šŸ’¬ Distance Sensor

  • @Boots33 thanks for your detailed response! Is the DYP-ME007 the same as the JSN-SR04? As my experience with the latter is not too exciting... Anyways, I might as well give it another try! Also, thanks for the lead to your project and the median filtering in newping. I will definitely look into that and might just have to increase the number of readings the node takes and than filter for a transmission every 15 mins or so.

  • Hero Member

    @jjk said in šŸ’¬ Distance Sensor:

    Is the DYP-ME007 the same as the JSN-SR04

    They certainly look the same but not sure if they are identical. definitely check on the power, i went around in circles for a while and was nearly ready to give up on the DYP until i found they are very fussy on voltage. at 4.7v I could not get mine to be stable over 1.2m yet it was still rock solid under 1.2m.... nearly drove me crazy šŸ™‚

  • @Boots33 o.k. that's good advice! I just ordered some DYP and they have a bit of a lead time, that gives me time to think about getting an extra and stable 5V to the sensor.

  • @jjk The JSN-SR04 looks very similar to the DYP-ME007 sensor, but what I found even more confusing is that there is a direct board mounted single transducer type advertised under the same type number for both models numbers when you do a search. As Boots33 has said and not the first to say it, these seem very voltage 'fussy'. I was about to order a JSN-SR04T variety to test out when I spotted this exchange. If you still have the JSN version would it not be worth trialling with a beefier supply as a test? I am most curious if this a case of voltage/current rather than faulty device.
    I would suggest a 5v booster in your own scenario running off two AAs, they are cheap enough these days...

  • @zboblamont, excellent idea, but unfortunately my previous tries with the JSN-SR04T were in a "previous life" of arduino experimenting quite a while ago and at the time, I dumped pretty much most of it (I hate to say, the JSN failures were one if the reasons...). That said, I have ordered some DYP and will give it another try. The tips you and @Boots33 have provided should get me much farer than last time šŸ˜‰ The key information I guess I was missing at the time was the sensitivity to voltage.

    On another note... has anyone played around with alternative ways to measure water level, like a pressure tube or so? I'd be interested to see if that's an easier way, maybe?!

  • @jjk Fair enough. It will be interesting nevertheless to see how you get on with the newer version now you are looking at voltage, it does seem sensitive to power, both in volts and current (however small the latter).
    I had a long look at pressure sensors before looking again at ultrasonics, and it is almost impossible to strike a balance between submerged IP68 and cheap. Closest I found were differential sensors (loads of them available from RS, Mouser, etc. to very low mBar ratings) but the problem was always the correspondence between measuring fluid pressure as air pressure. At a near constant temperature there should be no issues, but where you have the pressure vary as it must between -20 and + 45c environmental temperature throws out accuracy, ignoring gassing off.
    For sewage only non-contact works, for clean water, DP cells can work but only under consistent environmental circumstances. Submerged low pressure cells should work, if you find a cheap one post it up....

  • Hero Member

    @jjk said in šŸ’¬ Distance Sensor:

    I have ordered some DYP and will give it another try.

    That's the spirit. My tank sensor using the DYP has been running for a few months now and is performing very well so far. During our summer we had daytime temperatures well over 40 deg c and the readings remained stable. So I think the DYP is up to the task.

  • @Boots33 So it seems on balance from the above experiences that the DYP sensor is proven reliable in use once given good voltage but questions remain on the JSN. The DYP type is not so readily available at reasonable cost over here so will order up a JSN and trial it. If it fails at least it is only $10 wasted, if not, it will answer this puzzle.

  • Hero Member

    @zboblamont It will be good to see the final results of both yours and @jjk

  • @Boots33 Still waiting on the gateway to arrive, as well as the DYP sensor, so had a go at assembling the electronics. Having red elsewhere about potential interference between a booster and ultrasonic, have mounted the booster with the ground plane facing the board and direct mounted onto the SR04T (I see this is 2.0 version which reportedly gave problems before). Although it works electrically with 3v firing the bistable relay feeding the booster feeding the SR04T, and switches off fine, any opinions on the proximity issues?

  • @jjk Well I think I am done trying to get this JSN-SR04T-2.0 to work, tried different versions of ping and newping, as well as other sketches from suppliers of this device, but got no joy at all. Even separated the 5v booster in case of potential interference, no joy whatsoever.
    Recent complaints on supplier sites seem to confirm problems persist for this version 2.0, and on one site there was a note "Note: Version 2.0 requires echo pin to be pulled up to VCC. A 4.7K to 10K resistor can be used as pull-up resistor."
    Fat lot of use that is to me with a 3.3v unit, and if it needs a dedicate sketch to work, good luck with those sales..
    I guess I can only wait on the DYP to arrive now....

  • Hero Member

    @zboblamont Still no luck with the JSN unit I see. Hope the DYP unit will bring better results.

  • @Boots33 It seems that the newer version (2.0) is the one giving problems, the previous version did not. Presumably the sensor head is unchanged and common across all of them, so perhaps not a total waste of $10.
    It will be interesting to see if mounting the 5v booster so close on the DYP causes any issues, as it makes for a compact arrangement in a corner of a box.
    As an aside, with one of these heads needed in a sewage tank I needed a robust holder. The sensor head is a snug fit in the big end of a 3/4" to 1/2" GS tube reducer, giving both protection and rigidity.

  • I have tried to compile this sketch, but it fails, see error below. Any idea what's the reason and how it can be fixed ?
    I use the latest Arduino 1.8.3 (windows) version, mysensors 2.x and the above NewPing library.

    C:\Users\arthur\AppData\Local\Temp\ccAlQHJ9.ltrans2.ltrans.o: In function `setup':

    Y:_Domotica\NRF24L01\DistanceSensor/DistanceSensor.ino:53: undefined reference to `getControllerConfig()'

    collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status

    exit status 1
    Fout bij het compileren van board Arduino/Genuino Uno

  • Fixed the problem by changing some code:
    void setup()
    // metric = getControllerConfig().isMetric;

  • @Boots33 Now I am flummoxed.... Got the DYP unit and yet, no difference in responses.... I can only conclude this has to be a hardware or device issue, as I checked all wiring (unless I missed something really stupid), tried the same 6 sketches even on a spare 3v3 device with the same result. Now ordered up a couple of Pro-Mini 5v to check out whether this is a 5v related issue since I cannot create a timed response otherwise, nothing makes sense with respect to the ultrasonic units now otherwise unless my earlier information that 3v3 was sufficient to trigger the device was wrong... Time for a slow drink, a long smoke, and shout abuse at passing dogs.... Nice weather, 26c, Friday, what's not to smile about.... Ah, Port..

  • @Boots33 Well, finally I got some positive results, but not quite as expected...
    The JSN-SR04T-2.0 nor the DYP-ME007Y I could get to work on all six variations of sketches tried. Still not sure why neither would work using this 3v3 board even with 5v to the ultrasonic board and dropper resistors on the echo. Allegedly the ping from 3.3v should work.

    So, bought and finished today trialling a 5v/16MHz Pro-Mini ;
    The JSN version 2.0 nor the DYP would not respond to NewPing, simply churning out zeroes.
    Other sketches would turn out fixed numbers and zeroes which did not alter irrespective of the transducer/object distance.
    The JSN finally got working with a simple PulseIn calculation loop with a 500 delay. First reading was always Zero, all the rest consistent and rock solid.
    The DYP unexpectedly responded only to the SoftwareSerial method originally found to work from a Russian site. The readings are spot on from the start.

    Now that they work, I need to figure out if there is a workaround for the 3.3v transceiver node....

  • Hero Member

    @zboblamont it certainly has been a bumpy road for you. good to see you making some headway.

  • I've been fighting with DYP-ME007Y myself for the last few days...
    Originally i wanted to monitor the level of a water tank with an SR04 ; as it is not waterproof i assumed that it would die fairly quickly.
    So i ordered a DYP-ME007... but the last letter ("Y") means that it uses serial communication, so the ping Library doesn't apply.
    Bouncing from site to site i found the following code that @zboblamont refers to :

    #include <SoftwareSerial.h>
    SoftwareSerial mySerial =  SoftwareSerial(10,11); 
    #define echoPin 10
    #define trigPin 11
    unsigned int reading;
    byte readByte;
    byte read_buffer[4]; 
    byte crcCalc;
    word distance;
    String outText;
    void setup() {
      mySerial.begin (9600);
      Serial.begin (9600);
      for (byte loopstep = 0; loopstep <= 3; loopstep++) {
        read_buffer[loopstep] = 0;
    void loop() {
      if (mySerial.available() < 1) {
      readByte = mySerial.read();
      for (byte loopstep = 0; loopstep <= 2; loopstep++) {
        read_buffer[loopstep] = read_buffer[loopstep + 01];
      read_buffer[03] = readByte;   
      if (read_buffer[00] != 0xff) {
      crcCalc = read_buffer[00] + read_buffer[01] + read_buffer[02];
      if (read_buffer[03] != crcCalc) {
      distance = (read_buffer[01] * 0xff) + read_buffer[02];
      outText = "bytes: ";
      outText = String(outText + read_buffer[00]);
      outText = String(outText + "+");
      outText = String(outText + read_buffer[01]);
      outText = String(outText + "+");
      outText = String(outText + read_buffer[02]);
      outText = String(outText + "+");
      outText = String(outText + read_buffer[03]);
      outText = String(outText + " = ");
      outText = String(outText + distance);
      outText = String(outText + " mm");
      while (mySerial.available() > 0) {
         readByte = mySerial.read();

    Worked first shot

  • @ben999 So glad it worked, I tormented myself as a newbie in Arduinoworld. I didn't realise that the 'Y' was significant though, I recall others saying it fitted NewPing like a glove...
    I don't think it helps when there are so many conflicting model numbers for completely (physically) different devices...
    Hey ho....

  • hi folks, received my DYP-ME007Y finally, tried it and got the same inconsistent readings with the old sketch that @zboblamont and others reported. I was excited to see the code that @ben999 found and tested successfully - but I don't even get past the "start" print out in the serial monitor. the LED on the DYP board is flashing eagerly, but it doesn't look like it gets any readings... Have you guys changed anything else to get it t work?

  • update: we're getting there... after a bit a tweaking and trying different angles, I'm now getting readings. The good news: in one position, when readings come in, they are consistent. The bad news: as soon as I move the sensor head, it's a gamble, in some cases the readings are o.k., in other cases it drops to 0mm... Anybody has seen a similar effect?

  • @jjk sensor head need to be perpendicular to surface being measured?

  • @jjk If the readings you ARE getting are accurate when moved to new positions, it could as @ben999 said be inaccurate alignment to the reflective surface, or as was commented somewhere else, the plug/socket on the board being loose.
    With a 3/4 to 1/2 reducer on a 1/2 pipe ready here for final installation, I sat transducer the socket to take out movement or alignment issues, it drifts off quite readily if angle is wrong. The code Ben refers to for this DYP gave me a slightly lower but not silly first reading then consistent results thereafter, no zeroes.

    Please note that I had tried all 6 sketch variants on the 3.3v device with a 5v DYP supply and got nonsense. Using the 3.3v Trig with drop resistors on the Echo neither the JSN nor the DYP worked properly despite the 5v power from the separate booster supply to them.
    I only found consistency using a 5v pro-mini, with the DYP power supplied from logic pins, which leads me to think Trig and/or Echo are also 5v sensitive, contradicting previous advice and complicating my layout.

    Have not yet got round to trialling a logic converter from the 3.3v pro-mini for Trig and Echo with the original 5v supply, which is the next step, will report back once I get some time to test.

  • @ben999 and @zboblamont thanks for the swift feedback and advice. I think you are right, the DYP seems to be VERY sensitive to alignment. The tests I did were "handheld" and readings jumped arbitrarily btw zeroes, accurate, and off values. I've done a few tests now with the sensor head fixed and more aligned to the target surface and that seems to work out much better now. I also found that readings get less accurate above 1m, though?!

  • btw. I'm using a pro mini 5V to power and trigger the DYP at the moment. Have played with an external 5V supply, but that didn't seem to make a noticeable difference.

  • @jjk Sounds like you're getting there, it should be no problem with the 5v pro-mini, the only variables should be alignment and sketches.

    To clarify, I only got a 5v pro-mini to figure out whether the DYP and JSN devices would work, which they did after trying different sketches. Those same sketches had retrieved garbage on the 3.3v pro-mini, despite a separate 5v supply to the DYP, running contrary to experience of others. That supply was unnecessary with the 5v pro-mini.

    As the 3.3v is the intended battery powered radio node, I need the DYP to work with it, hence the logic level converter being the next attempt to get the DYP to work with the node.

  • DYP measuring range starts at 30cm -ish

    When water tank is full-up, water level is near the top of the cistern...

    So to achieve the minimum reading distance I used a big PVC pipe placed vertically on top of cistern (about 30cm) through a hole...
    I went from 5cm to 8cm but no luck : I guess there must be some "echo" in the pipe that fools the reading...

    I will end-up with a plastic bucket (dia 30cm height 30cm) on top of cistern opening (not tested yet)

    Final word : be aware of confined spaces, that sensor is kind of claustrophobic šŸ˜‰

  • I don't quite like the idea of the DYP board being powered full-time...
    It "ticks" every one second and i only need a few updates of water level per day.

    I would like to power it via a transistor (itself being triggered by arduino)

    What would be your thoughts on that ?

    • powering that board say 4 times a day for 10 seconds would be more deadly than being powered on all the time ?
    • looks like the serial "conversation" kicks-in as soon as power is applied to the board... could it damage either board if serial link is cut anytime ?
    • DYP board uses on average less than 15mA. What transistor would be a good contender for that job ?

    Thanks again for reading and thanks even more for your input šŸ™‚

  • @ben999 Surprised if you are getting echoes in a pipe, there are no surfaces to reflect the signal. Both the tanks I am looking to monitor are quite big, I might have to use a pipe in the water tank as it is a plastic moulding which has vertical facing flats on the ribs. Will report back once tested in place.

    I looked at transistor switching the device due to RTC and radio occupying all but 4 analogue lines on the node, but there were reportedly some issues with switching ground, so I settled on the latching dpdt relay I posted further up the thread. It needs two pins to open or close by changing outputs from high to low. It opened or closed in less than 30ms, about 33mA from memory, zero consumption once latched.

    In my own case the node is 3.3v, the 5v boosted line for the DYP power was originally controlled by the relay.
    Having established now that the DYP requires a 5v trig/echo, the relay is being reworked so one contact switches the 3.3v the other the 5v to power both the DYP and the level switcher, hopefully resolving earlier failures.

  • Hi Everyone,

    Just trying to get everything set back up correctly and I def have something wrong, my distance sensors show Zero.
    3 TSM:INIT
    4 TSF:WUR:MS=0
    13 TSF:SID:OK,ID=254
    15 TSM:FPAR
    51 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    2061 TSM:FPAR
    2097 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    2615 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-254,s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
    2620 TSF:MSG:FPAR OK,ID=0,D=1
    4105 TSM:FPAR:OK
    4106 TSM:ID
    4107 TSM:ID:OK
    4109 TSM:UPL
    4118 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
    4128 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-254,s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
    4136 TSM:UPL:OK
    4137 TSM:READY:ID=254,PAR=0,DIS=1
    4150 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0100
    4157 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-254,s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
    4166 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2.1.1
    4177 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
    4211 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-254,s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0:M
    4234 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=15,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:Distance Sensor
    4246 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1.0
    4265 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=1,c=0,t=15,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
    4272 MCO:REG:REQ
    4282 TSF:MSG:SEND,254-254-0-0,s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:2
    4289 TSF:MSG:READ,0-0-254,s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
    4294 MCO:PIM:NODE REG=1
    4296 MCO:BGN:STP
    4298 MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
    Ping: 0 cm
    4336 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
    4341 MCO:SLP:TPD
    4343 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
    Ping: 0 cm
    4380 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
    4386 MCO:SLP:TPD
    4387 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
    Ping: 0 cm
    4425 MCO:SLP:MS=5000,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
    4430 MCO:SLP:TPD

    Any idea why? Pins are set correctly 5 and 6.


  • @Newzwaver which sensor are you using? And which library?

  • Thanks for the reply, I am using the HC SR04

  • @ben999 Finally good news at least on getting the DYP-SR04T-2.0 to behave with the 3.3v Pro Mini, currently arrangement like wire spaghetti. How it all fits in the weatherproof box is another day's work, as is coding it up to send hourly data back to the Gateway.

    Earlier trials using the 5v Mini worked perfectly, so ended up with latching relay and booster on separate battery pack, unfortunately I did not realise the complications of using a single coil latching relay on the Arduino.

    Needed to get some work done on the house, so delayed getting back to until last week.

    So the working hardware is now 10k resistor to DIODES DMG6968U-7 switching a NEC EE2-3TNU double coil relay, a level converter for trig/echo, and a 5v booster to power the ultrasonic. Works fine now even though the first reading is still always a Zero.
    Relay switch on and switch off is less than 10ms- Arduino and low current..

  • @ben999 As a postscript to the above, I puzzled over how quickly I could get a valid result before being able to power down the secondary circuit of relay, booster, level converter etc...

    I looked at the results coming in (in this case from the JSN sensor) and read up on median analysis and gave up pretty quickly on that level of sophistication, as I realised only the first result was incorrect, that puzzling zero, all the rest were consistent and repetitive.

    Inserting a while statement in the Void Setup (instead of the forever version in the Void Loop) checking the time duration < 1, I got a valid result immediately after the first ping, and the secondary circuit could be shut down.

    As I only need one valid result to switch the relay off and radio the reading in once and hour, this seems to satisfy my requirements while limiting power drain on the secondary circuit.

  • I had to add some lines to the sample sketch to get console printouts:

    #include <SoftwareSerial.h>

    and in the void setup():

    Is everybody so specialized that they see immediately this omission? šŸ™‚

  • Mod

    @peerv strange. Those lines should not be needed. I've never had to add them.

    What board are you using? Did you change anything in the example sketch?

  • I am using a Nano V3.
    Apart from the above lines I didn't change anything in the sketch.
    Before the change I only got debug messages and no Serial.print lines!

    Is the SoftwareSerial.h included in one of the other libraries?

  • Mod

    @peerv SoftwareSerial should not be needed at all, the hardware serial is used.

  • Thanks. Due to some bad dupont cable connection the program was not entering the void loop() and not printing to the console. Was not aware about a hardware serial print. It is stable now.

  • Found a new distance sensor HC-SR04P .
    De spec shows that the input voltage of this model is 3-5V. So this model can be used with a 3.3V arduino.

  • Banned

    Sorry for bumping up an old question but Iā€™m in the same boat of requirement.

    And to my surprise there are quite a few new sensors in town:

    This one has 2 transducers instead of 1 therefore has less minimum detection distance as compared to JSN SR04T. It is also completely sealed and waterproof.

    Ebay spam link removed by moderator

    Before finalizing on this I had bought another one which was a waterproof modified version of HC-SR04 from here

    Ebay spam link removed by moderator

    The 1st one is much more rugged and waterproof as compared to the latter one

  • @ritesh-t Dual sensor types were the first on the market, send on one sensor receive on the other from memory, but could suffer in high water vapour Zones.
    The single sensor types switches between send and receive on the same head, commonly used as car parking sensors.

    The cheaper one you show has exposed diaphragms and says it is water resistant not waterPROOF šŸ˜‰
    Aside the smaller deadband of 3cm the more expensive one used more robust moulded sensors but steep on price, 3 times the JSN single sensor head device, but 20cm deadband is adequate for my use.
    Both need 5v supply same as the JSN single sensor type, for a 3.3v Node this adds complication.

  • Are there any tricks to configure one node with two distance sensors? I tried, it generally works, shows two distances, but periodically shows first or second distance =0

  • Actually, even when I use this example without any changes with single sensor, quite often node sends out 0cm. Real distance in my office from table top to ceiling is about 160cm. Maximum distance set to 300.

  • @apl2017 There are many techniques to get avoid bogus or wrong results, assuming there are no environmental effects (reflective side objects to make readings difficult).
    On the setup here the sensor is a single transducer, and the sketch is a basic single pulse, time the echo to calculate the distance, with a sufficient delay to ensure the preceding pulse has decayed (hard surface underground tank) - The sketch tests for two consective results within the expected range, if it does not succeed in X attempts it does not update the Gateway and goes back to sleep for the next event, hence not flattening batteries.

  • zboblamont . Thank you, I understand all of this except I really don't see in sketch testing of two consecutive results in X attempts. I see that node will wake up and update the distance if new data is different than old data, but, anyway, question was about something different. Why, single sensor node based on this example periodically generates 0 distance? Are there different models of these sensors, so NewPing library needs to be altered?

  • @apl2017 Verifying the reading is something you have to write into the sketch yourself, nothing complicated. I didn't use a library so no idea what advantage it brings over the simple timing method. Because I only take readings every hour triggered by an RTC, I don't care if it is the same as previous, only that it is valid in which case it is sent in.
    Parts of my sketch follow, all fairly self-explanatory, perhaps they are of some use.
    Main loop - Call subroutine and test to ensure it lies between two values, up to 10 attempts allowed to get a proper reading.

    while ((tankdepth<350||tankdepth>1000)&&counter<=10){//10 attempts to get proper range

    The READULTRASONIC subroutine uses the simple timing method to get the 2 consecutive readings.

      void READULTRASONIC(){//JSN-SR04-2.0
    //Main loop checks valid range on a defined number of readings
    // Normal range should lie between 389 and 989 absolutely empty is 1520
    while (test!=test2){// Get two consecutive readings
      digitalWrite(Trigpin, LOW);
      digitalWrite(Trigpin, HIGH);
      digitalWrite(Trigpin, LOW);
      duration = pulseIn(Echopin, HIGH);
      distance = duration/5.82;//This is in mm
     if (test!=distance){
      delay(100);///// 500 originally but why???????

    There are many version of these sensors, neither of the two I trialled reliably ran unless on 5v, which made it bit more complicated for a 3.3v Node.
    One operated on softserial from memory, but I couldn't get it to do what I wanted, I settled on the one which allows straightforward timing.

    When I was first testing these, the first reading would always be a zero for reasons unknown, then solid readings, but the 2 consecutive readings test worked for me.

  • @zboblamont Thanks, you are proposing to filter out wrong reading, I am trying to understand why system periodically sends out 0.

  • @apl2017 Understood, good luck finding out whether environment, hardware, software, in isolation or combination are the cause.
    As said previously, aside the leading zero, the arrangement and technique here returns stable readings, the only critical aspect found was need of a solid 5v.
    The only anomaly found were a condensation drip on the sensor face at below -10 outside air temp, hence the 10 attempts limitation.
    Good luck

Log in to reply

Suggested Topics

  • 1041
  • 54
  • 170
  • 175
  • 38
  • 25
  • 101
  • 15