Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Everything nRF52840

Everything nRF52840

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
323 Posts 28 Posters 50.5k Views 33 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN NeverDie

    @rozpruwacz The nRF52840 chip itself should be better because of its greater receive sensitivity.You didn't say exactly what you're comparing it against (aside from it being an nRF51822), but the dongle has a smallish antenna and a small ground plane. Usually those don't have as good a range. It's one of the trade-offs that comes with smaller size. It may also be more directional that what you're expecting, so try rotating it and see if that makes a difference.

    rozpruwaczR Offline
    rozpruwaczR Offline
    rozpruwacz
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    @neverdie i'm comparing it with core51822 module which also has pcb antenna

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDieN Offline
      NeverDie
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #185

      I just now posted a much easier mecrisp-starellis FORTH for the nRF52840-DK: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52840-DK_easy/blob/master/README.md

      On this one, all you need do is upload the hex file located in that repository and you're done. :-)

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NeverDieN NeverDie

        I just now posted a much easier mecrisp-starellis FORTH for the nRF52840-DK: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52840-DK_easy/blob/master/README.md

        On this one, all you need do is upload the hex file located in that repository and you're done. :-)

        H Offline
        H Offline
        heinzv
        wrote on last edited by
        #186

        @neverdie interesting research and ideas. Have you tried to get BLE 5.0 running (the S140 SD) or using the nrf52840 radio features (best with long range) so that we can consider a sensor node/actor and does the sleep properly work? There are some basic features which have to work before switching the development/runtime env.

        NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H heinzv

          @neverdie interesting research and ideas. Have you tried to get BLE 5.0 running (the S140 SD) or using the nrf52840 radio features (best with long range) so that we can consider a sensor node/actor and does the sleep properly work? There are some basic features which have to work before switching the development/runtime env.

          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDie
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #187

          @heinzv

          I haven't been working on that per se, but I do have a REPL over radio working: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52_wireless_Forth_REPL
          which can also be used for doing OTA code updates.

          H 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NeverDieN NeverDie

            @heinzv

            I haven't been working on that per se, but I do have a REPL over radio working: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52_wireless_Forth_REPL
            which can also be used for doing OTA code updates.

            H Offline
            H Offline
            heinzv
            wrote on last edited by
            #188

            @NeverDie You doing a great research! I have quickly checked your REPL code and the radio lib.
            So you have implemented a OSI Layer 3+4 (Transport Layer with IP/TCP Stack).
            I'm wondering if/how this can be used to complay to BLE 5.0 (long range), ZigBee and Threads which the new Nordic SDK (Zigbee and Threads 2.0) offers? Are they also using the Softdevice S140 (6.1) libs or ...?
            There is a ZigBee OTA update example provided by Nordic (but I have not yet enogh time to test it).
            Currently, I'm still using MySensors and the NRF5_ESP (Nordic private) protocol which works. IT would be also interesting to use a more industry standard protocol like ZigBee or THREADS which seem to be also supported by OpenHAB.
            I'll certainly do further investigations in this direction. I have tried to test it with Segger Embedded studio and also with IAR Studio for ARM (the second requires some newer 32Bit version libs from Nordic and an internat request for that was raised already). Segger works fine with the J-Link adapters.

            NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H heinzv

              @NeverDie You doing a great research! I have quickly checked your REPL code and the radio lib.
              So you have implemented a OSI Layer 3+4 (Transport Layer with IP/TCP Stack).
              I'm wondering if/how this can be used to complay to BLE 5.0 (long range), ZigBee and Threads which the new Nordic SDK (Zigbee and Threads 2.0) offers? Are they also using the Softdevice S140 (6.1) libs or ...?
              There is a ZigBee OTA update example provided by Nordic (but I have not yet enogh time to test it).
              Currently, I'm still using MySensors and the NRF5_ESP (Nordic private) protocol which works. IT would be also interesting to use a more industry standard protocol like ZigBee or THREADS which seem to be also supported by OpenHAB.
              I'll certainly do further investigations in this direction. I have tried to test it with Segger Embedded studio and also with IAR Studio for ARM (the second requires some newer 32Bit version libs from Nordic and an internat request for that was raised already). Segger works fine with the J-Link adapters.

              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDie
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by
              #189

              @heinzv said in Everything nRF52840:

              I'm wondering if/how this can be used to complay to BLE 5.0 (long range), ZigBee and Threads which the new Nordic SDK (Zigbee and Threads 2.0) offers? Are they also using the Softdevice S140 (6.1) libs or ...?

              If you specifically want those protocols, then at present the Nordic SDK is the only existing library I know of that will get you them.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #190

                It appears that Fanstel is now selling the amplified nRF52840 modules:
                https://www.fanstel.com/bt840f-nrf52840-ble-5-module-secure-iot-802154-thread-zigbee-1

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alowhumA Offline
                  alowhumA Offline
                  alowhum
                  Plugin Developer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #191

                  Wait, what? The nRF52840 can now act as a Zigbee device too??

                  So I could make Arduino projects that talk Zigbee?

                  NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • alowhumA alowhum

                    Wait, what? The nRF52840 can now act as a Zigbee device too??

                    So I could make Arduino projects that talk Zigbee?

                    NeverDieN Offline
                    NeverDieN Offline
                    NeverDie
                    Hero Member
                    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                    #192

                    @alowhum Well, 802.15.4 for sure. I already did it, as I reported earlier. Beyond that, there's no native on-chip support for Zigbee per se. Maybe they confused it with zigbee? https://www.electronicdesign.com/what-s-difference-between/what-s-difference-between-ieee-802154-and-zigbee-wireless

                    That said, someone could certainly write a zigbee on top of it. It's meant for stuff like that. I imagine Thread is already written on top of it.

                    Anyway, I suspect that the amplified nRF52840 modules will be as good as it gets for quite some time and will remain relevant for years to come. The long wait is finally over!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDieN Offline
                      NeverDie
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                      #193

                      By the way, I now have the wireless FORTH REPL working on the same nRF52840-dongle as in the OP of this thread: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52840-Dongle_hex/blob/master/README.md

                      I can plug the dongle into any USB port to power it, and with the wireless REPL the experience is exactly the same as if I had a wired serial connection to the dongle. I can interact with the REPL, start programs, load code or updates, and/or debug--all wirelessly. If you want to try it, I have getting started instructions in the github repository.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        blademckain
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #194

                        Someone know if exist a usb nRF52840-dongle (with external antenna ) to plug into a raspberry to scan nearby tag?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alowhumA Offline
                          alowhumA Offline
                          alowhum
                          Plugin Developer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #195

                          @blademckain The Micro:bit comes close.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nagelcN Offline
                            nagelcN Offline
                            nagelc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #196

                            The new Arduino Nano 33 BLE is going to use the nrf52840. It will be interesting to see how support for the nrf52840 evolves in the Arduino environment.

                            https://hackaday.com/2019/05/19/new-arduino-nano-line-rolls-out-in-four-flavors-at-maker-faire-bay-area/

                            monteM 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • nagelcN nagelc

                              The new Arduino Nano 33 BLE is going to use the nrf52840. It will be interesting to see how support for the nrf52840 evolves in the Arduino environment.

                              https://hackaday.com/2019/05/19/new-arduino-nano-line-rolls-out-in-four-flavors-at-maker-faire-bay-area/

                              monteM Offline
                              monteM Offline
                              monte
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #197
                              This post is deleted!
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • alowhumA Offline
                                alowhumA Offline
                                alowhum
                                Plugin Developer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #198

                                @nagelc that's great news!!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nagelcN Offline
                                  nagelcN Offline
                                  nagelc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #199

                                  Arduino Nano 33 BLE code is coming out. It's going to be based on MBED. Here's a discussion on the Arcuino Blog:
                                  https://blog.arduino.cc/2019/07/31/why-we-chose-to-build-the-arduino-nano-33-ble-core-on-mbed-os/

                                  I think it is interesting that no one has updated Sandeep Mistry's code for the NRF52840. Since it has been so long, I'm guessing this is not an easy task.

                                  NeverDieN monteM 2 Replies Last reply
                                  1
                                  • nagelcN nagelc

                                    Arduino Nano 33 BLE code is coming out. It's going to be based on MBED. Here's a discussion on the Arcuino Blog:
                                    https://blog.arduino.cc/2019/07/31/why-we-chose-to-build-the-arduino-nano-33-ble-core-on-mbed-os/

                                    I think it is interesting that no one has updated Sandeep Mistry's code for the NRF52840. Since it has been so long, I'm guessing this is not an easy task.

                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDieN Offline
                                    NeverDie
                                    Hero Member
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #200

                                    @nagelc thanks for the update. Mbed has a lot of overhead to it, but anything is better than moving mountains alone.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • simboS Offline
                                      simboS Offline
                                      simbo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #201

                                      Someone may get some reuse out of this. I've made a 3d printed prototyping rig for the NRF52840 DK board as part of my MySensors adventures....

                                      https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3836487

                                      1_1567139386009_Photo 30-8-19, 2 10 17 pm.jpg 0_1567139386008_Photo 30-8-19, 2 10 43 pm.jpg

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • nagelcN nagelc

                                        Arduino Nano 33 BLE code is coming out. It's going to be based on MBED. Here's a discussion on the Arcuino Blog:
                                        https://blog.arduino.cc/2019/07/31/why-we-chose-to-build-the-arduino-nano-33-ble-core-on-mbed-os/

                                        I think it is interesting that no one has updated Sandeep Mistry's code for the NRF52840. Since it has been so long, I'm guessing this is not an easy task.

                                        monteM Offline
                                        monteM Offline
                                        monte
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #202

                                        @nagelc I think Sandeep Mistry is working on new arduino core, based on mbed. As you can see he is titled as "Senior Software Engineer at Arduino" here. So I guess Mysensors community would need to move to new core eventually, or to fork Sandeep's core and develop it alone. I would prefer the first choice.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • scalzS Offline
                                          scalzS Offline
                                          scalz
                                          Hardware Contributor
                                          wrote on last edited by scalz
                                          #203

                                          @monte
                                          I remember in first place they mentioned apache mynewt a while ago, but finally they are moving to mbed.. still nice to hear. I think this new arduino/mbed core has not everything yet for running MySensors, that needs some work on proprietary rf.., whereas there are other working cores. At least for short-mid term. There are so much nice things to improve or add on todolist.
                                          Team knows about new mcus, new cores etc :nerd_face: what's missing is time, resources vs real life and projects!

                                          monteM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          11

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular