Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Multiple mqtt gateways via nrlf24l01 secure/unsecure
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

Multiple mqtt gateways via nrlf24l01 secure/unsecure

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
5 Posts 3 Posters 46 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • YoshuY Offline
    YoshuY Offline
    Yoshu
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Re: Multiple Gateways

    If possible what would be required to se up two separate mysensors gateways?
    I want to have two seperate networks

    • One using the full security and signing for some security crital equipment.
      -A second to be unsecure for non security critical components allowing quick easy setup of these nodes
      I will use the mqtt gateway or (ethernet gateway if the openhab binding become functional again ) and the nrlf24l01 radios on an arduino
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • electrikE Offline
      electrikE Offline
      electrik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Yes it is possible, as long as you use different channels for the communication so the gateways won't be confused. I have two gateways running also (I am using static node IDs), one with nrf24 and the other one with rfm69.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • YoshuY Offline
        YoshuY Offline
        Yoshu
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hi Thanks for the reply!

        If I used only nrf24l01 radios, (as I have plenty laying around) if I defined a different channel (and node Id) for the second network. Would this prevent confusion between the two networks rather then using a different radio type (rfm69)?

        • @def MY_RF24_CHANNEL
        • @brief RF channel for the sensor net, 0-125.
        • Frequence: 2400 Mhz - 2525 Mhz Channels: 126
        • http://www.mysensors.org/radio/nRF24L01Plus.pdf
        • 0 => 2400 Mhz (RF24 channel 1)
        • 1 => 2401 Mhz (RF24 channel 2)
        • 76 => 2476 Mhz (RF24 channel 77)
        • 83 => 2483 Mhz (RF24 channel 84)
        • 124 => 2524 Mhz (RF24 channel 125)
        • 125 => 2525 Mhz (RF24 channel 126)
        • In some countries there might be limitations, in Germany for example only the range 2400,0 - 2483,5 Mhz is allowed
        • http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Frequenzen/Allgemeinzuteilungen/2013_10_WLAN_2,4GHz_pdf.pdf
          */
          #ifndef MY_RF24_CHANNEL
          #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 76
          #endif
        mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • YoshuY Yoshu

          Hi Thanks for the reply!

          If I used only nrf24l01 radios, (as I have plenty laying around) if I defined a different channel (and node Id) for the second network. Would this prevent confusion between the two networks rather then using a different radio type (rfm69)?

          • @def MY_RF24_CHANNEL
          • @brief RF channel for the sensor net, 0-125.
          • Frequence: 2400 Mhz - 2525 Mhz Channels: 126
          • http://www.mysensors.org/radio/nRF24L01Plus.pdf
          • 0 => 2400 Mhz (RF24 channel 1)
          • 1 => 2401 Mhz (RF24 channel 2)
          • 76 => 2476 Mhz (RF24 channel 77)
          • 83 => 2483 Mhz (RF24 channel 84)
          • 124 => 2524 Mhz (RF24 channel 125)
          • 125 => 2525 Mhz (RF24 channel 126)
          • In some countries there might be limitations, in Germany for example only the range 2400,0 - 2483,5 Mhz is allowed
          • http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Frequenzen/Allgemeinzuteilungen/2013_10_WLAN_2,4GHz_pdf.pdf
            */
            #ifndef MY_RF24_CHANNEL
            #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 76
            #endif
          mfalkviddM Offline
          mfalkviddM Offline
          mfalkvidd
          Mod
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Yoshu yes, different channel is sufficient. Maybe a few channels away from the default/other network to avoid crosstalk.

          No need to use different nodeID.

          YoshuY 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

            @Yoshu yes, different channel is sufficient. Maybe a few channels away from the default/other network to avoid crosstalk.

            No need to use different nodeID.

            YoshuY Offline
            YoshuY Offline
            Yoshu
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @mfalkvidd Cheers! This project will keep me occupied for my 2 week hotel isolation stay.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            8

            Online

            11.7k

            Users

            11.2k

            Topics

            113.0k

            Posts


            Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • OpenHardware.io
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular