for a response.
                                When this response doesn't come, the sensor just carries on as if the parent has been found, sending messages until again a number of times it failed to contact the parent.

                                Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                                hekH Offline
                                hekH Offline
                                hek
                                Admin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #46

                                @Yveaux said:

                                Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                                Blocking is as you say a bad idea for battery sensors (1.3 had this problem resulting in drained batteries).

                                How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                                YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • hekH Offline
                                  hekH Offline
                                  hek
                                  Admin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @Yveaux

                                  BTW. Do you have any idea why this happens?

                                  http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/347/1-4-error-compiling-with-pinchangeint-h-library-file/5

                                  I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                                  YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • hekH hek

                                    @Yveaux said:

                                    Shouldn't findParentNode() either block until the parent has been found (maybe not desirable for battery based nodes) or only reset the failedTransmissions counter when a succesful response from the parent has been received?

                                    Blocking is as you say a bad idea for battery sensors (1.3 had this problem resulting in drained batteries).

                                    How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                                    YveauxY Offline
                                    YveauxY Offline
                                    Yveaux
                                    Mod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @hek said:

                                    How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                                    Just thinking out aloud:

                                    • Don't reset failedTransmissions in findParentNode()
                                    • Reset failedTransmissions only when a new parent has been found
                                    • In sendRoute() first perform findParentNode() when failedTransmissions > SEARCH_FAILURES
                                    • When succesful (failedTransmissions == 0) perform sendWrite()

                                    This will always first try to find a parent when none has been found yet, before trying to send the message.
                                    If it fails, the send of the message will fail and the (battery powered) sensor will just carry on as if the message has been send, and sleep the sensor as usual.
                                    Just sending to a known-bad parent node should be avoided at all times.

                                    http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                    hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • YveauxY Yveaux

                                      @hek said:

                                      How would it help to reset failedTransmissions?

                                      Just thinking out aloud:

                                      • Don't reset failedTransmissions in findParentNode()
                                      • Reset failedTransmissions only when a new parent has been found
                                      • In sendRoute() first perform findParentNode() when failedTransmissions > SEARCH_FAILURES
                                      • When succesful (failedTransmissions == 0) perform sendWrite()

                                      This will always first try to find a parent when none has been found yet, before trying to send the message.
                                      If it fails, the send of the message will fail and the (battery powered) sensor will just carry on as if the message has been send, and sleep the sensor as usual.
                                      Just sending to a known-bad parent node should be avoided at all times.

                                      hekH Offline
                                      hekH Offline
                                      hek
                                      Admin
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @Yveaux

                                      Sounds good. Go for it!

                                      YveauxY 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • hekH hek

                                        @Yveaux

                                        Sounds good. Go for it!

                                        YveauxY Offline
                                        YveauxY Offline
                                        Yveaux
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @hek ;-)

                                        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hekH hek

                                          @Yveaux

                                          BTW. Do you have any idea why this happens?

                                          http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/347/1-4-error-compiling-with-pinchangeint-h-library-file/5

                                          I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                                          YveauxY Offline
                                          YveauxY Offline
                                          Yveaux
                                          Mod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #51

                                          @hek said:

                                          I can't explain why linker includes things from MyGateway.cpp when compiling sensor examples.

                                          Compiler & linker seem to be configured correctly in 1.5.7 (see hardware\arduino\avr\patform.txt)
                                          Did you have a look at the map-file? What exactly is included from the MyGateway.cpp file?

                                          http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                                          hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          7

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular