Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.

Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
59 Posts 5 Posters 6.0k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDie
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    It sounds like you're happy already. Good luck!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gohanG Offline
      gohanG Offline
      gohan
      Mod
      wrote on last edited by
      #45

      If I remeber well, passive node is used when you have a very tiny node, with low memory that only send data one way, like RF433

      alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • gohanG gohan

        If I remeber well, passive node is used when you have a very tiny node, with low memory that only send data one way, like RF433

        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1A Offline
        alexsh1
        wrote on last edited by
        #46

        @gohan OK, but I think the key here is to get consumption down to something meaningful - 5uA or something. The only down side when not using a passive node is that if GW is disconnected, node would not go to sleep, but will be trying to connect to GW. define MY_TRANSPORT_UPLINK_CHECK_DISABLED would disable the node sending more than MY_TRANSPORT_STATE_RETRIES times message

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG Offline
          gohanG Offline
          gohan
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #47

          even if it drains the battery when the GW is dead, it is no big deal as you just have to wait for some sunlight

          alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG gohan

            even if it drains the battery when the GW is dead, it is no big deal as you just have to wait for some sunlight

            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1
            wrote on last edited by
            #48

            @gohan True! I was more talking about super small nodes working on CR1632. I have a few of these.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1
              wrote on last edited by
              #49

              Another interesting set of graphs (voltage scale is wrong - please ignore):

              This is with signing:
              0_1523542625334_Screenshot (44).png
              This is without signing:
              0_1523542649796_Screenshot (45).png

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gohanG Offline
                gohanG Offline
                gohan
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #50

                It looks a little irregular to me, doesn't it?

                alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gohanG gohan

                  It looks a little irregular to me, doesn't it?

                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1A Offline
                  alexsh1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #51

                  @gohan Well, the point is that signing does take more tx time. Therefore, voltage does drop upto 0.2-0.3V.

                  I am not sure about irregularities though

                  AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gohanG Offline
                    gohanG Offline
                    gohan
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #52

                    Maybe it has to do with the harvesting chip. My graph looks like a sawtooth from day to day.

                    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDie
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #53

                      For this type of comparison, I think you're better off charging up the supercap in a standardized way and then running with the solar panel disconnected. Otherwise, how recently and how long the supercap was charged to full capacity can affect the rate of discharge.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gohanG gohan

                        Maybe it has to do with the harvesting chip. My graph looks like a sawtooth from day to day.

                        alexsh1A Offline
                        alexsh1A Offline
                        alexsh1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #54

                        @gohan there is no harversting - this is just 30F cap connected to a node.
                        I have two setups:

                        1. BQ25570 + 2x10F supercaps in series and a small solar panel connected to a node. This is an excellent setup which can last for days without recharging
                        2. 30F cap connected directly (initially I tried it via mcp1640) to a different node. The above graphs are from this setup.
                          I am re-measuring it them right now as the code was wrong.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alexsh1A alexsh1

                          @gohan Well, the point is that signing does take more tx time. Therefore, voltage does drop upto 0.2-0.3V.

                          I am not sure about irregularities though

                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #55

                          @alexsh1 with signing you also get message bursts. Not only is the max size data transmitted for every signed message, two more messages are exchanged; a nonce request (small) and a nonce (big).

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • AnticimexA Anticimex

                            @alexsh1 with signing you also get message bursts. Not only is the max size data transmitted for every signed message, two more messages are exchanged; a nonce request (small) and a nonce (big).

                            alexsh1A Offline
                            alexsh1A Offline
                            alexsh1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #56

                            @anticimex said in Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.:

                            @alexsh1 with signing you also get message bursts.

                            That's clearly visible on the graph.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alexsh1A alexsh1

                              I have got my hands on 30F 2.7V supercapacitor.

                              0_1523113648078_30FSupercap.jpg

                              With it was charged for the first time, it only lasted sending 2583 times (1 time a minute voltage and an 20ms LED pulse and then sleeping; sleeping consumption is 4-5uA). The number is a bit disappointing. It is however connected via boost MCP1640 to provide the node with a stable 3.3V. I may try to get the supercapacitor connected directly to the node to see if I can extract more packets.

                              alexsh1A Offline
                              alexsh1A Offline
                              alexsh1
                              wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                              #57

                              @alexsh1 said in Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.:

                              I have got my hands on 30F 2.7V supercapacitor.

                              0_1523113648078_30FSupercap.jpg

                              With it was charged for the first time, it only lasted sending 2583 times (1 time a minute voltage and an 20ms LED pulse and then sleeping; sleeping consumption is 4-5uA). The number is a bit disappointing. It is however connected via boost MCP1640 to provide the node with a stable 3.3V. I may try to get the supercapacitor connected directly to the node to see if I can extract more packets.

                              Supercap connected directly to the node stopped working at 2V.
                              I got about 8949 packets (10ms LED and sent voltage every minute. No signing). It has been running about 6 days.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gohanG Offline
                                gohanG Offline
                                gohan
                                Mod
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #58

                                basically you got 3 times packets sent without the booster?

                                alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gohanG gohan

                                  basically you got 3 times packets sent without the booster?

                                  alexsh1A Offline
                                  alexsh1A Offline
                                  alexsh1
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #59

                                  @gohan That's correct and I am sure the result is not final

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  16

                                  Online

                                  11.7k

                                  Users

                                  11.2k

                                  Topics

                                  113.1k

                                  Posts


                                  Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • MySensors
                                  • OpenHardware.io
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular