Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
1.1k Posts 173 Posters 422.9k Views 131 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

    @alowhum to my knowledge, activating SPI has always been required, unless the user has already activated SPI by some other means.

    Do you have a suggestion on how to make it more prominent that what it is now? Preferably without contributing too much to the pileup of notices that scare users - everything is super-important to at least 1 person.

    alowhumA Offline
    alowhumA Offline
    alowhum
    Plugin Developer
    wrote on last edited by alowhum
    #1018

    @mfalkvidd I don't know, perhaps mention it as something that has to be done upfront instead of something that might need to be done if there is an error?

    I'm not having any luck actually getting the radio to work. I now noticed this warning during compilation:

    g++ -MT build/drivers/Linux/GPIO.o -MMD -MP -DMY_RADIO_RF24 -DMY_GATEWAY_LINUX -DMY_GATEWAY_MQTT_CLIENT -DMY_DEBUG -DLINUX_SPI_SPIDEV -DMY_MQTT_CLIENT_ID=\"mygateway1\" -DMY_MQTT_SUBSCRIBE_TOPIC_PREFIX=\"mysensors-in\" -DMY_MQTT_PUBLISH_TOPIC_PREFIX=\"mysensors-out\" -DMY_CONTROLLER_IP_ADDRESS=127,0,0,1  -Ofast -g -Wall -Wextra  -I. -I./core -I./drivers/Linux -c drivers/Linux/GPIO.cpp -o build/drivers/Linux/GPIO.o
    drivers/Linux/GPIO.cpp: In constructor ‘GPIOClass::GPIOClass()’:
    drivers/Linux/GPIO.cpp:53:18: warning: ‘%s’ directive writing up to 255 bytes into a region of size 48 [-Wformat-overflow=]
        sprintf(file, "/sys/class/gpio/%s/base", de->d_name);
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    drivers/Linux/GPIO.cpp:53:11: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 22 and 277 bytes into a destination of size 64
        sprintf(file, "/sys/class/gpio/%s/base", de->d_name);
        ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    drivers/Linux/GPIO.cpp:62:18: warning: ‘%s’ directive writing up to 255 bytes into a region of size 48 [-Wformat-overflow=]
        sprintf(file, "/sys/class/gpio/%s/ngpio", de->d_name);
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    drivers/Linux/GPIO.cpp:62:11: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 23 and 278 bytes into a destination of size 64
        sprintf(file, "/sys/class/gpio/%s/ngpio", de->d_name);
        ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • alowhumA Offline
      alowhumA Offline
      alowhum
      Plugin Developer
      wrote on last edited by alowhum
      #1019

      Could this be an issue?

      ./configure without any additional parameters gives:

      [SECTION] Detecting target machine.
        [OK] machine detected: SoC=unknown, Type=unknown, CPU=armv7l.
      

      The rest looks fine:

      [SECTION] Checking GPIO Sysfs.
        [OK] /sys/class/gpio/export found.
      [SECTION] Detecting SPI driver.
        [OK] SPI driver detected:SPIDEV.
      [SECTION] Gateway configuration.
        [OK] Type: ethernet.
        [OK] Transport: rf24.
        [OK] Signing: Disabled.
        [OK] Encryption: Disabled.
        [OK] CPPFLAGS: -DMY_RADIO_RF24 -DMY_GATEWAY_LINUX -DMY_DEBUG -DLINUX_SPI_SPIDEV 
      [SECTION] Detecting init system.
        [OK] Init system detected: systemd.
      [SECTION] Saving configuration.
        [OK] Saved.
      [SECTION] Cleaning previous builds.
        [OK] Finished.
      

      Same thing happens with the dev version

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkviddM Offline
        mfalkvidd
        Mod
        wrote on last edited by mfalkvidd
        #1020

        Yes, if the configure script cannot detect which hardware to use, compilation failure could very well be the result.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          swedchef
          wrote on last edited by
          #1021

          Hi All

          I'm just venturing into this world of building my own sensors - but perhaps i am a tad late? Two months since last update.. Typically me - showing up to the party when everybody else has left.

          My main issue is, i am running the Raspberry Pi 4 - and when trying to build (i've tried both the development and master builds) i get from 4 (master build) to A BUNCH (development) of errors. First of all, the autodetect of SoC does not work for me either (just like @alowhum, and with the same warnings), and when using --help the actual SoC is not listed either, so should i just assume it does not work for Raspberry Pi 4?

          Is there any chance the 4 will be supported soon?

          Just a note - i can actually complete the configure and then make - but unfortunately i just get a TSP error when trying to fire up the radio.

          Hope i can get this working as it was the main reason for upgrading my RaspberryPi version 1 to a version 4 :man-facepalming:

          Thanks in advance for any and all help!

          mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S swedchef

            Hi All

            I'm just venturing into this world of building my own sensors - but perhaps i am a tad late? Two months since last update.. Typically me - showing up to the party when everybody else has left.

            My main issue is, i am running the Raspberry Pi 4 - and when trying to build (i've tried both the development and master builds) i get from 4 (master build) to A BUNCH (development) of errors. First of all, the autodetect of SoC does not work for me either (just like @alowhum, and with the same warnings), and when using --help the actual SoC is not listed either, so should i just assume it does not work for Raspberry Pi 4?

            Is there any chance the 4 will be supported soon?

            Just a note - i can actually complete the configure and then make - but unfortunately i just get a TSP error when trying to fire up the radio.

            Hope i can get this working as it was the main reason for upgrading my RaspberryPi version 1 to a version 4 :man-facepalming:

            Thanks in advance for any and all help!

            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkviddM Offline
            mfalkvidd
            Mod
            wrote on last edited by
            #1022

            Thanks for sharing your experience @swedchef

            From the problems reported by users (you included), it seems like the rpi4 is quite different fom the earlier rpis. To add support, the following ingredients are needed in one person

            • person needs to have sufficient knowledge and skills to figure out how to support the rpi4
            • person needs to have sufficient time to do the work
            • person needs to have a rpi4
            • person needs to be sufficiently interested/motivated to do the work

            It seems like, so far, we haven't found this person (or this person hasn't found us).

            phildeferP 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

              Thanks for sharing your experience @swedchef

              From the problems reported by users (you included), it seems like the rpi4 is quite different fom the earlier rpis. To add support, the following ingredients are needed in one person

              • person needs to have sufficient knowledge and skills to figure out how to support the rpi4
              • person needs to have sufficient time to do the work
              • person needs to have a rpi4
              • person needs to be sufficiently interested/motivated to do the work

              It seems like, so far, we haven't found this person (or this person hasn't found us).

              phildeferP Offline
              phildeferP Offline
              phildefer
              wrote on last edited by
              #1023

              Re: 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

              Hi all,

              i compile with success the gateway in Raspberry PI 4 (with some code modification)

              this is not perfect.. but it works.

              if someone wants to try, i upload the gateway compiled with this options :

              --my-transport=rf24 --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5003
              

              https://gofile.io/?c=fRxeF7

              AnticimexA mfalkviddM 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • phildeferP phildefer

                Re: 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

                Hi all,

                i compile with success the gateway in Raspberry PI 4 (with some code modification)

                this is not perfect.. but it works.

                if someone wants to try, i upload the gateway compiled with this options :

                --my-transport=rf24 --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5003
                

                https://gofile.io/?c=fRxeF7

                AnticimexA Offline
                AnticimexA Offline
                Anticimex
                Contest Winner
                wrote on last edited by
                #1024

                @phildefer could you please share what you changed? The security concerned might not be comfortable running a binary with unspecified changes that manages their home automation setup. Especially not a project supposed to be open source.

                Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • phildeferP phildefer

                  Re: 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

                  Hi all,

                  i compile with success the gateway in Raspberry PI 4 (with some code modification)

                  this is not perfect.. but it works.

                  if someone wants to try, i upload the gateway compiled with this options :

                  --my-transport=rf24 --my-gateway=ethernet --my-port=5003
                  

                  https://gofile.io/?c=fRxeF7

                  mfalkviddM Offline
                  mfalkviddM Offline
                  mfalkvidd
                  Mod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1025

                  @phildefer would you mind sharing the code modifications that were needed?

                  phildeferP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                    @phildefer would you mind sharing the code modifications that were needed?

                    phildeferP Offline
                    phildeferP Offline
                    phildefer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1026

                    @mfalkvidd @Anticimex : yes i sharing the code perhaps this week end. I need to find time to make a PR to GITHUB
                    As I said, my code may not be as clean as you'd like, but it works.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      patrikr76
                      wrote on last edited by patrikr76
                      #1027

                      Hey all,

                      I got the same problem as @swedchef and saw the warnings @alowhum mentioned.
                      Simply upping the buffer that is declared in GPIO.cpp solved the warnings and made it compile without issue but the radio still won't work.
                      Maybe it has to do with the soc not being detected, as mentioned, and that the pin positions on the new soc are different from previous ones.

                      @phildefer, weekend has come and gone buddy. Patience is a virtue some do not have. :)

                      Edit: So looking a little more through the files today i see that configure looks for the soc type in /proc/cpuinfo and funnily my raspi 4 reports a BCM2835

                      mfalkviddM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P patrikr76

                        Hey all,

                        I got the same problem as @swedchef and saw the warnings @alowhum mentioned.
                        Simply upping the buffer that is declared in GPIO.cpp solved the warnings and made it compile without issue but the radio still won't work.
                        Maybe it has to do with the soc not being detected, as mentioned, and that the pin positions on the new soc are different from previous ones.

                        @phildefer, weekend has come and gone buddy. Patience is a virtue some do not have. :)

                        Edit: So looking a little more through the files today i see that configure looks for the soc type in /proc/cpuinfo and funnily my raspi 4 reports a BCM2835

                        mfalkviddM Offline
                        mfalkviddM Offline
                        mfalkvidd
                        Mod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1028

                        @patrikr76 I beleive @phildefer pushed the code 4 days ago. See https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/pull/1353

                        Something has seriously mangled whitespace in the modified code, but apart from that it looks good to me, but I am not that familiar with the rpi code and I have not tested it myself.

                        P K 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                          @patrikr76 I beleive @phildefer pushed the code 4 days ago. See https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/pull/1353

                          Something has seriously mangled whitespace in the modified code, but apart from that it looks good to me, but I am not that familiar with the rpi code and I have not tested it myself.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          patrikr76
                          wrote on last edited by patrikr76
                          #1029

                          @mfalkvidd said in 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway:

                          @patrikr76 I beleive @phildefer pushed the code 4 days ago. See https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/pull/1353

                          You are correct.
                          @phildefer, thank you.
                          There were a couple of minor warnings about indentations and the buffer size i mentioned earlier fixed by upping the declared buffer in GPIO.cpp. Not sure if that is a good fix or not, the warning goes away though.
                          A few other warnings looks like this:

                          In member function ‘char* MyMessage::getString(char*) const’,
                              inlined from ‘bool transportSendWrite(uint8_t, MyMessage&)’ at ./core/MyTransport.cpp:987:2,
                              inlined from ‘bool transportRouteMessage(MyMessage&)’ at ./core/MyTransport.cpp:560:40,
                              inlined from ‘void stUplinkTransition()’ at ./core/MyTransport.cpp:252:29:
                          ./core/MyMessage.cpp:284:17: warning: ‘char* strncpy(char*, const char*, size_t)’ output may be truncated copying between 0 and 25 bytes from a string of length 25 [-Wstringop-truncation]
                              (void)strncpy(buffer, this->data, this->getLength());
                                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          

                          Not sure how to fix those.

                          Edit: Forgot to mention, it seems to be working though.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • franz-unixF Offline
                            franz-unixF Offline
                            franz-unix
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1030

                            Thanks guys for the effort to port MySensors for the Pi 4.

                            I'm very interested, but my coding skills are not sufficient to help in the development. Maybe I can do some debug when my Pi4 will arrive

                            MySensors for the Pi4 is a must-have!😊

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mfalkviddM mfalkvidd

                              @patrikr76 I beleive @phildefer pushed the code 4 days ago. See https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/pull/1353

                              Something has seriously mangled whitespace in the modified code, but apart from that it looks good to me, but I am not that familiar with the rpi code and I have not tested it myself.

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              kiesel
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1031

                              @mfalkvidd @phildefer

                              I can confirm that the code compiles and runs on my rasbperry pi 4 model b. I am using a rfm69 radio and that seems to be working too. I couldn't test it yet though since I haven't wired any rfm69 nodes up yet.

                              franz-unixF 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • K kiesel

                                @mfalkvidd @phildefer

                                I can confirm that the code compiles and runs on my rasbperry pi 4 model b. I am using a rfm69 radio and that seems to be working too. I couldn't test it yet though since I haven't wired any rfm69 nodes up yet.

                                franz-unixF Offline
                                franz-unixF Offline
                                franz-unix
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1032

                                @kiesel Good news!😉
                                I will test both (nrf24 and rfm69) when my Pi 4 arrive.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • franz-unixF Offline
                                  franz-unixF Offline
                                  franz-unix
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1033

                                  Ok my Pi 4 is arrived. I have 2 gateway, one RFM69 and one NRF24 connected respectively to spi0 and spi1. Details here.

                                  With a Raspberry Pi 3 all works fine (compilation and execution) with both Rasbian Stretch and with Raspbian Buster.

                                  With a Raspberry Pi 4 and the same version of Rasbian Buster the situation is a bit different:

                                  • The RFM69 gateway on the SPI0 compiles and can be executed without problems. In this days I don't have an RFM69 radio module, so I don't know if it works, but the daemon start in a regular way.

                                  • The NRF24 gateway compile, but after few seconds of execution the daemon stops with the following error.

                                  Oct 26 13:59:47 ERROR Could not open /sys/class/gpio/gpio12/direction
                                  

                                  Considering that the same configuration works for a Pi 3, it is possible that the error is caused by the autodetect of SoC issue mentioned above?

                                  The details of my /boot/config.txt file are here

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • franz-unixF Offline
                                    franz-unixF Offline
                                    franz-unix
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1034

                                    Update:

                                    • tested the RFM69 gateway with a radio module attached -> Not working

                                    • tried to compile and execute the NRF24 gateway on the first spi bus (--spi-spidev-device=/dev/spidev0.0) -> same error as above

                                    ERROR Could not open /sys/class/gpio/gpio12/direction
                                    

                                    I have checked my Makefile and configure files and they don't contain the modification proposed by @phildefer . Is this normal? I'm using the development branch.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • franz-unixF Offline
                                      franz-unixF Offline
                                      franz-unix
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1035

                                      Tested with this commit of @phildefer, now both gateways compiles and starts but for both I got this error.

                                      Oct 27 20:50:41 DEBUG !TSM:INIT:TSP FAIL
                                      
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • franz-unixF Offline
                                        franz-unixF Offline
                                        franz-unix
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1036

                                        Hi, if someone needs more info (debug, log, etc...) I'm here.

                                        I can perform tests on Rpi 3 and Rpi 4 (Raspbian Buster) with NRF24 and RFM69 radio modules and then report the results. Not so much but maybe this can help the development.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jerseyguy1996J Offline
                                          jerseyguy1996J Offline
                                          jerseyguy1996
                                          wrote on last edited by jerseyguy1996
                                          #1037

                                          I'm doing a brand new install of Openhab2 and the mysensors gateway on a new Raspberry Pi 4 after having run Openhab(1) and the mysensors gateway successfully on a Raspberry Pi 3 for years. I used the development branch of the mysensorsgateway as discussed here: https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors/pull/1364

                                          I wrote down my step by step procedure here in case it helps someone else. I'm starting out with the pre-built Openhabian image found here: https://www.openhab.org/docs/installation/openhabian.html

                                          Install the PiGatewaySerial using these instructions:

                                          1. First get to your Downloads directory
                                          cd
                                          cd Downloads
                                          
                                          1. Clone the MySensors repository into your Downloads directory and then go into that folder
                                          git clone https://github.com/mysensors/MySensors.git --branch development
                                          cd MySensors
                                          
                                          1. Set configuration options (you can use “./configure —help” to see your options)
                                            a. In this case we are choosing to use the serial gateway with a pseudo terminal and a symbolic link to that pseudoterminal called ttyUSB20 in /dev. We then set the group to tty.
                                          ./configure --my-gateway=serial --my-serial-is-pty --my-serial-pty=/dev/ttyUSB20 --my-serial-groupname=tty
                                          

                                          Edit: If building this on a 64bit operating system you will need to edit the configure file before running make. Do the following:

                                          cp configure configure_bk
                                          nano configure
                                          

                                          Find this function

                                          function gcc_cpu_flags {
                                              local soc=$1
                                              case $soc in
                                          

                                          and find your CPU. In my case it is the BCM2711 (I've only done this on this one CPU so your mileage may vary) and I changed this:

                                           BCM2711)
                                                  flags="-march=armv8-a+crc -mtune=cortex-a72 -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8 -mfloat-abi=hard"
                                          

                                          to this:

                                          BCM2711)
                                                  flags="-march=armv8-a+crc -mtune=cortex-a72"
                                          

                                          Then proceed to step 4 below.

                                          1. Run make and make install
                                          make
                                          sudo make install
                                          
                                          1. We can set it to launch on boot up by running
                                          sudo systemctl enable mysgw.service
                                          
                                          1. To launch it manually right now run (skip this step to run and see output for confirmation that it works)
                                          sudo systemctl start mysgw.service
                                          
                                          1. Executable in located:
                                          cd /usr/local/bin
                                          
                                          1. need root to run it:
                                          sudo mysgw
                                          

                                          That's pretty much it. I was happily greeted with:

                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 INFO Starting gateway...
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 INFO Protocol version - 2.4.0-alpha
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG Serial port /dev/ttyUSB20 (115200 baud) created
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG MCO:BGN:INIT GW,CP=RNNGL---,FQ=NA,REL=0,VER=2.4.0-alpha
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSF:LRT:OK
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSM:INIT
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSF:WUR:MS=0
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSM:INIT:TSP OK
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSM:INIT:GW MODE
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSM:READY:ID=0,PAR=0,DIS=0
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG MCO:REG:NOT NEEDED
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG MCO:BGN:STP
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG MCO:BGN:INIT OK,TSP=1
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSM:READY:NWD REQ
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG ?TSF:MSG:SEND,0-0-255-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0,ft=0,st=OK:
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,4-4-0,s=255,c=3,t=21,pt=1,l=1,sg=0:0
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,0-4-255,s=255,c=3,t=20,pt=0,l=0,sg=0:
                                          Dec 29 16:01:50 DEBUG TSF:MSG:BC
                                          Dec 29 16:01:52 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,4-4-0,s=1,c=1,t=2,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:0
                                          Dec 29 16:01:52 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,4-4-0,s=2,c=1,t=2,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:0
                                          Dec 29 16:01:52 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,4-4-0,s=3,c=1,t=2,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:1
                                          Dec 29 16:01:52 DEBUG TSF:MSG:READ,4-4-0,s=4,c=1,t=2,pt=2,l=2,sg=0:1
                                          ^CDec 29 16:02:35 NOTICE Received SIGINT

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          6

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular