Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Everything nRF52840

Everything nRF52840

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
323 Posts 28 Posters 50.5k Views 33 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H heinzv

    @neverdie interesting research and ideas. Have you tried to get BLE 5.0 running (the S140 SD) or using the nrf52840 radio features (best with long range) so that we can consider a sensor node/actor and does the sleep properly work? There are some basic features which have to work before switching the development/runtime env.

    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDie
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    @heinzv

    I haven't been working on that per se, but I do have a REPL over radio working: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52_wireless_Forth_REPL
    which can also be used for doing OTA code updates.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN NeverDie

      @heinzv

      I haven't been working on that per se, but I do have a REPL over radio working: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52_wireless_Forth_REPL
      which can also be used for doing OTA code updates.

      H Offline
      H Offline
      heinzv
      wrote on last edited by
      #188

      @NeverDie You doing a great research! I have quickly checked your REPL code and the radio lib.
      So you have implemented a OSI Layer 3+4 (Transport Layer with IP/TCP Stack).
      I'm wondering if/how this can be used to complay to BLE 5.0 (long range), ZigBee and Threads which the new Nordic SDK (Zigbee and Threads 2.0) offers? Are they also using the Softdevice S140 (6.1) libs or ...?
      There is a ZigBee OTA update example provided by Nordic (but I have not yet enogh time to test it).
      Currently, I'm still using MySensors and the NRF5_ESP (Nordic private) protocol which works. IT would be also interesting to use a more industry standard protocol like ZigBee or THREADS which seem to be also supported by OpenHAB.
      I'll certainly do further investigations in this direction. I have tried to test it with Segger Embedded studio and also with IAR Studio for ARM (the second requires some newer 32Bit version libs from Nordic and an internat request for that was raised already). Segger works fine with the J-Link adapters.

      NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H heinzv

        @NeverDie You doing a great research! I have quickly checked your REPL code and the radio lib.
        So you have implemented a OSI Layer 3+4 (Transport Layer with IP/TCP Stack).
        I'm wondering if/how this can be used to complay to BLE 5.0 (long range), ZigBee and Threads which the new Nordic SDK (Zigbee and Threads 2.0) offers? Are they also using the Softdevice S140 (6.1) libs or ...?
        There is a ZigBee OTA update example provided by Nordic (but I have not yet enogh time to test it).
        Currently, I'm still using MySensors and the NRF5_ESP (Nordic private) protocol which works. IT would be also interesting to use a more industry standard protocol like ZigBee or THREADS which seem to be also supported by OpenHAB.
        I'll certainly do further investigations in this direction. I have tried to test it with Segger Embedded studio and also with IAR Studio for ARM (the second requires some newer 32Bit version libs from Nordic and an internat request for that was raised already). Segger works fine with the J-Link adapters.

        NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDieN Offline
        NeverDie
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #189

        @heinzv said in Everything nRF52840:

        I'm wondering if/how this can be used to complay to BLE 5.0 (long range), ZigBee and Threads which the new Nordic SDK (Zigbee and Threads 2.0) offers? Are they also using the Softdevice S140 (6.1) libs or ...?

        If you specifically want those protocols, then at present the Nordic SDK is the only existing library I know of that will get you them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDieN Offline
          NeverDie
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by
          #190

          It appears that Fanstel is now selling the amplified nRF52840 modules:
          https://www.fanstel.com/bt840f-nrf52840-ble-5-module-secure-iot-802154-thread-zigbee-1

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • alowhumA Offline
            alowhumA Offline
            alowhum
            Plugin Developer
            wrote on last edited by
            #191

            Wait, what? The nRF52840 can now act as a Zigbee device too??

            So I could make Arduino projects that talk Zigbee?

            NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alowhumA alowhum

              Wait, what? The nRF52840 can now act as a Zigbee device too??

              So I could make Arduino projects that talk Zigbee?

              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDieN Offline
              NeverDie
              Hero Member
              wrote on last edited by NeverDie
              #192

              @alowhum Well, 802.15.4 for sure. I already did it, as I reported earlier. Beyond that, there's no native on-chip support for Zigbee per se. Maybe they confused it with zigbee? https://www.electronicdesign.com/what-s-difference-between/what-s-difference-between-ieee-802154-and-zigbee-wireless

              That said, someone could certainly write a zigbee on top of it. It's meant for stuff like that. I imagine Thread is already written on top of it.

              Anyway, I suspect that the amplified nRF52840 modules will be as good as it gets for quite some time and will remain relevant for years to come. The long wait is finally over!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by NeverDie
                #193

                By the way, I now have the wireless FORTH REPL working on the same nRF52840-dongle as in the OP of this thread: https://github.com/rabbithat/nRF52840-Dongle_hex/blob/master/README.md

                I can plug the dongle into any USB port to power it, and with the wireless REPL the experience is exactly the same as if I had a wired serial connection to the dongle. I can interact with the REPL, start programs, load code or updates, and/or debug--all wirelessly. If you want to try it, I have getting started instructions in the github repository.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • B Offline
                  B Offline
                  blademckain
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #194

                  Someone know if exist a usb nRF52840-dongle (with external antenna ) to plug into a raspberry to scan nearby tag?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • alowhumA Offline
                    alowhumA Offline
                    alowhum
                    Plugin Developer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #195

                    @blademckain The Micro:bit comes close.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nagelcN Offline
                      nagelcN Offline
                      nagelc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #196

                      The new Arduino Nano 33 BLE is going to use the nrf52840. It will be interesting to see how support for the nrf52840 evolves in the Arduino environment.

                      https://hackaday.com/2019/05/19/new-arduino-nano-line-rolls-out-in-four-flavors-at-maker-faire-bay-area/

                      monteM 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • nagelcN nagelc

                        The new Arduino Nano 33 BLE is going to use the nrf52840. It will be interesting to see how support for the nrf52840 evolves in the Arduino environment.

                        https://hackaday.com/2019/05/19/new-arduino-nano-line-rolls-out-in-four-flavors-at-maker-faire-bay-area/

                        monteM Offline
                        monteM Offline
                        monte
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #197
                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • alowhumA Offline
                          alowhumA Offline
                          alowhum
                          Plugin Developer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #198

                          @nagelc that's great news!!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nagelcN Offline
                            nagelcN Offline
                            nagelc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #199

                            Arduino Nano 33 BLE code is coming out. It's going to be based on MBED. Here's a discussion on the Arcuino Blog:
                            https://blog.arduino.cc/2019/07/31/why-we-chose-to-build-the-arduino-nano-33-ble-core-on-mbed-os/

                            I think it is interesting that no one has updated Sandeep Mistry's code for the NRF52840. Since it has been so long, I'm guessing this is not an easy task.

                            NeverDieN monteM 2 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            • nagelcN nagelc

                              Arduino Nano 33 BLE code is coming out. It's going to be based on MBED. Here's a discussion on the Arcuino Blog:
                              https://blog.arduino.cc/2019/07/31/why-we-chose-to-build-the-arduino-nano-33-ble-core-on-mbed-os/

                              I think it is interesting that no one has updated Sandeep Mistry's code for the NRF52840. Since it has been so long, I'm guessing this is not an easy task.

                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDieN Offline
                              NeverDie
                              Hero Member
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #200

                              @nagelc thanks for the update. Mbed has a lot of overhead to it, but anything is better than moving mountains alone.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • simboS Offline
                                simboS Offline
                                simbo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #201

                                Someone may get some reuse out of this. I've made a 3d printed prototyping rig for the NRF52840 DK board as part of my MySensors adventures....

                                https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3836487

                                1_1567139386009_Photo 30-8-19, 2 10 17 pm.jpg 0_1567139386008_Photo 30-8-19, 2 10 43 pm.jpg

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • nagelcN nagelc

                                  Arduino Nano 33 BLE code is coming out. It's going to be based on MBED. Here's a discussion on the Arcuino Blog:
                                  https://blog.arduino.cc/2019/07/31/why-we-chose-to-build-the-arduino-nano-33-ble-core-on-mbed-os/

                                  I think it is interesting that no one has updated Sandeep Mistry's code for the NRF52840. Since it has been so long, I'm guessing this is not an easy task.

                                  monteM Offline
                                  monteM Offline
                                  monte
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #202

                                  @nagelc I think Sandeep Mistry is working on new arduino core, based on mbed. As you can see he is titled as "Senior Software Engineer at Arduino" here. So I guess Mysensors community would need to move to new core eventually, or to fork Sandeep's core and develop it alone. I would prefer the first choice.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • scalzS Offline
                                    scalzS Offline
                                    scalz
                                    Hardware Contributor
                                    wrote on last edited by scalz
                                    #203

                                    @monte
                                    I remember in first place they mentioned apache mynewt a while ago, but finally they are moving to mbed.. still nice to hear. I think this new arduino/mbed core has not everything yet for running MySensors, that needs some work on proprietary rf.., whereas there are other working cores. At least for short-mid term. There are so much nice things to improve or add on todolist.
                                    Team knows about new mcus, new cores etc :nerd_face: what's missing is time, resources vs real life and projects!

                                    monteM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • scalzS scalz

                                      @monte
                                      I remember in first place they mentioned apache mynewt a while ago, but finally they are moving to mbed.. still nice to hear. I think this new arduino/mbed core has not everything yet for running MySensors, that needs some work on proprietary rf.., whereas there are other working cores. At least for short-mid term. There are so much nice things to improve or add on todolist.
                                      Team knows about new mcus, new cores etc :nerd_face: what's missing is time, resources vs real life and projects!

                                      monteM Offline
                                      monteM Offline
                                      monte
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #204

                                      @scalz With official support from arduino and massive amount of chinese clone boards and much more powerful hardware I think in a year new nano board can become a new standard. Not to mention that single board which already has everything to work with mysensors is something many people where looking for for years.
                                      I understand the time constrains, and am always thankful for a dev's work for community's good :)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • scalzS Offline
                                        scalzS Offline
                                        scalz
                                        Hardware Contributor
                                        wrote on last edited by scalz
                                        #205

                                        @monte sure would be nice, no need to argue on this, about a standard. (still not sure imho if 2.4g would be best choice). I'm wondering if adafruit will give up on all the work they made on their custom core too (I imagine they have no hurry, and wait to see if that'll be promising).
                                        let's see what will happen. and perhaps next year there will be new better mcus again, almost sure :grin:

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H heinzv

                                          @neverdie I admit that I also powered the module via the DK because it takes less than 20mA. I used this connection description: 0_1538973615073_nRF52_DK_0005.layout.png
                                          But I'll try to use a complete an external PS next time and see if it makes a difference.

                                          A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          Amine Alami
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #206

                                          @heinzv Sorry to cut-in with an unrelated comment, but can you tell me how or from where you got this nice schematic diagram? I am looking for one that has other cards such as Raspberry Pi and TI cards for an architectural diagram

                                          Cheers

                                          H 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          17

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular