Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Development
  3. Battery percentage on door contact sensor erratic (sent on interrupt)

Battery percentage on door contact sensor erratic (sent on interrupt)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
20 Posts 5 Posters 2.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rozpruwaczR rozpruwacz

    @greymarvel what kind of battery are You using ? The voltage on the battery may not be constant in short periods, it depends on the load and bettery internal resistance. The higher the internal resistance the bigger are voltage swings in response to load swings. I have two identical boards, differing only in the batery holder, one is for cr2032 (higher internal resistance) and the other is for cr123 (lower internal resistance). These boards have exactyl the same circuit and software, the only difference is the battery type. And the one with cr2032 give me very unstable battery voltage readings while the other very is stable. So for sure it depends on the battery type and the current consumption at the moment of voltage probing.

    G Offline
    G Offline
    GreyLinux
    wrote on last edited by GreyLinux
    #8

    @rozpruwacz I'm using 2 AA batteries . I think it might be worthwhile me using @Yveaux vcc library as a reference and see if that improves things. Also I think I might delay a little longer before the read to allow it to settle more after the contact interrupt .

    rozpruwaczR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G GreyLinux

      @rozpruwacz I'm using 2 AA batteries . I think it might be worthwhile me using @Yveaux vcc library as a reference and see if that improves things. Also I think I might delay a little longer before the read to allow it to settle more after the contact interrupt .

      rozpruwaczR Offline
      rozpruwaczR Offline
      rozpruwacz
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @greymarvel AA batteries should have much lower internal resistance, so I guess that voltage reading should be stable. Good luck finding the problem :)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gohanG Offline
        gohanG Offline
        gohan
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        try adding a little ceramic cap on vcc or near the analog pin you are reading from.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG gohan

          try adding a little ceramic cap on vcc or near the analog pin you are reading from.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          GreyLinux
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          @gohan 0_1522146871766_IMG_20180327_113328.jpg

          This is how it looks I know it's a little messy but a little cap between the high impedance point and A0 will help ?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            are you using a voltage divider on pin A0? if so, a small 0.1uF ceramic should do. If you are using a booster is your only option. In addition you can also consider using a single LiFePO4 battery and use the vcc library to get battery voltage

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gohanG gohan

              are you using a voltage divider on pin A0? if so, a small 0.1uF ceramic should do. If you are using a booster is your only option. In addition you can also consider using a single LiFePO4 battery and use the vcc library to get battery voltage

              G Offline
              G Offline
              GreyLinux
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @gohan yeah it's hard to see but the black wire behind all the radio wires goes to A0 from the divider. I'll put a little cap on this .

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gohanG Offline
                gohanG Offline
                gohan
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                You may also consider some Easy Pcb you can find on openhardware.io that would make a much cleaner solution for your node

                G 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • gohanG gohan

                  You may also consider some Easy Pcb you can find on openhardware.io that would make a much cleaner solution for your node

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  GreyLinux
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @gohan yeah I have some on order. I'm just learning with what I've got till they come and the sensors I've made won't be seen so not a problem for the moment . Thanks again .

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gohanG gohan

                    You may also consider some Easy Pcb you can find on openhardware.io that would make a much cleaner solution for your node

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    GreyLinux
                    wrote on last edited by GreyLinux
                    #16

                    @gohan well adding a cap from the impedance point to A0 has 100% stabilized my readings

                    4630 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                    4632 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    4634 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                    4638 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    4640 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                    4642 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    Sensor value: 862
                    Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                    Battery percent: 13 %
                    4751 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                    4759 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                    4763 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    4765 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                    4767 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    4769 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                    4775 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    4777 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                    4780 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    Sensor value: 863
                    Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                    Battery percent: 13 %
                    4886 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                    4894 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                    4898 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    4900 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                    4902 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    4904 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                    4911 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    4913 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                    4915 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    Sensor value: 862
                    Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                    Battery percent: 13 %
                    5021 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                    5029 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                    5033 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    5036 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                    5038 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    5040 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                    5046 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    5048 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                    5050 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    Sensor value: 862
                    Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                    Battery percent: 13 %
                    5156 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                    5165 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                    5169 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    5171 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                    5173 TSF:TRI:TSB
                    5175 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                    5181 TSF:TDI:TSL
                    

                    however a multi meter gives me 2.90v and the reading is 2.78v i understand it wont be 100% accurate but this far out is a little weird my other sensors are about 1 or 2 volts if that . any ideas?

                    rozpruwaczR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G GreyLinux

                      @gohan well adding a cap from the impedance point to A0 has 100% stabilized my readings

                      4630 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                      4632 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      4634 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                      4638 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      4640 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                      4642 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      Sensor value: 862
                      Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                      Battery percent: 13 %
                      4751 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                      4759 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                      4763 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      4765 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                      4767 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      4769 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                      4775 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      4777 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                      4780 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      Sensor value: 863
                      Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                      Battery percent: 13 %
                      4886 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                      4894 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                      4898 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      4900 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                      4902 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      4904 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                      4911 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      4913 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                      4915 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      Sensor value: 862
                      Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                      Battery percent: 13 %
                      5021 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:0
                      5029 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                      5033 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      5036 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                      5038 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      5040 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                      5046 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      5048 MCO:SLP:WUP=1
                      5050 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      Sensor value: 862
                      Battery Voltage: 2.78 V
                      Battery percent: 13 %
                      5156 TSF:MSG:SEND,4-4-0-0,s=3,c=1,t=16,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:1
                      5165 MCO:SLP:MS=5,SMS=0,I1=255,M1=255,I2=255,M2=255
                      5169 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      5171 MCO:SLP:WUP=-1
                      5173 TSF:TRI:TSB
                      5175 MCO:SLP:MS=0,SMS=0,I1=1,M1=1,I2=255,M2=255
                      5181 TSF:TDI:TSL
                      

                      however a multi meter gives me 2.90v and the reading is 2.78v i understand it wont be 100% accurate but this far out is a little weird my other sensors are about 1 or 2 volts if that . any ideas?

                      rozpruwaczR Offline
                      rozpruwaczR Offline
                      rozpruwacz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @greymarvel check the actual values of the resistors in voltage divider how far they are from the nominal values. Resistors have some tolerance so they are not exactly 1kOhm or whatever, this makes the division ratio different than You take into account calculating voltage from ADC reading.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gohanG Offline
                        gohanG Offline
                        gohan
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        also the internal reference is not 100% accurate, so you can't have a multimeter precision. There is a battery measurement code that you can add some correction to it, look into the examples

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Offline
                          G Offline
                          GreyLinux
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @rozpruwacz I've checked the values and they don't seem to be that far from expected but as you say they definitely weren't the stated resistance . I think @gohan is right I will add the correction in the sketch and try and get it reasonably close. Thanks again everyone for your help .

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BulldogLowellB Offline
                            BulldogLowellB Offline
                            BulldogLowell
                            Contest Winner
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            As the analog pins share a single A2D, rapid use of it can cause the previous read to impact the next. A common workaround in this situation is to read twice on each input, ignoring the first.

                            try that:

                            // read analog pin
                              (void) analogRead(BATTERY_SENSE_PIN);
                              int sensorValue = analogRead(BATTERY_SENSE_PIN);
                              // calculate battery voltage
                              float vBat  = static_cast<float>(sensorValue * (V_MAX/1023));
                            
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            16

                            Online

                            11.7k

                            Users

                            11.2k

                            Topics

                            113.1k

                            Posts


                            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • MySensors
                            • OpenHardware.io
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular