Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Radio problems

Radio problems

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
1.4b1nrf24l01+pa+lna
25 Posts 8 Posters 15.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jocke4u
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    DAMN :( :(
    I think dataMine played a prank on me and the statistic is probably not correct (not logging everything). Will hook in my MQTT monitor to extract statistics in a way I control it.
    Currently I am running 1.3b3 and will run a test sensor for a while to see how it's works and then eventually go for 1.4 again.
    Thanks for your support and I have learnt more about power and capacitors :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Y Yveaux

      @ServiceXp said:

      Can't say that about 1.4.

      Do you mean you're having problems with 1.4 then or did you just not have any experience with it yet?

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RJ_Make
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Yveaux
      I think both.. The radio problems I had drove me crazy, and then there's still the temps not converting to F using the existing 1.4b library. Which is not a big problem thanks to @hek help.

      I literately had zero issues with the 1.3b library.

      RJ_Make

      Y 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R RJ_Make

        @Yveaux
        I think both.. The radio problems I had drove me crazy, and then there's still the temps not converting to F using the existing 1.4b library. Which is not a big problem thanks to @hek help.

        I literately had zero issues with the 1.3b library.

        Y Offline
        Y Offline
        Yveaux
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @ServiceXp I'm not aware of any major issues with 1.4 at the moment and @hek is about to tag it. If you are really having (radio) issues related to 1.4 we should fix them asap.

        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Y Yveaux

          @ServiceXp I'm not aware of any major issues with 1.4 at the moment and @hek is about to tag it. If you are really having (radio) issues related to 1.4 we should fix them asap.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          RJ_Make
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by RJ_Make
          #24

          @Yveaux

          At this point I think I found the solution, but have not built up another test bed to make sure the solution worked. The temp conversion problem is persistent,

          http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/309/1-4b-radio-transmission-problem-not-present-in-1-3b

          RJ_Make

          Y 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R RJ_Make

            @Yveaux

            At this point I think I found the solution, but have not built up another test bed to make sure the solution worked. The temp conversion problem is persistent,

            http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/309/1-4b-radio-transmission-problem-not-present-in-1-3b

            Y Offline
            Y Offline
            Yveaux
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by Yveaux
            #25

            @ServiceXp you said in this post:

            That was it!!!!! I tried 22uF, was still doggie, so I thought why not move up to 47uF wink and what do you know, that seems to be the winning value. I have some more testing, but looking pretty good so far.

            This sounds to me that the issue is solved...
            I can imagine that 1.4 requires a bigger cap while 1.3 doesn't. 1.4 uses auto acknowledge which can send burst packets. This could put a bigger load on your power supply.

            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

            Register Login
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            8

            Online

            12.1k

            Users

            11.2k

            Topics

            113.4k

            Posts


            Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • MySensors
            • OpenHardware.io
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular