Small wall outlet sensor node
-
really cool :) what are u using to convert the AC-DC ? how u doing it ?
@sharath-krishna thanks
yearly in this thread you can find a schematics.
I'm using here SR10. Many alternatives were discussed here http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/687/230v-power-supply-to-arduinoI've found a solution to my problem with DHT. I put delay(500) at the beginning of setup().
This is needed to stabilize DC before initializing DHT.
Alternatively a 4.7uF capacitor can be connected between RESET and GND -
This is my combined sketch with automatic detection of connected many DS18B20 and DHT11/22
#define RADIO_CHANNEL 76 #define DS18B20_PIN A0 #define DS18B20_MAX_SENSORS 8 #define DHT_PIN A5 #define LED_PIN 5 #define SLEEP_TIME_SEC 60 #include <avr/wdt.h> #include <avr/interrupt.h> #include <avr/sleep.h> #include <MySensor.h> #include <SPI.h> #include <DallasTemperature.h> #include <OneWire.h> #include <DHT.h> // DS18B20 OneWire oneWire(DS18B20_PIN); DallasTemperature sensors(&oneWire); MyMessage msgHum(0, V_HUM); MyMessage msgTemp(0, V_TEMP); struct { struct { uint8_t count; float lastTemperature[DS18B20_MAX_SENSORS]; } ds18b20; struct { DHT sensor; uint8_t count; float lastTemp; float lastHum; } dht; MySensor gw; } var; ISR(WDT_vect) { } void setup() { wdt_disable(); //delay(500); pinMode(LED_PIN, OUTPUT); digitalWrite(LED_PIN, HIGH); // init mysensors var.gw.begin(NULL, AUTO, false, AUTO, RF24_PA_LEVEL,RADIO_CHANNEL); // init dalas sensors.begin(); var.ds18b20.count = sensors.getDeviceCount(); if(var.ds18b20.count > DS18B20_MAX_SENSORS) var.ds18b20.count = DS18B20_MAX_SENSORS; // init dht digitalWrite(LED_PIN, LOW); var.dht.sensor.setup(DHT_PIN); float temperature = var.dht.sensor.getTemperature(); var.dht.count = (isnan(temperature))?0:1; var.gw.sendSketchInfo("WallCombined", "1.0"); // present ds18b20 for (int i=0; i<var.ds18b20.count; i++) { var.gw.present(i+2, S_TEMP); } if(var.dht.count) { var.gw.present(0, S_HUM); var.gw.present(1, S_TEMP); } var.gw.debugPrint(PSTR("Init of combined sensor: %d ds18b20 sensors, %d dht sensors\n"), var.ds18b20.count, var.dht.count); for(int i=0; i < var.ds18b20.count + var.dht.count; i++) { digitalWrite(LED_PIN, LOW); delay(500); digitalWrite(LED_PIN, HIGH); delay(1000); } } void loop() { // Process incoming messages (like config from server) var.gw.process(); // Fetch temperatures from Dallas sensors if(var.ds18b20.count) sensors.requestTemperatures(); // Read temperatures and send them to controller for (int i=0; i<var.ds18b20.count; i++) { // Fetch and round temperature to one decimal float temperature = static_cast<float>(static_cast<int>((var.gw.getConfig().isMetric?sensors.getTempCByIndex(i):sensors.getTempFByIndex(i)) * 10.)) / 10.; // Only send data if temperature has changed and no error if (var.ds18b20.lastTemperature[i] != temperature && temperature != -127.00) { // Send in the new temperature var.gw.send(msgTemp.setSensor(i+2).set(temperature,1)); var.ds18b20.lastTemperature[i]=temperature; } } if(var.dht.count) { boolean metric = var.gw.getConfig().isMetric; float temperature = var.dht.sensor.getTemperature(); if (isnan(temperature)) { var.gw.debugPrint(PSTR("Failed reading temperature from DHT\n")); } else if (temperature != var.dht.lastTemp) { var.dht.lastTemp = temperature; if (!metric) { temperature = var.dht.sensor.toFahrenheit(temperature); } var.gw.send(msgTemp.setSensor(1).set(temperature, 1)); } float humidity = var.dht.sensor.getHumidity(); if (isnan(humidity)) { var.gw.debugPrint(PSTR("Failed reading humidity from DHT")); } else if (humidity != var.dht.lastHum) { var.dht.lastHum = humidity; var.gw.send(msgHum.setSensor(0).set(humidity, 1)); } } digitalWrite(LED_PIN, HIGH); delay(5000); digitalWrite(LED_PIN, LOW); delay(500); // sleep Serial.flush(); var.gw.powerDown(); for(int wdt_count=SLEEP_TIME_SEC; wdt_count > 0; wdt_count--) { wdt_enable(WDTO_1S); WDTCSR |= (1 << WDIE); set_sleep_mode(SLEEP_MODE_PWR_DOWN); sleep_enable(); sei(); sleep_cpu(); sleep_disable(); } wdt_disable(); } -
3D models are published here http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:688442
@axillent said:
3D models are published here http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:688442
nice job
can you tell us what kind of 3D printer you are using, and if you are happy with it.
I have a lot of electronics, and not a lot of housings.... I'm thinking about jumping in!
-
@axillent said:
3D models are published here http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:688442
nice job
can you tell us what kind of 3D printer you are using, and if you are happy with it.
I have a lot of electronics, and not a lot of housings.... I'm thinking about jumping in!
@BulldogLowell I'm using Makerbot Replicator 2 for more than 2 years
I have nothing to compare with. But it gives the possibilities I never have.
From hardware side I had to fix some problems Replicator 2 is having. New models I hope is more sufficient.
Makerbot is progressing, at least an improvement on software side is essential.Today you will find many brands and many models to choose from.
-
really cool :) what are u using to convert the AC-DC ? how u doing it ?
@axillent How do you upload the sketch? Do you solder in a preprogrammed atmega or are there connectors on the board? The DHT needs only 1.5 mA. Wouldn't it be possible to supply this with an digital out pin of the atmega? This way you could delay the power up process.
-
Just a fair warning for anyone considering a new ("5th generation") Makerbot Replicator. Check up on some reviews before getting one. Things have apparently gone downhill since the good old days. Extruders don't last as long etc. If anyone is willing to pay the sort of price that Makerbot is asking there are better alternatives.
http://nicklievendag.com/makerbot-replicator-5th-generation-review/Also, the Makerbot software is painfully slow compared to most alternatives.
http://nicklievendag.com/simplify3d-vs-makerbot-desktop/
http://www.fabbaloo.com/blog/2014/7/20/hands-on-with-simplify3d
Not that I endorse Simplify3D. There are free / open-source alternatives that are just as fast.Finally, I'm skeptical about the legal details surrounding Thingiverse.
-
@axillent How do you upload the sketch? Do you solder in a preprogrammed atmega or are there connectors on the board? The DHT needs only 1.5 mA. Wouldn't it be possible to supply this with an digital out pin of the atmega? This way you could delay the power up process.
@Jan-Gatzke originally a pre-loaded MCU were soldered but later I solder on top of the PCB a 6 pin ISP connectors
There is no need to source DHT from the MCU pin, it is simple to put delay at the beginning of setup or use highest startup time by fuses (my choice)the original idea is to use pogopin connector, but I've just ordered them and not yet received. I need a very small footprint ISP connector for Mysensors devices
@bjornhallberg said:
Just a fair warning for anyone considering a new ("5th generation") Makerbot Replicator. Check up on some reviews before getting one.
have no experience with 5th generation but fully agree with you that there are many alternatives
Also, the Makerbot software is painfully slow compared to most alternatives.
it is not true. I'm very satisfied with the performance of the software.
I do not believe that someone can be faster than instantaneousFinally, I'm skeptical about the legal details surrounding Thingiverse.
what kind of issues?
-
@Jan-Gatzke originally a pre-loaded MCU were soldered but later I solder on top of the PCB a 6 pin ISP connectors
There is no need to source DHT from the MCU pin, it is simple to put delay at the beginning of setup or use highest startup time by fuses (my choice)the original idea is to use pogopin connector, but I've just ordered them and not yet received. I need a very small footprint ISP connector for Mysensors devices
@bjornhallberg said:
Just a fair warning for anyone considering a new ("5th generation") Makerbot Replicator. Check up on some reviews before getting one.
have no experience with 5th generation but fully agree with you that there are many alternatives
Also, the Makerbot software is painfully slow compared to most alternatives.
it is not true. I'm very satisfied with the performance of the software.
I do not believe that someone can be faster than instantaneousFinally, I'm skeptical about the legal details surrounding Thingiverse.
what kind of issues?
@axillent said:
Also, the Makerbot software is painfully slow compared to most alternatives.
it is not true. I'm very satisfied with the performance of the software.
I do not believe that someone can be faster than instantaneousI meant slicing speeds on very complex models specifically. But it would not surprise me if the print quality / toolpaths created are better with competing software as well.
Finally, I'm skeptical about the legal details surrounding Thingiverse.
what kind of issues?
Like Facebook and other big corporations where they basically own the data you upload and store on their servers.
Oh, also, bonus points to Makerbot / Stratasys for actually stealing technology and incorporating it into their own designs:
http://3dprintingindustry.com/2014/05/28/makerbot-become-takerbot/Bottom line, your Replicator 2 is in many ways better than the current line-up from Makerbot. Mostly because the extruder will last you many thousands of hours and not just 200-500 or whatever they guarantee these days when people come complaining.
The biggest joke is perhaps their massive Z18 printer, which costs a fortune, puts out dismal results (at least without a ton of tweaking if at all possible), can't handle ABS and is really slow. Plus having the same lousy extruder. I mean, 200 hours on the Z18 could translate into just 10 reasonably big print jobs. They actually got one at my local Makerspace. :dizzy_face: They could have gotten two ordinary printers for the price of that one ...
-
@axillent said:
Also, the Makerbot software is painfully slow compared to most alternatives.
it is not true. I'm very satisfied with the performance of the software.
I do not believe that someone can be faster than instantaneousI meant slicing speeds on very complex models specifically. But it would not surprise me if the print quality / toolpaths created are better with competing software as well.
Finally, I'm skeptical about the legal details surrounding Thingiverse.
what kind of issues?
Like Facebook and other big corporations where they basically own the data you upload and store on their servers.
Oh, also, bonus points to Makerbot / Stratasys for actually stealing technology and incorporating it into their own designs:
http://3dprintingindustry.com/2014/05/28/makerbot-become-takerbot/Bottom line, your Replicator 2 is in many ways better than the current line-up from Makerbot. Mostly because the extruder will last you many thousands of hours and not just 200-500 or whatever they guarantee these days when people come complaining.
The biggest joke is perhaps their massive Z18 printer, which costs a fortune, puts out dismal results (at least without a ton of tweaking if at all possible), can't handle ABS and is really slow. Plus having the same lousy extruder. I mean, 200 hours on the Z18 could translate into just 10 reasonably big print jobs. They actually got one at my local Makerspace. :dizzy_face: They could have gotten two ordinary printers for the price of that one ...
@bjornhallberg bad to know that new models are worse
actually had no plans to upgrade. For the nearest feature I'm fine with Repl2.
it is also important that I made a required tuning and able to recover many things by myself
already have an experience and know what to expectI do not think my models complicated but the slicing speed was improved by handred times in the first year of the purchase
today i have to wait almost none before printing startswhat is even more important - raft support was improved revolutionary. Before it was sucks to print surface on the raft - it became ugly and unacceptable as a from panel. Now all are very different
-
Great project axillent +1
-
Great project axillent +1
-
@Johnny-B-Good thanks!
-
@axillent How do you upload the sketch? Do you solder in a preprogrammed atmega or are there connectors on the board? The DHT needs only 1.5 mA. Wouldn't it be possible to supply this with an digital out pin of the atmega? This way you could delay the power up process.
-
@axillent i wanted some more information along with the schematics.. like the wattage of the resistors used and also the type and voltage rating of the capacitors . Please could you provide the same ?
-
@axillent i wanted some more information along with the schematics.. like the wattage of the resistors used and also the type and voltage rating of the capacitors . Please could you provide the same ?
-
@sharath-krishna no problem
all resistors except R4 & R5 are SMD 0603, R4 & R5 are SMD 1206
C8 is 0.47-0.68uF @ 400V for 220V input, or 0.68-1uF @ 250V for 110Vall other capacitors need a rate for 10V and above
-
@Tibus I gave you the footprints, for SMD it is equivalent of the wattage)
actually only R4 & R5 a sensitive to the footprints. An even more sensitive to a maximum rating voltage than to the wattage.
I'm using two 1206 in series to be sure that they will hold up to 400V. I made a check of different brands, usually the maximum rated voltage for 1206 is not bellow 200-300V, that means that in series of equal resistors the maximum rated voltage will be 400-600Vall other resistors are under low voltage and very low power dissipation
but if you need wattage just for learning curve, usually 0601 is 0.1W, 1206 is 0.25W