Node is not using repeater to talk to gateway

[tekka]

@karl261 What version is it saying?

[karl261]

@tekka 1.0.0beta built 3314

[tekka]

@karl261 Ok, then send a C_INTERNAL | I_DEBUG | R message to the GW and node 99 and upload the output.

[karl261]

@tekka So you mean I connect to my serial gateway and then issue the commands? Yes, let's see.

[karl261]

Here we go:

10	22.08.2016 21:49:41	TX	0 - Gateway	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
12	22.08.2016 21:49:41	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0202
14	22.08.2016 21:49:41	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0303
16	22.08.2016 21:49:41	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0463
18	22.08.2016 21:49:41	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	1E1E
20	22.08.2016 21:49:42	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	1F1F
22	22.08.2016 21:49:42	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	6363
24	22.08.2016 21:49:42	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	8B03
25	22.08.2016 21:50:06	TX	99 - Repeater Node	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
28	22.08.2016 21:50:06	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0000
30	22.08.2016 21:50:06	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0303
32	22.08.2016 21:50:07	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0404
34	22.08.2016 21:50:07	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	1E1E
37	22.08.2016 21:50:23	RX	2	1	C_SET	NO	V_TEMP	20.8
39	22.08.2016 21:50:23	RX	2	0	C_SET	NO	V_HUM	76.1

[tekka]

@karl261 Ok, and now send C_INTERNAL | I_DEBUG | E - first to node 99, then to the GW and finally, press Discover in MYSController. This should re-establish the routing table.

[karl261]

@tekka I received ok twice back. Now the nano (GW) is blinking like crazy. And so is the pro mini (repeater). I do a power cycle?

[tekka]

@karl261 yup

[karl261]

@tekka Still weird:
99 says 0203 so 02 is going via 03?? Why?
0 says 0263 so 02 is going via 99?

247	22.08.2016 22:15:24	TX	99 - Repeater Node	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
250	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0000
252	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0203
254	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0404
255	22.08.2016 22:15:50	TX	0 - Gateway	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
257	22.08.2016 22:15:50	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0263
259	22.08.2016 22:15:50	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	6363

[tekka]

@karl261 hmm...indeed, that's weird. Do you have the debug log of node 3?

[karl261]

@tekka Which log exactly? Node 3 is Mysensors 1.5... It is sitting somewhere hidden...

[tekka]

@karl261 But you wrote:

Btw, all is on 2.0.0.

mixed setups are not advisable (and not supported). Please update if possible.

[karl261]

@tekka Yes, with "all" I meant those being involved in the repeater stuff.

[tekka]

@karl261 Can you add this to node 4 (this is the relayed one?):

#define MY_PARENT_NODE_ID 99
#define MY_PARENT_NODE_IS_STATIC

[karl261]

@tekka I can add it to node 30 right now. It is also supposed to be relayed. In fact this is why I did start this thread in the first place, I had no luck with these two lines. Will try again.

Oooohhh, there is a mistake further up: I am talking about node 30, and wrote node 3. That is incorrect. Let's see if I can edit. That is why you were asking about the 1.5...

[karl261]

@tekka Node 30 does still not care about the two lines. It is sending direct.
It also does not send back any routing table. Maybe because it is sleeping most of the time?

[tekka]

@karl261 If it's not defined as repeater, it won't have a routing table. And yes, sleeping nodes do not listen for incoming traffic. But still, if GW and node 99 are up, it should prefer 99 - can you show me the log of node 30 during booting?

[karl261]

@tekka Now it seems to work.

But I recompiled, because I had MY_DEBUG commented out. Somehow there is something wrong with debug...

Starting sensor (RNNNA-, 2.0.0)
TSM:INIT
TSM:RADIO:OK
TSP:ASSIGNID:OK (ID=30)
TSM:FPAR
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
TSP:MSG:READ 3-3-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=3, dist=1)
TSP:MSG:PAR OK (ID=3, dist=2)
TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=99, dist=1)
TSP:MSG:FPAR (PPAR FOUND)
TSP:MSG:PAR OK (ID=99, dist=2)
TSM:FPAR:OK
TSM:ID
TSM:CHKID:OK (ID=30)
TSM:UPL
TSP:PING:SEND (dest=0)
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
TSP:MSG:READ 0-0-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=0, dist=0)
TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
TSP:MSG:PONG RECV (hops=2)
TSP:CHKUPL:OK
TSM:UPL:OK
TSM:READY
Serial started
Voltage: 3289 mV
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:0100
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:2.0.0
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:99
TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=15,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:EgTmpHumBat5min
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=10,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1.0 151106
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=0,c=0,t=6,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=1,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:
Node and 2 children presented.
Request registration...
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:2
TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
Node registration=1
Init complete, id=30, parent=99, distance=2, registration=1
T: 21.59
TempDiff :121.59
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:21.6
T sent!
H: 81
HumDiff  :181.00
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=1,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:81
H sent!
Battery voltage: 3279 mV
Battery percent: 98 %
TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:98
T: 21.61
TempDiff :0.02
H: 81
HumDiff  :0.00

[tekka]

@karl261 said:

@tekka Now it seems to work.

But I recompiled, because I had MY_DEBUG commented out. Somehow there is something wrong with debug...

You mean, if MY_DEBUG is commented out, the node does not communicate over the repeater (99)?

[karl261]

@tekka Well, yes, I added the two lines you suggested, re-compiled, and then it was not using the 99. And also some posts above, I had these weird messages transmitted 6-7 times, see logs. This happend while MY_DEBUG was commented out.

Hm, I can re-upload the sketch and see if this is reproducible.