How to contribute code to the MySensors project

Zeph

I wasn't seeing a step where you selected which relative to send the pull request to.

hek

You can press the "Edit" button (top right) on the last picture.

epierre

Hello,

I make my contribution as License: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0), I hope this will not conflict with your CLA...

Rasmus Eneman

@epierre MySensors is GPL so all code needs to conform with that, which CC doesn't. Also CC isn't for code.

hek

@epierre

https://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ#Can_I_use_a_Creative_Commons_license_for_software.3F

epierre

@Rasmus-Eneman good, I did not find that mention on the website, and the CLA made me wondering on this...

@hek right ;-) I distribute too much under various licenses...but not the same media ;-)

epierre

@hek you have a CC in an example too : https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/blob/master/libraries/MySensors/examples/SecretKnockSensor/SecretKnockSensor.ino ;-)

hek

@epierre

Yeah. I know. Most of that example was copied from Adafruit (see link in example) with the CC license. I'm not a legal expert and unsure if I can "change" the CC. Would prefer having GPL on everything.

oshwit

Ok, 2 questions:

What's the matter with this Contributor License Agreement? Why is it needed at all? Then in plain words, what the heck do you want from people with it? Because my plain words are: section 2.1a explicitly says that copyright for the contributed code remains with the contributor - and it's usually the copyright assignment is why CLA are put forth at all. Yet section 2.1b says that contributor gives you a license and right to sublicense the code - without naming the license concretely. That sounds as if you ask to give you right to put the code under any license, besides the one under which it is released by contributor. But that's madness. If someone releases code under GPL, and you accept it, you're bound by that GPL.
What's the matter with including non Open Source code into the project? Because is CC-NC (non-commercial) is not an Open Source license, because no Open Source license puts limitation on the use of the software (like "only for non-commercial use"). If you include non Open Source code in your project, then your entire project is not Open Source.

So, would be nice to get answers to these licensing questions. Thanks.

jka

@oshwit

Let me first explain how it works in our case. All code written for mysensors.org should be GPL v2 or higher. If you contribute code to mysensors.org you have to agree on our CLA. If you don't agree with the CLA you should not create a pull request. According to our CLA you still own the copyright to all code you submit (you may for example submit your code to another site under whatever license you like) but you also give mysensors.org the right to release the code under any other license.

It is not uncommon that organisations impose you to sign CLA:s. Even if you contribute code to FSF (Free Software foundation) you need to sign a CLA. One of the reasons is that the organisation in the future more easily can adapt to changes. Another example is the Linux Kernal that is released under GNU GPL v2, in order to change to GNU GPL v3 they whould need a written statement for all contibuting developers, since they didn't sign any CLA:s.

We will use GNU GPL v2 or higher as license for all code written for mysensors.org in the repos.

ntruchsess

so when you intent to use GNU GPL v2 or higher for all code why would you need the right to change to 'any other license' (even to licenses not compliant with GPL v2 of higher)?

I'd like to contribute but will not sign a CLA that allows this 'change to any other license'.

Feel free to pull any changes that I commit to my fork (as you have done with my UIPEthernet-lib):

https://github.com/ntruchsess/MySensors/tree/ethernet_gw
https://github.com/ntruchsess/MySensors/tree/mqttclient

all changes there are (and will remain) licensed GPL v2 or higher.

myname

Copyright
This software is copyright 2012-1014 Sensnology AB. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license conditions. The main licensing options available are GPL V2 or Commercial.

Heinz

2012-1014? I just can't belive it!

hek

@Heinz said:

2012-1014

Yep, typo, should be 2013-2015. :)

This is where the project started: http://forum.micasaverde.com/index.php/topic,16170.0.html

DrJeff

@hek said:

This is where the project started: http://forum.micasaverde.com/index.php/topic,16170.0.html

WOW your vision stayed the same! Cool

barduino

Hi @hek

When trying to sign the license agreement I get a very generic We're sorry, but something went wrong. on https://www.clahub.com/agreements/mysensors/Arduino/signatures

Cheers

hek

Yes, CLAhub has been messed up a couple of months.

You can just write "I agree to CLA" in the pull request comment until this has been fixed.

TD22057

Can anyone explain what the clahub github permissions actually mean? I was going to sign the agreement (which I have no problem with), but it sounds like the app permissions give someone (clahub? mysensors?) access to several things in my github account: all the organizations I belong to, all of my commit texts, etc. My initial reaction is to think that's seems a bit crazy - why does anything need permissions to anything in order for me to accept my agreement to a license? I'm not trying to argue about the need for a CLA - I get that - just wondering what I'm really agreeing to with the clahub application.

hek

From what I can tell the most sensitive information needed by CLAHUB (we're running their hosted variant) is your email address (which isn't revealed to the public):
https://github.com/clahub/clahub/blob/040629c91a25043605a0a1c4b100d0bde9c4d74f/config/initializers/omniauth.rb#L22-Lundefined

Anyhow, seems like the developer is looking for a new maintainer of the project:
https://github.com/clahub/clahub/issues/111

The best alternative I've found so far is https://github.com/cla-assistant/cla-assistant (Demo: https://cla-assistant.io/). Like clahub you can self-host it which is nice. Might spin it up to test one of these days...

Meanwhile you can just write "I agree to CLA" in the pull request comment.

To be clear, It is only contributions to the core MySensors library we're talking about here. Upgrading or adding external libraries and new examples is ok without it.

TD22057

OK - thanks for the info. The permissions it actually asks me for are:

user data (email read only)
repository webhooks and services (admin access)
organization webhooks (admin access)
commit statuses (read/write access)
organization and teams (read only)

Then it shows my other organizations. So it sounds like it can access those (not sure why it would need to), and read any of my commit status messages. I don't know what the webhooks are for but the admin access level made me a bit hesitant. The popup on an org that I belong to says that it can be accessed using the permissions above (which would include admin webhook access which sounds bad). Perhaps it's supposed to mean that it can only access those things for the mysensors repository which makes more sense but the description doesn't say that which is why I was curious about it.

How to contribute code to the MySensors project

10

11.7k

11.2k

113.0k