Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. NodeManager
  4. NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors

NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NodeManager
223 Posts 23 Posters 73.0k Views 26 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U user2684

    @mar.conte said in NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors:

    It happens even if i put 6 hours or every 3 hours so in the specified hours it is not regular the report sometimes jumps some report

    Ok, I'd probably need both MySensors and NodeManagers's logs to troubleshoot this, just to ensure there is no failure in sending out the messages as I've seen in the other logs you have previously shared.

    Thanks!

    mar.conteM Offline
    mar.conteM Offline
    mar.conte
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    @user2684
    Ok Tanks

    M.C.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mar.conteM Offline
      mar.conteM Offline
      mar.conte
      wrote on last edited by
      #117

      Then solved the problem of the accuracy of the battery report: basically I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes; The communication problems I solved them by letting antenna from rfm69 so every hour the battery report does not even send pir moviment
      ....Very strange my rfm69 modules communicate better without an antenna even at a distance of 10 meters with a wall

      M.C.

      U 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gohanG Offline
        gohanG Offline
        gohan
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #118

        There is a risk of damaging the radio module if you don't use an antenna. Also a wrong tuned antenna will make transmitting more difficult.

        mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG gohan

          There is a risk of damaging the radio module if you don't use an antenna. Also a wrong tuned antenna will make transmitting more difficult.

          mar.conteM Offline
          mar.conteM Offline
          mar.conte
          wrote on last edited by
          #119

          @gohan
          Ok Tanks, but the 86 mm wire for 868 what is Ideal diameter and thread type for simple antenna no dipole e non ground ant?

          M.C.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by gohan
            #120

            Found in another forum

            433 1/4 wave = 164.7mm
            433 1/2 wave = 329.4mm
            433 full wave = 692.7mm

            868 1/4 wave = 82.2mm
            868 1/2 wave = 164.3mm
            868 full wave = 345.5mm

            915 1/4 wave = 77.9mm
            915 1/2 wave = 155.9mm
            915 full wave = 327.8mm

            Try shortening a little bit. What kind of wire are you using?

            mar.conteM 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • gohanG gohan

              Found in another forum

              433 1/4 wave = 164.7mm
              433 1/2 wave = 329.4mm
              433 full wave = 692.7mm

              868 1/4 wave = 82.2mm
              868 1/2 wave = 164.3mm
              868 full wave = 345.5mm

              915 1/4 wave = 77.9mm
              915 1/2 wave = 155.9mm
              915 full wave = 327.8mm

              Try shortening a little bit. What kind of wire are you using?

              mar.conteM Offline
              mar.conteM Offline
              mar.conte
              wrote on last edited by
              #121

              @gohan
              Wery good Tanks gohan

              M.C.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gohanG gohan

                Found in another forum

                433 1/4 wave = 164.7mm
                433 1/2 wave = 329.4mm
                433 full wave = 692.7mm

                868 1/4 wave = 82.2mm
                868 1/2 wave = 164.3mm
                868 full wave = 345.5mm

                915 1/4 wave = 77.9mm
                915 1/2 wave = 155.9mm
                915 full wave = 327.8mm

                Try shortening a little bit. What kind of wire are you using?

                mar.conteM Offline
                mar.conteM Offline
                mar.conte
                wrote on last edited by
                #122

                @gohan
                Normal wire electric 1 mm diameter

                M.C.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gohanG Offline
                  gohanG Offline
                  gohan
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #123

                  Single core or threaded?

                  mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gohanG gohan

                    Single core or threaded?

                    mar.conteM Offline
                    mar.conteM Offline
                    mar.conte
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #124

                    @gohan
                    Threaded

                    M.C.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gohanG Offline
                      gohanG Offline
                      gohan
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #125

                      You need to use single core, that's why it is not working well

                      mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gohanG gohan

                        You need to use single core, that's why it is not working well

                        mar.conteM Offline
                        mar.conteM Offline
                        mar.conte
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #126

                        @gohan
                        Should it be isolated or even without a sheath?

                        M.C.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gohanG Offline
                          gohanG Offline
                          gohan
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #127

                          I think you can leave insulation on; there are some guides on how to make antennas for rfm69,just Google it. In addition there are also spring single wire antennas for different frequencies you can buy.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mar.conteM mar.conte

                            Then solved the problem of the accuracy of the battery report: basically I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes; The communication problems I solved them by letting antenna from rfm69 so every hour the battery report does not even send pir moviment
                            ....Very strange my rfm69 modules communicate better without an antenna even at a distance of 10 meters with a wall

                            U Offline
                            U Offline
                            user2684
                            Contest Winner
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #128

                            @mar.conte said in NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors:

                            I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes

                            Yes, when the pir wakes the node up, the sleep is aborted and when going back to sleep, it starts from scratch without resuming it. If this is not creating an issue, I'll keep the current behavior. Regarding the antenna, I'm using the small antennas from the store for my RFM69 and have a decent range without big issues.

                            mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U user2684

                              @mar.conte said in NodeManager: plugin for a rapid development of battery-powered sensors:

                              I did not realize that the sleep wait time started from the last pir movement then if i put an hour of sleep and during this active time the pir time resumes

                              Yes, when the pir wakes the node up, the sleep is aborted and when going back to sleep, it starts from scratch without resuming it. If this is not creating an issue, I'll keep the current behavior. Regarding the antenna, I'm using the small antennas from the store for my RFM69 and have a decent range without big issues.

                              mar.conteM Offline
                              mar.conteM Offline
                              mar.conte
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #129

                              @user2684
                              Tanks of course bye

                              M.C.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bilbolodz
                                wrote on last edited by gohan
                                #130

                                I'm trying to build sensor to drive 3 relays and connect it to Domoticz. Simple sketch:

                                // before
                                void before() {
                                  // setup the serial port baud rate
                                  Serial.begin(MY_BAUD_RATE);  
                                  /*
                                   * Register below your sensors
                                  */
                                int przek1 = nodeManager.registerSensor(SENSOR_RELAY,3);
                                int przek2 = nodeManager.registerSensor(SENSOR_RELAY,4);
                                  /*
                                   * Register above your sensors
                                  */
                                  nodeManager.before();
                                }
                                

                                sensors are visible into Domoticz as switches but It's not possible to turn it on/off from Domoticz. It looks that Nodemanager expect REQ message to change state of relay but Domoticz sends SET message to change state:

                                RECV S=0 I=3 C=1 T=2 D=1
                                RECV S=0 I=3 C=1 T=2 D=0

                                When I've used MYSController and send C_REQ message all is working fine.

                                I think that in case of "output" sensors logic of getting/setting should be reversed.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  user2684
                                  Contest Winner
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #131

                                  Hello, I think I was able to implement most of the requests discussed here during the last few weeks in a pre-release v1.5 version. Please consider it still as a dev release which gone through very limited testing but since I had to make quite a few changes to core code, would be great to start collecting some feedback now.

                                  Is is available here: https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/9a485cdcaf8e9856219338553335e2dce7253eb3

                                  It is complicated to reference each of you who requested something so please whoever is interested the full list of new additions/fixes is available here https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/milestone/5?closed=1. I did my best to add verbose comments so you should find all the details there. Please add any comment and report any problem directly to the existing issues on github so I can better understand the context. The documentation has been updated as well.
                                  Thanks

                                  mar.conteM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U user2684

                                    Hello, I think I was able to implement most of the requests discussed here during the last few weeks in a pre-release v1.5 version. Please consider it still as a dev release which gone through very limited testing but since I had to make quite a few changes to core code, would be great to start collecting some feedback now.

                                    Is is available here: https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/9a485cdcaf8e9856219338553335e2dce7253eb3

                                    It is complicated to reference each of you who requested something so please whoever is interested the full list of new additions/fixes is available here https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/milestone/5?closed=1. I did my best to add verbose comments so you should find all the details there. Please add any comment and report any problem directly to the existing issues on github so I can better understand the context. The documentation has been updated as well.
                                    Thanks

                                    mar.conteM Offline
                                    mar.conteM Offline
                                    mar.conte
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #132

                                    @user2684
                                    👍🏾

                                    M.C.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      user2684
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #133

                                      I've just pushed out 1.5-dev3 on https://github.com/mysensors/NodeManager/tree/702a05c7e2f4425c188d5abf62b4a119fea29bc8 fixing a critical bug for the BME280 sensor and providing a way to automatically detect which i2c address the sensor is on for both BME280 and BMP085/BMP180 if anybody is interested.

                                      I'm planning some additional tests so to release a stable v1.5 in a week or two (unfortunately starting from June the real life will become very demanding with me). So please share any feedback by then in case you will have the chance to test the latest dev release. Thanks

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gohanG Offline
                                        gohanG Offline
                                        gohan
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #134

                                        Just in time, I am going to get my BME280 sensor soon :D

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gohanG Offline
                                          gohanG Offline
                                          gohan
                                          Mod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #135

                                          May I ask you a favor? Could you add also the MCP9808 I2C sensor?

                                          U 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          15

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular