1.4 Beta

[MisterE]

This post is deleted!

[MisterE]

@BSoft

Crowd Backup (TM)

[Damme]

Hello

I'm using serialgateway and trying to interface with a linux machine.

I setup serial with a simple stty -F /dev/ttyUSB0 cs8 115200 -onlcr -icrnl
cat /dev/ttyUSB0 works fine;
0;0;3;9;Arduino startup complete.
0;0;3;9;read: 255-255-0 s=255,c=3,t=3,pt=0,l=0,cr=ok:
255;255;3;3;

but I am unable to send data from the gateway
echo -n -e "255;255;3;4;1\n" > /dev/ttyUSB0

Nothing happens, not even in perl I can get it to work.
$port->write("255;255;3;4;1\n");

what am I doing wrong?

[hek]

@Damme said:

$port->write("255;255;3;4;1\n");

Try
$port->write("255;255;3;0;4;1\n");

[Damme]

@hek

Thanks, that worked. I thought I understood the message layout.. never seen that 0 before:)

[hek]

@Damme said:

Thanks, that worked. I thought I understood the message layout.. never seen that 0 before:)

It's a change in the serial protocol for 1.4.
1 = request ack back from destination node.
0 = no ack.

[jendrush]

@hek said:

It's a change in the serial protocol for 1.4.

Could you describe it better keeping in mind my problem with Relay? How the message should look like to turn on Relay? Previously message like this worked ok - 11;1;1;2;1.

[Damme]

@jendrush I suppose it should be 11:1:1:0:2:1 then

@hek what about C_STREAM ? Didnt find much about it.

[hek]

@Damme

It will be used for firmware updates.

[jendrush]

@Damme said:

I suppose it should be 11:1:1:0:2:1 then

I fugured it out yesterday, but thanx!

[Damme]

@hek

I just tried to send myself a picture over the network. real ugly code but it worked.. thought if I put a small cam and someone rings on the doorbell or something.. :) (Right now I just read the data from SPI flash)

[hek]

@Damme

great

[MisterE]

This post is deleted!

[Damme]

I've tried the lib for a while now and found the following:

Then using ack=1 the returned message is exacly the one I sent. No way of knowing if its a request or an ACK.

example:
Client sends
3;255;3;6;0 (Give me configuration 0 (btw, why not leave config as a byte 0-255 instead of hardcoing it? I could have plenty of uses for configuration-values.)
Gateway responds: 3;255;3;6;M and requests ack
client sends
3;255;3;6;M
my software tried to lookup config id 'M' (Not a big deal for letter, but what if its a number?)
maybe ACK should be some sort of incremental number in return in special message type. I dont really know what is best.
It would be great if GW resends the messsage automatically a couple of times (configurable) if ACK = 1.

I've also noticed during DEBUG enabled that the message gets overwritten by old one, i.e.

send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=18,pt=0,l=15,st=fail:1.4b1 (18848a2)
send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=4,st=ok:test1 (18848a2)
send: 3-3-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:2.0t1 (18848a2)
(message 2: test1, message 3: 2.0)

Edit; One more thing
Do I really need one gw.process(); before each gw.send(..); in the loop? I seam to loose messages if I dont do like that.

void loop()
{
delay(dht.getMinimumSamplingPeriod());

gw.process();
float temperature = dht.getTemperature();
gw.send(msgTemp.set(temperature, 1));

gw.process();
float humidity = dht.getHumidity();
gw.send(msgHum.set(humidity, 1));

// gw.sleep(SLEEP_TIME); //Seems to break recieing message, loosing ~75%

}

[Yveaux]

@Damme Other wireless protocols usually have a counter which is increased with each message. Returning the counter as an ack would be sufficient to correlate the ack and the original message.
Returning the whole message seems like overkill indeed...

The send-methods could e.g. return the Id counter of the message sent, and an app waiting for an ack on that message should check for this value in any ack received (using some timeout)

[Damme]

Additional comment on config;
I think it should be request config, response config messages.

I also think its a bit odd that the actuator reports as
gw.present(2, S_LIGHT);
but requests as
if (message.type==V_LIGHT) {

V_LIGHT != S_LIGHT (2 vs 3)
I think the def should follow as much as possible.

hope any of my thoughts are somewhat useful

[Yveaux]

@Damme there's a lot of Vera legacy in there... This forum had a discussion going on about decoupling from Vera, but I'm afraid that got lost in the crash...

[Damme]

@Damme said:

// gw.sleep(SLEEP_TIME); //Seems to break recieing message, loosing ~75%

me just dumb here, delay(SLEEP_TIME); works. gw.sleep puts radio in sleep I guess.

[hek]

@Damme said:

me just dumb here, delay(SLEEP_TIME); works. gw.sleep puts radio in sleep I guess.

gw.sleep() puts both Arduino and radio to sleep.

[hek]

@Yveaux said:

The send-methods could e.g. return the Id counter of the message sent, and an app waiting for an ack on that message should check for this value in any ack received (using some timeout)

That mean you might have to rememeber the original message. The idea is to have all the information necessary in the callback.
In my example sketches (e.g. RelayActuator) the ack message actually changes the relay status when the ack comes back from gateway. If not full message came in you would have to keep buffers with sent messages and start matching counter-values. Much more complicated.

But a message counter will probably be necessary if/when we start encrypting messages to prohibit replay attacks.

@Damme
I actually thought about having a bit in the message header which says if the message is an ack or not. With that implemented you would just call a msg.isAck() to determine if the incoming message is an ack message. Would that be ok?

You shouldn't need to call gw.process() after each send. It is only necessary in the loop() section if you expect incoming messages or have enabled repeater mode.

I don't understand what you mean with messages getting overwritten with DEBUG enabled. Could you explain it a bit more (with an example?).