Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. [SOLVED] 2 X nrf24l01+pa+lna with RF24_PA_MAX

[SOLVED] 2 X nrf24l01+pa+lna with RF24_PA_MAX

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
31 Posts 9 Posters 26.1k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OitzuO Offline
    OitzuO Offline
    Oitzu
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    External 2xAA batteries for my tests. In the final use case I will add a 3.3V voltage regulator. I got a tip yesterday that this could be a matter of inproper shielding to the module itself. Sounds like a plausible explanation to me. I will try today to shield the module from his own rf with tin foil.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OitzuO Offline
      OitzuO Offline
      Oitzu
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Just if anybody else is running into this problem:
      Shielding the module with tinfoil against RF worked great! With the tinfoil shield i got over 1km reach in a clear line of sight!

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Z Offline
        Z Offline
        Zeph
        Hero Member
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Wow. A little better!

        I assume that's at 250 Kbps? Did you do any range tests at different speeds?

        The nRF24L01+ with LNA & PA & antenna is not that much more expensive than the rfm69* so for some applications that need the higher speed they are still in the running even with longer distances.

        I saw an analsyis (maybe here?) which suggested that this setup would not do very much good for reception, which was more limited by the noise floor, such that the antenna gain and LNA would not improve things much - so most of the range gain would come from the increased transmit power (including antenna gain). This was a theoretic analysis, not an empircal test.

        If true, it would mean that using an enhanced power unit on one end of the link only would not give one much additional range in bidirectional protocols, where the back-link (conventional to enhanced) would be the limiting factor. I've been curious if this is indeed the case or not in practice.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          Fabien
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          @Oitzu do you have some photo of your module with shielding ?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OitzuO Offline
            OitzuO Offline
            Oitzu
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @Zeph Only tried 250kbps at the moment, i tried to test the maximum range possible.
            But i will also do some 1mbit and 2 mbit tests in the near future (depends on weather).

            Hm.. i don't know what exactly do the performance gain. I also ordered some modules with external antenna but without external LNA+PA. Let's see what the LNA+PA really do. ;)

            @Fabien: I will post a photo tomorrow. But basicly i just wraped cling film arround the module (to not get any shorts) and then wraped tin foil arround that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OitzuO Offline
              OitzuO Offline
              Oitzu
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @Fabien:
              2015-08-31 09.01.05.jpg

              Surely doesn't look "professional" but it works. In the final installation i will try to add aluminum tape to the inside of the project box.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z Offline
                Z Offline
                Zeph
                Hero Member
                wrote on last edited by Zeph
                #14

                @Oitzu The range was greatly improved by using a far-aday cage.

                Z 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • OitzuO Offline
                  OitzuO Offline
                  Oitzu
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @Zeph: Yeah i understand that. I meant if the pa all alone or if the lna also plays a role with this modules.
                  Because you mentioned that the lna probably doesn't play a role in this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fabien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Thank you !

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z Zeph

                      @Oitzu The range was greatly improved by using a far-aday cage.

                      Z Offline
                      Z Offline
                      Zeph
                      Hero Member
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @Zeph said:

                      @Oitzu The range was greatly improved by using a far-aday cage.

                      Sorry, it was meant to be a throw-away pun, not an insight.

                      OitzuO 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z Zeph

                        @Zeph said:

                        @Oitzu The range was greatly improved by using a far-aday cage.

                        Sorry, it was meant to be a throw-away pun, not an insight.

                        OitzuO Offline
                        OitzuO Offline
                        Oitzu
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @Zeph said:

                        @Zeph said:

                        @Oitzu The range was greatly improved by using a far-aday cage.

                        Sorry, it was meant to be a throw-away pun, not an insight.

                        ... now i got it... haha... sorry. You know how many germans does it takes to change a lightbulb?
                        One. We are very efficient and don't have humour. ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          wico2002
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          @Oitzu questions: on the picture, the foil cover up the base of the antenna. Can it touch the antenna connector itself (golden part the antenna is screw on) or this part also need to be covered with plastic film ?

                          You also told you will try to cover up the inside of the case with foil to not wrap the radio itself... did you try it ?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • OitzuO Offline
                            OitzuO Offline
                            Oitzu
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            @wico2002: you should also cover the base of the antenna with plastic foil.
                            As far as i know the base is grounded. I don't really know if this makes any difference but i let my tinfoil ungrounded. I'm no expert in RF mechanics. :D

                            No not tried this yet.. but this should have the same effect as the tinfoil wrapping.
                            As long as you let stick the antenna out of the housing.... ;)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W Offline
                              W Offline
                              wico2002
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              @Oitzu A BIG THANK YOU, it work now with the foil trick. I'll will maybe close other forum topics including your topic's url. thank you again

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DwaltD Offline
                                DwaltD Offline
                                Dwalt
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Using @Oitzu 's trick, I wrapped my iBoard Gateway in aluminum tape. I can't tell if there is any benefit in transmission range or reduced interference but at least it looks nice and shiny!

                                IMG_20151007_213755.jpg

                                IMG_20151007_213811.jpg

                                Veralite UI5 :: IBoard Ethernet GW :: MyS 1.5

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • OitzuO Offline
                                  OitzuO Offline
                                  Oitzu
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @Dwalt will this box also sends packets to the path of valallah?
                                  Screenshot 2015-10-08 09.27.25.png

                                  DwaltD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • OitzuO Oitzu

                                    @Dwalt will this box also sends packets to the path of valallah?
                                    Screenshot 2015-10-08 09.27.25.png

                                    DwaltD Offline
                                    DwaltD Offline
                                    Dwalt
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @Oitzu Yes, now my network will ride eternal!

                                    Actually, my brother saw the modification and asked if I was trying to prevent the NSA from intercepting my humidity readings. Hmmm, maybe a secondary benefit...

                                    rob-tinfoil-hat-compressed.jpg

                                    Veralite UI5 :: IBoard Ethernet GW :: MyS 1.5

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      doblanch
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Finally does the foil should be grounded or not ??
                                      thanks

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mfalkviddM Offline
                                        mfalkviddM Offline
                                        mfalkvidd
                                        Mod
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Grounding the foil will not affect the shininess, but it could improve the shielding.

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                                          Grounding the foil will not affect the shininess, but it could improve the shielding.

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          doblanch
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @mfalkvidd thanks for your reply.
                                          If we want to ground it, can we use the gold base ? I guess that this part is grounded....

                                          I met some issues with PA LNA, do you think that it can freeze after a while, and powering the NRF24+PA+LNA directly on the nano ? It seems that after one month of use, I loss many packets..

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          16

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular