Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Radio problems

Radio problems

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
1.4b1nrf24l01+pa+lna
25 Posts 8 Posters 13.0k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jocke4uJ Offline
    jocke4uJ Offline
    jocke4u
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    DAMN :( :(
    I think dataMine played a prank on me and the statistic is probably not correct (not logging everything). Will hook in my MQTT monitor to extract statistics in a way I control it.
    Currently I am running 1.3b3 and will run a test sensor for a while to see how it's works and then eventually go for 1.4 again.
    Thanks for your support and I have learnt more about power and capacitors :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • YveauxY Yveaux

      @ServiceXp said:

      Can't say that about 1.4.

      Do you mean you're having problems with 1.4 then or did you just not have any experience with it yet?

      RJ_MakeR Offline
      RJ_MakeR Offline
      RJ_Make
      Hero Member
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Yveaux
      I think both.. The radio problems I had drove me crazy, and then there's still the temps not converting to F using the existing 1.4b library. Which is not a big problem thanks to @hek help.

      I literately had zero issues with the 1.3b library.

      RJ_Make

      YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

        @Yveaux
        I think both.. The radio problems I had drove me crazy, and then there's still the temps not converting to F using the existing 1.4b library. Which is not a big problem thanks to @hek help.

        I literately had zero issues with the 1.3b library.

        YveauxY Offline
        YveauxY Offline
        Yveaux
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @ServiceXp I'm not aware of any major issues with 1.4 at the moment and @hek is about to tag it. If you are really having (radio) issues related to 1.4 we should fix them asap.

        http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

        RJ_MakeR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • YveauxY Yveaux

          @ServiceXp I'm not aware of any major issues with 1.4 at the moment and @hek is about to tag it. If you are really having (radio) issues related to 1.4 we should fix them asap.

          RJ_MakeR Offline
          RJ_MakeR Offline
          RJ_Make
          Hero Member
          wrote on last edited by RJ_Make
          #24

          @Yveaux

          At this point I think I found the solution, but have not built up another test bed to make sure the solution worked. The temp conversion problem is persistent,

          http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/309/1-4b-radio-transmission-problem-not-present-in-1-3b

          RJ_Make

          YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • RJ_MakeR RJ_Make

            @Yveaux

            At this point I think I found the solution, but have not built up another test bed to make sure the solution worked. The temp conversion problem is persistent,

            http://forum.mysensors.org/topic/309/1-4b-radio-transmission-problem-not-present-in-1-3b

            YveauxY Offline
            YveauxY Offline
            Yveaux
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by Yveaux
            #25

            @ServiceXp you said in this post:

            That was it!!!!! I tried 22uF, was still doggie, so I thought why not move up to 47uF wink and what do you know, that seems to be the winning value. I have some more testing, but looking pretty good so far.

            This sounds to me that the issue is solved...
            I can imagine that 1.4 requires a bigger cap while 1.3 doesn't. 1.4 uses auto acknowledge which can send burst packets. This could put a bigger load on your power supply.

            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            8

            Online

            11.7k

            Users

            11.2k

            Topics

            113.0k

            Posts


            Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • MySensors
            • OpenHardware.io
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular