Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. [security] Introducing signing support to MySensors

[security] Introducing signing support to MySensors

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
security
491 Posts 48 Posters 334.0k Views 30 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AnticimexA Anticimex

    @alexsh1 Looks like RF performance was significantly improved by that change.

    alexsh1A Offline
    alexsh1A Offline
    alexsh1
    wrote on last edited by alexsh1
    #399

    @Anticimex It seems to me that 90% of all issues is actually RF.
    Very annoying!

    Thanks for your help!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1
      wrote on last edited by
      #400

      I am using latest beta (2.2.0b). Does anyone know what this means in the log:

      !SGN:NCE:GEN
      

      I think this is related to signing

      AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • alexsh1A alexsh1

        I am using latest beta (2.2.0b). Does anyone know what this means in the log:

        !SGN:NCE:GEN
        

        I think this is related to signing

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #401

        @alexsh1 https://ci.mysensors.org/job/Verifiers/job/MySensors/job/development/Doxygen_HTML/group__MySigningDebugMessages.html

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alexsh1A alexsh1

          I am using latest beta (2.2.0b). Does anyone know what this means in the log:

          !SGN:NCE:GEN
          

          I think this is related to signing

          AnticimexA Offline
          AnticimexA Offline
          Anticimex
          Contest Winner
          wrote on last edited by
          #402

          @alexsh1 to be more specific; the backend failed to generate a nonce. If you use the soft backed, it did not initialize properly (and you should have a log entry for that failure as well).
          If using atsha204a, it either failed init like described above, or it failed to communicate properly (which should also be visible in other failures in the log)

          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

          alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • AnticimexA Anticimex

            @alexsh1 to be more specific; the backend failed to generate a nonce. If you use the soft backed, it did not initialize properly (and you should have a log entry for that failure as well).
            If using atsha204a, it either failed init like described above, or it failed to communicate properly (which should also be visible in other failures in the log)

            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1A Offline
            alexsh1
            wrote on last edited by alexsh1
            #403

            @Anticimex Spot on -> there was a mistake :

            #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 3
            

            and should have been

            #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 17
            

            I was wondering why nonce was all zeros...

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alexsh1A alexsh1

              @Anticimex Spot on -> there was a mistake :

              #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 3
              

              and should have been

              #define MY_SIGNING_ATSHA204_PIN 17
              

              I was wondering why nonce was all zeros...

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #404

              @alexsh1 excellent. Signing won't work well without proper communication with the chip :)
              I considered just hanging if that happened but decided it was a bit too harsh and might disguise the problem in case UART debug isn't enabled.

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • magpernM Offline
                magpernM Offline
                magpern
                wrote on last edited by magpern
                #405

                I cannot get my china USB to Serial device to work with the arduino boards, so I cannot program the board to run the personalization. As a work around a use a Arduino Uno board as the "USB to Serial" and now I can upload the sketch and the personalizer writes to serial output fine at 115200 baud.
                But, when it wants me to press SPACE, it responds with "Unexpected answer. Skipping lock."

                I tried an other sketch that does Serial.read() and echos back the result. It does not work at 115200 but works at 9600 baud. At 9600 I get char 32 back as SPACE, but 160 or 130 or 254 at 115200. Maybe the Uno board cannot handle 115200?

                So, question: Can the personalizer sketch be changed to use 9600 (or something slower than 115200)? I tried to change the Serial.begin(115200) to 9600, but it is still 115200.

                (of course, I can alter the code to bypass the press SPACE to press any key, but I want to get to the bottom with the problem)

                AnticimexA mfalkviddM 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • magpernM magpern

                  I cannot get my china USB to Serial device to work with the arduino boards, so I cannot program the board to run the personalization. As a work around a use a Arduino Uno board as the "USB to Serial" and now I can upload the sketch and the personalizer writes to serial output fine at 115200 baud.
                  But, when it wants me to press SPACE, it responds with "Unexpected answer. Skipping lock."

                  I tried an other sketch that does Serial.read() and echos back the result. It does not work at 115200 but works at 9600 baud. At 9600 I get char 32 back as SPACE, but 160 or 130 or 254 at 115200. Maybe the Uno board cannot handle 115200?

                  So, question: Can the personalizer sketch be changed to use 9600 (or something slower than 115200)? I tried to change the Serial.begin(115200) to 9600, but it is still 115200.

                  (of course, I can alter the code to bypass the press SPACE to press any key, but I want to get to the bottom with the problem)

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #406

                  @Magnus-Pernemark
                  Question 1: so you run stable release or beta?
                  Answer 1: yes you can change baud rate but it is handled differently between stable and beta.

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • magpernM magpern

                    I cannot get my china USB to Serial device to work with the arduino boards, so I cannot program the board to run the personalization. As a work around a use a Arduino Uno board as the "USB to Serial" and now I can upload the sketch and the personalizer writes to serial output fine at 115200 baud.
                    But, when it wants me to press SPACE, it responds with "Unexpected answer. Skipping lock."

                    I tried an other sketch that does Serial.read() and echos back the result. It does not work at 115200 but works at 9600 baud. At 9600 I get char 32 back as SPACE, but 160 or 130 or 254 at 115200. Maybe the Uno board cannot handle 115200?

                    So, question: Can the personalizer sketch be changed to use 9600 (or something slower than 115200)? I tried to change the Serial.begin(115200) to 9600, but it is still 115200.

                    (of course, I can alter the code to bypass the press SPACE to press any key, but I want to get to the bottom with the problem)

                    AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #407

                    @Magnus-Pernemark there is a configuration switch to disable UART verification you can use

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • magpernM magpern

                      I cannot get my china USB to Serial device to work with the arduino boards, so I cannot program the board to run the personalization. As a work around a use a Arduino Uno board as the "USB to Serial" and now I can upload the sketch and the personalizer writes to serial output fine at 115200 baud.
                      But, when it wants me to press SPACE, it responds with "Unexpected answer. Skipping lock."

                      I tried an other sketch that does Serial.read() and echos back the result. It does not work at 115200 but works at 9600 baud. At 9600 I get char 32 back as SPACE, but 160 or 130 or 254 at 115200. Maybe the Uno board cannot handle 115200?

                      So, question: Can the personalizer sketch be changed to use 9600 (or something slower than 115200)? I tried to change the Serial.begin(115200) to 9600, but it is still 115200.

                      (of course, I can alter the code to bypass the press SPACE to press any key, but I want to get to the bottom with the problem)

                      mfalkviddM Online
                      mfalkviddM Online
                      mfalkvidd
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #408

                      @Magnus-Pernemark which version are you using?
                      The development version from github supports

                      #define MY_BAUD_RATE 9600
                      

                      at the start of the sketch.

                      The 2.1.1 version has

                      Serial.begin(115200);
                      

                      in the sketch. Just change that.

                      magpernM 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                        @Magnus-Pernemark which version are you using?
                        The development version from github supports

                        #define MY_BAUD_RATE 9600
                        

                        at the start of the sketch.

                        The 2.1.1 version has

                        Serial.begin(115200);
                        

                        in the sketch. Just change that.

                        magpernM Offline
                        magpernM Offline
                        magpern
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #409

                        @Anticimex I am so not familiar with the arduino/mysensors development yet, but I guess I use 2.1.1, since i used "Sketch / Include Library / Manage Library" and it had 2.1.1

                        @mfalkvidd Since I have the line Serial.begin(115200) I assume it is 2.1.1, but changing it to 9600 and uploading the sketch does nothing. I still need to open serial window with 115200, else I just see garbage as output from the mini pro.

                        I will try the development version and see if that helps.

                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • magpernM magpern

                          @Anticimex I am so not familiar with the arduino/mysensors development yet, but I guess I use 2.1.1, since i used "Sketch / Include Library / Manage Library" and it had 2.1.1

                          @mfalkvidd Since I have the line Serial.begin(115200) I assume it is 2.1.1, but changing it to 9600 and uploading the sketch does nothing. I still need to open serial window with 115200, else I just see garbage as output from the mini pro.

                          I will try the development version and see if that helps.

                          AnticimexA Offline
                          AnticimexA Offline
                          Anticimex
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #410

                          @Magnus-Pernemark or you can just disable the confirmation altogether. Just define SKIP_UART_CONFIRMATION

                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                          magpernM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • AnticimexA Anticimex

                            @Magnus-Pernemark or you can just disable the confirmation altogether. Just define SKIP_UART_CONFIRMATION

                            magpernM Offline
                            magpernM Offline
                            magpern
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #411

                            @Anticimex hehe, true... but I am a developer by trade, and bypassing something just because it would be easier, feels so wrong. I might end up doing so, but I'll give it some more tries first. Problems are a very good way to learn, and in arduino development I am a total noobie, more used to C# and the .NET world.

                            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • magpernM magpern

                              @Anticimex hehe, true... but I am a developer by trade, and bypassing something just because it would be easier, feels so wrong. I might end up doing so, but I'll give it some more tries first. Problems are a very good way to learn, and in arduino development I am a total noobie, more used to C# and the .NET world.

                              AnticimexA Offline
                              AnticimexA Offline
                              Anticimex
                              Contest Winner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #412

                              @Magnus-Pernemark as a developer by trade, you should be bold enough to use the beta releases and live on the bleeding edge then ;)

                              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                              magpernM 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                @Magnus-Pernemark as a developer by trade, you should be bold enough to use the beta releases and live on the bleeding edge then ;)

                                magpernM Offline
                                magpernM Offline
                                magpern
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #413

                                @Anticimex I'll start living on the edge immediately. It's the way to go!
                                I switched to develop and could change the band rate, however develop version skips UART confirmation by default so I never had the problem there. Never needed to send any keys. Got the chip configured atleast.
                                I kind of started in the wrong end - designed my own pcbs, then start to know the development environment.
                                But I'll figure it out... just takes time.. thanks for the help!!

                                AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • magpernM magpern

                                  @Anticimex I'll start living on the edge immediately. It's the way to go!
                                  I switched to develop and could change the band rate, however develop version skips UART confirmation by default so I never had the problem there. Never needed to send any keys. Got the chip configured atleast.
                                  I kind of started in the wrong end - designed my own pcbs, then start to know the development environment.
                                  But I'll figure it out... just takes time.. thanks for the help!!

                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  Anticimex
                                  Contest Winner
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #414

                                  @Magnus-Pernemark that's correct. Or, it is correct if you follow the "guided mode". If you wanna be hardcore, you drop the guided defines and set the individual flags according to your specific needs, and then you get to enable (or more precisely, not disable) UART confirmation (in case you want to test it).

                                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gusG Offline
                                    gusG Offline
                                    gus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #415

                                    Hi!
                                    Starting to learn signing. I use a parallell system (with another channel) where I could test signing before I went on my live system. For now I just use soft signing, it works perfect!

                                    Now, I just want to test a node (motionsensor) that include:

                                    #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
                                    

                                    The gateway has no signing feature (it has not gone thru personalition process) In my head, the node shall reject to connect to this gateway, but after the signing fails, it start to send data to the gateway. Did I miss something here?

                                    Debug text on node:

                                    0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS--,VER=2.2.0-beta
                                    49 SGN:PER:OK
                                    83 SGN:INI:BND OK
                                    83 TSM:INIT
                                    86 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                                    94 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                                    96 TSM:INIT:STATID=101
                                    98 TSF:SID:OK,ID=101
                                    100 TSM:FPAR
                                    102 SGN:SGN:NREQ=255
                                    139 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                                    684 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
                                    690 SGN:SKP:MSG CMD=3,TYPE=8
                                    692 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
                                    2148 TSM:FPAR:OK
                                    2148 TSM:ID
                                    2150 TSM:ID:OK
                                    2152 TSM:UPL
                                    2154 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2158 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                                    2168 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                                    2174 SGN:SKP:MSG CMD=3,TYPE=25
                                    2177 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                                    2181 TSM:UPL:OK
                                    2183 TSM:READY:ID=101,PAR=0,DIS=1
                                    2187 SGN:PRE:SGN REQ
                                    2189 SGN:PRE:WHI NREQ
                                    2191 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2195 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
                                    2203 SGN:PRE:XMT,TO=0
                                    2205 SGN:PRE:WAIT GW
                                    2207 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
                                    2213 SGN:SKP:MSG CMD=3,TYPE=15
                                    2217 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2222 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=10,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2.2.0-beta
                                    2232 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2234 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                                    2248 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:M
                                    2254 !SGN:VER:NSG
                                    2256 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                                    2258 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2263 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=13,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:Motion Sensor
                                    2273 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2277 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1.0
                                    2285 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2289 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=1,c=0,t=1,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                                    2295 MCO:REG:REQ
                                    2297 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2301 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2
                                    2310 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                                    2316 !SGN:VER:NSG
                                    2318 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                                    2322 MCO:BGN:STP
                                    2324 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                                    1
                                    2326 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2330 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=0,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                                    2338 MCO:SLP:MS=120000,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                                    2344 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                    2347 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                                    2349 TSF:TRI:TSB
                                    0
                                    2351 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                    2355 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=0,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                                    2363 MCO:SLP:MS=120000,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                                    2367 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                    
                                    
                                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gusG gus

                                      Hi!
                                      Starting to learn signing. I use a parallell system (with another channel) where I could test signing before I went on my live system. For now I just use soft signing, it works perfect!

                                      Now, I just want to test a node (motionsensor) that include:

                                      #define MY_SIGNING_REQUEST_SIGNATURES
                                      

                                      The gateway has no signing feature (it has not gone thru personalition process) In my head, the node shall reject to connect to this gateway, but after the signing fails, it start to send data to the gateway. Did I miss something here?

                                      Debug text on node:

                                      0 MCO:BGN:INIT NODE,CP=RNNNAS--,VER=2.2.0-beta
                                      49 SGN:PER:OK
                                      83 SGN:INI:BND OK
                                      83 TSM:INIT
                                      86 TSF:WUR:MS=0
                                      94 TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                                      96 TSM:INIT:STATID=101
                                      98 TSF:SID:OK,ID=101
                                      100 TSM:FPAR
                                      102 SGN:SGN:NREQ=255
                                      139 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                                      684 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
                                      690 SGN:SKP:MSG CMD=3,TYPE=8
                                      692 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
                                      2148 TSM:FPAR:OK
                                      2148 TSM:ID
                                      2150 TSM:ID:OK
                                      2152 TSM:UPL
                                      2154 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2158 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                                      2168 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                                      2174 SGN:SKP:MSG CMD=3,TYPE=25
                                      2177 TSF:MSG:PONG RECV,HP=1
                                      2181 TSM:UPL:OK
                                      2183 TSM:READY:ID=101,PAR=0,DIS=1
                                      2187 SGN:PRE:SGN REQ
                                      2189 SGN:PRE:WHI NREQ
                                      2191 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2195 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0101
                                      2203 SGN:PRE:XMT,TO=0
                                      2205 SGN:PRE:WAIT GW
                                      2207 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
                                      2213 SGN:SKP:MSG CMD=3,TYPE=15
                                      2217 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2222 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=10,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2.2.0-beta
                                      2232 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2234 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                                      2248 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:M
                                      2254 !SGN:VER:NSG
                                      2256 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                                      2258 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2263 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=13,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:Motion Sensor
                                      2273 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2277 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1.0
                                      2285 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2289 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=1,c=0,t=1,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                                      2295 MCO:REG:REQ
                                      2297 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2301 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2
                                      2310 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-101,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                                      2316 !SGN:VER:NSG
                                      2318 !TSF:MSG:SIGN VERIFY FAIL
                                      2322 MCO:BGN:STP
                                      2324 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                                      1
                                      2326 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2330 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=0,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                                      2338 MCO:SLP:MS=120000,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                                      2344 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                      2347 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                                      2349 TSF:TRI:TSB
                                      0
                                      2351 SGN:SGN:NREQ=0
                                      2355 TSF:MSG:SEND,101-101-0-0,s=1,c=1,t=16,pt=0,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                                      2363 MCO:SLP:MS=120000,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                                      2367 TSF:TDI:TSL
                                      
                                      
                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      Anticimex
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                                      #416

                                      @gus what is it that you think is not working? Just because your node require signatures does not prevent the node from sending data to your gateway which does not require signatures.
                                      And as you can see in the log you get errors about missing signatures (and hence failed verifications) so it looks as expected to me.
                                      You could try to paste your log into the log parser to get a easier to read output.

                                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                      gusG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • AnticimexA Anticimex

                                        @gus what is it that you think is not working? Just because your node require signatures does not prevent the node from sending data to your gateway which does not require signatures.
                                        And as you can see in the log you get errors about missing signatures (and hence failed verifications) so it looks as expected to me.
                                        You could try to paste your log into the log parser to get a easier to read output.

                                        gusG Offline
                                        gusG Offline
                                        gus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #417

                                        @Anticimex Ok, just thought when signing failed, the node was halted :confused:
                                        So that control mechanism need to be implemented in my sketch then?
                                        Great, I will use the log parser!

                                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gusG gus

                                          @Anticimex Ok, just thought when signing failed, the node was halted :confused:
                                          So that control mechanism need to be implemented in my sketch then?
                                          Great, I will use the log parser!

                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          Anticimex
                                          Contest Winner
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #418

                                          @gus no, when signing verification fail, the message is just discarded

                                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                          gusG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          19

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular