Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD

MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
20 Posts 2 Posters 2.7k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L LuFi

    Yes, i did read that documentation.

    So for encryption you prefer the atsha204a (hardware encryption) in combination with the rfm69 (433/868/915) Mhz radio ?

    Typically, the encryption should work via the NRF2401 (2.4 Ghz) module though?
    And you have already used it?

    I am always ready to look for the error first with me ;-)

    P.S.:+1: Many thx for your Support

    Regards

    LuFi

    AnticimexA Offline
    AnticimexA Offline
    Anticimex
    Contest Winner
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @LuFi no, atsha204a is for signing. Nrf24 has no hw encryption support. Rfm69 has. I use nrf24 with software encryption for my tests. And if you use the simple password option, you get software based signing and software based encryption on all hw (except rfm69 based nodes).

    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      LuFi
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      All right, thank you. I'll look what I do wrong.

      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L LuFi

        All right, thank you. I'll look what I do wrong.

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        @LuFi there is constant action on the development branch. It could be that something grew over a critical threshold for atmga328p based gateways with the simple signing option enabled. You could try to sift through log using git bisect if you have an older known good version. Signing and personalization has not been touched for some time. I have not tested any signing features since my last signing commit. You could start with 59337b19fe2280e3d375a5e70156c75379d18196

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          LuFi
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          You are fully right, i tested again with the Version from 7 of June.
          And now i'am able to see messages on node and Gateway.
          Also was it be possible to enable MY_DEBUG.

          How i need to register the node now ?

          Gateway:

          0;255;3;0;9;0 MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGAS-X,VER=2.2.0-beta
          0;255;3;0;9;32 TSM:INIT
          0;255;3;0;9;34 TSF:WUR:MS=0
          0;255;3;0;9;44 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
          0;255;3;0;9;47 TSM:INIT:GW MODE
          0;255;3;0;9;49 TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
          0;255;3;0;9;53 MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
          0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
          0;255;0;0;18;2.2.0-beta
          0;255;3;0;9;57 MCO:BGN:STP
          0;255;3;0;9;64 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
          0;255;3;0;9;7947 TSF:MSG:READ,100-69-67,s=243,c=6,t=27,pt=5,l=25,sg=0:205739666
          0;255;3;0;9;7954 !TSF:MSG:PVER,0=2
          0;255;3;0;9;7958 TSF:MSG:READ,156-86-188,s=209,c=3,t=10,pt=2,l=19,sg=0:896
          0;255;3;0;9;7964 !TSF:MSG:PVER,3=2
          0;255;3;0;9;8240 TSF:MSG:READ,84-13-13,s=195,c=6,t=239,pt=0,l=24,sg=1:⸮⸮⸮⸮|x`
          0;255;3;0;9;8247 !TSF:MSG:PVER,0=2
          0;255;3;0;9;8251 TSF:MSG:READ,108-183-170,s=192,c=4,t=37,pt=3,l=15,sg=1:44342
          0;255;3;0;9;8258 !TSF:MSG:PVER,1=2
          0;255;3;0;9;24365 TSF:MSG:READ,68-108-243,s=208,c=0,t=182,pt=6,l=18,sg=1:0468A782773E75481B000000000000000000
          0;255;3;0;9;24374 TSF:MSG:REL MSG
          0;255;3;0;9;24378 !TSF:RTE:243 UNKNOWN
          0;255;3;0;9;24430 !TSF:MSG:SEND,68-0-243-243,s=208,c=0,t=182,pt=6,l=18,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:0468A782773E75481B000000000000000000
          0;255;3;0;9;24442 TSF:MSG:READ,12-221-80,s=37,c=1,t=70,pt=0,l=14,sg=1:⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮
          0;255;3;0;9;24450 !TSF:MSG:PVER,1=2
          0;255;3;0;9;24677 TSF:MSG:READ,27-236-160,s=96,c=4,t=229,pt=4,l=25,sg=0:1384774534
          0;255;3;0;9;24685 !TSF:MSG:PVER,3=2
          0;255;3;0;9;24689 TSF:MSG:READ,242-199-50,s=75,c=5,t=246,pt=2,l=25,sg=0:421
          0;255;3;0;9;24695 TSF:MSG:REL MSG
          0;255;3;0;9;24699 !TSF:RTE:50 UNKNOWN
          0;255;3;0;9;24752 !TSF:MSG:SEND,242-0-50-50,s=75,c=5,t=246,pt=2,l=31,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:421
          

          Node:

          0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNONAS-X,VER=2.2.0-beta
          34 TSM:INIT
          36 TSF:WUR:MS=0
          45 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
          47 TSF:SID:OK,ID=102
          49 TSM:FPAR
          92 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
          489 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
          495 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
          2101 TSM:FPAR:OK
          2101 TSM:ID
          2103 TSM:ID:OK
          2105 TSM:UPL
          2109 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
          2119 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
          2125 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
          2129 TSM:UPL:OK
          2131 TSM:READY:ID=102,PAR=0,DIS=1
          2134 MCO:BGN:STP
          6148 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          6150 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          6299 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          6307 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
          6338 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:<NONCE>
          6533 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:27
          6541 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          10547 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          10549 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          10553 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
          10708 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          14721 MCO:SLP:MS=1000,SMS=0,I1=0,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
          14727 TSF:TDI:TSL
          14729 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
          14731 TSF:TRI:TSB
          14733 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
          14737 MCO:SLP:MS=600000,SMS=1,I1=1,M1=1,I2=0,M2=1
          14747 TSF:M⸮G:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
          14770 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
          14968 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=32,pt=5,l=4,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:500
          15480 TSF:TDI:TSL
          

          Regards

          LuFi

          AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L LuFi

            You are fully right, i tested again with the Version from 7 of June.
            And now i'am able to see messages on node and Gateway.
            Also was it be possible to enable MY_DEBUG.

            How i need to register the node now ?

            Gateway:

            0;255;3;0;9;0 MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGAS-X,VER=2.2.0-beta
            0;255;3;0;9;32 TSM:INIT
            0;255;3;0;9;34 TSF:WUR:MS=0
            0;255;3;0;9;44 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
            0;255;3;0;9;47 TSM:INIT:GW MODE
            0;255;3;0;9;49 TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
            0;255;3;0;9;53 MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
            0;255;3;0;14;Gateway startup complete.
            0;255;0;0;18;2.2.0-beta
            0;255;3;0;9;57 MCO:BGN:STP
            0;255;3;0;9;64 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
            0;255;3;0;9;7947 TSF:MSG:READ,100-69-67,s=243,c=6,t=27,pt=5,l=25,sg=0:205739666
            0;255;3;0;9;7954 !TSF:MSG:PVER,0=2
            0;255;3;0;9;7958 TSF:MSG:READ,156-86-188,s=209,c=3,t=10,pt=2,l=19,sg=0:896
            0;255;3;0;9;7964 !TSF:MSG:PVER,3=2
            0;255;3;0;9;8240 TSF:MSG:READ,84-13-13,s=195,c=6,t=239,pt=0,l=24,sg=1:⸮⸮⸮⸮|x`
            0;255;3;0;9;8247 !TSF:MSG:PVER,0=2
            0;255;3;0;9;8251 TSF:MSG:READ,108-183-170,s=192,c=4,t=37,pt=3,l=15,sg=1:44342
            0;255;3;0;9;8258 !TSF:MSG:PVER,1=2
            0;255;3;0;9;24365 TSF:MSG:READ,68-108-243,s=208,c=0,t=182,pt=6,l=18,sg=1:0468A782773E75481B000000000000000000
            0;255;3;0;9;24374 TSF:MSG:REL MSG
            0;255;3;0;9;24378 !TSF:RTE:243 UNKNOWN
            0;255;3;0;9;24430 !TSF:MSG:SEND,68-0-243-243,s=208,c=0,t=182,pt=6,l=18,sg=1,ft=0,st=NACK:0468A782773E75481B000000000000000000
            0;255;3;0;9;24442 TSF:MSG:READ,12-221-80,s=37,c=1,t=70,pt=0,l=14,sg=1:⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮⸮
            0;255;3;0;9;24450 !TSF:MSG:PVER,1=2
            0;255;3;0;9;24677 TSF:MSG:READ,27-236-160,s=96,c=4,t=229,pt=4,l=25,sg=0:1384774534
            0;255;3;0;9;24685 !TSF:MSG:PVER,3=2
            0;255;3;0;9;24689 TSF:MSG:READ,242-199-50,s=75,c=5,t=246,pt=2,l=25,sg=0:421
            0;255;3;0;9;24695 TSF:MSG:REL MSG
            0;255;3;0;9;24699 !TSF:RTE:50 UNKNOWN
            0;255;3;0;9;24752 !TSF:MSG:SEND,242-0-50-50,s=75,c=5,t=246,pt=2,l=31,sg=0,ft=0,st=NACK:421
            

            Node:

            0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNONAS-X,VER=2.2.0-beta
            34 TSM:INIT
            36 TSF:WUR:MS=0
            45 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
            47 TSF:SID:OK,ID=102
            49 TSM:FPAR
            92 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
            489 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
            495 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
            2101 TSM:FPAR:OK
            2101 TSM:ID
            2103 TSM:ID:OK
            2105 TSM:UPL
            2109 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
            2119 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
            2125 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
            2129 TSM:UPL:OK
            2131 TSM:READY:ID=102,PAR=0,DIS=1
            2134 MCO:BGN:STP
            6148 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            6150 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            6299 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            6307 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
            6338 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=0:<NONCE>
            6533 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:27
            6541 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            10547 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            10549 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            10553 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
            10708 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            14721 MCO:SLP:MS=1000,SMS=0,I1=0,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
            14727 TSF:TDI:TSL
            14729 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
            14731 TSF:TRI:TSB
            14733 !MCO:SND:NODE NOT REG
            14737 MCO:SLP:MS=600000,SMS=1,I1=1,M1=1,I2=0,M2=1
            14747 TSF:M⸮G:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=16,pt=0,l=0,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:
            14770 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-102,s=255,c=3,t=17,pt=6,l=25,sg=1:<NONCE>
            14968 TSF:MSG:SEND,102-102-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=32,pt=5,l=4,sg=1,ft=0,st=OK:500
            15480 TSF:TDI:TSL
            

            Regards

            LuFi

            AnticimexA Offline
            AnticimexA Offline
            Anticimex
            Contest Winner
            wrote on last edited by Anticimex
            #14

            @LuFi you get a lot of NACKs. Have you checked your radio power supply etc? Many threads on the forum about radio issues. It is not a signing issue.

            Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              LuFi
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Both are PA Radios with Antenna, and on both i added an 47uf Capacitor.

              What i do not understand is the Node not registerd Messge.

              LuFi

              AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L LuFi

                Both are PA Radios with Antenna, and on both i added an 47uf Capacitor.

                What i do not understand is the Node not registerd Messge.

                LuFi

                AnticimexA Offline
                AnticimexA Offline
                Anticimex
                Contest Winner
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                @LuFi I am not an expert on those messages, I suggest you use the log parser on the homepage as I said earlier.
                That said, I suspect they are there because your GW cannot get any messages through to the node, all SEND:s are NACKed. And it also looks like node and GW disasgree on protocol versions, at least that is what I think !TSF:MSG:PVER,1=2 means.

                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  LuFi
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Oh, yes. But this happens since i first updated the gateway while the node was sending Data based on latest dev Version.

                  After that i updated the Node.

                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L LuFi

                    Oh, yes. But this happens since i first updated the gateway while the node was sending Data based on latest dev Version.

                    After that i updated the Node.

                    AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    @LuFi it is well known that sending full sized payloads (as you do when signing is enabled) puts a strain on the radio that nrf24 radios have trouble handling.
                    It could also be some bug on development branch present in the commit you use which has been fixed in a later commit. I also see that there are indications that your gw is configured as a repeater. I don't know if that has anything to do with it. I don't think it is supported to have a gw as a repeater. It at least makes no sense. But I could be wrong about that.
                    You could try the latest but without debugging and see if anything comes through that way, with and without signing.

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      LuFi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      I used the default Gateway sample Code.
                      I will change this.

                      Many thx for Support !

                      Regards

                      LuFi

                      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L LuFi

                        I used the default Gateway sample Code.
                        I will change this.

                        Many thx for Support !

                        Regards

                        LuFi

                        AnticimexA Offline
                        AnticimexA Offline
                        Anticimex
                        Contest Winner
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        @LuFi you are welcome. Hope it works out.

                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        11

                        Online

                        11.7k

                        Users

                        11.2k

                        Topics

                        113.1k

                        Posts


                        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • MySensors
                        • OpenHardware.io
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular