Skip to content
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Efficiency of Voltage Boosters
  • Getting Started
  • Controller
  • Build
  • Hardware
  • Download/API
  • Forum
  • Store

Efficiency of Voltage Boosters

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
47 Posts 14 Posters 34.2k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    a-lurker
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    (Note resurrected post) @therik I used to think that you could run the MySensor stuff just using two batteries connected directly to the processor but came to the conclusion that's a bad idea. First, to get the best out of some sensors running them off a fixed Voltage is preferable.

    Secondly two alkaline AAs supply about 2.4V to 2.6V (during most of their operational life time) and the 3.3V CPUs have the brownout set to 2.7 V (typ). So if you use this method, you need to ensure the brown out detector (BOD) fuses are set to disable the brownout detection completely. Doing it in software is not sufficient, as the BOD is automatically re-enabled as soon as the CPU comes out of sleep.

    The CPU spec shows the maximum Frequency vs. VCC line for between 1.8 V and 2.7 V. The line equation is Vmin = (F-k)/m, where from the spec k = -8 and m =6.6666 so for 8 MHz: Vmin = 2.4V Towards the end of their life two AAs will go below this Voltage. What happens then? With an inverter you can monitor the battery Voltage and trigger an alarm when it gets really, really low.

    Also with the inverter you can squeeze every last ounce of juice out of them and everything will still work.

    @axillent Totally agree about charging batteries - probably more hassle than it's worth. Depending on the application, just solar charging a super capacitor could work well. Imagine a temperature sensor reporting back every fifteen minutes and it consumes say 30ma at 3V3 for 0.5 seconds while it reports and we use one of these:

    https://www.sparkfun.com/products/746

    time roughly = (C/I)*(Vmax-Vmin)

    so say we use say a Vmax of 2V and Vmin of 1V and use that to power an inverter to 3V3. Also assume we draw 100 mA at 1V, which is about 30 mA at 3V3 for the CPU and radio. We have a ten Farad cap but it's a bit out of tolerance, so it's actually only five Farads.

    (5/0.1)*(2-1)= 50 seconds

    That allows for one hundred 0.5 second samples to sent before the cap is "flat", which is 25 hours if sent every 15 minutes. So it looks like it could work OK. Should work for @HeK in Sweden where the shortest day is only about 7 hours long, with the main problem is keeping snow off the solar panel.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      a-lurker
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Just adding to the above. It does make sense to run the radio directly off the battery (1V9 to 3V6) but two problems remain: the CPU brownout detector and the minimum Voltage required to run the CPU, which is 2V4 at 8 MHz.. See also:

      http://forum.micasaverde.com/index.php/topic,20078.msg164716.html#msg164716

      The radio must have a supply Voltage of 2V7 to 3V3 if the input signals are greater than 3V6. you would encounter this when running a CPU at 5V, which hopefully you wouldn't be doing on a battery powered set up.

      BSoftB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A a-lurker

        Just adding to the above. It does make sense to run the radio directly off the battery (1V9 to 3V6) but two problems remain: the CPU brownout detector and the minimum Voltage required to run the CPU, which is 2V4 at 8 MHz.. See also:

        http://forum.micasaverde.com/index.php/topic,20078.msg164716.html#msg164716

        The radio must have a supply Voltage of 2V7 to 3V3 if the input signals are greater than 3V6. you would encounter this when running a CPU at 5V, which hopefully you wouldn't be doing on a battery powered set up.

        BSoftB Offline
        BSoftB Offline
        BSoft
        wrote on last edited by BSoft
        #23

        @a-lurker If brownout detection is disabled we could power atmega328p with 1.9V minimum, but frequency of operation will decrease.
        I know you get it right, i just want to standout that there is no problem of operation at low voltage if we know 2 thinks:

        • disable BOD (no soft)
        • we get lower frequency
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Z Offline
          Z Offline
          Zeph
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by Zeph
          #24

          There are a few subjects in this valuable thread.

          One is the best type of capacitor to use across the power and ground of the nRF24L01+ module. I'm very interested in that. My earliest tests were frustrating, I was busy trying to figure out what was wrong with the software (before I came here by the way), but it turned out to be power and/or too long SPI wires. A cap across the power at the module made a great difference. So I'm tending towards always doing that in the future, and I'd like to know what kind to stock up on.

          I'm seeing some opinion that tantalum would be better, some that it has too high ESR. So a low ESR electrolytic (probable aluminum polymer) would be better. Or maybe a ceramic is better still, and cheap.

          Are there any recommended caps below 50 cents in small quantities? Is there anything from eBay or Tayda or are those all junk for our purposes? If not, Digikey or Mouser is OK, tho the minimum shipping raises the effective cost per unit substantially for small quantities (and I may not have a large order to combine it with for months).

          There is a variation of this question which is about caps for use with noisy boost converters. I am thinking that a good cap for that purpose would also be a good cap for use with the tranceiver in general - low ESR and with an appropriate value, with low leakage. (In another case the noise of a sensor or actuator might be what needs to be filtered out rather than a boost voltage converter).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • marceltrapmanM Offline
            marceltrapmanM Offline
            marceltrapman
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by marceltrapman
            #25

            I changed the capacitor that I used for my radios from 4.7 mF into 220 mF and I can only say thank you for this discussion, it is really immediately much better :)

            Fulltime Servoy Developer
            Parttime Moderator MySensors board

            I use Domoticz as controller for Z-Wave and MySensors (previously Indigo and OpenHAB).
            I have a FABtotum to print cases.

            DammeD axillentA 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • marceltrapmanM marceltrapman

              I changed the capacitor that I used for my radios from 4.7 mF into 220 mF and I can only say thank you for this discussion, it is really immediately much better :)

              DammeD Offline
              DammeD Offline
              Damme
              Code Contributor
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              @marceltrapman mF as in milli or micro? :) µF I suppose..

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • marceltrapmanM marceltrapman

                I changed the capacitor that I used for my radios from 4.7 mF into 220 mF and I can only say thank you for this discussion, it is really immediately much better :)

                axillentA Offline
                axillentA Offline
                axillent
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by axillent
                #27

                @marceltrapman there is a convention to mark micro by µ if you have a special symbol or by u if you don't
                this way 220 micro Farad should be market as 220 µF or 220 uF

                @Damme it is a good point)

                sense and drive

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • marceltrapmanM Offline
                  marceltrapmanM Offline
                  marceltrapman
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  @Damme @axillent Oh my, so much to learn :)
                  Thank you guys, I mean 220 uF...

                  Fulltime Servoy Developer
                  Parttime Moderator MySensors board

                  I use Domoticz as controller for Z-Wave and MySensors (previously Indigo and OpenHAB).
                  I have a FABtotum to print cases.

                  DammeD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • marceltrapmanM marceltrapman

                    @Damme @axillent Oh my, so much to learn :)
                    Thank you guys, I mean 220 uF...

                    DammeD Offline
                    DammeD Offline
                    Damme
                    Code Contributor
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    @marceltrapman You're welcome :)

                    I tried 220µF myself now (EU keyoard can write µ with alt-gr+m or (ctrl+alt m if alt+gr is missing))

                    much better, I first used 33µF and then 100µF but 220µF is a winner.
                    The wierd thing is that I cant measure any difference with 33µF or 220µF with my oscilloscope. but with no cap at all my arduino nano 3.3v looks like this: (AC coupled)

                    NewFile0.png
                    And wit cap (33µF or 220µF makes no difference at all..) But it works much better..
                    NewFile4.png

                    YveauxY Z 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • DammeD Damme

                      @marceltrapman You're welcome :)

                      I tried 220µF myself now (EU keyoard can write µ with alt-gr+m or (ctrl+alt m if alt+gr is missing))

                      much better, I first used 33µF and then 100µF but 220µF is a winner.
                      The wierd thing is that I cant measure any difference with 33µF or 220µF with my oscilloscope. but with no cap at all my arduino nano 3.3v looks like this: (AC coupled)

                      NewFile0.png
                      And wit cap (33µF or 220µF makes no difference at all..) But it works much better..
                      NewFile4.png

                      YveauxY Offline
                      YveauxY Offline
                      Yveaux
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      @Damme strange, disturbance is around 50hz... Could it be caused by mains supply?

                      http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                      DammeD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • YveauxY Yveaux

                        @Damme strange, disturbance is around 50hz... Could it be caused by mains supply?

                        DammeD Offline
                        DammeD Offline
                        Damme
                        Code Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        @Yveaux I triggerd on transmission.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • marceltrapmanM Offline
                          marceltrapmanM Offline
                          marceltrapman
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          @Yveaux As mentioned I am still learning about this stuff.
                          The question I have right now is, a bit off topic, at which pin do you measure this?
                          Is that simply vcc on the radio?

                          Fulltime Servoy Developer
                          Parttime Moderator MySensors board

                          I use Domoticz as controller for Z-Wave and MySensors (previously Indigo and OpenHAB).
                          I have a FABtotum to print cases.

                          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • marceltrapmanM marceltrapman

                            @Yveaux As mentioned I am still learning about this stuff.
                            The question I have right now is, a bit off topic, at which pin do you measure this?
                            Is that simply vcc on the radio?

                            YveauxY Offline
                            YveauxY Offline
                            Yveaux
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by Yveaux
                            #33

                            @marceltrapman I guess. If you want to measure stability of supply of the nrf then you measure on vcc & gnd of the nrf.

                            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • marceltrapmanM Offline
                              marceltrapmanM Offline
                              marceltrapman
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              @Yveaux :)

                              Fulltime Servoy Developer
                              Parttime Moderator MySensors board

                              I use Domoticz as controller for Z-Wave and MySensors (previously Indigo and OpenHAB).
                              I have a FABtotum to print cases.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DammeD Damme

                                @marceltrapman You're welcome :)

                                I tried 220µF myself now (EU keyoard can write µ with alt-gr+m or (ctrl+alt m if alt+gr is missing))

                                much better, I first used 33µF and then 100µF but 220µF is a winner.
                                The wierd thing is that I cant measure any difference with 33µF or 220µF with my oscilloscope. but with no cap at all my arduino nano 3.3v looks like this: (AC coupled)

                                NewFile0.png
                                And wit cap (33µF or 220µF makes no difference at all..) But it works much better..
                                NewFile4.png

                                Z Offline
                                Z Offline
                                Zeph
                                Hero Member
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                @Damme said:

                                much better, I first used 33µF and then 100µF but 220µF is a winner.
                                The wierd thing is that I cant measure any difference with 33µF or 220µF with my oscilloscope.

                                So I think you are saying that you are not seeing a visual difference (on the o'scope) between 33uF and 220uF, but you are seeing better real world performance with the latter?

                                Do the different capacitors have the same spec's? I'm wondering if the capacity is the only significant change, or if the different values of cap you tested have different specs (eg: ESR) or even diff technology.

                                DammeD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Z Zeph

                                  @Damme said:

                                  much better, I first used 33µF and then 100µF but 220µF is a winner.
                                  The wierd thing is that I cant measure any difference with 33µF or 220µF with my oscilloscope.

                                  So I think you are saying that you are not seeing a visual difference (on the o'scope) between 33uF and 220uF, but you are seeing better real world performance with the latter?

                                  Do the different capacitors have the same spec's? I'm wondering if the capacity is the only significant change, or if the different values of cap you tested have different specs (eg: ESR) or even diff technology.

                                  DammeD Offline
                                  DammeD Offline
                                  Damme
                                  Code Contributor
                                  wrote on last edited by Damme
                                  #36

                                  @Zeph Exacly, I first used 3.3µf and there I see voltage drop. But almost no measurable difference with 33µF or 220µF. But I get less failed transmission with the larger cap.
                                  They are all the same brand (some cheap Chinese unknown (to me) brand, "Chong" (yay!))
                                  All 16v, and all electrolytic. I don't have any ESR meter, thinking of trying to measure it with oscilloscope and function generator.. (Or I'll just bu one :))

                                  I bought them from ebay in a large 1800pcs asorted pack.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    therik
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    New data on the XC9140A331 3.3 V voltage booster. This looks like a nice IC with low quiescent current and an improvement over the stock "china" 3.3 V booster.

                                    XC9140.jpg

                                    This option can be purchased from Digikey for $0.90, with a total bill of materials of $1.34 (in quantity, minus a PCB). It is also a nice size SOT23-5, not too small to hand solder.

                                    Thoughts?

                                    axillentA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T therik

                                      New data on the XC9140A331 3.3 V voltage booster. This looks like a nice IC with low quiescent current and an improvement over the stock "china" 3.3 V booster.

                                      XC9140.jpg

                                      This option can be purchased from Digikey for $0.90, with a total bill of materials of $1.34 (in quantity, minus a PCB). It is also a nice size SOT23-5, not too small to hand solder.

                                      Thoughts?

                                      axillentA Offline
                                      axillentA Offline
                                      axillent
                                      Mod
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      @therik thanks, it is an interesting chip

                                      sense and drive

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Z Offline
                                        Z Offline
                                        Zeph
                                        Hero Member
                                        wrote on last edited by Zeph
                                        #39

                                        @therik

                                        I look forward to a test of the TPS61222 used in the MySensors Battery board - I see the chip on your list and hope you will be checking it.

                                        Felix at lowpowerlab (http://lowpowerlab.com/blog/2014/06/08/powershield-r2-released/) has switched from the TPS61220 to the LTC3525 for stability reasons. That's a 5v chip, tho but maybe there's a related one as a contender.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • DammeD Offline
                                          DammeD Offline
                                          Damme
                                          Code Contributor
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          How do you guys measure <mA accuratly? Using mr Jones's µCurrent?

                                          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          12

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular