NRF24L01+PA+LNA
-
@bigjimjeedom you should receive the best results with:
#define RF24_PA_LEVEL RF24_PA_MAX #define RF24_PA_LEVEL_GW RF24_PA_MAX #define RF24_DATARATE RF24_250KBPSAs long as your power supply is clean and your module is shielded.
@Oitzu
do you use thoses settings (max max) ? because some people says that it was not the good way with this module but maybe it is because of bad power supply ???
i use this for supplying (with a 5v from USB):
http://fr.aliexpress.com/item/New-Socket-Adapter-plate-Board-for-8Pin-NRF24L01-Wireless-Transceive-module-51/32230227557.html?spm=2114.30011508.3.2.TXAdlL&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_1,searchweb201602_1_10036_10035_10034_10033_507_10032_10020_10001_10002_10017_10010_10005_10006_10011_10003_10021_10004_10022_10009_401_10008_10018_10019,searchweb201603_8&btsid=3092fef5-564c-43aa-98a5-0e834674bcd1 -
@bigjimjeedom said:
@Oitzu
do you use thoses settings (max max)?Yes. I use the max/max settings. I also use as datarate RF24_2MBPS but RF24_250KBPS should be better for good range.
because some people says that it was not the good way with this module but maybe it is because of bad power supply
Yes this is due to low power supply -> The module doesn't get enough current for the MAX setting.
OR
Bad power supply -> The module needs more current -> bad supplys tend to be noisier on higher current.
OR
Bad shielding -> The output from the module is that high that it feedbacks (without the shielding) back into the IC.i use this for supplying (with a 5v from USB):
Never used them, but on the datasheet they look okay.
-
@bigjimjeedom said:
@Oitzu
do you use thoses settings (max max)?Yes. I use the max/max settings. I also use as datarate RF24_2MBPS but RF24_250KBPS should be better for good range.
because some people says that it was not the good way with this module but maybe it is because of bad power supply
Yes this is due to low power supply -> The module doesn't get enough current for the MAX setting.
OR
Bad power supply -> The module needs more current -> bad supplys tend to be noisier on higher current.
OR
Bad shielding -> The output from the module is that high that it feedbacks (without the shielding) back into the IC.i use this for supplying (with a 5v from USB):
Never used them, but on the datasheet they look okay.
@Oitzu
thanks a lot for your help !
i try this tonight and i will tell you! -
@bigjimjeedom i'm eager to hear your results. :)
-
Other problem
I have cap 4,7uf
No shield
Power from seperate sourceWhen I use it in my Ethernet gateway it starts up but can't receive anything.
When I put it on other Uno(repeater) it works fine.
When I have it on Uno(battery sensor sketch) it works fine.What am I missing?
-
Add shield try again. Even electronics near to the pa/lna module can induce enough noise that it stops working.
Different power supplys on the ethernet gateway and the uno?
-
@flopp said:
Yes, different computers both GW and REP is powered by USB.
But same source the pa/lna module or also different?
-
@Oitzu
PA is getting from a second USB port(not same as GW) through a step-down to 3,3.
GND is connected together from both ports -
@flopp said:
through a step-down to 3,3.I suspect linear regulator? Then it should, normally, no problem.
-
@flopp said:
I have no knowledge about that but I don't think so, because I can turn on a screw to change from ~1.5-4 V
Oh, sounds like a switching regulator to me, but can't be sure. Does it have any name? A switching regulator could produce some significant ripple in your supply, that maybe needs to be filtered out.
Would try the shield first, and then see. :D
-
@flopp said:
I have no knowledge about that but I don't think so, because I can turn on a screw to change from ~1.5-4 V
Oh, sounds like a switching regulator to me, but can't be sure. Does it have any name? A switching regulator could produce some significant ripple in your supply, that maybe needs to be filtered out.
Would try the shield first, and then see. :D
@Oitzu said:
@flopp said:
I have no knowledge about that but I don't think so, because I can turn on a screw to change from ~1.5-4 V
Oh, sounds like a switching regulator to me, but can't be sure. Does it have any name? A switching regulator could produce some significant ripple in your supply, that maybe needs to be filtered out.
Would try the shield first, and then see. :D
Thank you @Oitzu I change to a different step-down and it started to work, even without shield. Now I use this http://www.ebay.com/itm/DC-5V-to-3-3V-DC-DC-Step-Down-Power-Supply-Buck-Module-AMS1117-LDO-800MA-/281058278731
before it was this "s**t" http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/RC-Airplane-Module-Mini-360-DC-Buck-Converter-Step-Down-Module-4-75V-23V-to/1686390_32266152653.html
Left is GOOD right is BAD
-
@flopp said:
Left is GOOD right is BAD
Just to note: That is a little bit to simple. The left is a linear regulator the right one a switching regulator.
That are different technologies that both have there up and downsides. But for sensors a linear regulator often fits better, yes.it started to work, even without shield
Never the less i would recommend the shield for even better performance, especially if you want to crank up the pa_level for higher range.
-
I gave up on trying to get the PA+LNB version working with my NodeMCU, reverted back to standard for now!
BTW, I tried it with many different power supplies and with without shielding. Tried for almost a week.
In the end I buckled and ordered a proper shielded version, awaiting its arrival...
-
@Mark-Swift said:
In the end I buckled and ordered a proper shielded version, awaiting its arrival...
Where did you get this one? And also share your experience after arriving of the item
-
The company also communicated some interesting issues that can cause issues with the nRF... Such as:
- Watch control voltage, they're easily damaged if you use 5v, hence they suggest pushing control voltage with a 1K-5.1K resistor, even better to use 3.3v (hence on my next one to play it safe I'll use a spare 5v -> 3.3v level shift converter too).
-
@Mark-Swift let us know how they perform. The supplier looks very professional.
Would be interesting if they really reach the promised 2.1km :D
(I wonder with which antenna)even better to use 3.3v (hence on my next one to play it safe I'll use a spare 5v -> 3.3v level shift converter too).
Or use a 3.3V pro mini.
