Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. What's the best PIR sensor?

What's the best PIR sensor?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
45 Posts 13 Posters 25.9k Views 9 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pyrodetectorP Offline
    pyrodetectorP Offline
    pyrodetector
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    I have published the brochure in which I tested the eleven pyroelectric detectors from different manufacturers, pyroelectric materials, and electrical connections - both parallel and serial. I tested them under the same conditions. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask the questions:)

    NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pyrodetectorP pyrodetector

      I have published the brochure in which I tested the eleven pyroelectric detectors from different manufacturers, pyroelectric materials, and electrical connections - both parallel and serial. I tested them under the same conditions. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask the questions:)

      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      @pyrodetector said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

      I have published the brochure in which I tested the eleven pyroelectric detectors from different manufacturers, pyroelectric materials, and electrical connections - both parallel and serial. I tested them under the same conditions. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask the questions:)

      For the TL;DR, which one did you like the best?

      pyrodetectorP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NeverDieN NeverDie

        @pyrodetector said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

        I have published the brochure in which I tested the eleven pyroelectric detectors from different manufacturers, pyroelectric materials, and electrical connections - both parallel and serial. I tested them under the same conditions. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask the questions:)

        For the TL;DR, which one did you like the best?

        pyrodetectorP Offline
        pyrodetectorP Offline
        pyrodetector
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        @NeverDie said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

        @pyrodetector said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

        I have published the brochure in which I tested the eleven pyroelectric detectors from different manufacturers, pyroelectric materials, and electrical connections - both parallel and serial. I tested them under the same conditions. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask the questions:)

        For the TL;DR, which one did you like the best?

        Dear NeverDie!
        What is "TL;DR", please?
        Every sensor is good for its application. Among a set of sensors the best two sensors or more are those having similar characteristics.

        NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pyrodetectorP pyrodetector

          @NeverDie said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

          @pyrodetector said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

          I have published the brochure in which I tested the eleven pyroelectric detectors from different manufacturers, pyroelectric materials, and electrical connections - both parallel and serial. I tested them under the same conditions. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask the questions:)

          For the TL;DR, which one did you like the best?

          Dear NeverDie!
          What is "TL;DR", please?
          Every sensor is good for its application. Among a set of sensors the best two sensors or more are those having similar characteristics.

          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDie
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by NeverDie
          #36

          @pyrodetector "TL;DR" = "too long; didn't read." Nothing personal. Just a common internet acronym. It means, in effect, "What's the bottom line?"

          pyrodetectorP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            chrisjn52
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            @NeverDie - Just in case you haven't seen them there are a number of TI Reference Designs and Application Notes that you may find useful.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • NeverDieN NeverDie

              @pyrodetector "TL;DR" = "too long; didn't read." Nothing personal. Just a common internet acronym. It means, in effect, "What's the bottom line?"

              pyrodetectorP Offline
              pyrodetectorP Offline
              pyrodetector
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              @NeverDie said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

              @pyrodetector "TL;DR" = "too long; didn't read." Nothing personal. Just a common internet acronym. It means, in effect, "What's the bottom line?"

              Dear @NeverDie Thanks a lot! I am not an experienced user on the internet forums and you help me be getting better.
              In order to say which sensor is the best, one has to determine the criteria. I research the dynamic behavior of pyroelectric detectors. One common rule is true for all pyroelectric detectors: the higher the AC responsivity, the higher the noise, the higher the current consumption, the shorter the transient response. And vice versa. If you want to gain more knowledge on pyroelectric detectors, you can build an experimental setup/bench similar to mine for testing your pyroelectric detectors. I wish anyone had such a bench and we could share the results with one another. Probably, closer to spring, I will test the sensor you mentioned above and publish its transient response here.

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                #39

                At the time I thought the am612 was in a good sweet spot (low price, low power, and "good enough" sensitivity), but technology is constantly improving, and so I'm always interested if anyone knows of something better.

                Also, these days wireless cameras are so cheap that I think the trend is toward combining them with PIR's, so that the cause of the trigger is always documented (well, to the degree it can be).

                Nca78N L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • NeverDieN NeverDie

                  At the time I thought the am612 was in a good sweet spot (low price, low power, and "good enough" sensitivity), but technology is constantly improving, and so I'm always interested if anyone knows of something better.

                  Also, these days wireless cameras are so cheap that I think the trend is toward combining them with PIR's, so that the cause of the trigger is always documented (well, to the degree it can be).

                  Nca78N Offline
                  Nca78N Offline
                  Nca78
                  Hardware Contributor
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  @NeverDie AM612 has been improved with BS612: down to 2.2V instead of 2.7V, and max 11uA working current compared to 14.
                  There's also a HM612 which is supposed to be "long range" and has a higher sensibility, other specs seem to be the same. I've not tested them, not using any pir sensors here it's too hot to be usable :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • NeverDieN NeverDie

                    At the time I thought the am612 was in a good sweet spot (low price, low power, and "good enough" sensitivity), but technology is constantly improving, and so I'm always interested if anyone knows of something better.

                    Also, these days wireless cameras are so cheap that I think the trend is toward combining them with PIR's, so that the cause of the trigger is always documented (well, to the degree it can be).

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    lood29
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    @NeverDie
                    Excelitas PYD1588/1598 are the best I've used, running now for years without a single false alert.
                    Fully integrated, 1.8V and only 3uA

                    nagelcN NeverDieN 2 Replies Last reply
                    2
                    • L lood29

                      @NeverDie
                      Excelitas PYD1588/1598 are the best I've used, running now for years without a single false alert.
                      Fully integrated, 1.8V and only 3uA

                      nagelcN Offline
                      nagelcN Offline
                      nagelc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      @lood29
                      I recently got a PYD1598 sensor up an running. I made a lot of guesses at the settings and would like to hear what you are using. I wound up with:
                      Pulse Detection Mode 0 = signal has to exceed the threshold and change of sign
                      High Pass Filter Freq. 1 = 0.2 Hz
                      Filter Source 0 = PIR (BPF)
                      Window Time 0 = 2 seconds
                      Pulse Counter 0 = 1 pulse
                      Blind Time 2 seconds
                      Threshold = 128

                      I played around with the threshold a little, but didn't get a very good sense of the tradeoff of sensitivity vs false alarms (working in a relatively small room). The 128 seems to work, but wondering if there are better settings.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L lood29

                        @NeverDie
                        Excelitas PYD1588/1598 are the best I've used, running now for years without a single false alert.
                        Fully integrated, 1.8V and only 3uA

                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDie
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        @lood29 said in What's the best PIR sensor?:

                        Excelitas PYD1588/1598

                        What kind of range?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • nagelcN nagelc

                          @lood29
                          I recently got a PYD1598 sensor up an running. I made a lot of guesses at the settings and would like to hear what you are using. I wound up with:
                          Pulse Detection Mode 0 = signal has to exceed the threshold and change of sign
                          High Pass Filter Freq. 1 = 0.2 Hz
                          Filter Source 0 = PIR (BPF)
                          Window Time 0 = 2 seconds
                          Pulse Counter 0 = 1 pulse
                          Blind Time 2 seconds
                          Threshold = 128

                          I played around with the threshold a little, but didn't get a very good sense of the tradeoff of sensitivity vs false alarms (working in a relatively small room). The 128 seems to work, but wondering if there are better settings.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          lood29
                          wrote on last edited by lood29
                          #44

                          @nagelc
                          I kept all setting to default except the maintain window =8s
                          So the SERIN reg is: 0x0031ED10

                          @NeverDie
                          With the fresnel and the wide angle 1598 it's ~ 7m

                          nagelcN 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • L lood29

                            @nagelc
                            I kept all setting to default except the maintain window =8s
                            So the SERIN reg is: 0x0031ED10

                            @NeverDie
                            With the fresnel and the wide angle 1598 it's ~ 7m

                            nagelcN Offline
                            nagelcN Offline
                            nagelc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            @lood29 Interesting. Looks like I can cut the threshold way down. I'll give that a try.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            10

                            Online

                            11.7k

                            Users

                            11.2k

                            Topics

                            113.0k

                            Posts


                            Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • MySensors
                            • OpenHardware.io
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular