Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Why continue to use NRF24L01?

Why continue to use NRF24L01?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
17 Posts 8 Posters 9.4k Views 8 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TD22057T Offline
    TD22057T Offline
    TD22057
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @neech said:

    TD22057, I love this idea. However, how are you going to power the ESP? I'd like to do the same thing but don't want to take the thing out to replace a battery. I also don't want to try and fit a 5v or 3.3v power supply in there...just curious if you thought of that yet.

    Search for HLK-PM01 - there are a bunch of threads on how to power from 120/240V mains.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • AnticimexA Offline
      AnticimexA Offline
      Anticimex
      Contest Winner
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      You will also find out that there is a limit in your WiFI AP(s) on how many nodes you can handle simultaneously.

      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Henk BakkerH Offline
        Henk BakkerH Offline
        Henk Bakker
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        I'm using the NRF24L01 for my setup because I don't want my "security grid" to go offline if my router for example breaks down. Next to that it's safer in my eyes to keep the 2 networks separated. It's easier to hack a wifi network than your own custom build security network.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • neechN Offline
          neechN Offline
          neech
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          You could still do that with a separate WiFi router, right? I am starting to think about a new system that will have a dedicated router for my "things".

          Henk BakkerH TheoLT 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • neechN neech

            You could still do that with a separate WiFi router, right? I am starting to think about a new system that will have a dedicated router for my "things".

            Henk BakkerH Offline
            Henk BakkerH Offline
            Henk Bakker
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            @neech Sure.

            Depending on your router you could even make a different VLAN with a different SSID and keep it seperated in this way. Only allow the most essential ports from one network to the other.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • neechN neech

              You could still do that with a separate WiFi router, right? I am starting to think about a new system that will have a dedicated router for my "things".

              TheoLT Online
              TheoLT Online
              TheoL
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by TheoL
              #11

              @neech I'm extending my local Intranet Of Things eco-system, my conclusion is the same as yours. I'll be adding a separate local router. By that I'm also creating a DMZ, which will make it harder for hackers to get to my local network. And I'll be able to add a VPN in the DMZ. With the VPN I'll be able to connect to my local network when I'm not at home.

              Since I already want an extra router, I'll have no extra costs when I'll be adding some ESP8266 sensors. But my point is, that most people don't know how to add an extra router, besides it adds cost at least 100 dollar or more your solution. I haven't checked how much cheaper the ESP8266 is, but you'll have to take the extra cost for purchasing an extra router and the power consumption of that router into account. How many NRF24L01 sensors can you build for that kind of money?

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • AnticimexA Offline
                AnticimexA Offline
                Anticimex
                Contest Winner
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                What about battery power? Is it on par with nrf24 and rfm69 with respect to power consumption?

                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • neechN Offline
                  neechN Offline
                  neech
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  It is true that the NRF24L01 use a lot less power (apparently). I haven't used them so I would be concerned about the range of these types of devices? How many gateways would I have to build to cover my whole home?

                  On the Ethernet side, I am looking to do smart outlets: for that the ESP8266 makes sense because I could use the 120VAC power and convert it to 5VDC with a pretty small board using one of those transformer-less DC power supplies.

                  Maybe I'll test both scenarios before scaling up.

                  Thanks,
                  neech

                  TheoLT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    You only need one GW. If nodes are out of reach, use relay nodes. That's the whole point. The radios provide a mesh network.

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • neechN neech

                      It is true that the NRF24L01 use a lot less power (apparently). I haven't used them so I would be concerned about the range of these types of devices? How many gateways would I have to build to cover my whole home?

                      On the Ethernet side, I am looking to do smart outlets: for that the ESP8266 makes sense because I could use the 120VAC power and convert it to 5VDC with a pretty small board using one of those transformer-less DC power supplies.

                      Maybe I'll test both scenarios before scaling up.

                      Thanks,
                      neech

                      TheoLT Online
                      TheoLT Online
                      TheoL
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      @neech The first answer is 1 Gateway. Depending on the size of your house you might need some repeater nodes. But you could also use the radio's with the larger antenna's. I have one larger antenna which is currently mounted to my Gateway. I installed it recently. Didn't have any troubles concerning the distance. But I'm planning on building a weather station. It just a better safe than sorry thing.

                      For smart IoT devices a Pi or Pi zero would make much more sense than an ESP8266. At least in my opinion. Until this moment I'm more than happy with the NRF24L01+ wouldn't change it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Henk BakkerH Offline
                        Henk BakkerH Offline
                        Henk Bakker
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        here is someone that did a test: https://hallard.me/nrf24l01-real-life-range-test/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tbowmoT Offline
                          tbowmoT Offline
                          tbowmo
                          Admin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          Another option, would be to go with rfm69.. It's sub gHz, so it would have longer range (Even compared to esp8266). Power consumption is equal to nrf24 (as far as I know).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          26

                          Online

                          11.7k

                          Users

                          11.2k

                          Topics

                          113.1k

                          Posts


                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • MySensors
                          • OpenHardware.io
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular