Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. OpenHAB
  4. openHAB 2.0 binding
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

openHAB 2.0 binding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHAB
534 Posts 88 Posters 479.5k Views 99 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TimO

    @gonzalonal I have no idea why this should happen. The binding isn't that smart to do something like that. I've done a complete fresh installation on 21.06. with the nightly build from cloudbees and don't see this issue.

    @dakky Do you see disconnection messages in the log? The binding already tries to detect a disconnect and tries to reestablish the connection when an ethernet gateway is used. Currently the time within a reconnect would be successful is very small due to sleep limitations of threads in OH2 bindings.

    G Offline
    G Offline
    gonzalonal
    wrote on last edited by
    #241

    Thanks @TimO . I will try to make a progressive installation and try to figure out what is causing this behavior.

    I'll let you know if I find out.
    Have you read my previous message?
    Regards

    @gonzalonal said:

    Thanks @TimO. Now I get it.
    What do you think about having two gateways, one with NRF radio and the other one with RFM69 radio?

    Will the binding support both gateways simultaneusly with no issues?

    Another question..Will you support HearbeatRequest for the development branch?

    Thanks, regards.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gonzalonal

      Thanks @TimO . I will try to make a progressive installation and try to figure out what is causing this behavior.

      I'll let you know if I find out.
      Have you read my previous message?
      Regards

      @gonzalonal said:

      Thanks @TimO. Now I get it.
      What do you think about having two gateways, one with NRF radio and the other one with RFM69 radio?

      Will the binding support both gateways simultaneusly with no issues?

      Another question..Will you support HearbeatRequest for the development branch?

      Thanks, regards.

      T Offline
      T Offline
      TimO
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #242

      @gonzalonal : I just downloaded the recent version of the binding again and I don't see this behaviour.

      I hope both gateways will work together! This is was the idea. I've not tested it in combination with RFM69 but I don't see a reason why this should not work! :-)

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T TimO

        @gonzalonal : I just downloaded the recent version of the binding again and I don't see this behaviour.

        I hope both gateways will work together! This is was the idea. I've not tested it in combination with RFM69 but I don't see a reason why this should not work! :-)

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gonzalonal
        wrote on last edited by
        #243

        @TimO I have solved my probles using OH2 Beta3 and the last release of the MyS binding.

        It seems that the problem is only reproduced with the last release of OH2 from Cloudbees. At least withe the release 372.

        Have you tryed it?

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          kolaf
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #244

          After a full computer crash (overheated CPU, CPU fan stopped working) I'm trying to set everything up on a new computer. Using the latest openhab2 beta 3 I'm having issues with using this binding. Specifically, whenever I add my standard thing configuration I get a buffer overflow in openhab which results in a core dump.

          I have downloaded latest binding from the link at github, but that did not affect it. In addition to this binding I am using the zwave binding and rfxcom binding. All three connect to devices through serial ports, although I I'm not sure if they do it in the same way.

          You may recall that I have had trouble using these three bindings together earlier, but for some reason things worked out and it has worked quite reliably since then.

          I'm not sure which information from the system crash is useful, but if there is anything I can send you to help you figure out what happens, let me know. Also, I realise that this problem might not be related directly with mysensors, but maybe with the serial library used (I saw a reference to NVJavaSeria in the stack trace after the crash.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Offline
            K Offline
            kolaf
            Hero Member
            wrote on last edited by
            #245

            Hello again.

            As a temporary fix I found a simple TCP/serial Gateway Python snippet that handles the connection to the serial mysensors device and provides a TCP interface to openhab. Switching the binding of aggression from serial to socket and having it connected to this software gateway removes the core dump issue. This confirms my suspicions that the issues are with the serial port library.

            It works okay as a workaround until someone figure something out :-)

            If anyone else is having issues with the serial connection, this is the by then snippet I found and used:

            https://github.com/pyserial/pyserial/blob/master/examples/tcp_serial_redirect.py

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              TimO
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by
              #246

              @kolaf I'm only using one serial gw and that is running rock stable within OH2. My last update was 22 days ago, so maybe it is time for an update again. :-)

              I recently changed my job, so I'm a little low in time at the moment. :-(

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Fredrik JönssonF Offline
                Fredrik JönssonF Offline
                Fredrik Jönsson
                wrote on last edited by
                #247

                From what i can see this binding is not part of the official bindings for openHAB. Are there any plans to try to get this as a official binding for openhab?

                /Fredrik

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Fredrik JönssonF Fredrik Jönsson

                  From what i can see this binding is not part of the official bindings for openHAB. Are there any plans to try to get this as a official binding for openhab?

                  /Fredrik

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  TimO
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #248

                  @Fredrik-Jönsson : Yes, this is on my to do list with high priority. I've done some preparations but need to contact the OH2 developers before creating a PR.

                  Fredrik JönssonF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G gonzalonal

                    @TimO I have solved my probles using OH2 Beta3 and the last release of the MyS binding.

                    It seems that the problem is only reproduced with the last release of OH2 from Cloudbees. At least withe the release 372.

                    Have you tryed it?

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TimO
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #249

                    @gonzalonal :

                    I've found the time to sync my repository with upstream master OH2. Now I do see the behaviour you described above. The status of every item is send out at startup.

                    Using the current package of the MySensors binding from today with an older version of OH2 does work fine. But my development environment now throws out the status of all things.

                    Are you using any other bindings? Are they working fine?At first I need to find out if this problem only occures with the MySensors binding or if there is a bug. ;-)

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T TimO

                      @gonzalonal :

                      I've found the time to sync my repository with upstream master OH2. Now I do see the behaviour you described above. The status of every item is send out at startup.

                      Using the current package of the MySensors binding from today with an older version of OH2 does work fine. But my development environment now throws out the status of all things.

                      Are you using any other bindings? Are they working fine?At first I need to find out if this problem only occures with the MySensors binding or if there is a bug. ;-)

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gonzalonal
                      wrote on last edited by gonzalonal
                      #250

                      Hi @TimO.
                      I am using several bindings in my OH2 setup.
                      As I am using MyS and OH2 in a productive and sensible environement I could try out how the other bindings behaved. As soon as I detect the error I had to rollback my setup. So I can't really tell is there is a bug with the latest snapshot of OH2 or if it is something more specific of MyS binding.

                      I am currently using OH2 Beta 3 with no issues.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T TimO

                        @Fredrik-Jönsson : Yes, this is on my to do list with high priority. I've done some preparations but need to contact the OH2 developers before creating a PR.

                        Fredrik JönssonF Offline
                        Fredrik JönssonF Offline
                        Fredrik Jönsson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #251

                        @TimO That sounds great, i will start trying this out. By reading this thread it sounds like it works quite well..

                        Thanks for all you time you put into this binding.

                        /Fredrik

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G gonzalonal

                          Hi @TimO.
                          I am using several bindings in my OH2 setup.
                          As I am using MyS and OH2 in a productive and sensible environement I could try out how the other bindings behaved. As soon as I detect the error I had to rollback my setup. So I can't really tell is there is a bug with the latest snapshot of OH2 or if it is something more specific of MyS binding.

                          I am currently using OH2 Beta 3 with no issues.

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          TimO
                          Hero Member
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #252

                          @gonzalonal : I've found the reason for this beaviour and fixed the bug.

                          @andreacioni contributed a PR to the code that includes a channel for the last update of a thing. If you want to know at which time there was a message from a node you may subscribe to the "lastupdate" channel.

                          Example:

                          DateTime   lastUpdate01 "Last Update" { channel="mysensors:baro:gateway:baro01:lastupdate" }
                          

                          Thanks @andreacioni !

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T TimO

                            @gonzalonal : I've found the reason for this beaviour and fixed the bug.

                            @andreacioni contributed a PR to the code that includes a channel for the last update of a thing. If you want to know at which time there was a message from a node you may subscribe to the "lastupdate" channel.

                            Example:

                            DateTime   lastUpdate01 "Last Update" { channel="mysensors:baro:gateway:baro01:lastupdate" }
                            

                            Thanks @andreacioni !

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            gonzalonal
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #253

                            Hi @TimO .
                            I have tried the binding and the issue is fixed as you have said.
                            I have been looking at the logs, and found the following regarding last update feature:

                            15:52:11.580 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;253;1;0;2;1
                            15:52:11.583 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.581-0300
                            15:52:11.585 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.584-0300
                            15:52:11.590 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.588-0300
                            15:52:11.594 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.592-0300
                            15:52:11.598 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.597-0300
                            15:52:11.602 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.601-0300
                            15:52:11.606 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.604-0300
                            15:52:11.609 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.608-0300
                            15:52:11.613 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.611-0300
                            15:52:11.618 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.616-0300
                            15:52:11.624 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.622-0300
                            15:52:11.628 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.626-0300
                            

                            Is this the expected behavior? It seems to me that we should have only one "Setting last.." for value updated.
                            Maybe is my setup. Can someone check this.
                            Thanks!

                            andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G gonzalonal

                              Hi @TimO .
                              I have tried the binding and the issue is fixed as you have said.
                              I have been looking at the logs, and found the following regarding last update feature:

                              15:52:11.580 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.protocol.MySensorsReader] - 1;253;1;0;2;1
                              15:52:11.583 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.581-0300
                              15:52:11.585 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.584-0300
                              15:52:11.590 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.588-0300
                              15:52:11.594 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.592-0300
                              15:52:11.598 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.597-0300
                              15:52:11.602 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.601-0300
                              15:52:11.606 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.604-0300
                              15:52:11.609 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.608-0300
                              15:52:11.613 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.611-0300
                              15:52:11.618 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.616-0300
                              15:52:11.624 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.622-0300
                              15:52:11.628 [DEBUG] [g.mysensors.handler.MySensorsHandler] - Setting last update for node 1 to 2016-08-08T15:52:11.626-0300
                              

                              Is this the expected behavior? It seems to me that we should have only one "Setting last.." for value updated.
                              Maybe is my setup. Can someone check this.
                              Thanks!

                              andreacioniA Offline
                              andreacioniA Offline
                              andreacioni
                              wrote on last edited by andreacioni
                              #254

                              Hi @gonzalonal

                              The implementation of the binding create a thing for every channel of a single node. So the solution result is what you can see in the log. We can do a little bit more to prevent a single message to fire every 'lastupdate' channel of every thing that have the same node ID. But I think it is not a good idea.

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • andreacioniA andreacioni

                                Hi @gonzalonal

                                The implementation of the binding create a thing for every channel of a single node. So the solution result is what you can see in the log. We can do a little bit more to prevent a single message to fire every 'lastupdate' channel of every thing that have the same node ID. But I think it is not a good idea.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                gonzalonal
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #255

                                Got it!
                                Thanks for your quick reply @andreacioni

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  Gustafsson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #256

                                  Hi guys,

                                  I've tried to add my ethernet gateway to openhab2 through but I just cant get the Online-status on, it. Do I have to do anything else than just adding it into the things file?

                                  andreacioniA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G Gustafsson

                                    Hi guys,

                                    I've tried to add my ethernet gateway to openhab2 through but I just cant get the Online-status on, it. Do I have to do anything else than just adding it into the things file?

                                    andreacioniA Offline
                                    andreacioniA Offline
                                    andreacioni
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #257

                                    Hi @Gustafsson,

                                    Have you read the readme? Readme . Probably you have not configured things? See the readme on how to do that :)

                                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • andreacioniA andreacioni

                                      Hi @Gustafsson,

                                      Have you read the readme? Readme . Probably you have not configured things? See the readme on how to do that :)

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      Gustafsson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #258

                                      @andreacioni That's exactly what I did.

                                      Things

                                      Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ]
                                              door    frontDoor       [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                      }
                                      

                                      Items

                                      Text    frontDoor       "Door"  { channel="mysensors:door:gateway:frontDoor:tripped" }
                                      

                                      Sitemap

                                      sitemap MySitemap label="Main Menu" {
                                              Frame {
                                                      Text item=frontDoor
                                              }
                                      }
                                      

                                      This is how everything looks like now. I get the door item green in habmin but still the red cross on the gateway. The door item dosn't show me if it's open or closed.

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G Gustafsson

                                        @andreacioni That's exactly what I did.

                                        Things

                                        Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ]
                                                door    frontDoor       [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                        }
                                        

                                        Items

                                        Text    frontDoor       "Door"  { channel="mysensors:door:gateway:frontDoor:tripped" }
                                        

                                        Sitemap

                                        sitemap MySitemap label="Main Menu" {
                                                Frame {
                                                        Text item=frontDoor
                                                }
                                        }
                                        

                                        This is how everything looks like now. I get the door item green in habmin but still the red cross on the gateway. The door item dosn't show me if it's open or closed.

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        gonzalonal
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #259

                                        @Gustafsson

                                        You are missing the opening brackets

                                        Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ] {
                                        door frontDoor [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                        }

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G gonzalonal

                                          @Gustafsson

                                          You are missing the opening brackets

                                          Bridge mysensors:bridge-eth:gateway [ ipAddress="192.168.254.228", tcpPort=5003, sendDelay=200 ] {
                                          door frontDoor [ nodeId="102", childId="4" ]
                                          }

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          Gustafsson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #260

                                          @gonzalonal sorry, I missed it when I pasted in my code here, so there is in fact a { in my code. Any other ideas?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          8

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular