Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.

Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
59 Posts 5 Posters 6.0k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDieN Offline
    NeverDie
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by NeverDie
    #34

    Try running with your fuses set to xFF xDA xC2, That way your BOD will be turned off, you'll be running from the internal 8mhz resonator, and you'll be waking from sleep in <4uSec.

    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NeverDieN NeverDie

      Try running with your fuses set to xFF xDA xC2, That way your BOD will be turned off, you'll be running from the internal 8mhz resonator, and you'll be waking from sleep in <4uSec.

      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1A Offline
      alexsh1
      wrote on last edited by alexsh1
      #35

      @neverdie I have already all that. I am using this node https://www.openhardware.io/view/76/Stamp-size-MySensor-node

      Let's see when I have final results. I have this supercap AVX 30F with ESR = 0.02ohm (vs Vishay 15F ESR=1.8Ohm used with Moteino and BQ25570 at lowpowerlab)

      EDIT: Another point is signing/encryption. This would affect supercap charge as the node would be transmitting more data to GW.

      NeverDieN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alexsh1A alexsh1

        @gohan However, in the nutshell you are right. With a small solar battery (53mm x 30mm, 5V 0.15W), this is what I get:

        0_1523444917578_Screenshot (42).png

        and today is an extremely cloudy day (no sun at all). Harvesting works really well.

        I implemented a voltage divider yesterday with 1.8M / 470k resistors. Now I can monitor voltage in Domoticz:
        voltage at 22:00 yesterday - 4.797V
        voltage at 12:00 today - 4.887V

        gohanG Offline
        gohanG Offline
        gohan
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #36

        @alexsh1 I use a total of 20F 5.5V supercaps and they discharge much more during night most likely because the buck/boost converter is not very low power and supercaps are chinese quality, but as far as I can get 36/48h of runtime without solar charge I should be fine

        alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gohanG gohan

          @alexsh1 I use a total of 20F 5.5V supercaps and they discharge much more during night most likely because the buck/boost converter is not very low power and supercaps are chinese quality, but as far as I can get 36/48h of runtime without solar charge I should be fine

          alexsh1A Offline
          alexsh1A Offline
          alexsh1
          wrote on last edited by alexsh1
          #37

          @gohan As you may see from the graph above my self discharge + sleep/tx consumption during the night dropped voltage from 4.851V at 21:00 (I charged supercaps initially) to 4.549V at 08:00. This is the rate of about 0.3V per 12 hours, I estimate that I have around 10 days without any charging before I run out of energy.

          It took 4h 25mins on a cloudy day (see another graph) to get 2x10F in series supercaps fully charged to 5.047V

          0_1523450756436_Screenshot (43).png

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gohanG Offline
            gohanG Offline
            gohan
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #38

            You are using a very efficient circuit and good quality supercaps, I loose about 1V in 12 hours

            alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gohanG gohan

              You are using a very efficient circuit and good quality supercaps, I loose about 1V in 12 hours

              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1A Offline
              alexsh1
              wrote on last edited by
              #39

              @gohan Did you try to measure your sleeping current?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • alexsh1A alexsh1

                @neverdie I have already all that. I am using this node https://www.openhardware.io/view/76/Stamp-size-MySensor-node

                Let's see when I have final results. I have this supercap AVX 30F with ESR = 0.02ohm (vs Vishay 15F ESR=1.8Ohm used with Moteino and BQ25570 at lowpowerlab)

                EDIT: Another point is signing/encryption. This would affect supercap charge as the node would be transmitting more data to GW.

                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDieN Offline
                NeverDie
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by
                #40

                @alexsh1 said in Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.:

                I am using this node https://www.openhardware.io/view/76/Stamp-size-MySensor-node

                If anything, you should have an advantage, since the nRF24L01 transmits at a faster bitrate, and using significantly less Tx power also.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NeverDieN Offline
                  NeverDieN Offline
                  NeverDie
                  Hero Member
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #41

                  Are you using the passive mode option for mysensors? If not, that could be part of what's draining you.

                  alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NeverDieN NeverDie

                    Are you using the passive mode option for mysensors? If not, that could be part of what's draining you.

                    alexsh1A Offline
                    alexsh1A Offline
                    alexsh1
                    wrote on last edited by alexsh1
                    #42

                    @neverdie said in Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.:

                    passive mode option for mysensors

                    I did notice there is an option:

                    #define MY_PASSIVE_NODE
                    

                    What is the passive node option please?
                    I am not using it and yet I do not have any problems with draining

                    EDIT: I see now

                        All transport-related checks and safety-mechanisms are disabled. 
                        Requires that MY_NODE_ID is set, MY_PARENT_NODE_ID and MY_PARENT_NODE_IS_STATIC are optional. 
                        Singing, registration, and OTA FW update are disabled. 
                    
                    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • alexsh1A alexsh1

                      @neverdie said in Node running on supercaps and a solar panel.:

                      passive mode option for mysensors

                      I did notice there is an option:

                      #define MY_PASSIVE_NODE
                      

                      What is the passive node option please?
                      I am not using it and yet I do not have any problems with draining

                      EDIT: I see now

                          All transport-related checks and safety-mechanisms are disabled. 
                          Requires that MY_NODE_ID is set, MY_PARENT_NODE_ID and MY_PARENT_NODE_IS_STATIC are optional. 
                          Singing, registration, and OTA FW update are disabled. 
                      
                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1A Offline
                      alexsh1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #43

                      In my view disabling transport related checks is not an option.
                      Singing, registration, and OTA FW do take a lot of power. Especially OTA. It is slow and takes a lot of up time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDieN Offline
                        NeverDie
                        Hero Member
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #44

                        It sounds like you're happy already. Good luck!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gohanG Offline
                          gohanG Offline
                          gohan
                          Mod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #45

                          If I remeber well, passive node is used when you have a very tiny node, with low memory that only send data one way, like RF433

                          alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • gohanG gohan

                            If I remeber well, passive node is used when you have a very tiny node, with low memory that only send data one way, like RF433

                            alexsh1A Offline
                            alexsh1A Offline
                            alexsh1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #46

                            @gohan OK, but I think the key here is to get consumption down to something meaningful - 5uA or something. The only down side when not using a passive node is that if GW is disconnected, node would not go to sleep, but will be trying to connect to GW. define MY_TRANSPORT_UPLINK_CHECK_DISABLED would disable the node sending more than MY_TRANSPORT_STATE_RETRIES times message

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gohanG Offline
                              gohanG Offline
                              gohan
                              Mod
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #47

                              even if it drains the battery when the GW is dead, it is no big deal as you just have to wait for some sunlight

                              alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gohanG gohan

                                even if it drains the battery when the GW is dead, it is no big deal as you just have to wait for some sunlight

                                alexsh1A Offline
                                alexsh1A Offline
                                alexsh1
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #48

                                @gohan True! I was more talking about super small nodes working on CR1632. I have a few of these.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alexsh1A Offline
                                  alexsh1A Offline
                                  alexsh1
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #49

                                  Another interesting set of graphs (voltage scale is wrong - please ignore):

                                  This is with signing:
                                  0_1523542625334_Screenshot (44).png
                                  This is without signing:
                                  0_1523542649796_Screenshot (45).png

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gohanG Offline
                                    gohanG Offline
                                    gohan
                                    Mod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #50

                                    It looks a little irregular to me, doesn't it?

                                    alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gohanG gohan

                                      It looks a little irregular to me, doesn't it?

                                      alexsh1A Offline
                                      alexsh1A Offline
                                      alexsh1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #51

                                      @gohan Well, the point is that signing does take more tx time. Therefore, voltage does drop upto 0.2-0.3V.

                                      I am not sure about irregularities though

                                      AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gohanG Offline
                                        gohanG Offline
                                        gohan
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #52

                                        Maybe it has to do with the harvesting chip. My graph looks like a sawtooth from day to day.

                                        alexsh1A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDieN Offline
                                          NeverDie
                                          Hero Member
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #53

                                          For this type of comparison, I think you're better off charging up the supercap in a standardized way and then running with the solar panel disconnected. Otherwise, how recently and how long the supercap was charged to full capacity can affect the rate of discharge.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          14

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular