Skip to content
  • MySensors
  • OpenHardware.io
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. 💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

💬 Building a Raspberry Pi Gateway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
1.1k Posts 173 Posters 423.1k Views 131 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gohanG Offline
    gohanG Offline
    gohan
    Mod
    wrote on last edited by
    #871

    I use also these parameters with the normal signing

    --my-signing=software --my-signing-request-signatures --my-signing-weak_security --my-signing-debug
    

    of course the debug parameter is there only for debug reasons

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MasMatM MasMat

      @gohan I did, I will post it (but it appears to send normally). But the only things I changed was:

      1. Rpi configure added: --my-signing=password --my-signing-password=ZZZZZZ
      2. In the nodes code: #define MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD = "ZZZZZZ"
      AnticimexA Offline
      AnticimexA Offline
      Anticimex
      Contest Winner
      wrote on last edited by
      #872

      @masmat check that the version you are using (release or beta) match your use of the simple flags, as they differ at the moment.

      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

      MasMatM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • AnticimexA Anticimex

        @masmat check that the version you are using (release or beta) match your use of the simple flags, as they differ at the moment.

        MasMatM Offline
        MasMatM Offline
        MasMat
        wrote on last edited by MasMat
        #873

        @anticimex Both Arduino IDE is 2.2 and Rpi is compiled with 2.2 stable.
        I'm seeing !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL in the serial monitor so something is not compatible... I will try making password >8 characters next (currently 6).

        I will also add those parameters to see if that makes a difference before reuploading arduino code

        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MasMatM MasMat

          @anticimex Both Arduino IDE is 2.2 and Rpi is compiled with 2.2 stable.
          I'm seeing !TSF:MSG:SIGN FAIL in the serial monitor so something is not compatible... I will try making password >8 characters next (currently 6).

          I will also add those parameters to see if that makes a difference before reuploading arduino code

          AnticimexA Offline
          AnticimexA Offline
          Anticimex
          Contest Winner
          wrote on last edited by Anticimex
          #874

          @masmat if you add the signing debug flag and use the log parser on the homepage it should become clear what the problem is. You can also use the troubleshooting guide in the signing documentation.

          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MasMatM Offline
            MasMatM Offline
            MasMat
            wrote on last edited by
            #875

            @anticimex This is what's happening in the gw:

            TSF:MSG:READ,36-192-15,s=69,c=0,t=81,pt=1,l=21,sg=0:221
            !TSF:MSG:LEN,16!=28
            TSF:MSG:READ,75-68-77,s=48,c=1,t=110,pt=1,l=25,sg=1:249
            !TSF:MSG:LEN,16!=32

            The parser didn't really help much: more baffled than before....and I came away from the troubleshooting guide feeling really stupid :)

            AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • MasMatM MasMat

              @anticimex This is what's happening in the gw:

              TSF:MSG:READ,36-192-15,s=69,c=0,t=81,pt=1,l=21,sg=0:221
              !TSF:MSG:LEN,16!=28
              TSF:MSG:READ,75-68-77,s=48,c=1,t=110,pt=1,l=25,sg=1:249
              !TSF:MSG:LEN,16!=32

              The parser didn't really help much: more baffled than before....and I came away from the troubleshooting guide feeling really stupid :)

              AnticimexA Offline
              AnticimexA Offline
              Anticimex
              Contest Winner
              wrote on last edited by
              #876

              @masmat looks to me that your gateway is not set up for signing

              Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

              gohanG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AnticimexA Anticimex

                @masmat looks to me that your gateway is not set up for signing

                gohanG Offline
                gohanG Offline
                gohan
                Mod
                wrote on last edited by
                #877

                @anticimex I think he didn't use all the parameters for the configure, right?

                AnticimexA MasMatM 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • gohanG gohan

                  @anticimex I think he didn't use all the parameters for the configure, right?

                  AnticimexA Offline
                  AnticimexA Offline
                  Anticimex
                  Contest Winner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #878

                  @gohan the simple flags should not need more args, but I don't use a rPi as gw so I honestly am not sure exactly the args to use. The beta documentation has clear instructions for rPi signing, but those are specifically for beta branch and probably don't map exactly to the release yet.

                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gohanG gohan

                    @anticimex I think he didn't use all the parameters for the configure, right?

                    MasMatM Offline
                    MasMatM Offline
                    MasMat
                    wrote on last edited by MasMat
                    #879

                    @gohan The whole configure-line:

                    sudo ./configure --my-transport=nrf24 --my-rf24-irq-pin=15 --my-signing=software --my-signing-request-signatures --my-signing-weak_security --my-signing-debug --my-signing=password --my-signing-password=ZZZZZZ --my-gateway=mqtt --my-controller-ip-address=127.0.0.1 --my-mqtt-user=XXXX --my-mqtt-password=YYYYY --my-mqtt-publish-topic-prefix=mysensors-out --my-mqtt-subscribe-topic-prefix=mysensors-in --my-mqtt-client-id=mygateway1 --my-leds-err-pin=12 --my-leds-rx-pin=16 --my-leds-tx-pin=18
                    

                    If anyone can tell what's missing or if there's a typo?

                    AnticimexA 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • MasMatM MasMat

                      @gohan The whole configure-line:

                      sudo ./configure --my-transport=nrf24 --my-rf24-irq-pin=15 --my-signing=software --my-signing-request-signatures --my-signing-weak_security --my-signing-debug --my-signing=password --my-signing-password=ZZZZZZ --my-gateway=mqtt --my-controller-ip-address=127.0.0.1 --my-mqtt-user=XXXX --my-mqtt-password=YYYYY --my-mqtt-publish-topic-prefix=mysensors-out --my-mqtt-subscribe-topic-prefix=mysensors-in --my-mqtt-client-id=mygateway1 --my-leds-err-pin=12 --my-leds-rx-pin=16 --my-leds-tx-pin=18
                      

                      If anyone can tell what's missing or if there's a typo?

                      AnticimexA Offline
                      AnticimexA Offline
                      Anticimex
                      Contest Winner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #880

                      @masmat https://www.mysensors.org/apidocs/group__RaspberryPiGateway.html

                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MasMatM MasMat

                        @gohan The whole configure-line:

                        sudo ./configure --my-transport=nrf24 --my-rf24-irq-pin=15 --my-signing=software --my-signing-request-signatures --my-signing-weak_security --my-signing-debug --my-signing=password --my-signing-password=ZZZZZZ --my-gateway=mqtt --my-controller-ip-address=127.0.0.1 --my-mqtt-user=XXXX --my-mqtt-password=YYYYY --my-mqtt-publish-topic-prefix=mysensors-out --my-mqtt-subscribe-topic-prefix=mysensors-in --my-mqtt-client-id=mygateway1 --my-leds-err-pin=12 --my-leds-rx-pin=16 --my-leds-tx-pin=18
                        

                        If anyone can tell what's missing or if there's a typo?

                        AnticimexA Offline
                        AnticimexA Offline
                        Anticimex
                        Contest Winner
                        wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                        #881

                        @masmat you have redundant flags. The password option require no other signing flags. Only if you select software as signing backend you need other options (and none of the simple flags)

                        And remember that if you use software signing and not password signing, you need to personalize the GW and/or node.

                        Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                        MasMatM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AnticimexA Anticimex

                          @masmat you have redundant flags. The password option require no other signing flags. Only if you select software as signing backend you need other options (and none of the simple flags)

                          And remember that if you use software signing and not password signing, you need to personalize the GW and/or node.

                          MasMatM Offline
                          MasMatM Offline
                          MasMat
                          wrote on last edited by MasMat
                          #882

                          @anticimex I thought so too, but I'm grasping at straws to get the signing to work.
                          To clarify, is the following enough for simple signing: --my-signing-debug --my-signing=password --my-signing-password=ZZZZZZ

                          And the arduino code #define MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD = "ZZZZZZ"
                          Any difference where it's placed in the code? Anything else to check for?

                          AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • MasMatM MasMat

                            @anticimex I thought so too, but I'm grasping at straws to get the signing to work.
                            To clarify, is the following enough for simple signing: --my-signing-debug --my-signing=password --my-signing-password=ZZZZZZ

                            And the arduino code #define MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD = "ZZZZZZ"
                            Any difference where it's placed in the code? Anything else to check for?

                            AnticimexA Offline
                            AnticimexA Offline
                            Anticimex
                            Contest Winner
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #883

                            @masmat it needs to be defined prior to the inclusion of mysensors.h. That should be it. (on the arduino node that is).

                            Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                            MasMatM 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • alowhumA Offline
                              alowhumA Offline
                              alowhum
                              Plugin Developer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #884

                              While on the subject: what would be the flags needed for setting the gateway to only use the simple encryption but not the (simple) signing feature?

                              I looked in the documentation and the node commands aren't mirrored for the gateway. I was hoping for something like:

                              --MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD=flowerpot77
                              --MY_ENCRYPTION_SIMPLE_PASSWD=spiderman41

                              AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gohanG Offline
                                gohanG Offline
                                gohan
                                Mod
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #885

                                It's actually not needed since you can still set signing as optional on gateway

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alowhumA alowhum

                                  While on the subject: what would be the flags needed for setting the gateway to only use the simple encryption but not the (simple) signing feature?

                                  I looked in the documentation and the node commands aren't mirrored for the gateway. I was hoping for something like:

                                  --MY_SIGNING_SIMPLE_PASSWD=flowerpot77
                                  --MY_ENCRYPTION_SIMPLE_PASSWD=spiderman41

                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  AnticimexA Offline
                                  Anticimex
                                  Contest Winner
                                  wrote on last edited by Anticimex
                                  #886

                                  @alowhum that feature is still only available for beta and is documented here: https://www.mysensors.org/apidocs-beta/group__SecuritySettingGrpPub.html

                                  EDIT: not yet for rPi

                                  Pull requests are welcome. I don't have time for this at the moment.

                                  Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • alowhumA Offline
                                    alowhumA Offline
                                    alowhum
                                    Plugin Developer
                                    wrote on last edited by alowhum
                                    #887

                                    Right. So is this correct?

                                    NODES (arduino nano)
                                    On all my nodes I will update them to have this code at the top:

                                    #define MY_ENCRYPTION_SIMPLE_PASSWD spiderman41 // unfortunately Nano hardware doesn't really have enough memory for signing.
                                    #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 100 // in EU the default channel 76 overlaps with wifi.
                                    #define MY_RF24_DATARATE RF24_1MBPS // slower datarate makes the network more stable?

                                    GATEWAY (Raspberry Pi Zero W)
                                    On my gateway I will use this configure code:

                                    --my-security-password=spiderman41
                                    --my-rf24-encryption-enabled
                                    --my-signing-weak_security
                                    --my-rf24-channel=100
                                    --extra-cxxflags="-DMY_RF24_DATARATE=(RF24_1MBPS)"

                                    AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • alowhumA alowhum

                                      Right. So is this correct?

                                      NODES (arduino nano)
                                      On all my nodes I will update them to have this code at the top:

                                      #define MY_ENCRYPTION_SIMPLE_PASSWD spiderman41 // unfortunately Nano hardware doesn't really have enough memory for signing.
                                      #define MY_RF24_CHANNEL 100 // in EU the default channel 76 overlaps with wifi.
                                      #define MY_RF24_DATARATE RF24_1MBPS // slower datarate makes the network more stable?

                                      GATEWAY (Raspberry Pi Zero W)
                                      On my gateway I will use this configure code:

                                      --my-security-password=spiderman41
                                      --my-rf24-encryption-enabled
                                      --my-signing-weak_security
                                      --my-rf24-channel=100
                                      --extra-cxxflags="-DMY_RF24_DATARATE=(RF24_1MBPS)"

                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      AnticimexA Offline
                                      Anticimex
                                      Contest Winner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #888

                                      @alowhum you will need to enable weak security as well as that will enable both signing and encryption with signature requirements from all nodes on the gw

                                      Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • alowhumA Offline
                                        alowhumA Offline
                                        alowhum
                                        Plugin Developer
                                        wrote on last edited by alowhum
                                        #889

                                        @Anticimex thanks!

                                        as that will enable both signing and encryption with signature requirements from all nodes on the gw
                                        But I don't want signing? Or do you mean that it will remove that requirement?

                                        I only need to set that on the gateway, right?
                                        I've also added a slower datarate, thinking that will also create a more stable connection. I am in a busy urban environment with lots of RF noise. Is that smart?

                                        AnticimexA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • alowhumA alowhum

                                          @Anticimex thanks!

                                          as that will enable both signing and encryption with signature requirements from all nodes on the gw
                                          But I don't want signing? Or do you mean that it will remove that requirement?

                                          I only need to set that on the gateway, right?
                                          I've also added a slower datarate, thinking that will also create a more stable connection. I am in a busy urban environment with lots of RF noise. Is that smart?

                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          AnticimexA Offline
                                          Anticimex
                                          Contest Winner
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #890

                                          @alowhum I thought you did not want signing: "but not the (simple) signing feature?"

                                          Do you feel secure today? No? Start requiring some signatures and feel better tomorrow ;)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          15

                                          Online

                                          11.7k

                                          Users

                                          11.2k

                                          Topics

                                          113.0k

                                          Posts


                                          Copyright 2019 TBD   |   Forum Guidelines   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • MySensors
                                          • OpenHardware.io
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular