Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Why continue to use NRF24L01?

Why continue to use NRF24L01?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
17 Posts 8 Posters 9.4k Views 8 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TD22057T Offline
    TD22057T Offline
    TD22057
    Hardware Contributor
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Another reason: number of inputs. The arduino has a lot more pins so for more complicated sensors, the ESP just doesn't cut it. Pairing them together isn't a bad idea though. Can the ESP do over the air boot loading? That's a nice feature in the radios.

    I think both are good ideas. In my "future plans", I want to replace my Insteon remote switches and outlets with home made ones and I think using an ESP is perfect for that. They aren't battery powered, the ESP is much smaller than an arduino+radio, cheaper, and it only needs to control a single relay.

    neechN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • TD22057T TD22057

      Another reason: number of inputs. The arduino has a lot more pins so for more complicated sensors, the ESP just doesn't cut it. Pairing them together isn't a bad idea though. Can the ESP do over the air boot loading? That's a nice feature in the radios.

      I think both are good ideas. In my "future plans", I want to replace my Insteon remote switches and outlets with home made ones and I think using an ESP is perfect for that. They aren't battery powered, the ESP is much smaller than an arduino+radio, cheaper, and it only needs to control a single relay.

      neechN Offline
      neechN Offline
      neech
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      @TD22057 said:

      reply
      TD22057, I love this idea. However, how are you going to power the ESP? I'd like to do the same thing but don't want to take the thing out to replace a battery. I also don't want to try and fit a 5v or 3.3v power supply in there...just curious if you thought of that yet.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • TD22057T Offline
        TD22057T Offline
        TD22057
        Hardware Contributor
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @neech said:

        TD22057, I love this idea. However, how are you going to power the ESP? I'd like to do the same thing but don't want to take the thing out to replace a battery. I also don't want to try and fit a 5v or 3.3v power supply in there...just curious if you thought of that yet.

        Search for HLK-PM01 - there are a bunch of threads on how to power from 120/240V mains.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • AnticimexA Offline
          AnticimexA Offline
          Anticimex
          Contest Winner
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          You will also find out that there is a limit in your WiFI AP(s) on how many nodes you can handle simultaneously.

          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Henk BakkerH Offline
            Henk BakkerH Offline
            Henk Bakker
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            I'm using the NRF24L01 for my setup because I don't want my "security grid" to go offline if my router for example breaks down. Next to that it's safer in my eyes to keep the 2 networks separated. It's easier to hack a wifi network than your own custom build security network.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • neechN Offline
              neechN Offline
              neech
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              You could still do that with a separate WiFi router, right? I am starting to think about a new system that will have a dedicated router for my "things".

              Henk BakkerH TheoLT 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • neechN neech

                You could still do that with a separate WiFi router, right? I am starting to think about a new system that will have a dedicated router for my "things".

                Henk BakkerH Offline
                Henk BakkerH Offline
                Henk Bakker
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @neech Sure.

                Depending on your router you could even make a different VLAN with a different SSID and keep it seperated in this way. Only allow the most essential ports from one network to the other.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • neechN neech

                  You could still do that with a separate WiFi router, right? I am starting to think about a new system that will have a dedicated router for my "things".

                  TheoLT Offline
                  TheoLT Offline
                  TheoL
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by TheoL
                  #11

                  @neech I'm extending my local Intranet Of Things eco-system, my conclusion is the same as yours. I'll be adding a separate local router. By that I'm also creating a DMZ, which will make it harder for hackers to get to my local network. And I'll be able to add a VPN in the DMZ. With the VPN I'll be able to connect to my local network when I'm not at home.

                  Since I already want an extra router, I'll have no extra costs when I'll be adding some ESP8266 sensors. But my point is, that most people don't know how to add an extra router, besides it adds cost at least 100 dollar or more your solution. I haven't checked how much cheaper the ESP8266 is, but you'll have to take the extra cost for purchasing an extra router and the power consumption of that router into account. How many NRF24L01 sensors can you build for that kind of money?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • AnticimexA Offline
                    AnticimexA Offline
                    Anticimex
                    Contest Winner
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    What about battery power? Is it on par with nrf24 and rfm69 with respect to power consumption?

                    Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • neechN Offline
                      neechN Offline
                      neech
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      It is true that the NRF24L01 use a lot less power (apparently). I haven't used them so I would be concerned about the range of these types of devices? How many gateways would I have to build to cover my whole home?

                      On the Ethernet side, I am looking to do smart outlets: for that the ESP8266 makes sense because I could use the 120VAC power and convert it to 5VDC with a pretty small board using one of those transformer-less DC power supplies.

                      Maybe I'll test both scenarios before scaling up.

                      Thanks,
                      neech

                      TheoLT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • AnticimexA Offline
                        AnticimexA Offline
                        Anticimex
                        Contest Winner
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        You only need one GW. If nodes are out of reach, use relay nodes. That's the whole point. The radios provide a mesh network.

                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • neechN neech

                          It is true that the NRF24L01 use a lot less power (apparently). I haven't used them so I would be concerned about the range of these types of devices? How many gateways would I have to build to cover my whole home?

                          On the Ethernet side, I am looking to do smart outlets: for that the ESP8266 makes sense because I could use the 120VAC power and convert it to 5VDC with a pretty small board using one of those transformer-less DC power supplies.

                          Maybe I'll test both scenarios before scaling up.

                          Thanks,
                          neech

                          TheoLT Offline
                          TheoLT Offline
                          TheoL
                          Contest Winner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @neech The first answer is 1 Gateway. Depending on the size of your house you might need some repeater nodes. But you could also use the radio's with the larger antenna's. I have one larger antenna which is currently mounted to my Gateway. I installed it recently. Didn't have any troubles concerning the distance. But I'm planning on building a weather station. It just a better safe than sorry thing.

                          For smart IoT devices a Pi or Pi zero would make much more sense than an ESP8266. At least in my opinion. Until this moment I'm more than happy with the NRF24L01+ wouldn't change it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Henk BakkerH Offline
                            Henk BakkerH Offline
                            Henk Bakker
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            here is someone that did a test: https://hallard.me/nrf24l01-real-life-range-test/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tbowmoT Offline
                              tbowmoT Offline
                              tbowmo
                              Admin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Another option, would be to go with rfm69.. It's sub gHz, so it would have longer range (Even compared to esp8266). Power consumption is equal to nrf24 (as far as I know).

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              10

                              Online

                              11.7k

                              Users

                              11.2k

                              Topics

                              113.1k

                              Posts


                              Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • MySensors
                              • OpenHardware.io
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular