Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Controllers
  3. Vera
  4. Issue with temperature units

Issue with temperature units

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vera
23 Posts 9 Posters 9.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TroyF

    Hello everyone,

    I'm just starting out with MySensors, but think it's just amazing. Thanks to Hek and everyone else who has contributed for putting this together. I recently tried to setup a v1.4 serial gateway and a simple temperature sensor but for some reason I'm having trouble with the temperature reporting back to imperial, despite Metric being selected in the gateway device within Vera. I've tried toggling the switch back and forth, restarting Vera etc., but the temperature keeps being reported in Fahrenheit. Does anyone have any suggestions?

    Thanks,
    Troy.

    RJ_MakeR Offline
    RJ_MakeR Offline
    RJ_Make
    Hero Member
    wrote on last edited by RJ_Make
    #4

    @TroyF

    I have the same problem (but reverse), and the only fix is to hard code the conversion..

    Replace this (for the Temperature sketch) from @hek

     float temperature = static_cast<float(static_cast<int((gw.getConfig().isMetric?sensors.getTempCByIndex(i):sensors.getTempFByIndex(i)) * 10.)) / 10.;
    

    With this

     float temperature = static_cast<float>(static_cast<int>((sensors.getTempFByIndex(i)) * 10.)) / 10.;
    

    and this is what I used for the Humidity & Temp. Sketch

    	//float temperature = dht.getTemperature();
    	float temperature = dht.getTemperature()*9/5 + 32;
    
    	if (isnan(temperature)) {
    		Serial.println("Failed reading temperature from DHT");
    	} else if (temperature != lastTemp) {
    	lastTemp = temperature;
    	if (!metric) {
    		temperature = dht.getTemperature()*9/5 + 32;   //dht.toFahrenheit(temperature);
    	}
    	gw.send(msgTemp.set(temperature, 1));
    	Serial.print("T: ");
    	Serial.println(temperature);
    	}
    

    EDIT: Keep in mind you will need to make the changes necessary to convert to Celsius

    RJ_Make

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      TroyF
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      Strange. I actually just left it alone and a few hours later it was reading in Celsius like it should have been. Not sure why it took a while to start reading that way, but it's fine now. Thanks to everyone for their responses.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        legeantvert
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        I have seen the same issue with 1.4 when using DHT or Dallas ...
        I have try to clean EEPROM, change on Vera from metric to Imperial and back to metric without any succes...
        So hardcode temperature in C was the solution for me...

        Legeantvert

        -Oregon Scientific meteo sensors 433mhz
        -Vera3 fw:1.5.408fr
        -Zwave 3HSM02 1Duwi5457 2*AD142-6
        -IPX800v3
        -3 X Foscam
        -Synology DS413
        -Domoticz on Raspberry =&gt; on progress
        -MySensors Serial Gw + some arduino sensors =&gt; on progress

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jocke4uJ Offline
          jocke4uJ Offline
          jocke4u
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          I have the same problem with DallasSensor

          Startup says:

          sensor started, id 2
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
          read: 0-0-2 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=2:M                          <<<==== Metric <<<
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=17,st=ok:Light+Temp Sensor
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.0
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=0,c=0,t=16,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
          

          And I trace:

          Serial.println(gw.getConfig().isMetric);
          

          which output 0, not 1

          Switching to Imperial I get:

          sensor started, id 2
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
          read: 0-0-2 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=2:I                          <<<==== Imperial <<<
          send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=17,st=ok:Light+Temp Sensor
          

          and the trace says 0 as expected.

          Then I tried to trace in MySensors.cpp and added (not workin though ;) ):

          } else if (type == I_CONFIG) {
              // Pick up configuration from controller (currently only metric/imperial)
              // and store it in eeprom if changed
              isMetric = msg.getByte() == 'M' ;
              debug(PSTR("isMetric=%s\n"), isMetric);
              debug(PSTR("cc.isMetric=%s\n"), cc.isMetric);
              if (cc.isMetric != isMetric) {
          

          But then it started to work :D

          Removed the lines above and the problem is back....so something there...
          Don't have time right now to test....

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hekH Offline
            hekH Offline
            hek
            Admin
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            @jocke4u

            Are you saying adding debug prints makes it work?

            jocke4uJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hekH hek

              @jocke4u

              Are you saying adding debug prints makes it work?

              jocke4uJ Offline
              jocke4uJ Offline
              jocke4u
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @hek

              Yes for some strange reason :)
              However I used %s and not %d in the debug but have now used %d as below

              } else if (type == I_CONFIG) {
                  // Pick up configuration from controller (currently only metric/imperial)
                  // and store it in eeprom if changed
                  isMetric = msg.getByte() == 'M' ;
                  debug(PSTR("isMetric=%d\n"), isMetric);
                  debug(PSTR("cc.isMetric=%d\n"), cc.isMetric);
                  if (cc.isMetric != isMetric) {
                      cc.isMetric = isMetric;
                      debug(PSTR("Updating EEPROM\n"));	
                      debug(PSTR("isMetric=%d\n"), isMetric);	
                      debug(PSTR("cc.isMetric=%d\n"), cc.isMetric);						
                      eeprom_write_byte((uint8_t*)EEPROM_CONTROLLER_CONFIG_ADDRESS, isMetric);
                      //eeprom_write_block((const void*)&cc, (uint8_t*)EEPROM_CONTROLLER_CONFIG_ADDRESS, sizeof(ControllerConfig));
                  }
              

              Gives the output

              sensor started, id 2
              send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=3,st=ok:1.4
              send: 2-2-0-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,st=ok:0
              read: 0-0-2 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=2:M
              isMetric=0
              cc.isMetric=1
              Updating EEPROM
              isMetric=0
              cc.isMetric=0
              

              So it seems that "metric" flag is not unpacked correctly, or?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • YveauxY Offline
                YveauxY Offline
                Yveaux
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @jocke4u said:

                l=2:M

                I find it strange that length is reported as 2 while only a single character seems to be sent. The protocol version 1.4 is correctly reported as length 3.

                http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • YveauxY Yveaux

                  @jocke4u said:

                  l=2:M

                  I find it strange that length is reported as 2 while only a single character seems to be sent. The protocol version 1.4 is correctly reported as length 3.

                  hekH Offline
                  hekH Offline
                  hek
                  Admin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @Yveaux

                  uint8_t MyMessage::getByte() const {
                  	if (miGetPayloadType() == P_BYTE) {
                  		return data[0];
                  	} else if (miGetPayloadType() == P_STRING) {
                  		return atoi(data);
                  	} else {
                  		return 0;
                  	}
                  }
                  

                  Payload type will be P_STRING when controller sends the data. Yes, why does it get size 2?!

                  hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • hekH hek

                    @Yveaux

                    uint8_t MyMessage::getByte() const {
                    	if (miGetPayloadType() == P_BYTE) {
                    		return data[0];
                    	} else if (miGetPayloadType() == P_STRING) {
                    		return atoi(data);
                    	} else {
                    		return 0;
                    	}
                    }
                    

                    Payload type will be P_STRING when controller sends the data. Yes, why does it get size 2?!

                    hekH Offline
                    hekH Offline
                    hek
                    Admin
                    wrote on last edited by hek
                    #12

                    Hmm.. we should probably not use atoi in case of String. Payload type should not matter in the getByte.

                    hekH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • hekH hek

                      Hmm.. we should probably not use atoi in case of String. Payload type should not matter in the getByte.

                      hekH Offline
                      hekH Offline
                      hek
                      Admin
                      wrote on last edited by hek
                      #13

                      Yep, this is a bug.

                      I've also found that the newline character is included and transmitted on all outgoing messages from gateway! So payload length 2 was correct, and wrong ;)

                      How is it possible no one has seen this before (me included)?

                      YveauxY 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jocke4uJ Offline
                        jocke4uJ Offline
                        jocke4u
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Sounds good anyway....one bug less :)
                        I just setup a sensor with DHT22/AM2302 and get the same results here.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • hekH Offline
                          hekH Offline
                          hek
                          Admin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Fix checked in. I'm creating a more comprehensive release note in the 1.4 thread.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hekH hek

                            Yep, this is a bug.

                            I've also found that the newline character is included and transmitted on all outgoing messages from gateway! So payload length 2 was correct, and wrong ;)

                            How is it possible no one has seen this before (me included)?

                            YveauxY Offline
                            YveauxY Offline
                            Yveaux
                            Mod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            @hek said:

                            How is it possible no one has seen this before (me included)?

                            At least I saw it ;-)
                            I personally tend to read over all the details in the serial api... This time I noticed.

                            Be glad you nailed it!

                            http://yveaux.blogspot.nl

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jocke4uJ Offline
                              jocke4uJ Offline
                              jocke4u
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Thanks @hek and @Yveaux I can confirm it's working on both Dallas sensor and DHT22.
                              Great support!!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NuubiN Offline
                                NuubiN Offline
                                Nuubi
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                Hmmm... how can one override this statement to be METRIC?
                                float temperature = static_cast<float>(static_cast<int>((gw.getConfig().isMetric?TemperatureSensors.getTempCByIndex(CHILD_ID_TEMPERATURE_FIRST+i):TemperatureSensors.getTempFByIndex(CHILD_ID_TEMPERATURE_FIRST+i)) * 10.)) / 10.;

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  hexenmeister
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  hello,

                                  I must confess I have not read this thread completely. Too much for my bad english)

                                  We try MySensors support for FHEM (www.fhem.de) to impementieren. I noticed that when the I_CONFIG message is answered correctly with 'M' for metric, then the sensor sends in Imperial. Is not surprising, everything is interpreted as a string from Gateway, but also byte checked. My solution proposal: In MySensors.cpp:
                                  (isMetric = msg.getString()[0] == 'M' ; instead of isMetric = msg.getByte() == 'M' ;)

                                  			} else if (type == I_CONFIG) {
                                  				// Pick up configuration from controller (currently only metric/imperial)
                                  				// and store it in eeprom if changed
                                  				//isMetric = msg.getByte() == 'M' ;
                                  				isMetric = msg.getString()[0] == 'M' ;
                                  				if (cc.isMetric != isMetric) {
                                  					cc.isMetric = isMetric;
                                  					eeprom_write_byte((uint8_t*)EEPROM_CONTROLLER_CONFIG_ADDRESS, isMetric);
                                  					//eeprom_write_block((const void*)&cc, (uint8_t*)EEPROM_CONTROLLER_CONFIG_ADDRESS, sizeof(ControllerConfig));
                                  				}
                                  			} else if (type == I_CHILDREN) {
                                  

                                  Best regards,

                                  Alexander

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • hekH Offline
                                    hekH Offline
                                    hek
                                    Admin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    Welcome @hexenmeister!

                                    What version of MySensors library did you download? The current version in gihub/master already has getString()[0].

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      hexenmeister
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      Thanks for the quick reply.
                                      I've downloaded the source here: https://github.com/mysensors/CodeBender/blob/master/MySensor.cpp
                                      Since it is still old.

                                      Now I see that https://github.com/mysensors/Arduino/blob/master/libraries/MySensors/MySensor.cpp would be better.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • hekH Offline
                                        hekH Offline
                                        hek
                                        Admin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        Oh.. you downloaded from codebender. That explains it.

                                        Unfortunately it's still a bit too messy to update the public libraries over there (have to contact the codebender-people every time). Nowadays we keep a copy among in the MySensors-account which gets copied if you clone one of the examples.

                                        Github always contains the latest.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          hexenmeister
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          My mistake. Was unfortunately cost few hours time for the search. For that I have won something overview in MySensors Code :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          23

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular