Any plan to implement Ethernet GW?
-
hey Martin,
that's correct, those are the 2 items I saw that was little curious about.
The sketch I'm using, while custom, is a mix of different sketches that can be found in the MySensors page.
As you'll see below, each node (which are identical) have all the information (Sketch name, version, etc). And all of them have 4 childs:
- Ambient Humidity
- Ambient Temperature
- Ambient Light
- Movement (Motion Sensor Trip).But I might have something wrong so ... happy to learn! :)
#include <SPI.h> #include <MySensor.h> #include <DHT.h> #define NODE_ID 102 #define SKETCH_NAME "dyaSensor (HTLM) v1.2" #define SKETCH_VERSION "1.2" #define CHILD_ID_HUM 0 #define CHILD_ID_TEMP 1 #define CHILD_ID_LIGHT 2 #define CHILD_ID_MOV 3 #define HUMIDITY_SENSOR_DIGITAL_PIN 4 #define DIGITAL_INPUT_SENSOR 3 // The digital input you attached your motion sensor. (Only 2 and 3 generates interrupt!) #define INTERRUPT DIGITAL_INPUT_SENSOR-2 // Usually the interrupt = pin -2 (on uno/nano anyway) #define LIGHT_SENSOR_ANALOG_PIN 0 #defin TEMP_CORRECTION 2 unsigned long SLEEP_TIME = 1000; // Sleep time between reads (in milliseconds) MySensor gw; DHT dht; float lastTemp; float lastHum; int lastLightLevel; boolean metric = true; //Building Messages MyMessage msgHum(CHILD_ID_HUM, V_HUM); // Initialize humidity message MyMessage msgTemp(CHILD_ID_TEMP, V_TEMP); // Initialize temperature message MyMessage msgLum(CHILD_ID_LIGHT, V_LIGHT_LEVEL); // Initialize Light message MyMessage msgMov(CHILD_ID_MOV, V_TRIPPED); // Initialize motion message void setup() { gw.begin(NULL, NODE_ID, false); dht.setup(HUMIDITY_SENSOR_DIGITAL_PIN); // Send the Sketch Version Information to the Gateway gw.sendSketchInfo(SKETCH_NAME, SKETCH_VERSION); pinMode(DIGITAL_INPUT_SENSOR, INPUT); // sets the motion sensor digital pin as input // Register all sensors to gw (they will be created as child devices) Serial.println("Presenting Humidity Sensor"); gw.present(CHILD_ID_HUM, S_HUM, "Humidity Sensor"); Serial.println("Presenting Temperature Sensor"); gw.present(CHILD_ID_TEMP, S_TEMP, "Temperature Sensor"); Serial.println("Light Level Sensor"); gw.present(CHILD_ID_LIGHT, S_LIGHT_LEVEL, "Light Level Sensor"); Serial.println("Presenting Motion Sensor"); gw.present(CHILD_ID_MOV, S_MOTION, "Motion Sensor"); metric = gw.getConfig().isMetric; } void loop() { // By calling process() you route messages in the background gw.process(); delay(dht.getMinimumSamplingPeriod()); float temperature = dht.getTemperature()-TEMP_CORRECTION; if (isnan(temperature)) { Serial.println("Failed reading temperature from DHT"); } else if (temperature != lastTemp) { lastTemp = temperature; if (!metric) { temperature = dht.toFahrenheit(temperature); } gw.send(msgTemp.set(temperature, 1)); Serial.print("- T: "); Serial.println(temperature); } float humidity = dht.getHumidity(); if (isnan(humidity)) { Serial.println("Failed reading humidity from DHT"); } else if (humidity != lastHum) { lastHum = humidity; gw.send(msgHum.set(humidity, 1)); Serial.print("- H: "); Serial.println(humidity); } int lightLevel = (1023-analogRead(LIGHT_SENSOR_ANALOG_PIN))/10.23; if (lightLevel != lastLightLevel) { lastLightLevel = lightLevel; gw.send(msgLum.set(lightLevel)); Serial.print("- L: "); Serial.println(lightLevel); } // Read digital motion value boolean tripped = digitalRead(DIGITAL_INPUT_SENSOR) == HIGH; gw.send(msgMov.set(tripped?"1":"0")); // Send tripped value to gw Serial.println(tripped?"- Movement Detected":"- No Movement Detected"); gw.sleep(INTERRUPT,CHANGE, SLEEP_TIME); } -
:thumbsup:
When you have time, can you run
git logand tell me the top commit message, so I know which version you are using.Regarding autostart, no I don't think you can use the normal instructions together with the virtualenv. You could write a script, that changes to the virtualenv and starts hass, and run that script at login or similar.
If you don't have another production install of home assistant on the computer, you can skip the virtualenv alltogether and just do:
pip3 install --user "https://github.com/MartinHjelmare/home-assistant/archive/mysensors-tcp-gateway.zip"or if you want to install as root:
sudo pip3 install "https://github.com/MartinHjelmare/home-assistant/archive/mysensors-tcp-gateway.zip"This way you should be able to autostart the usual way, per instructions on the web.
But then if you want to test an update from me, you have to make sure you uninstall everything correctly and manually remove ~/.homeassistant/lib before you install again.
Hey @martinhjelmare
Does the above reply to @drock1985 means that I can do a basic installation as per https://home-assistant.io/
pip3 install homeassistant hass --open-uifollowed by
sudo pip3 install "https://github.com/MartinHjelmare/home-assistant/archive/mysensors-tcp-gateway.zip"and will have a valid testing env without going into all the above steps of creating a virtualenv??
If so I'd rather more this avenue because I can clean up everything with a new installation, install the zip and have a new testing env in minutes :)
-
Hey @martinhjelmare
Does the above reply to @drock1985 means that I can do a basic installation as per https://home-assistant.io/
pip3 install homeassistant hass --open-uifollowed by
sudo pip3 install "https://github.com/MartinHjelmare/home-assistant/archive/mysensors-tcp-gateway.zip"and will have a valid testing env without going into all the above steps of creating a virtualenv??
If so I'd rather more this avenue because I can clean up everything with a new installation, install the zip and have a new testing env in minutes :)
I can't see any big issues with your sketch, just one small:
I guess this is a typo:
#defin TEMP_CORRECTION 2Since your sketch looks ok, I think something must have gone wrong with the communication between node and gateway. Have you been monitoring the comm, with a serial monitor, on the node side for example, to make sure all messages are sent ok?
-
Hey @martinhjelmare
Does the above reply to @drock1985 means that I can do a basic installation as per https://home-assistant.io/
pip3 install homeassistant hass --open-uifollowed by
sudo pip3 install "https://github.com/MartinHjelmare/home-assistant/archive/mysensors-tcp-gateway.zip"and will have a valid testing env without going into all the above steps of creating a virtualenv??
If so I'd rather more this avenue because I can clean up everything with a new installation, install the zip and have a new testing env in minutes :)
The zip file you install from my github account, is the mysensors tcp gateway branch of home-assistant. So you shouldn't install home-assistant first, if you're going to install my branch.
If you don't have any other version of home-assistant that you wish to keep, on the same computer, you can install my branch directly. You just have to make sure you uninstall it and remove
~/.homeassistant/libbefore installing an update from me, if I commit some updates.Yeah, setting up a dev machine can be a hassle the first time, and not so useful if you're not developing with it.
-
I can't see any big issues with your sketch, just one small:
I guess this is a typo:
#defin TEMP_CORRECTION 2Since your sketch looks ok, I think something must have gone wrong with the communication between node and gateway. Have you been monitoring the comm, with a serial monitor, on the node side for example, to make sure all messages are sent ok?
thanks for the hint ... definetly a typo :$
Yes, I'm monitoring the GW with MYSController as my GW is ethernet and I see all messages showing with no issue. But, I'll be happy to review again. :)
-
thanks for the hint ... definetly a typo :$
Yes, I'm monitoring the GW with MYSController as my GW is ethernet and I see all messages showing with no issue. But, I'll be happy to review again. :)
Yes, please start from the beginning:
Remove the persistence file
Start hass
Wait until you see that hass has (:smile:) connected to the gateway
Start a node
Start the next nodeIf you can post the serial log from that here, and also the log from hass, that would be great.
-
Haven't had any issues with the sensors I have on my Dev unit; so far so good.
Are you thinking of releasing the ethernet GW code in this weeks update?
-
Though I'm eager to try, I can't actually launch the Ethernet Gateway branch in a Windows environment. The best error I can provide is the generic
failed to create processon callinghass. Platform is Windows Home Server 2011 running Python 3.5.1. All previous and current release branches of home assistant launch without error.Any thoughts or other steps I can take to debug it further?
-
Haven't had any issues with the sensors I have on my Dev unit; so far so good.
Are you thinking of releasing the ethernet GW code in this weeks update?
Good to hear. Have you tried connecting more than one node to the gateway at the same time?
Unfortunately I don't think it will make this release, cause I won't have time until Sunday, and the release might be finished before that. I will add some updates this weekend that you are welcome to try. After that we should be ready for release.
-
Though I'm eager to try, I can't actually launch the Ethernet Gateway branch in a Windows environment. The best error I can provide is the generic
failed to create processon callinghass. Platform is Windows Home Server 2011 running Python 3.5.1. All previous and current release branches of home assistant launch without error.Any thoughts or other steps I can take to debug it further?
My experience with python on Windows is very limited. How do you normally start home assistant?
-
I typically launch either using
hassorhass --open-uifrom an administrative powershell session. No-go in either of these two cases. -
I typically launch either using
hassorhass --open-uifrom an administrative powershell session. No-go in either of these two cases.Did you install directly from my github branch using pip?
-
Alright, false alarm. Root issue in my case was a faulty environment and/or operator that resulted in binaries being compiled for the wrong platform.
Once corrected, it compiled and launched your branch and connected to the gateway without incident. Next up is experimenting with the nodes and actuators. I'll see if the persistence file can be written to.
-
Alright, false alarm. Root issue in my case was a faulty environment and/or operator that resulted in binaries being compiled for the wrong platform.
Once corrected, it compiled and launched your branch and connected to the gateway without incident. Next up is experimenting with the nodes and actuators. I'll see if the persistence file can be written to.
:thumbsup:
-
Hey @martinhjelmare,
I've been able to do some tests this time.
From a Sensoring standpoint (retreive information from sensors to show in dashboard) works perfetly fine.
I found the issue that I was referring before.
Let's say you have already included a number of nodes and everything is working but for any reason you want to reset and start again. My logic was to remove the MSPersistance.json file, create a new one and the system will reconfigure again.
What I'm seeing is that if you do that the system enters in a limbo situation where no nodes are added but those that were beforer are not added either. you can't see them in the dashboard nor in the Developers Tools section.
Next step is to start testing relays, dimmers, etc.
Let me know if you need more detils on the scenario.
thanks!
-
Hey @martinhjelmare,
I've been able to do some tests this time.
From a Sensoring standpoint (retreive information from sensors to show in dashboard) works perfetly fine.
I found the issue that I was referring before.
Let's say you have already included a number of nodes and everything is working but for any reason you want to reset and start again. My logic was to remove the MSPersistance.json file, create a new one and the system will reconfigure again.
What I'm seeing is that if you do that the system enters in a limbo situation where no nodes are added but those that were beforer are not added either. you can't see them in the dashboard nor in the Developers Tools section.
Next step is to start testing relays, dimmers, etc.
Let me know if you need more detils on the scenario.
thanks!
@Dave-Dan said:
My logic was to remove the MSPersistance.json file, create a new one and the system will reconfigure again.
Can you describe more in detail how you did this? Do you have an example persistence file before and after your modifications?
-
Sure!
the persistence once I've added some nodes looks like this:
{"104": {"sketch_version": "1.0", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "38.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "22.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {"23": "34"}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 0, "sensor_id": 104, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM)"}, "106": {"sketch_version": "1.0", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "37.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "22.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {"23": "5"}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 9, "sensor_id": 106, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM)"}, "156": {"sketch_version": null, "children": {}, "battery_level": 0, "sensor_id": 156, "type": 17, "sketch_name": null}, "101": {"sketch_version": "1.2", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "34.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "21.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 0, "sensor_id": 101, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM) v1.2"}, "102": {"sketch_version": "1.0", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "36.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "18.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {"23": "69"}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 2, "sensor_id": 102, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM)"}}after my modification (meaning, clear everything) looks this way:
{} -
Sure!
the persistence once I've added some nodes looks like this:
{"104": {"sketch_version": "1.0", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "38.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "22.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {"23": "34"}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 0, "sensor_id": 104, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM)"}, "106": {"sketch_version": "1.0", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "37.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "22.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {"23": "5"}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 9, "sensor_id": 106, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM)"}, "156": {"sketch_version": null, "children": {}, "battery_level": 0, "sensor_id": 156, "type": 17, "sketch_name": null}, "101": {"sketch_version": "1.2", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "34.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "21.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 0, "sensor_id": 101, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM) v1.2"}, "102": {"sketch_version": "1.0", "children": {"0": {"id": 0, "values": {"1": "36.0"}, "type": 7}, "1": {"id": 1, "values": {"0": "18.0"}, "type": 6}, "2": {"id": 2, "values": {"23": "69"}, "type": 16}, "3": {"id": 3, "values": {"16": "0"}, "type": 1}}, "battery_level": 2, "sensor_id": 102, "type": 17, "sketch_name": "dyaSensor (HTLM)"}}after my modification (meaning, clear everything) looks this way:
{}Did you do it like this?
- Stop hass.
- Remove old persistence file.
- Create new persistence file with the same name and path, containing an empty JSON object, "{}".
- Start hass.
- Start node. Result: Messages are coming in to gateway, but node sensors are not added to entities nor shown in GUI.
-
Exactly that.
maybe something to do with the fact that those items are already included in the DB (for history, etc) and the system can't add them again? (just guessing)
One more thing.
If I move the file and create a new one instead of deleting it. And after trying to add the items again I stop everything and restore the backup everything works again.
-
Exactly that.
maybe something to do with the fact that those items are already included in the DB (for history, etc) and the system can't add them again? (just guessing)
One more thing.
If I move the file and create a new one instead of deleting it. And after trying to add the items again I stop everything and restore the backup everything works again.
I don't know yet, but I'll try to reproduce this and figure it out. Thanks for this report, and taking your time to test this.
I haven't had time to push my latest commits, that I had planned. I want to just test them quickly on my side before I push. But since you experience this problem, I think it's best to troubleshoot this first, before I push any new commits.
I'll post back here, once I have more info.