Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Troubleshooting
  3. Node is not using repeater to talk to gateway

Node is not using repeater to talk to gateway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Troubleshooting
42 Posts 3 Posters 8.0k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tekkaT tekka

    @karl261 Ok, and now send C_INTERNAL | I_DEBUG | E - first to node 99, then to the GW and finally, press Discover in MYSController. This should re-establish the routing table.

    karl261K Offline
    karl261K Offline
    karl261
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @tekka I received ok twice back. Now the nano (GW) is blinking like crazy. And so is the pro mini (repeater). I do a power cycle?

    tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • karl261K karl261

      @tekka I received ok twice back. Now the nano (GW) is blinking like crazy. And so is the pro mini (repeater). I do a power cycle?

      tekkaT Offline
      tekkaT Offline
      tekka
      Admin
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      @karl261 yup

      karl261K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tekkaT tekka

        @karl261 yup

        karl261K Offline
        karl261K Offline
        karl261
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        @tekka Still weird:
        99 says 0203 so 02 is going via 03?? Why?
        0 says 0263 so 02 is going via 99?

        247	22.08.2016 22:15:24	TX	99 - Repeater Node	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
        250	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0000
        252	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0203
        254	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0404
        255	22.08.2016 22:15:50	TX	0 - Gateway	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
        257	22.08.2016 22:15:50	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0263
        259	22.08.2016 22:15:50	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	6363
        
        tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • karl261K karl261

          @tekka Still weird:
          99 says 0203 so 02 is going via 03?? Why?
          0 says 0263 so 02 is going via 99?

          247	22.08.2016 22:15:24	TX	99 - Repeater Node	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
          250	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0000
          252	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0203
          254	22.08.2016 22:15:24	RX	99 - Repeater Node	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0404
          255	22.08.2016 22:15:50	TX	0 - Gateway	N/A	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	R
          257	22.08.2016 22:15:50	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	0263
          259	22.08.2016 22:15:50	RX	0 - Gateway	INTERNAL	C_INTERNAL	NO	I_DEBUG	6363
          
          tekkaT Offline
          tekkaT Offline
          tekka
          Admin
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          @karl261 hmm...indeed, that's weird. Do you have the debug log of node 3?

          karl261K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tekkaT tekka

            @karl261 hmm...indeed, that's weird. Do you have the debug log of node 3?

            karl261K Offline
            karl261K Offline
            karl261
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            @tekka Which log exactly? Node 3 is Mysensors 1.5... It is sitting somewhere hidden...

            tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • karl261K karl261

              @tekka Which log exactly? Node 3 is Mysensors 1.5... It is sitting somewhere hidden...

              tekkaT Offline
              tekkaT Offline
              tekka
              Admin
              wrote on last edited by tekka
              #24

              @karl261 But you wrote:

              Btw, all is on 2.0.0.

              mixed setups are not advisable (and not supported). Please update if possible.

              karl261K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tekkaT tekka

                @karl261 But you wrote:

                Btw, all is on 2.0.0.

                mixed setups are not advisable (and not supported). Please update if possible.

                karl261K Offline
                karl261K Offline
                karl261
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                @tekka Yes, with "all" I meant those being involved in the repeater stuff.

                tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • karl261K karl261

                  @tekka Yes, with "all" I meant those being involved in the repeater stuff.

                  tekkaT Offline
                  tekkaT Offline
                  tekka
                  Admin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  @karl261 Can you add this to node 4 (this is the relayed one?):

                  #define MY_PARENT_NODE_ID 99
                  #define MY_PARENT_NODE_IS_STATIC
                  
                  karl261K 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • tekkaT tekka

                    @karl261 Can you add this to node 4 (this is the relayed one?):

                    #define MY_PARENT_NODE_ID 99
                    #define MY_PARENT_NODE_IS_STATIC
                    
                    karl261K Offline
                    karl261K Offline
                    karl261
                    wrote on last edited by karl261
                    #27

                    @tekka I can add it to node 30 right now. It is also supposed to be relayed. In fact this is why I did start this thread in the first place, I had no luck with these two lines. Will try again.

                    Oooohhh, there is a mistake further up: I am talking about node 30, and wrote node 3. That is incorrect. Let's see if I can edit. That is why you were asking about the 1.5...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tekkaT tekka

                      @karl261 Can you add this to node 4 (this is the relayed one?):

                      #define MY_PARENT_NODE_ID 99
                      #define MY_PARENT_NODE_IS_STATIC
                      
                      karl261K Offline
                      karl261K Offline
                      karl261
                      wrote on last edited by karl261
                      #28

                      @tekka Node 30 does still not care about the two lines. It is sending direct.
                      It also does not send back any routing table. Maybe because it is sleeping most of the time?

                      tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • karl261K karl261

                        @tekka Node 30 does still not care about the two lines. It is sending direct.
                        It also does not send back any routing table. Maybe because it is sleeping most of the time?

                        tekkaT Offline
                        tekkaT Offline
                        tekka
                        Admin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        @karl261 If it's not defined as repeater, it won't have a routing table. And yes, sleeping nodes do not listen for incoming traffic. But still, if GW and node 99 are up, it should prefer 99 - can you show me the log of node 30 during booting?

                        karl261K 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tekkaT tekka

                          @karl261 If it's not defined as repeater, it won't have a routing table. And yes, sleeping nodes do not listen for incoming traffic. But still, if GW and node 99 are up, it should prefer 99 - can you show me the log of node 30 during booting?

                          karl261K Offline
                          karl261K Offline
                          karl261
                          wrote on last edited by karl261
                          #30

                          @tekka Now it seems to work.

                          But I recompiled, because I had MY_DEBUG commented out. Somehow there is something wrong with debug...

                          Starting sensor (RNNNA-, 2.0.0)
                          TSM:INIT
                          TSM:RADIO:OK
                          TSP:ASSIGNID:OK (ID=30)
                          TSM:FPAR
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
                          TSP:MSG:READ 3-3-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                          TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=3, dist=1)
                          TSP:MSG:PAR OK (ID=3, dist=2)
                          TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                          TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=99, dist=1)
                          TSP:MSG:FPAR (PPAR FOUND)
                          TSP:MSG:PAR OK (ID=99, dist=2)
                          TSM:FPAR:OK
                          TSM:ID
                          TSM:CHKID:OK (ID=30)
                          TSM:UPL
                          TSP:PING:SEND (dest=0)
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                          TSP:MSG:READ 0-0-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
                          TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=0, dist=0)
                          TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
                          TSP:MSG:PONG RECV (hops=2)
                          TSP:CHKUPL:OK
                          TSM:UPL:OK
                          TSM:READY
                          Serial started
                          Voltage: 3289 mV
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:0100
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:2.0.0
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:99
                          TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=15,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:EgTmpHumBat5min
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=10,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1.0 151106
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=0,c=0,t=6,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=1,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:
                          Node and 2 children presented.
                          Request registration...
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:2
                          TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                          Node registration=1
                          Init complete, id=30, parent=99, distance=2, registration=1
                          T: 21.59
                          TempDiff :121.59
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:21.6
                          T sent!
                          H: 81
                          HumDiff  :181.00
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=1,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:81
                          H sent!
                          Battery voltage: 3279 mV
                          Battery percent: 98 %
                          TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:98
                          T: 21.61
                          TempDiff :0.02
                          H: 81
                          HumDiff  :0.00
                          
                          tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • karl261K karl261

                            @tekka Now it seems to work.

                            But I recompiled, because I had MY_DEBUG commented out. Somehow there is something wrong with debug...

                            Starting sensor (RNNNA-, 2.0.0)
                            TSM:INIT
                            TSM:RADIO:OK
                            TSP:ASSIGNID:OK (ID=30)
                            TSM:FPAR
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-255-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=bc:
                            TSP:MSG:READ 3-3-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                            TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=3, dist=1)
                            TSP:MSG:PAR OK (ID=3, dist=2)
                            TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                            TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=99, dist=1)
                            TSP:MSG:FPAR (PPAR FOUND)
                            TSP:MSG:PAR OK (ID=99, dist=2)
                            TSM:FPAR:OK
                            TSM:ID
                            TSM:CHKID:OK (ID=30)
                            TSM:UPL
                            TSP:PING:SEND (dest=0)
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                            TSP:MSG:READ 0-0-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
                            TSP:MSG:FPAR RES (ID=0, dist=0)
                            TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
                            TSP:MSG:PONG RECV (hops=2)
                            TSP:CHKUPL:OK
                            TSM:UPL:OK
                            TSM:READY
                            Serial started
                            Voltage: 3289 mV
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:0100
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=0,t=17,pt=0,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:2.0.0
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:99
                            TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=11,pt=0,l=15,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:EgTmpHumBat5min
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=10,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1.0 151106
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=0,c=0,t=6,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=1,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:
                            Node and 2 children presented.
                            Request registration...
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:2
                            TSP:MSG:READ 0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                            Node registration=1
                            Init complete, id=30, parent=99, distance=2, registration=1
                            T: 21.59
                            TempDiff :121.59
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:21.6
                            T sent!
                            H: 81
                            HumDiff  :181.00
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=1,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:81
                            H sent!
                            Battery voltage: 3279 mV
                            Battery percent: 98 %
                            TSP:MSG:SEND 30-30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:98
                            T: 21.61
                            TempDiff :0.02
                            H: 81
                            HumDiff  :0.00
                            
                            tekkaT Offline
                            tekkaT Offline
                            tekka
                            Admin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            @karl261 said:

                            @tekka Now it seems to work.

                            But I recompiled, because I had MY_DEBUG commented out. Somehow there is something wrong with debug...

                            You mean, if MY_DEBUG is commented out, the node does not communicate over the repeater (99)?

                            karl261K 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tekkaT tekka

                              @karl261 said:

                              @tekka Now it seems to work.

                              But I recompiled, because I had MY_DEBUG commented out. Somehow there is something wrong with debug...

                              You mean, if MY_DEBUG is commented out, the node does not communicate over the repeater (99)?

                              karl261K Offline
                              karl261K Offline
                              karl261
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              @tekka Well, yes, I added the two lines you suggested, re-compiled, and then it was not using the 99. And also some posts above, I had these weird messages transmitted 6-7 times, see logs. This happend while MY_DEBUG was commented out.

                              Hm, I can re-upload the sketch and see if this is reproducible.

                              tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • karl261K karl261

                                @tekka Well, yes, I added the two lines you suggested, re-compiled, and then it was not using the 99. And also some posts above, I had these weird messages transmitted 6-7 times, see logs. This happend while MY_DEBUG was commented out.

                                Hm, I can re-upload the sketch and see if this is reproducible.

                                tekkaT Offline
                                tekkaT Offline
                                tekka
                                Admin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                @karl261 Yes, that would be good - node 30 is running@1Mhz?

                                karl261K 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • tekkaT tekka

                                  @karl261 Yes, that would be good - node 30 is running@1Mhz?

                                  karl261K Offline
                                  karl261K Offline
                                  karl261
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @tekka Yes, @1 MHz.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tekkaT tekka

                                    @karl261 Yes, that would be good - node 30 is running@1Mhz?

                                    karl261K Offline
                                    karl261K Offline
                                    karl261
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @tekka No, it seems to work as expected. Any idea why I am getting this "fail" line?

                                    23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-30-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:BC
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:FPAR REQ (sender=30)
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:CHKUPL:OK
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:GWL OK
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-30-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:0
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:PINGED (ID=99, hops=1)
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-99 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:PINGED (ID=30, hops=2)
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;!TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=fail:0100
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:99
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;255;3;0;6;99
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	TX	30;255;3;0;6;M
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:M
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=10,sg=0:1.0 151106
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;255;3;0;12;1.0 151106
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=1,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;1;0;0;7;
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	DEBUG	Update child id=1, type=S_HUM
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.3
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;0;1;0;0;24.3
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=1,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:73
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;1;1;0;1;73
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:91
                                    23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;255;3;0;0;91
                                    
                                    tekkaT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • karl261K karl261

                                      @tekka No, it seems to work as expected. Any idea why I am getting this "fail" line?

                                      23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-30-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:BC
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:FPAR REQ (sender=30)
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:CHKUPL:OK
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:33	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:GWL OK
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-30-30 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:0
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:1
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:PINGED (ID=99, hops=1)
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-99 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=24,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:PINGED (ID=30, hops=2)
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:34	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=25,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0:0100
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;!TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=15,pt=6,l=2,sg=0,ft=0,st=fail:0100
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:99
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;255;3;0;6;99
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	TX	30;255;3;0;6;M
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=6,pt=0,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:M
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=12,pt=0,l=10,sg=0:1.0 151106
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;255;3;0;12;1.0 151106
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=1,c=0,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;1;0;0;7;
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	DEBUG	Update child id=1, type=S_HUM
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=26,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:2
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-30 s=255,c=3,t=27,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=ok:1
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=0,c=1,t=0,pt=7,l=5,sg=0:24.3
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;0;1;0;0;24.3
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=1,c=1,t=1,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:73
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;1;1;0;1;73
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 30-99-0 s=255,c=3,t=0,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:91
                                      23.08.2016 00:30:35	RX	30;255;3;0;0;91
                                      
                                      tekkaT Offline
                                      tekkaT Offline
                                      tekka
                                      Admin
                                      wrote on last edited by tekka
                                      #36

                                      @karl261 Does it fail regularly?

                                      karl261K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tekkaT tekka

                                        @karl261 Does it fail regularly?

                                        karl261K Offline
                                        karl261K Offline
                                        karl261
                                        wrote on last edited by karl261
                                        #37

                                        @tekka yes, these fails come and go, I see them all the time, but not at the same place necessarily. The logs posted above show plenty of them.

                                        I don't understand this radio trouble.,the distances between the nodes are not long. The radios are all connected using all tricks, the relay is a nrf24+pa+lna which is located in a good location... Maybe all radios are crap? There is only one wifi network and it is not very busy... It's my own. Maybe I should change the channel? 110 or so sounds good. I am using default now. Power is set to max for all nodes, the nrf24+pa+lna is shielded from itself, I put small antenna extensions on the normal ones after @petewill, they all have nice caps, gw and repeater have excellent power sources, ...

                                        I found a script how to test nrf radios... Maybe I should try that?

                                        If I was going to buy new radios, just to try, which ones are the best???

                                        Edit: Hm, I think if I use antennas, it really helps if they all point into the same direction. Like all horizontal or all vertical. Which would make sens, wouldn't it?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tekkaT tekka

                                          @karl261 Yes, that would be good - node 30 is running@1Mhz?

                                          karl261K Offline
                                          karl261K Offline
                                          karl261
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @tekka But now I found something: the repeater sketch does not work, if MY_DEBUG is commented out. I tried several times forth and back. On the gw I get the output below.

                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:BC
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:FPAR REQ (sender=99)
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:CHKUPL:OK
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:GWL OK
                                          0;255;3;0;9;!TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-99 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=fail:0
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:READ 99-99-255 s=255,c=3,t=7,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:BC
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:FPAR REQ (sender=99)
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:CHKUPL:OK (FLDCTRL)
                                          0;255;3;0;9;TSP:MSG:GWL OK
                                          0;255;3;0;9;!TSP:MSG:SEND 0-0-99-99 s=255,c=3,t=8,pt=1,l=1,sg=0,ft=0,st=fail:0
                                          
                                          tekkaT karl261K 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          14

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.1k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2025 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular