Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Cannot get RFM69HW connection between ESP8266GW and Pro Mini Sensor

Cannot get RFM69HW connection between ESP8266GW and Pro Mini Sensor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
35 Posts 4 Posters 3.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mfalkviddM Offline
    mfalkviddM Offline
    mfalkvidd
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    I don't know why the code is written the way it is. When I verified the rfm69 wiring and wrote the instructions, I decided to not use the default IRQ pin, since it would interfere with boot (as you also have identified). That's why I added the define instructions to set both MY_RF69_IRQ_PIN and MY_RF69_IRQ_NUM.

    I am not familiar with the rfm69 driver code, but I think what you suggest should work. You are very welcome to create a pull request. If someone has any objections, they can always make their case during the code review.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      elcaron
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      I have already created an issue, but you are right, I could do a pull request.

      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E elcaron

        I have already created an issue, but you are right, I could do a pull request.

        AnticimexA Offline
        AnticimexA Offline
        Anticimex
        Contest Winner
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        @elcaron just add a #fixes tag to your pull request commit message and reference your issue so they get chained.

        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          elcaron
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          @mfalkvidd said in Cannot get RFM69HW connection between ESP8266GW and Pro Mini Sensor:

          When I verified the rfm69 wiring and wrote the instructions, I decided to not use the default IRQ pin

          Maybe note this in the instructions? This cost me 1 year (in which I did not touch the stuff after i didn't work immediately) and a weekend of checking wireing and so on (because with a missing IRQ on the gateway, it looks like nothing is working, while the issue is quite easy to find on a node).

          Ok, PR is filed, I also fixed it for the RFM95, which had the same issue.

          mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E elcaron

            @mfalkvidd said in Cannot get RFM69HW connection between ESP8266GW and Pro Mini Sensor:

            When I verified the rfm69 wiring and wrote the instructions, I decided to not use the default IRQ pin

            Maybe note this in the instructions? This cost me 1 year (in which I did not touch the stuff after i didn't work immediately) and a weekend of checking wireing and so on (because with a missing IRQ on the gateway, it looks like nothing is working, while the issue is quite easy to find on a node).

            Ok, PR is filed, I also fixed it for the RFM95, which had the same issue.

            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkvidd
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            @elcaron could you describe the type of note you think you would have noticed?

            Great work on the PR.

            E 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

              @elcaron could you describe the type of note you think you would have noticed?

              Great work on the PR.

              E Offline
              E Offline
              elcaron
              wrote on last edited by elcaron
              #30

              @mfalkvidd Maybe a "* Different from code default and examples"?
              You do not really expect that you have to change defaults when you get a wiring guide from the official site associated with the code, especially when running an example that is explicitly for the platform (the ESP8266 gateway sketch).

              In hindsight, this was probably stupid, but I didn't even look at the defines below the table, because I thought I was running a working example specifically for the ESP8266 and only needed to find the right pins.

              mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E elcaron

                @mfalkvidd Maybe a "* Different from code default and examples"?
                You do not really expect that you have to change defaults when you get a wiring guide from the official site associated with the code, especially when running an example that is explicitly for the platform (the ESP8266 gateway sketch).

                In hindsight, this was probably stupid, but I didn't even look at the defines below the table, because I thought I was running a working example specifically for the ESP8266 and only needed to find the right pins.

                mfalkviddM Offline
                mfalkviddM Offline
                mfalkvidd
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                @elcaron so we've determined that a note below the table wouldn't work (since you didn't read it). Where would we place the note so you would have noticed it?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Offline
                  E Offline
                  elcaron
                  wrote on last edited by elcaron
                  #32

                  As a * that resolves to above mentioned note directly in the table:
                  D1* | DIO0 | Gray
                  ...
                  Below: * Different from code default and examples

                  As I said, one doesn't necessarily expect that defaults have to changed an ESP-specific example sketch.

                  mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E elcaron

                    As a * that resolves to above mentioned note directly in the table:
                    D1* | DIO0 | Gray
                    ...
                    Below: * Different from code default and examples

                    As I said, one doesn't necessarily expect that defaults have to changed an ESP-specific example sketch.

                    mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkviddM Offline
                    mfalkvidd
                    Mod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    @elcaron thanks. I have updated connecting the radio.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mfalkviddM Offline
                      mfalkviddM Offline
                      mfalkvidd
                      Mod
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      Adding references to github:
                      https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/issues/1075
                      https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/pull/1076

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        elcaron
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        Ok, my setup is running now (including personalization, encryption, and soft signing) and stuff is published to mqtt.
                        Thanks everyone for the help! I really like this community.

                        Now I need to resolve the issue with the OpenHAB binding but that's no topic for here.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        29

                        Online

                        11.7k

                        Users

                        11.2k

                        Topics

                        113.1k

                        Posts


                        Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • MySensors
                        • OpenHardware.io
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular