Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. OpenHardware.io
  3. 💬 NModule PIR sensor shield

💬 NModule PIR sensor shield

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenHardware.io
contest2017am312am612pirmysensorsnmodule
13 Posts 4 Posters 3.4k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • openhardware.ioO Offline
    openhardware.ioO Offline
    openhardware.io
    wrote on last edited by openhardware.io
    #1

    https://www.openhardware.io/view/400/NModule-PIR-sensor-shield

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
      #2

      Cool! Thanks for posting this. I just now ordered your PIR project boards from Osh Park. Hopefully they'll arrive in two weeks, around the time that my AM612 PIR sensors arrive from China (e-packet delivery). Any chance you may have the rest of the project details posted by then as well? Your project write-ups are always excellent.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Nca78N Offline
        Nca78N Offline
        Nca78
        Hardware Contributor
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        You should have waited a bit for me to test the PCBs, it's never been tested that's why I didn't put any detailed instructions yet.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDie
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by NeverDie
          #4

          I don't mind sharing the risk. Did you run schematic verification on the PCB? In Diptrace, it's one of the simple tests that can be run to ensure that the PCB does correspond to the original schematic, and I presume Eagle has it as well. If ithe board passed that test, then I'm not overly worried.

          Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NeverDieN NeverDie

            I don't mind sharing the risk. Did you run schematic verification on the PCB? In Diptrace, it's one of the simple tests that can be run to ensure that the PCB does correspond to the original schematic, and I presume Eagle has it as well. If ithe board passed that test, then I'm not overly worried.

            Nca78N Offline
            Nca78N Offline
            Nca78
            Hardware Contributor
            wrote on last edited by Nca78
            #5

            @NeverDie said in 💬 NModule PIR sensor shield:

            I don't mind sharing the risk. Did you run schematic verification on the PCB? In Diptrace, it's one of the simple tests that can be run to ensure that the PCB does correspond to the original schematic, and I presume Eagle has it as well. If ithe board passed that test, then I'm not overly worried.

            I don't see the reason of such a test ? Schematic and board/pcb are linked in Eagle, everything I add in schematic is created on the board/pcb also. I just have to make sure all expected connections have a trace (no more "airwires") and make a design rules check to make sure I respect the rules set for PCB manufacturing.

            So yes I did that but I could have made a mistake in the footprint or made a wrong connection on the schematic, some of the PCBs were finished late at night so there's a high probability to have a failure or two in the 8 shields.

            NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Nca78N Nca78

              @NeverDie said in 💬 NModule PIR sensor shield:

              I don't mind sharing the risk. Did you run schematic verification on the PCB? In Diptrace, it's one of the simple tests that can be run to ensure that the PCB does correspond to the original schematic, and I presume Eagle has it as well. If ithe board passed that test, then I'm not overly worried.

              I don't see the reason of such a test ? Schematic and board/pcb are linked in Eagle, everything I add in schematic is created on the board/pcb also. I just have to make sure all expected connections have a trace (no more "airwires") and make a design rules check to make sure I respect the rules set for PCB manufacturing.

              So yes I did that but I could have made a mistake in the footprint or made a wrong connection on the schematic, some of the PCBs were finished late at night so there's a high probability to have a failure or two in the 8 shields.

              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDie
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by NeverDie
              #6

              Understood. In that case I'll make a barebones breakout board for the AM612 as a "Plan B". I figure the odds are good that at least one of our two boards should work! :)

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Nca78N Offline
                Nca78N Offline
                Nca78
                Hardware Contributor
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                So I made a test for the basic functionality of this shield (with 2s ontime and max sensitivity) and it works, but as I said in the other thread even with the SR501 lens it seems to have similar problem than the am312: some "blind" areas where it doesn't detect movement.

                @NeverDie you will tell me when you receive the shield if the PIR fits better than on the PCB I made, as I fixed the footprint on the version that I uploaded on OpenHardware.io following discovery of PDF with exact measurements. It was a bit difficult to put in place on mine :)

                0_1496750394180_IMAG1743.jpg

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • scalzS Offline
                  scalzS Offline
                  scalz
                  Hardware Contributor
                  wrote on last edited by scalz
                  #8

                  i wouldn't choose a CR2032 with a PIR (regarding lifetime...) but it looks nice :+1:
                  too bad for the PIR sensor, not tried yet, i should receive some soon. not a problem on my side, i can use both analog & digital types on my board. Still curious to test those though

                  Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • scalzS scalz

                    i wouldn't choose a CR2032 with a PIR (regarding lifetime...) but it looks nice :+1:
                    too bad for the PIR sensor, not tried yet, i should receive some soon. not a problem on my side, i can use both analog & digital types on my board. Still curious to test those though

                    Nca78N Offline
                    Nca78N Offline
                    Nca78
                    Hardware Contributor
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @scalz said in 💬 NModule PIR sensor shield:

                    i wouldn't choose a CR2032 with a PIR (regarding lifetime...) but it looks nice :+1:

                    Just wanted to test it and this was the only NModule board that was completely soldered :P
                    It can use 2*AA or CR123 for PIR.

                    And no, not looking so good I have butchered the boards when separating them from the panel :D

                    NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Nca78N Nca78

                      @scalz said in 💬 NModule PIR sensor shield:

                      i wouldn't choose a CR2032 with a PIR (regarding lifetime...) but it looks nice :+1:

                      Just wanted to test it and this was the only NModule board that was completely soldered :P
                      It can use 2*AA or CR123 for PIR.

                      And no, not looking so good I have butchered the boards when separating them from the panel :D

                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDie
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                      #10

                      @Nca78
                      I received the PCB today. Comments:

                      1. At least for my lens, the holes are too narrow and I can't fit them in. I'll try boring bigger holes with a drill. If you want, I'll look up for you the hole diameter that I used on my primitive breakout board, because it fit just right (by pure luck I'm sure).

                      2. Lettering on the silkscreen appears to have some issues (see photo):
                        0_1497472710835_pirNode.jpg

                      I'm still waiting to receive my AM612's, so nothing more I can really do right now.

                      Nca78N 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • NeverDieN NeverDie

                        @Nca78
                        I received the PCB today. Comments:

                        1. At least for my lens, the holes are too narrow and I can't fit them in. I'll try boring bigger holes with a drill. If you want, I'll look up for you the hole diameter that I used on my primitive breakout board, because it fit just right (by pure luck I'm sure).

                        2. Lettering on the silkscreen appears to have some issues (see photo):
                          0_1497472710835_pirNode.jpg

                        I'm still waiting to receive my AM612's, so nothing more I can really do right now.

                        Nca78N Offline
                        Nca78N Offline
                        Nca78
                        Hardware Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by Nca78
                        #11

                        @NeverDie I think I know the reason for the silkscreen problem. When you upload please make a zip with all the gerber files but do not include the .brd file. I hide the "Name" layer when I export so I can place the component name where I want, with the size I want, or hide it to replace it with more interesting information. Still some details to fix in the silkscreen though...
                        When you upload the .brd file OSH park will take all layers in it and export them, including the name layer and it will mix up with the additional info I added. It's the same problem with the NModule board.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Nca78N Offline
                          Nca78N Offline
                          Nca78
                          Hardware Contributor
                          wrote on last edited by Nca78
                          #12

                          Regarding the holes it's strange because on my board I have the spacing a bit wrong but the holes are big enough. And I don't remember changing hole size when I fixed the spacing. I'll increase the size anyway as I see on the "datasheet" picture I posted in the other thread that the feet are supposed to be 1.45mm and my holes are only 1.2... Probably my lenses are not really matching the standard.

                          alt text

                          NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Nca78N Nca78

                            Regarding the holes it's strange because on my board I have the spacing a bit wrong but the holes are big enough. And I don't remember changing hole size when I fixed the spacing. I'll increase the size anyway as I see on the "datasheet" picture I posted in the other thread that the feet are supposed to be 1.45mm and my holes are only 1.2... Probably my lenses are not really matching the standard.

                            alt text

                            NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDieN Offline
                            NeverDie
                            Hero Member
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Nca78

                            FWIW, I used 1.55mm holes. There may be no perfect diameter since we don't even know for sure yet which lens will turn out best.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            24

                            Online

                            11.7k

                            Users

                            11.2k

                            Topics

                            113.1k

                            Posts


                            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • MySensors
                            • OpenHardware.io
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular